P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalHavasu Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: +$176K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 030069

1Hospital

Havasu Regional Medical Center

2Location

Lake Havasu City, AZ (Arizona’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 86403

Mohave County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 152 beds · For-profit · Urban · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.4643

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $308K, likely $239⁠–⁠375K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4643 for Havasu Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $308K estimate 1% of about $30.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.8442 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $239–375K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4643 This hospital −0.4643 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4643 This hospital −0.4643

Higher than 22% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.4686, to −0.9329. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 1; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 94% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.7872

    Z-score−1.4049

    Part of score−0.2810

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4065

    Part of score−0.2813

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2637

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 62% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.270

    Z-score−0.4167

    Part of score−0.0833

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value2.095

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.4450

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.78720.9623−1.4049−0.2810Better than 94% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.0000.559−1.4065−0.2813Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2637Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.2700.346−0.4167−0.0833Better than 62% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA2.0950.6412.2251+0.4450Worse than 97% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−1.4049PSI 90−1.4065CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI−0.4167CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷5measures=−0.4643Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.4643; CMS reports −0.4643. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.8442 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.4643, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.4049 divided by 5 = −0.2810PSI 90−0.2810 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 5 = −0.2813CLABSI−0.2813 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 5 = −0.2637CAUTI−0.2637 CDI: z‑score −0.4167 divided by 5 = −0.0833CDI−0.0833 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: −0.4643Score−0.4643 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.4049 divided by 5 = −0.2810PSI 90−0.2810 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 5 = −0.2813CLABSI−0.2813 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 5 = −0.2637CAUTI−0.2637 CDI: z‑score −0.4167 divided by 5 = −0.0833CDI−0.0833 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: −0.4643Score−0.4643 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−1.4049−0.2810−0.2810
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2813−0.5623
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2637−0.8260
CDI−0.4167−0.0833−0.9093
MRSA2.2251+0.4450−0.4643
Total HAC Score−0.4643
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.8442 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.8442 higher, the cut would have been about $308K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $308K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $308K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4643 This hospital −0.4643 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $308K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $308Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4643 This hospital −0.4643

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$307,603
This hospital−0.4643$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$307,603

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($30,584,613payment−$88,969readmissions+$264,619value-based)×1%the cut=$307,603at stake

$307,603at stake÷1,847traditional Medicare stays=$167per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $308K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$89K and +$265K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $26,167,318
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $290,196
Outliers: unusually costly stays $954,060
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,417,153
Uncompensated care $755,886
Total, before the three programs $30,584,613
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9966 − 1) −$88,969
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0101 − 1) +$264,619
After these two $30,760,263
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $307,603 $0
Net of the three programs likely $140⁠–⁠204K +$175,650

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$26,167,318
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$290,196
Outliers: unusually costly stays$954,060
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,417,153
Uncompensated care$755,886
Total, before the three programs$30,584,613
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9966 − 1))−$88,969
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0101 − 1))+$264,619
After these two$30,760,263
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $307,603)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $140–204K)+$175,650

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.4643same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4643 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $308K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.7872 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.000 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 0.270 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

CMS 2.095 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0418

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.4643 among its measured results: +0.4450.
  • PSI 90 −0.2810
  • CLABSI −0.2813
  • CAUTI −0.2637
  • CDI −0.0833
  • MRSA +0.4450

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−1.4049−0.2810same
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2813same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2637same
CDI−0.4167−0.0833same
MRSA2.2251+0.4450same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030069/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.3000, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.0000, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.6200, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1676, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.0867, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4179, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.5338, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.9488, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.6091, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.0585, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4643, higher than 22% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.3000, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.0000, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.6200, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1676, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.0867, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4179, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.5338, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.9488, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.6091, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.0585, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4643, higher than 22% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.30007.6%not cut
FY20162.00004.1%not cut
FY20174.620035.7%not cut
FY20180.167664.4%not cut
FY20190.086759.9%not cut
FY2020−0.417923.7%not cut
FY2021−0.533818.3%not cut
FY2022−0.94884.3%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.609183.4%cut
FY20250.058556.7%not cut
FY2026−0.464322.2%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.000CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.90 → 4.37 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.901MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.000MRSA, 2022: 4.371 C. diff 0.80 → 0.19 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.798C. diff, 2018: 1.324C. diff, 2019: 0.154C. diff, 2021: 1.146C. diff, 2022: 1.078C. diff, 2023: 0.366C. diff, 2024: 0.188 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.000CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.90 → 4.37 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.901MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.000MRSA, 2022: 4.371 C. diff 0.80 → 0.19 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.798C. diff, 2018: 1.324C. diff, 2019: 0.154C. diff, 2021: 1.146C. diff, 2022: 1.078C. diff, 2023: 0.366C. diff, 2024: 0.188

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIMRSAC. diff
20170.0000.0001.9010.798
20180.0000.0000.0001.324
20190.0000.0000.0000.154
20210.0000.0000.0001.146
20220.0000.0004.3711.078
20230.0000.0000.366
20240.0000.0000.188

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Arizona, its score is higher than 26% of the other 60 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 26% (West region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona 61 hospitals20% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.4643 This hospital −0.4643 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona61 hospitals20% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.4643 This hospital −0.4643

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045322%
West region59315726%−0.030220%
Arizona611220%0.056026%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105327%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073223%
For-profit6519815%−0.259035%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057421%
This hospital−0.4643
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 39 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Harmon Hospital, Las Vegas: score 1.2562, cut, 121 miles87. Henderson Hospital, Henderson: score −0.7950, not cut, 117 miles76. Saint Rose Dominican Hospitals - Siena Campus, Henderson: score 0.0913, not cut, 114 miles65. Hi-Desert Medical Center, Joshua Tree: score 0.3018, not cut, 113 miles54. Yavapai Regional Medical Center, Prescott: score −0.1259, not cut, 106 miles43. Kingman Regional Medical Center, Kingman: score −0.4005, not cut, 56 miles32. Western Arizona Regional Medical Center, Bullhead City: score −0.8268, not cut, 45 miles21. Valley View Medical Center, Fort Mohave: score 0.1998, not cut, 39 miles1This hospital: Havasu Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Valley View Medical Center, Fort Mohave, AZ390.1998not cut
Western Arizona Regional Medical Center, Bullhead City, AZ45−0.8268not cut
Kingman Regional Medical Center, Kingman, AZ56−0.4005not cut
Yavapai Regional Medical Center, Prescott, AZ106−0.1259not cut
Hi-Desert Medical Center, Joshua Tree, CA1130.3018not cut
Saint Rose Dominican Hospitals - Siena Campus, Henderson, NV1140.0913not cut
Henderson Hospital, Henderson, NV117−0.7950not cut
Harmon Hospital, Las Vegas, NV1211.2562cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Valley View Medical CenterFort Mohave, AZ390.1998No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 2 measures
2Western Arizona Regional Medical CenterBullhead City, AZ45−0.8268No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
3Kingman Regional Medical CenterKingman, AZ56−0.4005No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4Yavapai Regional Medical CenterPrescott, AZ106−0.1259No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Hi-Desert Medical CenterJoshua Tree, CA1130.3018No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 5 measures
6Saint Rose Dominican Hospitals - Siena CampusHenderson, NV1140.0913No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Henderson HospitalHenderson, NV117−0.7950No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
8Harmon HospitalLas Vegas, NV1211.25621% cutno estimateAbove the national median on 3 of 4 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Havasu Regional Medical Center, Lake Havasu City, AZ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030069/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.