P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalHi-Desert Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: +$31K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050279

1Hospital

Hi-Desert Medical Center

2Location

Joshua Tree, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 92252

San Bernardino County

3Type

Minor teaching · 59 beds · Government · Urban · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3018

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $73K, likely $52⁠–⁠82K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3018 for Hi-Desert Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $73K estimate 1% of about $7.3M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.0781 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $52–82K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3018 This hospital 0.3018 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3018 This hospital 0.3018

Higher than 70% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.2789, to 0.0229. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9722

    Z-score−0.1137

    Part of score−0.0227

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 79% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.953

    Z-score0.8043

    Part of score+0.1609

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 84% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.954

    Z-score0.9810

    Part of score+0.1962

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 88% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.609

    Z-score1.2997

    Part of score+0.2599

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4622

    Part of score−0.2924

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.97220.9623−0.1137−0.0227Worse than 55% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.9530.5590.8043+0.1609Worse than 79% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.9540.4890.9810+0.1962Worse than 84% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.6090.7951.2997+0.2599Worse than 88% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.0000.346−1.4622−0.2924Better than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.1137PSI 90+0.8043CLABSI+0.9810CAUTI+1.2997SSI−1.4622CDI)÷5measures=0.3018Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0781 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3018, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1137 divided by 5 = −0.0227PSI 90−0.0227 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8043 divided by 5 = +0.1609CLABSI+0.1609 CAUTI: z‑score 0.9810 divided by 5 = +0.1962CAUTI+0.1962 SSI: z‑score 1.2997 divided by 5 = +0.2599SSI+0.2599 CDI: z‑score −1.4622 divided by 5 = −0.2924CDI−0.2924 Total HAC Score: 0.3018Score0.3018 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1137 divided by 5 = −0.0227PSI 90−0.0227 CLABSI: z‑score 0.8043 divided by 5 = +0.1609CLABSI+0.1609 CAUTI: z‑score 0.9810 divided by 5 = +0.1962CAUTI+0.1962 SSI: z‑score 1.2997 divided by 5 = +0.2599SSI+0.2599 CDI: z‑score −1.4622 divided by 5 = −0.2924CDI−0.2924 Total HAC Score: 0.3018Score0.3018 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.1137−0.0227−0.0227
CLABSI0.8043+0.16090.1382
CAUTI0.9810+0.19620.3344
SSI1.2997+0.25990.5943
CDI−1.4622−0.29240.3019
Total HAC Score0.3018
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0781 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.0781 higher, the cut would have been about $73K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $73K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $73K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3018 This hospital 0.3018 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $73K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $73Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3018 This hospital 0.3018

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$73,127
This hospital0.3018$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$73,127

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($6,971,087payment+$310,418teaching, MA stays−$483readmissions+$31,642value-based)×1%the cut=$73,127at stake

$73,127at stake÷397traditional Medicare stays=$184per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $73K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$483 and +$32K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $4,831,079
Teaching (indirect medical education) $316,436
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $310,418
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $144,932
Outliers: unusually costly stays $11,256
Low-volume adjustment $871,645
Capital: buildings and equipment $417,796
Uncompensated care $377,943
Total, before the three programs $7,281,505
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9999 − 1) −$483
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0065 − 1) +$31,642
After these two $7,312,664
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $73,127 $0
Net of the three programs likely $22⁠–⁠33K +$31,159

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$4,831,079
Teaching (indirect medical education)$316,436
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$310,418
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$144,932
Outliers: unusually costly stays$11,256
Low-volume adjustment$871,645
Capital: buildings and equipment$417,796
Uncompensated care$377,943
Total, before the three programs$7,281,505
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9999 − 1))−$483
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0065 − 1))+$31,642
After these two$7,312,664
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $73,127)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $22–33K)+$31,159

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3018same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3018 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $73K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0275
CLABSIup to 1.119
CAUTIup to 1.114
SSIup to 1.834
CDIup to 0.099

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9722 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.953 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 0.954 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 1.609 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0343

CMS 0.000 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3018 among its measured results: +0.2599.
  • PSI 90 −0.0227
  • CLABSI +0.1609
  • CAUTI +0.1962
  • SSI +0.2599
  • CDI −0.2924

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.1137−0.0227same
CLABSI0.8043+0.1609same
CAUTI0.9810+0.1962same
SSI1.2997+0.2599same
CDI−1.4622−0.2924same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050279/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.3500, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 1.2500, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 1.4500, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.4228, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.6905, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3299, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.0514, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.1536, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6306, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2720, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3018, higher than 70% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.3500, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 1.2500, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 1.4500, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.4228, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.6905, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3299, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.0514, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.1536, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6306, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2720, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3018, higher than 70% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.350032.1%not cut
FY20161.25000.5%not cut
FY20171.45001.8%not cut
FY2018−1.42284.0%not cut
FY2019−0.690515.1%not cut
FY2020−0.329928.6%not cut
FY20210.051456.5%not cut
FY20220.153666.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.630613.6%not cut
FY2025−0.272032.5%not cut
FY20260.301870.5%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 1 infection measures ended lower than they started.
C. diff 1.79 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle C. diff, 2017: 1.792C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 2.278C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 1.79 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle C. diff, 2017: 1.792C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 2.278C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearC. diff
20171.792
20180.000
20192.278
20210.000
20220.000
20230.000
20240.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 67% of the other 276 scored there.

In Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area, its score is higher than 82% of the other 29 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area) to 35% (Government).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 30 (13%); middle score −0.3020Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30 hospitals13% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government 401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3018 This hospital 0.3018 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 30 (13%); middle score −0.3020Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30 hospitals13% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3018 This hospital 0.3018

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045370%
West region59315726%−0.030269%
California2777627%−0.021767%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30413%−0.302082%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056774%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115468%
Government40114035%0.160258%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057472%
This hospital0.3018
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 26 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Riverside University Health System-Medical Center, Moreno Valley: score −0.3842, not cut, 55 miles87. Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley: score −0.0302, not cut, 55 miles76. Redlands Community Hospital, Redlands: score 0.4496, cut, 54 miles65. Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet: score −0.2741, not cut, 47 miles54. San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning: score 1.1204, cut, 41 miles43. John F Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Indio: score −0.9917, not cut, 30 miles32. Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage: score −0.4630, not cut, 27 miles21. Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs: score −0.2634, not cut, 26 miles1This hospital: Hi-Desert Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA26−0.2634not cut
Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, CA27−0.4630not cut
John F Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Indio, CA30−0.9917not cut
San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning, CA411.1204cut
Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, CA47−0.2741not cut
Redlands Community Hospital, Redlands, CA540.4496cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley, CA55−0.0302not cut
Riverside University Health System-Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA55−0.3842not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Desert Regional Medical CenterPalm Springs, CA26−0.2634No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Eisenhower Medical CenterRancho Mirage, CA27−0.4630No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3John F Kennedy Memorial HospitalIndio, CA30−0.9917No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
4San Gorgonio Memorial HospitalBanning, CA411.12041% cut$82KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Hemet Global Medical CenterHemet, CA47−0.2741No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Redlands Community HospitalRedlands, CA540.44961% cut$256KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Moreno ValleyMoreno Valley, CA55−0.0302No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Riverside University Health System-Medical CenterMoreno Valley, CA55−0.3842No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Hi-Desert Medical Center, Joshua Tree, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050279/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.