P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalJohn F Kennedy Memorial Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$87K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050534

1Hospital

John F Kennedy Memorial Hospital

2Location

Indio, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 92201

Riverside County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 156 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.9917

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $141K, likely $108⁠–⁠178K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.9917 for John F Kennedy Memorial Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $141K estimate 1% of about $14.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 1.3716 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $108–178K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.9917 This hospital −0.9917 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.9917 This hospital −0.9917

Higher than 4% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

None of the measures CMS scored it on is above the national median, so no single measure at the median would lower its score.

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 0.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 69% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9117

    Z-score−0.5362

    Part of score−0.0894

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4065

    Part of score−0.2344

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2198

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4565

    Part of score−0.2428

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.107

    Z-score−1.0478

    Part of score−0.1746

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 52% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.609

    Z-score−0.1845

    Part of score−0.0308

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.91170.9623−0.5362−0.0894Better than 69% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.0000.559−1.4065−0.2344Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2198Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.0000.795−1.4565−0.2428Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1070.346−1.0478−0.1746Better than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.6090.641−0.1845−0.0308Better than 52% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.5362PSI 90−1.4065CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI−1.4565SSI−1.0478CDI−0.1845MRSA)÷6measures=−0.9917Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.9917; CMS reports −0.9917. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 1.3716 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.9917, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5362 divided by 6 = −0.0894PSI 90−0.0894 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 6 = −0.2344CLABSI−0.2344 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score −1.0478 divided by 6 = −0.1746CDI−0.1746 MRSA: z‑score −0.1845 divided by 6 = −0.0308MRSA−0.0308 Total HAC Score: −0.9917Score−0.9917 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5362 divided by 6 = −0.0894PSI 90−0.0894 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 6 = −0.2344CLABSI−0.2344 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score −1.0478 divided by 6 = −0.1746CDI−0.1746 MRSA: z‑score −0.1845 divided by 6 = −0.0308MRSA−0.0308 Total HAC Score: −0.9917Score−0.9917 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.5362−0.0894−0.0894
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2344−0.3238
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198−0.5436
SSI−1.4565−0.2428−0.7864
CDI−1.0478−0.1746−0.9610
MRSA−0.1845−0.0308−0.9918
Total HAC Score−0.9917
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.3716 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 1.3716 higher, the cut would have been about $141K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $141K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $141K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.9917 This hospital −0.9917 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $141K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $141Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.9917 This hospital −0.9917

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$141,423
This hospital−0.9917$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$141,423

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($14,229,715payment−$93,233readmissions+$5,792value-based)×1%the cut=$141,423at stake

$141,423at stake÷814traditional Medicare stays=$174per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $141K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$93K and +$6K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $11,232,837
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,237,746
Outliers: unusually costly stays $76,945
Capital: buildings and equipment $995,719
Uncompensated care $686,468
Total, before the three programs $14,229,715
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9917 − 1) −$93,233
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0005 − 1) +$5,792
After these two $14,142,274
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $141,423 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$103K to −$70K −$87,441

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$11,232,837
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,237,746
Outliers: unusually costly stays$76,945
Capital: buildings and equipment$995,719
Uncompensated care$686,468
Total, before the three programs$14,229,715
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9917 − 1))−$93,233
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0005 − 1))+$5,792
After these two$14,142,274
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $141,423)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$103K to −$70K)−$87,441

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.9917same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.9917 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $141K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9117 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.000 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.000 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.107 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.609 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.9917: its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored.
  • PSI 90 −0.0894
  • CLABSI −0.2344
  • CAUTI −0.2198
  • SSI −0.2428
  • CDI −0.1746
  • MRSA −0.0308

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.5362−0.0894same
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2344same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198same
SSI−1.4565−0.2428same
CDI−1.0478−0.1746same
MRSA−0.1845−0.0308same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9500, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.2500, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.2100, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1420, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.9273, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3712, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.1940, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2661, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6529, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −1.0469, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.9917, higher than 4% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9500, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.2500, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.2100, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1420, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.9273, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3712, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.1940, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2661, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6529, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −1.0469, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.9917, higher than 4% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.950023.6%not cut
FY20164.250027.2%not cut
FY20174.210029.1%not cut
FY2018−0.142040.6%not cut
FY20190.927393.5%cut
FY20200.371277.3%cut
FY20210.194067.4%not cut
FY20220.266172.7%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.652912.9%not cut
FY2025−1.04693.5%not cut
FY2026−0.99174.0%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 2.44 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.435CLABSI, 2018: 1.575CLABSI, 2019: 1.605CLABSI, 2021: 2.030CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.70 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.695CAUTI, 2018: 0.542CAUTI, 2019: 0.476CAUTI, 2021: 0.369CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.77 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.772C. diff, 2018: 0.514C. diff, 2019: 0.799C. diff, 2021: 0.406C. diff, 2022: 0.105C. diff, 2023: 0.216C. diff, 2024: 0.000 CLABSI 2.44 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.435CLABSI, 2018: 1.575CLABSI, 2019: 1.605CLABSI, 2021: 2.030CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.70 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.695CAUTI, 2018: 0.542CAUTI, 2019: 0.476CAUTI, 2021: 0.369CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.77 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.772C. diff, 2018: 0.514C. diff, 2019: 0.799C. diff, 2021: 0.406C. diff, 2022: 0.105C. diff, 2023: 0.216C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIC. diff
20172.4351.6950.772
20181.5750.5420.514
20191.6050.4760.799
20212.0300.3690.406
20220.0000.0000.105
20230.0000.0000.216
20240.0000.0000.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 4% of the other 276 scored there.

In Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area, its score is higher than 6% of the other 29 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area) to 27% (California).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 30 (13%); middle score −0.3020Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.9917 This hospital −0.9917 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area: CMS cut 4 of 30 (13%); middle score −0.3020Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.9917 This hospital −0.9917

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.04534%
West region59315726%−0.03023%
California2777627%−0.02174%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA area30413%−0.30206%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.10535%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.07323%
For-profit6519815%−0.25909%
Urban2,24151023%−0.05743%
This hospital−0.9917
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 12 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Loma Linda University Medical Center-Murrieta, Murrieta: score −0.4652, not cut, 54 miles87. Menifee Global Medical Center, Sun City: score −0.4495, not cut, 54 miles76. Temecula Valley Hospital, Temecula: score −0.3298, not cut, 53 miles65. San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning: score 1.1204, cut, 44 miles54. Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet: score −0.2741, not cut, 42 miles43. Hi-Desert Medical Center, Joshua Tree: score 0.3018, not cut, 30 miles32. Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs: score −0.2634, not cut, 20 miles21. Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage: score −0.4630, not cut, 12 miles1This hospital: John F Kennedy Memorial Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, CA12−0.4630not cut
Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA20−0.2634not cut
Hi-Desert Medical Center, Joshua Tree, CA300.3018not cut
Hemet Global Medical Center, Hemet, CA42−0.2741not cut
San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Banning, CA441.1204cut
Temecula Valley Hospital, Temecula, CA53−0.3298not cut
Menifee Global Medical Center, Sun City, CA54−0.4495not cut
Loma Linda University Medical Center-Murrieta, Murrieta, CA54−0.4652not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Eisenhower Medical CenterRancho Mirage, CA12−0.4630No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Desert Regional Medical CenterPalm Springs, CA20−0.2634No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Hi-Desert Medical CenterJoshua Tree, CA300.3018No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 5 measures
4Hemet Global Medical CenterHemet, CA42−0.2741No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5San Gorgonio Memorial HospitalBanning, CA441.12041% cut$82KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6Temecula Valley HospitalTemecula, CA53−0.3298No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
7Menifee Global Medical CenterSun City, CA54−0.4495No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures
8Loma Linda University Medical Center-MurrietaMurrieta, CA54−0.4652No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. John F Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Indio, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050534/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.