P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalKingman Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: +$220K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 030055

1Hospital

Kingman Regional Medical Center

2Location

Kingman, AZ (Arizona’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 86401

Mohave County

3Type

Minor teaching · 235 beds · Government · Urban · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.4005

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $275K, likely $214⁠–⁠335K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4005 for Kingman Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $275K estimate 1% of about $27.5M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.7804 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $214–335K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4005 This hospital −0.4005 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4005 This hospital −0.4005

Higher than 26% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.1901, to −0.5906. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1257

    Z-score0.9581

    Part of score+0.1597

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.300

    Z-score−0.7105

    Part of score−0.1184

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 77% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.218

    Z-score−0.7931

    Part of score−0.1322

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4565

    Part of score−0.2428

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 76% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.176

    Z-score−0.7807

    Part of score−0.1301

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 69% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.879

    Z-score0.3797

    Part of score+0.0633

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.12570.96230.9581+0.1597Worse than 83% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.3000.559−0.7105−0.1184Better than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.2180.489−0.7931−0.1322Better than 77% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.0000.795−1.4565−0.2428Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1760.346−0.7807−0.1301Better than 76% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.8790.6410.3797+0.0633Worse than 69% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.9581PSI 90−0.7105CLABSI−0.7931CAUTI−1.4565SSI−0.7807CDI+0.3797MRSA)÷6measures=−0.4005Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.4005; CMS reports −0.4005. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.7804 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.4005, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.9581 divided by 6 = +0.1597PSI 90+0.1597 CLABSI: z‑score −0.7105 divided by 6 = −0.1184CLABSI−0.1184 CAUTI: z‑score −0.7931 divided by 6 = −0.1322CAUTI−0.1322 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score −0.7807 divided by 6 = −0.1301CDI−0.1301 MRSA: z‑score 0.3797 divided by 6 = +0.0633MRSA+0.0633 Total HAC Score: −0.4005Score−0.4005 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.9581 divided by 6 = +0.1597PSI 90+0.1597 CLABSI: z‑score −0.7105 divided by 6 = −0.1184CLABSI−0.1184 CAUTI: z‑score −0.7931 divided by 6 = −0.1322CAUTI−0.1322 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 6 = −0.2428SSI−0.2428 CDI: z‑score −0.7807 divided by 6 = −0.1301CDI−0.1301 MRSA: z‑score 0.3797 divided by 6 = +0.0633MRSA+0.0633 Total HAC Score: −0.4005Score−0.4005 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.9581+0.15970.1597
CLABSI−0.7105−0.11840.0413
CAUTI−0.7931−0.1322−0.0909
SSI−1.4565−0.2428−0.3337
CDI−0.7807−0.1301−0.4638
MRSA0.3797+0.0633−0.4005
Total HAC Score−0.4005
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.7804 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.7804 higher, the cut would have been about $275K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $275K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $275K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4005 This hospital −0.4005 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $275K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $275Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4005 This hospital −0.4005

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$275,226
This hospital−0.4005$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$275,226

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($25,793,948payment+$1,508,306teaching, MA stays−$28,853readmissions+$249,233value-based)×1%the cut=$275,226at stake

$275,226at stake÷1,650traditional Medicare stays=$167per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $275K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$29K and +$249K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $19,235,116
Teaching (indirect medical education) $1,010,998
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $1,508,306
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $599,366
Outliers: unusually costly stays $159,651
Sole community hospital rate difference $3,130,774
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,658,043
Total, before the three programs $27,302,254
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9985 − 1) −$28,853
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0130 − 1) +$249,233
After these two $27,522,634
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $275,226 $0
Net of the three programs likely $176⁠–⁠255K +$220,380

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$19,235,116
Teaching (indirect medical education)$1,010,998
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$1,508,306
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$599,366
Outliers: unusually costly stays$159,651
Sole community hospital rate difference$3,130,774
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,658,043
Total, before the three programs$27,302,254
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9985 − 1))−$28,853
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0130 − 1))+$249,233
After these two$27,522,634
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $275,226)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $176–255K)+$220,380

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.4005same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4005 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $275K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1257 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.300 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.218 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.000 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.176 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.879 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.4005 among its measured results: +0.1597.
  • PSI 90 +0.1597
  • CLABSI −0.1184
  • CAUTI −0.1322
  • SSI −0.2428
  • CDI −0.1301
  • MRSA +0.0633

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.9581+0.1597same
CLABSI−0.7105−0.1184same
CAUTI−0.7931−0.1322same
SSI−1.4565−0.2428same
CDI−0.7807−0.1301same
MRSA0.3797+0.0633same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030055/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.7750, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 8.0000, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.1410, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.7402, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.1892, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.6143, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −1.0035, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3229, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.5139, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4005, higher than 26% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.7750, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 8.0000, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.1410, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.7402, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.1892, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.6143, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −1.0035, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3229, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.5139, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4005, higher than 26% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.775054.0%not cut
FY20166.500068.6%not cut
FY20178.000093.6%cut
FY20181.141095.3%cut
FY20190.740289.8%cut
FY20200.189267.0%not cut
FY2021−0.614315.0%not cut
FY2022−1.00353.2%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.322930.2%not cut
FY2025−0.513919.5%not cut
FY2026−0.400526.1%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.58 → 0.30 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.583CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.200CLABSI, 2021: 0.759CLABSI, 2022: 0.366CLABSI, 2023: 0.305CLABSI, 2024: 0.296 CAUTI 0.16 → 0.22 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.164CAUTI, 2018: 0.557CAUTI, 2019: 0.369CAUTI, 2021: 0.418CAUTI, 2022: 0.953CAUTI, 2023: 0.214CAUTI, 2024: 0.222 SSI, colon 0.89 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.891SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 3.10 → 0.86 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 3.102MRSA, 2018: 1.278MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.958MRSA, 2022: 1.012MRSA, 2023: 0.894MRSA, 2024: 0.865 C. diff 1.34 → 0.11 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.339C. diff, 2018: 0.406C. diff, 2019: 0.260C. diff, 2021: 0.132C. diff, 2022: 0.213C. diff, 2023: 0.237C. diff, 2024: 0.110 CLABSI 0.58 → 0.30 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.583CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.200CLABSI, 2021: 0.759CLABSI, 2022: 0.366CLABSI, 2023: 0.305CLABSI, 2024: 0.296 CAUTI 0.16 → 0.22 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.164CAUTI, 2018: 0.557CAUTI, 2019: 0.369CAUTI, 2021: 0.418CAUTI, 2022: 0.953CAUTI, 2023: 0.214CAUTI, 2024: 0.222 SSI, colon 0.89 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.891SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 3.10 → 0.86 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 3.102MRSA, 2018: 1.278MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.958MRSA, 2022: 1.012MRSA, 2023: 0.894MRSA, 2024: 0.865 C. diff 1.34 → 0.11 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.339C. diff, 2018: 0.406C. diff, 2019: 0.260C. diff, 2021: 0.132C. diff, 2022: 0.213C. diff, 2023: 0.237C. diff, 2024: 0.110

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.5830.1640.8913.1021.339
20180.0000.5570.0001.2780.406
20190.2000.3690.0000.0000.260
20210.7590.4180.9580.132
20220.3660.9530.0001.0120.213
20230.3050.2140.0000.8940.237
20240.2960.2220.0000.8650.110

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Arizona, its score is higher than 30% of the other 60 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 20% (Arizona) to 35% (Government).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona 61 hospitals20% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government 401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.4005 This hospital −0.4005 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona61 hospitals20% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.4005 This hospital −0.4005

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045326%
West region59315726%−0.030225%
Arizona611220%0.056030%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056721%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073227%
Government40114035%0.160218%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057425%
This hospital−0.4005
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 46 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Harmon Hospital, Las Vegas: score 1.2562, cut, 104 miles87. Verde Valley Medical Center, Cottonwood: score −0.0941, not cut, 100 miles76. Saint Rose Dominican Hospitals - Siena Campus, Henderson: score 0.0913, not cut, 99 miles65. Henderson Hospital, Henderson: score −0.7950, not cut, 98 miles54. Yavapai Regional Medical Center, Prescott: score −0.1259, not cut, 81 miles43. Havasu Regional Medical Center, Lake Havasu City: score −0.4643, not cut, 56 miles32. Valley View Medical Center, Fort Mohave: score 0.1998, not cut, 49 miles21. Western Arizona Regional Medical Center, Bullhead City: score −0.8268, not cut, 46 miles1This hospital: Kingman Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Western Arizona Regional Medical Center, Bullhead City, AZ46−0.8268not cut
Valley View Medical Center, Fort Mohave, AZ490.1998not cut
Havasu Regional Medical Center, Lake Havasu City, AZ56−0.4643not cut
Yavapai Regional Medical Center, Prescott, AZ81−0.1259not cut
Henderson Hospital, Henderson, NV98−0.7950not cut
Saint Rose Dominican Hospitals - Siena Campus, Henderson, NV990.0913not cut
Verde Valley Medical Center, Cottonwood, AZ100−0.0941not cut
Harmon Hospital, Las Vegas, NV1041.2562cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Western Arizona Regional Medical CenterBullhead City, AZ46−0.8268No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
2Valley View Medical CenterFort Mohave, AZ490.1998No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 2 measures
3Havasu Regional Medical CenterLake Havasu City, AZ56−0.4643No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
4Yavapai Regional Medical CenterPrescott, AZ81−0.1259No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Henderson HospitalHenderson, NV98−0.7950No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
6Saint Rose Dominican Hospitals - Siena CampusHenderson, NV990.0913No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Verde Valley Medical CenterCottonwood, AZ100−0.0941No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
8Harmon HospitalLas Vegas, NV1041.25621% cutno estimateAbove the national median on 3 of 4 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Kingman Regional Medical Center, Kingman, AZ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030055/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.