P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalMarshfield Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$1.0M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 520037

1Hospital

Marshfield Medical Center

2Location

Marshfield, WI (Wisconsin’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 54449

Wood County

3Type

Minor teaching · 504 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

1 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.7373

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$611K estimate
Likely $475⁠–⁠745K; about $228 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$611K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7373 for Marshfield Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $61.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $228 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $475–745K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7373 This hospital 0.7373 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7373 This hospital 0.7373

Higher than 88% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 8 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4490, to 0.2883. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.7789

    Z-score2.5111

    Part of score+0.4185

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 77% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.914

    Z-score0.7138

    Part of score+0.1190

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 54% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.451

    Z-score−0.2315

    Part of score−0.0386

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 50% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.794

    Z-score−0.0964

    Part of score−0.0161

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 88% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.737

    Z-score1.3915

    Part of score+0.2319

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 60% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.762

    Z-score0.1352

    Part of score+0.0225

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.77890.96232.5111+0.4185Worse than 99% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.9140.5590.7138+0.1190Worse than 77% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.4510.489−0.2315−0.0386Better than 54% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.7940.795−0.0964−0.0161Better than 50% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.7370.3461.3915+0.2319Worse than 88% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.7620.6410.1352+0.0225Worse than 60% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.5111PSI 90+0.7138CLABSI−0.2315CAUTI−0.0964SSI+1.3915CDI+0.1352MRSA)÷6measures=0.7373Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3581 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.7373, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.7138 divided by 6 = +0.1190CLABSI+0.1190 CAUTI: z‑score −0.2315 divided by 6 = −0.0386CAUTI−0.0386 SSI: z‑score −0.0964 divided by 6 = −0.0161SSI−0.0161 CDI: z‑score 1.3915 divided by 6 = +0.2319CDI+0.2319 MRSA: z‑score 0.1352 divided by 6 = +0.0225MRSA+0.0225 Total HAC Score: 0.7373Score0.7373 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.7138 divided by 6 = +0.1190CLABSI+0.1190 CAUTI: z‑score −0.2315 divided by 6 = −0.0386CAUTI−0.0386 SSI: z‑score −0.0964 divided by 6 = −0.0161SSI−0.0161 CDI: z‑score 1.3915 divided by 6 = +0.2319CDI+0.2319 MRSA: z‑score 0.1352 divided by 6 = +0.0225MRSA+0.0225 Total HAC Score: 0.7373Score0.7373 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.5111+0.41850.4185
CLABSI0.7138+0.11900.5375
CAUTI−0.2315−0.03860.4989
SSI−0.0964−0.01610.4828
CDI1.3915+0.23190.7147
MRSA0.1352+0.02250.7372
Total HAC Score0.7373
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3581 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $611K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $611K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $611K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7373 This hospital 0.7373 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $611K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $611Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7373 This hospital 0.7373

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$611,401
This hospital0.7373−$611,401
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$611,401

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($53,676,134payment+$7,869,614teaching, MA stays−$211,529readmissions−$194,126value-based)×1%the cut=$611,401HAC cut

$611,401HAC cut÷2,678traditional Medicare stays=$228per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $611K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$212K and −$194K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $37,110,304
Teaching (indirect medical education) $5,566,175
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $7,869,614
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,113,309
Outliers: unusually costly stays $3,223,401
Sole community hospital rate difference $3,470,208
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,192,737
Total, before the three programs $61,545,748
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9943 − 1) −$211,529
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9948 − 1) −$194,126
After these two $61,140,093
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $475⁠–⁠745K −$611,401
Net of the three programs likely −$1.2M to −$813K −$1,017,056

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$37,110,304
Teaching (indirect medical education)$5,566,175
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$7,869,614
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,113,309
Outliers: unusually costly stays$3,223,401
Sole community hospital rate difference$3,470,208
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,192,737
Total, before the three programs$61,545,748
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9943 − 1))−$211,529
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9948 − 1))−$194,126
After these two$61,140,093
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $475–745K)−$611,401
Net of the three programs (likely −$1.2M to −$813K)−$1,017,056

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.7373same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$611Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7373 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $611K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.0403 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDI0.182 or lower
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.7789 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.914 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.451 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.794 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.737 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.762 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.7373 among its measured results: +0.4185.
  • PSI 90 +0.4185
  • CLABSI +0.1190
  • CAUTI −0.0386
  • SSI −0.0161
  • CDI +0.2319
  • MRSA +0.0225

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.5111+0.4185same
CLABSI0.7138+0.1190same
CAUTI−0.2315−0.0386same
SSI−0.0964−0.0161same
CDI1.3915+0.2319same
MRSA0.1352+0.0225same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520037/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 8 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.2500, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.4300, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0537, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2945, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3865, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6600, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4552, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.5451, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7387, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7373, higher than 88% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.2500, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.4300, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0537, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2945, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3865, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6600, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4552, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.5451, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7387, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7373, higher than 88% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.400083.3%cut
FY20167.250081.2%cut
FY20176.430072.7%not cut
FY2018−0.053746.7%not cut
FY20190.294572.0%not cut
FY20200.386578.0%cut
FY20210.660089.5%cut
FY20220.455281.8%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.545181.9%cut
FY20250.738789.1%cut
FY20260.737388.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.06 → 0.83 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.056CLABSI, 2018: 1.307CLABSI, 2019: 0.990CLABSI, 2021: 1.262CLABSI, 2022: 0.889CLABSI, 2023: 1.001CLABSI, 2024: 0.835 CAUTI 0.61 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.608CAUTI, 2018: 0.921CAUTI, 2019: 0.727CAUTI, 2021: 0.548CAUTI, 2022: 0.722CAUTI, 2023: 0.457CAUTI, 2024: 0.446 SSI, colon 1.78 → 0.69 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.780SSI, colon, 2018: 0.969SSI, colon, 2019: 2.063SSI, colon, 2021: 1.745SSI, colon, 2022: 1.289SSI, colon, 2023: 0.888SSI, colon, 2024: 0.689 SSI, hysterectomy 2.65 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 2.646SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.000 MRSA 0.44 → 0.73 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.439MRSA, 2018: 1.327MRSA, 2019: 0.864MRSA, 2021: 1.005MRSA, 2022: 1.139MRSA, 2023: 0.794MRSA, 2024: 0.733 C. diff 0.88 → 0.84 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.876C. diff, 2018: 0.713C. diff, 2019: 0.745C. diff, 2021: 0.658C. diff, 2022: 0.798C. diff, 2023: 0.650C. diff, 2024: 0.841 CLABSI 1.06 → 0.83 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.056CLABSI, 2018: 1.307CLABSI, 2019: 0.990CLABSI, 2021: 1.262CLABSI, 2022: 0.889CLABSI, 2023: 1.001CLABSI, 2024: 0.835 CAUTI 0.61 → 0.45 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.608CAUTI, 2018: 0.921CAUTI, 2019: 0.727CAUTI, 2021: 0.548CAUTI, 2022: 0.722CAUTI, 2023: 0.457CAUTI, 2024: 0.446 SSI, colon 1.78 → 0.69 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.780SSI, colon, 2018: 0.969SSI, colon, 2019: 2.063SSI, colon, 2021: 1.745SSI, colon, 2022: 1.289SSI, colon, 2023: 0.888SSI, colon, 2024: 0.689 SSI, hysterectomy 2.65 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 2.646SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.000 MRSA 0.44 → 0.73 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.439MRSA, 2018: 1.327MRSA, 2019: 0.864MRSA, 2021: 1.005MRSA, 2022: 1.139MRSA, 2023: 0.794MRSA, 2024: 0.733 C. diff 0.88 → 0.84 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.876C. diff, 2018: 0.713C. diff, 2019: 0.745C. diff, 2021: 0.658C. diff, 2022: 0.798C. diff, 2023: 0.650C. diff, 2024: 0.841

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.0560.6081.7802.6460.4390.876
20181.3070.9210.9690.0001.3270.713
20190.9900.7272.0630.0000.8640.745
20211.2620.5481.7451.0050.658
20220.8890.7221.2891.1390.798
20231.0010.4570.8880.7940.650
20240.8350.4460.6890.7330.841

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Wisconsin, its score is higher than 91% of the other 61 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin 62 hospitals26% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.7373 This hospital 0.7373 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin62 hospitals26% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.7373 This hospital 0.7373

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045388%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026888%
Wisconsin621626%0.099691%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056792%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132387%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013488%
Rural61919632%0.022981%
This hospital0.7373
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 27 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Mayo Clinic Health System Eau Claire Hospital, Eau Claire: score −0.3779, not cut, 67 miles87. Marshfield Medical Center - Eau Claire, Eau Claire: score 0.0111, not cut, 66 miles76. Oakleaf Surgical Hospital, Altoona: score 0.2008, not cut, 62 miles65. Mile Bluff Medical Center, Mauston: score 1.0264, cut, 62 miles54. Marshfield Medical Center - Weston, Weston: score 0.4322, cut, 33 miles43. Aspirus Wausau Hospital, Wausau: score 0.0221, not cut, 32 miles32. Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc., Stevens Point: score 0.2428, not cut, 32 miles21. Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics Inc, Wisconsin Rapids: score 0.5368, cut, 27 miles1This hospital: Marshfield Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics Inc, Wisconsin Rapids, WI270.5368cut
Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc., Stevens Point, WI320.2428not cut
Aspirus Wausau Hospital, Wausau, WI320.0221not cut
Marshfield Medical Center - Weston, Weston, WI330.4322cut
Mile Bluff Medical Center, Mauston, WI621.0264cut
Oakleaf Surgical Hospital, Altoona, WI620.2008not cut
Marshfield Medical Center - Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI660.0111not cut
Mayo Clinic Health System Eau Claire Hospital, Eau Claire, WI67−0.3779not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics IncWisconsin Rapids, WI270.53681% cut$75KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc.Stevens Point, WI320.2428No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
3Aspirus Wausau HospitalWausau, WI320.0221No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Marshfield Medical Center - WestonWeston, WI330.43221% cut$139KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Mile Bluff Medical CenterMauston, WI621.02641% cut$27KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
6Oakleaf Surgical HospitalAltoona, WI620.2008No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
7Marshfield Medical Center - Eau ClaireEau Claire, WI660.0111No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
8Mayo Clinic Health System Eau Claire HospitalEau Claire, WI67−0.3779No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, WI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520037/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.