P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc. Estimated FY2026 net: +$74K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 520002

1Hospital

Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc.

2Location

Stevens Point, WI (Wisconsin’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 54481

Portage County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 181 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2428

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $80K, likely $59⁠–⁠99K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2428 for Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc. and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $80K estimate 1% of about $8.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.1371 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $59–99K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2428 This hospital 0.2428 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2428 This hospital 0.2428

Higher than 67% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 3 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4789, to −0.2361. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 3 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1681

    Z-score1.2542

    Part of score+0.4181

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4565

    Part of score−0.4855

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.618

    Z-score0.9308

    Part of score+0.3103

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.16810.96231.2542+0.4181Worse than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTIno value published0.489no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
SSI0.0000.795−1.4565−0.4855Better than 87% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.6180.3460.9308+0.3103Worse than 83% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 3; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.2542PSI 90−1.4565SSI+0.9308CDI)÷3measures=0.2428Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1371 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2428, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.2542 divided by 3 = +0.4181PSI 90+0.4181 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 3 = −0.4855SSI−0.4855 CDI: z‑score 0.9308 divided by 3 = +0.3103CDI+0.3103 Total HAC Score: 0.2428Score0.2428 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.2542 divided by 3 = +0.4181PSI 90+0.4181 SSI: z‑score −1.4565 divided by 3 = −0.4855SSI−0.4855 CDI: z‑score 0.9308 divided by 3 = +0.3103CDI+0.3103 Total HAC Score: 0.2428Score0.2428 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.2542+0.41810.4181
SSI−1.4565−0.4855−0.0674
CDI0.9308+0.31030.2429
Total HAC Score0.2428
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1371 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1371 higher, the cut would have been about $80K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $80K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $80K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2428 This hospital 0.2428 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $80K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $80Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2428 This hospital 0.2428

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$79,970
This hospital0.2428$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$79,970

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($7,923,091payment+$0readmissions+$73,945value-based)×1%the cut=$79,970at stake

$79,970at stake÷735traditional Medicare stays=$109per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $80K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and +$74K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $6,499,576
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $133,891
Outliers: unusually costly stays $107,243
Capital: buildings and equipment $503,626
Uncompensated care $678,755
Total, before the three programs $7,923,091
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0114 − 1) +$73,945
After these two $7,997,036
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $79,970 $0
Net of the three programs likely $54⁠–⁠94K +$73,945

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$6,499,576
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$133,891
Outliers: unusually costly stays$107,243
Capital: buildings and equipment$503,626
Uncompensated care$678,755
Total, before the three programs$7,923,091
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0114 − 1))+$73,945
After these two$7,997,036
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $79,970)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $54–94K)+$73,945

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2428same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2428 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $80K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.2266
SSIup to 0.238
CDIup to 0.723

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 3 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1681 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.2327

CMS 0.000 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0571

CMS 0.618 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.1291

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2428 among its measured results: +0.4181.
  • PSI 90 +0.4181
  • SSI −0.4855
  • CDI +0.3103

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 3, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.2542+0.4181same
SSI−1.4565−0.4855same
CDI0.9308+0.3103same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520002/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.2500, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2016: score 5.8750, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.7875, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.4372, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.609, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.2806, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.3273, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0638, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4206, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0875, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2428, higher than 67% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.2500, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2016: score 5.8750, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.7875, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.4372, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.609, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.2806, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.3273, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0638, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4206, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0875, higher than 58% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2428, higher than 67% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.250080.9%cut
FY20165.875056.1%not cut
FY20173.787522.7%not cut
FY20180.437279.0%cut
FY20190.60985.6%cut
FY2020−0.280631.7%not cut
FY20210.327374.3%not cut
FY20220.063858.8%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.420624.1%not cut
FY20250.087558.8%not cut
FY20260.242867.5%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.
SSI, colon 1.79 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle SSI, colon, 2017: 1.788SSI, colon, 2018: 0.674SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.45 → 0.63 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.445C. diff, 2018: 0.408C. diff, 2019: 0.975C. diff, 2021: 0.545C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.608C. diff, 2024: 0.629 SSI, colon 1.79 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle SSI, colon, 2017: 1.788SSI, colon, 2018: 0.674SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.45 → 0.63 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.445C. diff, 2018: 0.408C. diff, 2019: 0.975C. diff, 2021: 0.545C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.608C. diff, 2024: 0.629

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearSSI, colonC. diff
20171.7880.445
20180.6740.408
20190.0000.975
20210.545
20220.0000.000
20230.608
20240.0000.629

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Wisconsin, its score is higher than 63% of the other 61 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (100 to 299 beds) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin 62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2428 This hospital 0.2428 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2428 This hospital 0.2428

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045367%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026866%
Wisconsin621626%0.099663%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105369%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073268%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013466%
Rural61919632%0.022962%
This hospital0.2428
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 5 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 16 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Thedacare Regional Medical Center - Appleton Inc, Appleton: score −0.0268, not cut, 60 miles87. Aurora Medical Ctr Oshkosh, Oshkosh: score 0.5633, cut, 59 miles76. Mile Bluff Medical Center, Mauston: score 1.0264, cut, 57 miles65. Thedacare Regional Med Ctr - Neenah, Neenah: score −0.4204, not cut, 57 miles54. Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield: score 0.7373, cut, 32 miles43. Aspirus Wausau Hospital, Wausau: score 0.0221, not cut, 31 miles32. Marshfield Medical Center - Weston, Weston: score 0.4322, cut, 25 miles21. Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics Inc, Wisconsin Rapids: score 0.5368, cut, 16 miles1This hospital: Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics Inc, Wisconsin Rapids, WI160.5368cut
Marshfield Medical Center - Weston, Weston, WI250.4322cut
Aspirus Wausau Hospital, Wausau, WI310.0221not cut
Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, WI320.7373cut
Thedacare Regional Med Ctr - Neenah, Neenah, WI57−0.4204not cut
Mile Bluff Medical Center, Mauston, WI571.0264cut
Aurora Medical Ctr Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI590.5633cut
Thedacare Regional Medical Center - Appleton Inc, Appleton, WI60−0.0268not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Aspirus Riverview Hospital & Clinics IncWisconsin Rapids, WI160.53681% cut$75KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Marshfield Medical Center - WestonWeston, WI250.43221% cut$139KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Aspirus Wausau HospitalWausau, WI310.0221No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Marshfield Medical CenterMarshfield, WI320.73731% cut$611KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Thedacare Regional Med Ctr - NeenahNeenah, WI57−0.4204No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Mile Bluff Medical CenterMauston, WI571.02641% cut$27KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
7Aurora Medical Ctr OshkoshOshkosh, WI590.56331% cut$106KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
8Thedacare Regional Medical Center - Appleton IncAppleton, WI60−0.0268No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Aspirus Stevens Point Hospital & Clinics, Inc., Stevens Point, WI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520002/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.