P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalOakleaf Surgical Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: $0×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 520196

1Hospital

Oakleaf Surgical Hospital

2Location

Altoona, WI (Wisconsin’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 54720

Eau Claire County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 13 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

Not Available

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 16: There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2008

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $24K, likely $18⁠–⁠30K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2008 for Oakleaf Surgical Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $24K estimate 1% of about $2.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.1791 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $18–30K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2008 This hospital 0.2008 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2008 This hospital 0.2008

Higher than 65% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 2 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.4608, to −0.2600. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 2 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 1; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 64% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9275

    Z-score−0.4253

    Part of score−0.2127

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 80% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.333

    Z-score0.8270

    Part of score+0.4135

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.92750.9623−0.4253−0.2127Better than 64% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTIno value published0.489no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
SSI1.3330.7950.8270+0.4135Worse than 80% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDIno value published0.346no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 2; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.4253PSI 90+0.8270SSI)÷2measures=0.2008Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make 0.2009; CMS reports 0.2008. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.1791 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2008, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4253 divided by 2 = −0.2127PSI 90−0.2127 SSI: z‑score 0.8270 divided by 2 = +0.4135SSI+0.4135 Total HAC Score: 0.2008Score0.2008 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4253 divided by 2 = −0.2127PSI 90−0.2127 SSI: z‑score 0.8270 divided by 2 = +0.4135SSI+0.4135 Total HAC Score: 0.2008Score0.2008 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.4253−0.2127−0.2127
SSI0.8270+0.41350.2008
Total HAC Score0.2008
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1791 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1791 higher, the cut would have been about $24K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $24K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $24K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2008 This hospital 0.2008 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $24K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $24Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2008 This hospital 0.2008

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$24,468
This hospital0.2008$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$24,468

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($2,446,797payment+$0readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$24,468at stake

$24,468at stake÷118traditional Medicare stays=$207per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $24K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $1,932,911
Outliers: unusually costly stays $317,229
Capital: buildings and equipment $196,657
Total, before the three programs $2,446,797
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $2,446,797
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $24,468 $0
Net of the three programs $0

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, low-income-patient payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$1,932,911
Outliers: unusually costly stays$317,229
Capital: buildings and equipment$196,657
Total, before the three programs$2,446,797
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$2,446,797
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $24,468)$0
Net of the three programs$0

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2008same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2008 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $24K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 0.9785
SSIup to 1.541

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 2 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9275 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.3491

CMS 1.333 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0857

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2008 among its measured results: +0.4135.
  • PSI 90 −0.2127
  • SSI +0.4135

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 2, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.4253−0.2127same
SSI0.8270+0.4135same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520196/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.0000, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.0000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.4500, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4646, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.8087, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.7747, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3830, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1330, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3602, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.4000, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2008, higher than 65% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.0000, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.0000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.4500, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4646, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.8087, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.7747, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3830, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1330, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3602, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.4000, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2008, higher than 65% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.000025.0%not cut
FY20164.000022.1%not cut
FY20172.450010.6%not cut
FY2018−0.464622.2%not cut
FY2019−0.808712.0%not cut
FY2020−0.774711.2%not cut
FY2021−0.383025.8%not cut
FY2022−0.133041.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.360227.7%not cut
FY2025−0.400024.8%not cut
FY20260.200865.0%not cut

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Wisconsin, its score is higher than 57% of the other 61 scored there.

Figure 7. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 28% (Fewer than 100 beds).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin 62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2008 This hospital 0.2008 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2008 This hospital 0.2008

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045365%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026863%
Wisconsin621626%0.099657%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105367%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115465%
For-profit6519815%−0.259076%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057466%
This hospital0.2008
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 8. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 4 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Medical Center Inc, La Crosse: score −0.7078, not cut, 70 miles87. Lakeview Memorial Hospital, Stillwater: score −0.4454, not cut, 70 miles76. Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield: score 0.7373, cut, 62 miles65. Mayo Clinic Health System in Red Wing, Red Wing: score −0.3248, not cut, 58 miles54. Winona Health Services, Winona: score 0.3649, not cut, 54 miles43. Marshfield Medical Center - Rice Lake, Rice Lake: score 0.3725, not cut, 51 miles32. Mayo Clinic Health System Eau Claire Hospital, Eau Claire: score −0.3779, not cut, 5 miles21. Marshfield Medical Center - Eau Claire, Eau Claire: score 0.0111, not cut, 4 miles1This hospital: Oakleaf Surgical Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Marshfield Medical Center - Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI40.0111not cut
Mayo Clinic Health System Eau Claire Hospital, Eau Claire, WI5−0.3779not cut
Marshfield Medical Center - Rice Lake, Rice Lake, WI510.3725not cut
Winona Health Services, Winona, MN540.3649not cut
Mayo Clinic Health System in Red Wing, Red Wing, MN58−0.3248not cut
Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, WI620.7373cut
Lakeview Memorial Hospital, Stillwater, MN70−0.4454not cut
Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Medical Center Inc, La Crosse, WI70−0.7078not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Marshfield Medical Center - Eau ClaireEau Claire, WI40.0111No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
2Mayo Clinic Health System Eau Claire HospitalEau Claire, WI5−0.3779No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Marshfield Medical Center - Rice LakeRice Lake, WI510.3725No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 3 measures
4Winona Health ServicesWinona, MN540.3649No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
5Mayo Clinic Health System in Red WingRed Wing, MN58−0.3248No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
6Marshfield Medical CenterMarshfield, WI620.73731% cut$611KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Lakeview Memorial HospitalStillwater, MN70−0.4454No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
8Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Medical Center IncLa Crosse, WI70−0.7078No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Oakleaf Surgical Hospital, Altoona, WI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520196/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.