P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalMedical City Alliance Estimated FY2026 net: −$378×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 670103

1Hospital

Medical City Alliance

2Location

Fort Worth, TX (Texas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 76177

Tarrant County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 140 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.4532

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $139K, likely $102⁠–⁠173K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4532 for Medical City Alliance and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $139K estimate 1% of about $13.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.8331 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $102–173K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4532 This hospital −0.4532 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.4532 This hospital −0.4532

Higher than 23% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 10 years

  1. 15—
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

In FY2016, CMS reports a payment reduction decision for this hospital but no Total HAC Score.

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.1863, to −0.6395. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0196

    Z-score0.2172

    Part of score+0.0362

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 79% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.241

    Z-score−0.8474

    Part of score−0.1412

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2198

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 66% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.548

    Z-score−0.5177

    Part of score−0.0863

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 89% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.054

    Z-score−1.2531

    Part of score−0.2089

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.176

    Z-score1.0004

    Part of score+0.1667

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.01960.96230.2172+0.0362Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.2410.559−0.8474−0.1412Better than 79% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2198Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.5480.795−0.5177−0.0863Better than 66% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.0540.346−1.2531−0.2089Better than 89% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.1760.6411.0004+0.1667Worse than 83% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.2172PSI 90−0.8474CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI−0.5177SSI−1.2531CDI+1.0004MRSA)÷6measures=−0.4532Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.4532; CMS reports −0.4532. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.8331 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.4532, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2172 divided by 6 = +0.0362PSI 90+0.0362 CLABSI: z‑score −0.8474 divided by 6 = −0.1412CLABSI−0.1412 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −0.5177 divided by 6 = −0.0863SSI−0.0863 CDI: z‑score −1.2531 divided by 6 = −0.2089CDI−0.2089 MRSA: z‑score 1.0004 divided by 6 = +0.1667MRSA+0.1667 Total HAC Score: −0.4532Score−0.4532 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2172 divided by 6 = +0.0362PSI 90+0.0362 CLABSI: z‑score −0.8474 divided by 6 = −0.1412CLABSI−0.1412 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −0.5177 divided by 6 = −0.0863SSI−0.0863 CDI: z‑score −1.2531 divided by 6 = −0.2089CDI−0.2089 MRSA: z‑score 1.0004 divided by 6 = +0.1667MRSA+0.1667 Total HAC Score: −0.4532Score−0.4532 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.2172+0.03620.0362
CLABSI−0.8474−0.1412−0.1050
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198−0.3248
SSI−0.5177−0.0863−0.4111
CDI−1.2531−0.2089−0.6200
MRSA1.0004+0.1667−0.4533
Total HAC Score−0.4532
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.8331 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.8331 higher, the cut would have been about $139K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $139K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $139K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4532 This hospital −0.4532 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $139K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $139Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.4532 This hospital −0.4532

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$139,171
This hospital−0.4532$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$139,171

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($13,917,429payment−$8,594readmissions+$8,216value-based)×1%the cut=$139,171at stake

$139,171at stake÷842traditional Medicare stays=$165per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $139K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$9K and +$8K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $9,548,796
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $286,464
Capital: buildings and equipment $742,385
Uncompensated care $3,339,784
Total, before the three programs $13,917,429
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9991 − 1) −$8,594
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0009 − 1) +$8,216
After these two $13,917,051
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $139,171 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$483 to −$274 −$378

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$9,548,796
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$286,464
Capital: buildings and equipment$742,385
Uncompensated care$3,339,784
Total, before the three programs$13,917,429
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9991 − 1))−$8,594
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0009 − 1))+$8,216
After these two$13,917,051
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $139,171)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$483 to −$274)−$378

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.4532same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.4532 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $139K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0196 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.241 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.548 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.054 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.176 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.4532 among its measured results: +0.1667.
  • PSI 90 +0.0362
  • CLABSI −0.1412
  • CAUTI −0.2198
  • SSI −0.0863
  • CDI −0.2089
  • MRSA +0.1667

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.2172+0.0362same
CLABSI−0.8474−0.1412same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198same
SSI−0.5177−0.0863same
CDI−1.2531−0.2089same
MRSA1.0004+0.1667same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 10 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2017: score 8.5000, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2018: score −0.1059, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3655, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5062, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3379, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2932, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.7847, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.7264, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4532, higher than 23% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2017: score 8.5000, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2018: score −0.1059, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3655, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5062, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3379, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2932, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.7847, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.7264, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.4532, higher than 23% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY2015no decision
FY2016N/Anot cut, with no score published
FY20178.500096.6%cut
FY2018−0.105943.2%not cut
FY2019−0.365527.1%not cut
FY2020−0.506219.6%not cut
FY2021−0.337928.7%not cut
FY2022−0.293231.5%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.78478.6%not cut
FY2025−0.726410.9%not cut
FY2026−0.453223.1%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.43 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.724CLABSI, 2022: 0.687CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.432 CAUTI 0.84 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2021: 0.840CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.695SSI, colon, 2021: 0.747SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.281SSI, colon, 2024: 0.666 C. diff 1.50 → 0.11 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.505C. diff, 2018: 1.084C. diff, 2019: 0.189C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.267C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.107 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.43 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.724CLABSI, 2022: 0.687CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.432 CAUTI 0.84 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2021: 0.840CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.695SSI, colon, 2021: 0.747SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.281SSI, colon, 2024: 0.666 C. diff 1.50 → 0.11 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.505C. diff, 2018: 1.084C. diff, 2019: 0.189C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.267C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.107

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20171.505
20180.0000.0001.084
20190.6950.189
20211.7240.8400.7470.000
20220.6870.0000.267
20230.0000.0000.2810.000
20240.4320.0000.6660.107

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Texas, its score is higher than 35% of the other 254 scored there.

In Fort Worth-Arlington-Grapevine, TX area, its score is higher than 33% of the other 24 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 8% (Fort Worth-Arlington-Grapevine, TX area) to 26% (Nonprofit).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas 255 hospitals13% cut Fort Worth-Arlington-Grapevine, TX area: CMS cut 2 of 25 (8%); middle score −0.2589Fort Worth-Arlington-Grapevine, TX area25 hospitals8% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.4532 This hospital −0.4532 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas255 hospitals13% cut Fort Worth-Arlington-Grapevine, TX area: CMS cut 2 of 25 (8%); middle score −0.2589Fort Worth-Arlington-Grapevine, TX area25 hospitals8% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.4532 This hospital −0.4532

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045323%
South region1,17426322%−0.105626%
Texas2553213%−0.236835%
Fort Worth-Arlington-Grapevine, TX area2528%−0.258933%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105327%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073224%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013419%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057422%
This hospital−0.4532
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Medical City Fort Worth, Fort Worth: score −0.0079, not cut, 11 miles87. Texas Health Harris Methodist Fort Worth, Fort Worth: score −0.3850, not cut, 11 miles76. Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Southlake: score −0.2589, not cut, 11 miles65. Methodist Southlake Medical Center, Southlake: score −0.6590, not cut, 10 miles54. Baylor Medical Center at Trophy Club, Trophy Club: score −0.3599, not cut, 9 miles43. Saint Camillus Medical Center, Hurst: score 2.2433, cut, 8 miles32. Medical City North Hills, North Richland Hills: score 0.1271, not cut, 8 miles21. Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Alliance, Fort Worth: score −1.1911, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Medical City Alliance

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Alliance, Fort Worth, TX2−1.1911not cut
Medical City North Hills, North Richland Hills, TX80.1271not cut
Saint Camillus Medical Center, Hurst, TX82.2433cut
Baylor Medical Center at Trophy Club, Trophy Club, TX9−0.3599not cut
Methodist Southlake Medical Center, Southlake, TX10−0.6590not cut
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Southlake, TX11−0.2589not cut
Texas Health Harris Methodist Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX11−0.3850not cut
Medical City Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX11−0.0079not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital AllianceFort Worth, TX2−1.1911No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
2Medical City North HillsNorth Richland Hills, TX80.1271No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Saint Camillus Medical CenterHurst, TX82.24331% cutno estimateAbove the national median on 5 of 5 measures
4Baylor Medical Center at Trophy ClubTrophy Club, TX9−0.3599No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
5Methodist Southlake Medical CenterSouthlake, TX10−0.6590No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
6Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital SouthlakeSouthlake, TX11−0.2589No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
7Texas Health Harris Methodist Fort WorthFort Worth, TX11−0.3850No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Medical City Fort WorthFort Worth, TX11−0.0079No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Medical City Alliance, Fort Worth, TX: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/670103/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.