P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSheridan Memorial Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$59K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 530006

1Hospital

Sheridan Memorial Hospital

2Location

Sheridan, WY (Wyoming’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 82801

Sheridan County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 88 beds · Government · Rural · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6273

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$169K estimate
Likely $121⁠–⁠189K; about $196 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$169K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6273 for Sheridan Memorial Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $16.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $196 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $121–189K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6273 This hospital 0.6273 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6273 This hospital 0.6273

Higher than 84% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 3 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.8421, to −0.2148. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 3 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 77% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0735

    Z-score0.5938

    Part of score+0.1979

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 98% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value2.122

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.7954

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 86% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.094

    Z-score−1.0982

    Part of score−0.3661

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.07350.96230.5938+0.1979Worse than 77% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI2.1220.4892.3863+0.7954Worse than 98% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.0940.346−1.0982−0.3661Better than 86% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 3; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.5938PSI 90+2.3863CAUTI−1.0982CDI)÷3measures=0.6273Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2481 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6273, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.5938 divided by 3 = +0.1979PSI 90+0.1979 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 3 = +0.7954CAUTI+0.7954 CDI: z‑score −1.0982 divided by 3 = −0.3661CDI−0.3661 Total HAC Score: 0.6273Score0.6273 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.5938 divided by 3 = +0.1979PSI 90+0.1979 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 3 = +0.7954CAUTI+0.7954 CDI: z‑score −1.0982 divided by 3 = −0.3661CDI−0.3661 Total HAC Score: 0.6273Score0.6273 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.5938+0.19790.1979
CAUTI2.3863+0.79540.9933
CDI−1.0982−0.36610.6272
Total HAC Score0.6273
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2481 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $169K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $169K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $169K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6273 This hospital 0.6273 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $169K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $169Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6273 This hospital 0.6273

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$168,883
This hospital0.6273−$168,883
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$168,883

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($16,778,667payment−$20,894readmissions+$130,562value-based)×1%the cut=$168,883HAC cut

$168,883HAC cut÷861traditional Medicare stays=$196per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $169K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$21K and +$131K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $8,705,733
Outliers: unusually costly stays $262,478
Sole community hospital rate difference $5,494,802
Low-volume adjustment $1,606,834
Capital: buildings and equipment $708,820
Total, before the three programs $16,778,667
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9976 − 1) −$20,894
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0150 − 1) +$130,562
After these two $16,888,335
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $121⁠–⁠189K −$168,883
Net of the three programs likely −$63K to −$41K −$59,215

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, low-income-patient payments, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$8,705,733
Outliers: unusually costly stays$262,478
Sole community hospital rate difference$5,494,802
Low-volume adjustment$1,606,834
Capital: buildings and equipment$708,820
Total, before the three programs$16,778,667
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9976 − 1))−$20,894
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0150 − 1))+$130,562
After these two$16,888,335
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $121–189K)−$168,883
Net of the three programs (likely −$63K to −$41K)−$59,215

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6273same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$169Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6273 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $169K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9668 or lower
CAUTI1.228 or lower
CDInot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 3 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0735 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.2327

CMS 2.122 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0804

CMS 0.094 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.1291

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6273 among its measured results: +0.7954.
  • PSI 90 +0.1979
  • CAUTI +0.7954
  • CDI −0.3661

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 3, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.5938+0.1979same
CAUTI2.3863+0.7954same
CDI−1.0982−0.3661same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/530006/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.9500, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.4500, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3405, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4124, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −1.2344, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9255, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1377, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5275, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.8843, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6273, higher than 84% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.9500, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.4500, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3405, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4124, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −1.2344, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9255, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1377, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5275, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.8843, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6273, higher than 84% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.950039.4%not cut
FY20162.25006.2%not cut
FY20174.450032.6%not cut
FY2018−0.340528.8%not cut
FY2019−0.412425.0%not cut
FY2020−1.23442.0%not cut
FY2021−0.92556.9%not cut
FY2022−0.137741.4%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.527518.1%not cut
FY20250.884392.1%cut
FY20260.627384.7%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.979CAUTI, 2022: 0.000 C. diff 0.52 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.519C. diff, 2018: 0.395C. diff, 2019: 0.594C. diff, 2021: 0.223C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.207C. diff, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.979CAUTI, 2022: 0.000 C. diff 0.52 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.519C. diff, 2018: 0.395C. diff, 2019: 0.594C. diff, 2021: 0.223C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.207C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTIC. diff
20170.0000.519
20180.0000.395
20190.594
20210.9790.223
20220.0000.000
20230.207
20240.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Wyoming, its score is higher than 71% of the other 7 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 25% (All hospitals) to 50% (Wyoming).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Wyoming: CMS cut 4 of 8 (50%); middle score 0.3395Wyoming 8 hospitals50% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government 401 hospitals35% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6273 This hospital 0.6273 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Wyoming: CMS cut 4 of 8 (50%); middle score 0.3395Wyoming8 hospitals50% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government401 hospitals35% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6273 This hospital 0.6273

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045384%
West region59315726%−0.030285%
Wyoming8450%0.339571%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105383%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115478%
Government40114035%0.160276%
Rural61919632%0.022978%
This hospital0.6273
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 80 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Same Day Surgery Center LLC, Rapid City: score −0.6651, not cut, 192 miles87. Monument Health Spearfish Hospital, Spearfish: score −0.7816, not cut, 155 miles76. Sagewest Health Care, Riverton: score 1.2653, cut, 142 miles65. Summit Medical Center, Casper: score −0.1409, not cut, 141 miles54. Banner Wyoming Medical Center, Casper: score 0.2011, not cut, 139 miles43. Intermountain Health St Vincent Regional Hospital, Billings: score −0.1567, not cut, 101 miles32. Billings Clinic Hospital, Billings: score −0.6233, not cut, 101 miles21. Campbell County Health, Gillette: score 0.4779, cut, 80 miles1This hospital: Sheridan Memorial Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Campbell County Health, Gillette, WY800.4779cut
Billings Clinic Hospital, Billings, MT101−0.6233not cut
Intermountain Health St Vincent Regional Hospital, Billings, MT101−0.1567not cut
Banner Wyoming Medical Center, Casper, WY1390.2011not cut
Summit Medical Center, Casper, WY141−0.1409not cut
Sagewest Health Care, Riverton, WY1421.2653cut
Monument Health Spearfish Hospital, Spearfish, SD155−0.7816not cut
Same Day Surgery Center LLC, Rapid City, SD192−0.6651not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Campbell County HealthGillette, WY800.47791% cut$145KAbove the national median on 2 of 4 measures
2Billings Clinic HospitalBillings, MT101−0.6233No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
3Intermountain Health St Vincent Regional HospitalBillings, MT101−0.1567No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4Banner Wyoming Medical CenterCasper, WY1390.2011No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Summit Medical CenterCasper, WY141−0.1409No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
6Sagewest Health CareRiverton, WY1421.26531% cut$84KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
7Monument Health Spearfish HospitalSpearfish, SD155−0.7816No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
8Same Day Surgery Center LLCRapid City, SD192−0.6651No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Sheridan Memorial Hospital, Sheridan, WY: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/530006/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.