P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalBillings Clinic Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$584K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 270004

1Hospital

Billings Clinic Hospital

2Location

Billings, MT (Montana’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 59101

Yellowstone County

3Type

Minor teaching · 304 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.6233

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $1.0M, likely $816K⁠–⁠$1.1M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.6233 for Billings Clinic Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $1.0M estimate 1% of about $100M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 1.0032 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $816K–$1.1M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.6233 This hospital −0.6233 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.6233 This hospital −0.6233

Higher than 14% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

None of the measures CMS scored it on is above the national median, so no single measure at the median would lower its score.

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 0.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 82% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8674

    Z-score−0.8455

    Part of score−0.1409

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 72% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.324

    Z-score−0.6549

    Part of score−0.1092

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 62% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.373

    Z-score−0.4195

    Part of score−0.0699

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 71% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.466

    Z-score−0.6582

    Part of score−0.1097

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 67% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.231

    Z-score−0.5677

    Part of score−0.0946

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 70% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.413

    Z-score−0.5941

    Part of score−0.0990

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.86740.9623−0.8455−0.1409Better than 82% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.3240.559−0.6549−0.1092Better than 72% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.3730.489−0.4195−0.0699Better than 62% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.4660.795−0.6582−0.1097Better than 71% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2310.346−0.5677−0.0946Better than 67% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.4130.641−0.5941−0.0990Better than 70% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.8455PSI 90−0.6549CLABSI−0.4195CAUTI−0.6582SSI−0.5677CDI−0.5941MRSA)÷6measures=−0.6233Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.6233; CMS reports −0.6233. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 1.0032 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.6233, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.8455 divided by 6 = −0.1409PSI 90−0.1409 CLABSI: z‑score −0.6549 divided by 6 = −0.1092CLABSI−0.1092 CAUTI: z‑score −0.4195 divided by 6 = −0.0699CAUTI−0.0699 SSI: z‑score −0.6582 divided by 6 = −0.1097SSI−0.1097 CDI: z‑score −0.5677 divided by 6 = −0.0946CDI−0.0946 MRSA: z‑score −0.5941 divided by 6 = −0.0990MRSA−0.0990 Total HAC Score: −0.6233Score−0.6233 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.8455 divided by 6 = −0.1409PSI 90−0.1409 CLABSI: z‑score −0.6549 divided by 6 = −0.1092CLABSI−0.1092 CAUTI: z‑score −0.4195 divided by 6 = −0.0699CAUTI−0.0699 SSI: z‑score −0.6582 divided by 6 = −0.1097SSI−0.1097 CDI: z‑score −0.5677 divided by 6 = −0.0946CDI−0.0946 MRSA: z‑score −0.5941 divided by 6 = −0.0990MRSA−0.0990 Total HAC Score: −0.6233Score−0.6233 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.8455−0.1409−0.1409
CLABSI−0.6549−0.1092−0.2501
CAUTI−0.4195−0.0699−0.3200
SSI−0.6582−0.1097−0.4297
CDI−0.5677−0.0946−0.5243
MRSA−0.5941−0.0990−0.6233
Total HAC Score−0.6233
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.0032 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 1.0032 higher, the cut would have been about $1.0M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.6233 This hospital −0.6233 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.6233 This hospital −0.6233

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,001,955
This hospital−0.6233$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,001,955

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($98,734,199payment+$2,045,409teaching, MA stays−$108,297readmissions−$475,774value-based)×1%the cut=$1,001,955at stake

$1,001,955at stake÷5,085traditional Medicare stays=$197per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $1.0M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$108K and −$476K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $77,355,240
Teaching (indirect medical education) $4,912,831
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,045,409
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $3,021,496
Outliers: unusually costly stays $2,266,509
Capital: buildings and equipment $6,773,927
Uncompensated care $4,404,196
Total, before the three programs $100,779,608
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9986 − 1) −$108,297
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9938 − 1) −$475,774
After these two $100,195,537
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $1,001,955 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$639K to −$505K −$584,071

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$77,355,240
Teaching (indirect medical education)$4,912,831
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,045,409
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$3,021,496
Outliers: unusually costly stays$2,266,509
Capital: buildings and equipment$6,773,927
Uncompensated care$4,404,196
Total, before the three programs$100,779,608
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9986 − 1))−$108,297
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9938 − 1))−$475,774
After these two$100,195,537
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $1,001,955)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$639K to −$505K)−$584,071

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.6233same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.6233 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $1.0M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8674 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.324 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.373 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.466 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.231 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.413 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.6233: its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored.
  • PSI 90 −0.1409
  • CLABSI −0.1092
  • CAUTI −0.0699
  • SSI −0.1097
  • CDI −0.0946
  • MRSA −0.0990

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.8455−0.1409same
CLABSI−0.6549−0.1092same
CAUTI−0.4195−0.0699same
SSI−0.6582−0.1097same
CDI−0.5677−0.0946same
MRSA−0.5941−0.0990same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/270004/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.2250, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.1900, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2131, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2503, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.6147, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2021: score −0.0786, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.4611, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4259, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.6210, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.6233, higher than 14% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.2250, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.1900, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2131, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2503, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.6147, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2021: score −0.0786, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.4611, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4259, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.6210, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.6233, higher than 14% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.225046.1%not cut
FY20165.000038.0%not cut
FY20176.190067.6%not cut
FY2018−0.213136.3%not cut
FY20190.250369.8%not cut
FY20200.614786.6%cut
FY2021−0.078645.5%not cut
FY2022−0.461121.7%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.425923.5%not cut
FY2025−0.621014.9%not cut
FY2026−0.623314.7%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 6 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.63 → 0.54 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.625CLABSI, 2018: 0.534CLABSI, 2019: 0.394CLABSI, 2021: 0.724CLABSI, 2022: 0.953CLABSI, 2023: 0.147CLABSI, 2024: 0.541 CAUTI 2.06 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.058CAUTI, 2018: 0.921CAUTI, 2019: 0.884CAUTI, 2021: 0.370CAUTI, 2022: 0.310CAUTI, 2023: 0.509CAUTI, 2024: 0.272 SSI, colon 1.68 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.679SSI, colon, 2018: 1.158SSI, colon, 2019: 0.449SSI, colon, 2021: 0.277SSI, colon, 2022: 0.154SSI, colon, 2023: 0.523SSI, colon, 2024: 0.459 SSI, hysterectomy 1.58 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.584SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.361SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.214SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.242SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.125SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.668SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.81 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.813MRSA, 2018: 0.258MRSA, 2019: 0.542MRSA, 2021: 0.690MRSA, 2022: 0.237MRSA, 2023: 0.451MRSA, 2024: 0.380 C. diff 0.94 → 0.20 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.939C. diff, 2018: 0.867C. diff, 2019: 0.193C. diff, 2021: 0.231C. diff, 2022: 0.218C. diff, 2023: 0.264C. diff, 2024: 0.205 CLABSI 0.63 → 0.54 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.625CLABSI, 2018: 0.534CLABSI, 2019: 0.394CLABSI, 2021: 0.724CLABSI, 2022: 0.953CLABSI, 2023: 0.147CLABSI, 2024: 0.541 CAUTI 2.06 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.058CAUTI, 2018: 0.921CAUTI, 2019: 0.884CAUTI, 2021: 0.370CAUTI, 2022: 0.310CAUTI, 2023: 0.509CAUTI, 2024: 0.272 SSI, colon 1.68 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.679SSI, colon, 2018: 1.158SSI, colon, 2019: 0.449SSI, colon, 2021: 0.277SSI, colon, 2022: 0.154SSI, colon, 2023: 0.523SSI, colon, 2024: 0.459 SSI, hysterectomy 1.58 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.584SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.361SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.214SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.242SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.125SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.668SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.81 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.813MRSA, 2018: 0.258MRSA, 2019: 0.542MRSA, 2021: 0.690MRSA, 2022: 0.237MRSA, 2023: 0.451MRSA, 2024: 0.380 C. diff 0.94 → 0.20 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.939C. diff, 2018: 0.867C. diff, 2019: 0.193C. diff, 2021: 0.231C. diff, 2022: 0.218C. diff, 2023: 0.264C. diff, 2024: 0.205

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.6252.0581.6791.5840.8130.939
20180.5340.9211.1581.3610.2580.867
20190.3940.8840.4490.2140.5420.193
20210.7240.3700.2770.2420.6900.231
20220.9530.3100.1541.1250.2370.218
20230.1470.5090.5230.6680.4510.264
20240.5410.2720.4590.0000.3800.205

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Montana, its score is higher than 0% of the other 9 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 40% (Montana).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Montana: CMS cut 4 of 10 (40%); middle score 0.0472Montana 10 hospitals40% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.6233 This hospital −0.6233 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Montana: CMS cut 4 of 10 (40%); middle score 0.0472Montana10 hospitals40% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.6233 This hospital −0.6233

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045314%
West region59315726%−0.030213%
Montana10440%0.04720%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.05679%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.03847%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013411%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057413%
This hospital−0.6233
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 5 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Sagewest Health Care, Riverton: score 1.2653, cut, 191 miles87. Campbell County Health, Gillette: score 0.4779, cut, 179 miles76. Benefis Hospitals Inc, Great Falls: score −0.1060, not cut, 176 miles65. St Peters Health, Helena: score 0.7430, cut, 175 miles54. Great Falls Clinic Hospital, Great Falls: score 0.1567, not cut, 175 miles43. Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital, Bozeman: score 0.5081, cut, 121 miles32. Sheridan Memorial Hospital, Sheridan: score 0.6273, cut, 101 miles21. Intermountain Health St Vincent Regional Hospital, Billings: score −0.1567, not cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Billings Clinic Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Intermountain Health St Vincent Regional Hospital, Billings, MTunder 1−0.1567not cut
Sheridan Memorial Hospital, Sheridan, WY1010.6273cut
Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital, Bozeman, MT1210.5081cut
Great Falls Clinic Hospital, Great Falls, MT1750.1567not cut
St Peters Health, Helena, MT1750.7430cut
Benefis Hospitals Inc, Great Falls, MT176−0.1060not cut
Campbell County Health, Gillette, WY1790.4779cut
Sagewest Health Care, Riverton, WY1911.2653cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Intermountain Health St Vincent Regional HospitalBillings, MTunder 1−0.1567No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Sheridan Memorial HospitalSheridan, WY1010.62731% cut$169KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
3Bozeman Health Deaconess HospitalBozeman, MT1210.50811% cut$293KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Great Falls Clinic HospitalGreat Falls, MT1750.1567No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures
5St Peters HealthHelena, MT1750.74301% cut$223KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Benefis Hospitals IncGreat Falls, MT176−0.1060No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
7Campbell County HealthGillette, WY1790.47791% cut$145KAbove the national median on 2 of 4 measures
8Sagewest Health CareRiverton, WY1911.26531% cut$84KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Billings Clinic Hospital, Billings, MT: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/270004/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.