P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalGreeneville Community Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$155K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 440050

1Hospital

Greeneville Community Hospital

2Location

Greeneville, TN (Tennessee’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 37745

Greene County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 140 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Medicare-dependent hospital

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.1925

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $117K, likely $84⁠–⁠131K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1925 for Greeneville Community Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $117K estimate 1% of about $11.7M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.1874 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $84–131K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1925 This hospital 0.1925 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1925 This hospital 0.1925

Higher than 64% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.3130, to −0.1205. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.2313

    Z-score1.6954

    Part of score+0.2826

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 69% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.777

    Z-score0.3960

    Part of score+0.0660

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2198

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 53% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.736

    Z-score−0.1957

    Part of score−0.0326

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 73% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.194

    Z-score−0.7110

    Part of score−0.1185

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.314

    Z-score1.2888

    Part of score+0.2148

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.23130.96231.6954+0.2826Worse than 91% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7770.5590.3960+0.0660Worse than 69% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2198Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.7360.795−0.1957−0.0326Better than 53% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1940.346−0.7110−0.1185Better than 73% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.3140.6411.2888+0.2148Worse than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.6954PSI 90+0.3960CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI−0.1957SSI−0.7110CDI+1.2888MRSA)÷6measures=0.1925Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1874 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.1925, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.6954 divided by 6 = +0.2826PSI 90+0.2826 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3960 divided by 6 = +0.0660CLABSI+0.0660 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −0.1957 divided by 6 = −0.0326SSI−0.0326 CDI: z‑score −0.7110 divided by 6 = −0.1185CDI−0.1185 MRSA: z‑score 1.2888 divided by 6 = +0.2148MRSA+0.2148 Total HAC Score: 0.1925Score0.1925 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.6954 divided by 6 = +0.2826PSI 90+0.2826 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3960 divided by 6 = +0.0660CLABSI+0.0660 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −0.1957 divided by 6 = −0.0326SSI−0.0326 CDI: z‑score −0.7110 divided by 6 = −0.1185CDI−0.1185 MRSA: z‑score 1.2888 divided by 6 = +0.2148MRSA+0.2148 Total HAC Score: 0.1925Score0.1925 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.6954+0.28260.2826
CLABSI0.3960+0.06600.3486
CAUTI−1.3186−0.21980.1288
SSI−0.1957−0.03260.0962
CDI−0.7110−0.1185−0.0223
MRSA1.2888+0.21480.1925
Total HAC Score0.1925
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1874 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1874 higher, the cut would have been about $117K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $117K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $117K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1925 This hospital 0.1925 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $117K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $117Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1925 This hospital 0.1925

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$117,157
This hospital0.1925$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$117,157

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($11,870,789payment−$102,640readmissions−$52,445value-based)×1%the cut=$117,157at stake

$117,157at stake÷1,068traditional Medicare stays=$110per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $117K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$103K and −$52K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $9,503,741
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $237,498
Outliers: unusually costly stays $5,132
Capital: buildings and equipment $728,342
Uncompensated care $1,396,076
Total, before the three programs $11,870,789
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9892 − 1) −$102,640
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9945 − 1) −$52,445
After these two $11,715,704
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $117,157 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$164K to −$108K −$155,085

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$9,503,741
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$237,498
Outliers: unusually costly stays$5,132
Capital: buildings and equipment$728,342
Uncompensated care$1,396,076
Total, before the three programs$11,870,789
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9892 − 1))−$102,640
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9945 − 1))−$52,445
After these two$11,715,704
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $117,157)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$164K to −$108K)−$155,085

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.1925same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1925 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $117K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIup to 1.259
CAUTIup to 0.464
SSIup to 1.389
CDIup to 0.483
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.2313 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.777 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.736 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.194 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.314 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.1925 among its measured results: +0.2826.
  • PSI 90 +0.2826
  • CLABSI +0.0660
  • CAUTI −0.2198
  • SSI −0.0326
  • CDI −0.1185
  • MRSA +0.2148

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.6954+0.2826same
CLABSI0.3960+0.0660same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198same
SSI−0.1957−0.0326same
CDI−0.7110−0.1185same
MRSA1.2888+0.2148same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/440050/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.7500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.9000, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.9308, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.793, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3094, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.3485, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.0522, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8397, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.5621, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.1925, higher than 64% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.7500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.9000, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.9308, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.793, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3094, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.3485, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.0522, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8397, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.5621, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.1925, higher than 64% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.05006.1%not cut
FY20163.750019.6%not cut
FY20173.900024.6%not cut
FY2018−0.93089.1%not cut
FY2019−0.79312.4%not cut
FY2020−0.309429.8%not cut
FY20210.348575.3%cut
FY20220.052257.6%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.839789.9%cut
FY20250.562183.9%cut
FY20260.192564.4%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.60 → 0.79 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 0.596CLABSI, 2022: 2.368CLABSI, 2023: 0.769CLABSI, 2024: 0.785 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.574CAUTI, 2021: 0.743CAUTI, 2022: 2.597CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.65 → 1.26 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.645SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 1.326SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 1.198SSI, colon, 2023: 0.279SSI, colon, 2024: 1.257 MRSA 0.96 → 1.61 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2022: 0.962MRSA, 2023: 0.962MRSA, 2024: 1.608 C. diff 0.36 → 0.13 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.365C. diff, 2018: 0.770C. diff, 2019: 0.343C. diff, 2021: 0.373C. diff, 2022: 0.602C. diff, 2023: 0.263C. diff, 2024: 0.127 CLABSI 0.60 → 0.79 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 0.596CLABSI, 2022: 2.368CLABSI, 2023: 0.769CLABSI, 2024: 0.785 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.574CAUTI, 2021: 0.743CAUTI, 2022: 2.597CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.65 → 1.26 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.645SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 1.326SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 1.198SSI, colon, 2023: 0.279SSI, colon, 2024: 1.257 MRSA 0.96 → 1.61 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2022: 0.962MRSA, 2023: 0.962MRSA, 2024: 1.608 C. diff 0.36 → 0.13 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.365C. diff, 2018: 0.770C. diff, 2019: 0.343C. diff, 2021: 0.373C. diff, 2022: 0.602C. diff, 2023: 0.263C. diff, 2024: 0.127

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.0000.6450.365
20180.0000.0000.770
20190.5741.3260.343
20210.5960.7430.0000.373
20222.3682.5971.1980.9620.602
20230.7690.0000.2790.9620.263
20240.7850.0001.2571.6080.127

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Tennessee, its score is higher than 69% of the other 72 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 19% (Tennessee) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Tennessee: CMS cut 14 of 73 (19%); middle score −0.2186Tennessee 73 hospitals19% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.1925 This hospital 0.1925 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Tennessee: CMS cut 14 of 73 (19%); middle score −0.2186Tennessee73 hospitals19% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.1925 This hospital 0.1925

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045364%
South region1,17426322%−0.105667%
Tennessee731419%−0.218669%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105366%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073265%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013463%
Rural61919632%0.022958%
This hospital0.1925
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 25 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Tennova Healthcare-Jefferson Memorial Hospital, Jefferson City: score −0.3378, not cut, 41 miles87. Sycamore Shoals Hospital, Elizabethton: score 0.9218, cut, 33 miles76. Indian Path Community Hospital, Kingsport: score −1.0670, not cut, 30 miles65. Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport: score 0.7462, cut, 29 miles54. Morristown Hamblen Hospital Association, Morristown: score −0.2186, not cut, 29 miles43. Tennova Healthcare - Newport Medical Center, Newport: score −0.5535, not cut, 26 miles32. Franklin Woods Community Hospital, Johnson City: score −0.2186, not cut, 25 miles21. Johnson City Medical Center, Johnson City: score 0.7814, cut, 25 miles1This hospital: Greeneville Community Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Johnson City Medical Center, Johnson City, TN250.7814cut
Franklin Woods Community Hospital, Johnson City, TN25−0.2186not cut
Tennova Healthcare - Newport Medical Center, Newport, TN26−0.5535not cut
Morristown Hamblen Hospital Association, Morristown, TN29−0.2186not cut
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN290.7462cut
Indian Path Community Hospital, Kingsport, TN30−1.0670not cut
Sycamore Shoals Hospital, Elizabethton, TN330.9218cut
Tennova Healthcare-Jefferson Memorial Hospital, Jefferson City, TN41−0.3378not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Johnson City Medical CenterJohnson City, TN250.78141% cut$764KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Franklin Woods Community HospitalJohnson City, TN25−0.2186No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Tennova Healthcare - Newport Medical CenterNewport, TN26−0.5535No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 4 measures
4Morristown Hamblen Hospital AssociationMorristown, TN29−0.2186No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Wellmont Holston Valley Medical CenterKingsport, TN290.74621% cut$504KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
6Indian Path Community HospitalKingsport, TN30−1.0670No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
7Sycamore Shoals HospitalElizabethton, TN330.92181% cut$56KAbove the national median on 4 of 5 measures
8Tennova Healthcare-Jefferson Memorial HospitalJefferson City, TN41−0.3378No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Greeneville Community Hospital, Greeneville, TN: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/440050/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.