P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSycamore Shoals Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$201K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 440018

1Hospital

Sycamore Shoals Hospital

2Location

Elizabethton, TN (Tennessee’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 37643

Carter County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 121 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.9218

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $41⁠–⁠70K; about $102 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$56K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.9218 for Sycamore Shoals Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $5.6M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $102 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $41–70K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.9218 This hospital 0.9218 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.9218 This hospital 0.9218

Higher than 92% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.4533, to 0.4685. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 66% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9208

    Z-score−0.4724

    Part of score−0.0945

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.858

    Z-score0.5839

    Part of score+0.1168

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 73% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.745

    Z-score0.4772

    Part of score+0.0954

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value4.118

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.4343

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.855

    Z-score1.8484

    Part of score+0.3697

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.92080.9623−0.4724−0.0945Better than 66% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.8580.5590.5839+0.1168Worse than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7450.4890.4772+0.0954Worse than 73% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI4.1180.7952.1717+0.4343Worse than 99% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.8550.3461.8484+0.3697Worse than 92% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.4724PSI 90+0.5839CLABSI+0.4772CAUTI+2.1717SSI+1.8484CDI)÷5measures=0.9218Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.5426 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.9218, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4724 divided by 5 = −0.0945PSI 90−0.0945 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5839 divided by 5 = +0.1168CLABSI+0.1168 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4772 divided by 5 = +0.0954CAUTI+0.0954 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 5 = +0.4343SSI+0.4343 CDI: z‑score 1.8484 divided by 5 = +0.3697CDI+0.3697 Total HAC Score: 0.9218Score0.9218 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.4724 divided by 5 = −0.0945PSI 90−0.0945 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5839 divided by 5 = +0.1168CLABSI+0.1168 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4772 divided by 5 = +0.0954CAUTI+0.0954 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 5 = +0.4343SSI+0.4343 CDI: z‑score 1.8484 divided by 5 = +0.3697CDI+0.3697 Total HAC Score: 0.9218Score0.9218 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.4724−0.0945−0.0945
CLABSI0.5839+0.11680.0223
CAUTI0.4772+0.09540.1177
SSI2.1717+0.43430.5520
CDI1.8484+0.36970.9217
Total HAC Score0.9218
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.5426 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $56K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $56K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $56K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.9218 This hospital 0.9218 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $56K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $56Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.9218 This hospital 0.9218

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$55,963
This hospital0.9218−$55,963
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$55,963

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($5,741,517payment−$103,891readmissions−$41,280value-based)×1%the cut=$55,963HAC cut

$55,963HAC cut÷547traditional Medicare stays=$102per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $56K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$104K and −$41K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $4,517,001
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $116,719
Capital: buildings and equipment $344,197
Uncompensated care $763,600
Total, before the three programs $5,741,517
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9770 − 1) −$103,891
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9909 − 1) −$41,280
After these two $5,596,346
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $41⁠–⁠70K −$55,963
Net of the three programs likely −$257K to −$146K −$201,134

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$4,517,001
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$116,719
Capital: buildings and equipment$344,197
Uncompensated care$763,600
Total, before the three programs$5,741,517
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9770 − 1))−$103,891
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9909 − 1))−$41,280
After these two$5,596,346
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $41–70K)−$55,963
Net of the three programs (likely −$257K to −$146K)−$201,134

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.9218same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$56Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.9218 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $56K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSI0.534 or lower
CDI0.154 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9208 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.858 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 0.745 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 4.118 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0343

CMS 0.855 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.9218 among its measured results: +0.4343.
  • PSI 90 −0.0945
  • CLABSI +0.1168
  • CAUTI +0.0954
  • SSI +0.4343
  • CDI +0.3697

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.4724−0.0945same
CLABSI0.5839+0.1168same
CAUTI0.4772+0.0954same
SSI2.1717+0.4343same
CDI1.8484+0.3697same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.3500, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.1300, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1271, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.3618, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.6470, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2021: score −0.0678, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5843, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6463, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2370, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.9218, higher than 92% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.3500, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.1300, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1271, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.3618, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.6470, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2021: score −0.0678, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5843, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6463, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2370, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.9218, higher than 92% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20151.35001.6%not cut
FY20162.25006.2%not cut
FY20173.130015.8%not cut
FY20180.127162.1%not cut
FY20190.361875.8%cut
FY20200.647087.6%cut
FY2021−0.067846.5%not cut
FY2022−0.584316.5%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.646313.1%not cut
FY2025−0.237035.6%not cut
FY20260.921892.4%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 0.64 → 0.59 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.643CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.590 C. diff 1.35 → 0.88 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.355C. diff, 2018: 0.668C. diff, 2019: 0.596C. diff, 2021: 0.391C. diff, 2022: 0.371C. diff, 2023: 0.840C. diff, 2024: 0.879 CAUTI 0.64 → 0.59 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.643CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.590 C. diff 1.35 → 0.88 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.355C. diff, 2018: 0.668C. diff, 2019: 0.596C. diff, 2021: 0.391C. diff, 2022: 0.371C. diff, 2023: 0.840C. diff, 2024: 0.879

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTIC. diff
20170.6431.355
20180.0000.668
20190.0000.596
20210.0000.391
20220.5900.371
20230.840
20240.879

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Tennessee, its score is higher than 95% of the other 72 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 19% (Tennessee) to 26% (Nonprofit).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Tennessee: CMS cut 14 of 73 (19%); middle score −0.2186Tennessee 73 hospitals19% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.9218 This hospital 0.9218 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Tennessee: CMS cut 14 of 73 (19%); middle score −0.2186Tennessee73 hospitals19% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.9218 This hospital 0.9218

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045392%
South region1,17426322%−0.105692%
Tennessee731419%−0.218695%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105390%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073294%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013493%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057494%
This hospital0.9218
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 8 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Watauga Medical Center, Boone: score 0.2806, not cut, 35 miles87. Greeneville Community Hospital, Greeneville: score 0.1925, not cut, 33 miles76. Johnston Memorial Hospital, Abingdon: score −0.0320, not cut, 27 miles65. Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport: score 0.7462, cut, 22 miles54. Indian Path Community Hospital, Kingsport: score −1.0670, not cut, 21 miles43. Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center, Bristol: score −0.1675, not cut, 17 miles32. Franklin Woods Community Hospital, Johnson City: score −0.2186, not cut, 9 miles21. Johnson City Medical Center, Johnson City: score 0.7814, cut, 8 miles1This hospital: Sycamore Shoals Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Johnson City Medical Center, Johnson City, TN80.7814cut
Franklin Woods Community Hospital, Johnson City, TN9−0.2186not cut
Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center, Bristol, TN17−0.1675not cut
Indian Path Community Hospital, Kingsport, TN21−1.0670not cut
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN220.7462cut
Johnston Memorial Hospital, Abingdon, VA27−0.0320not cut
Greeneville Community Hospital, Greeneville, TN330.1925not cut
Watauga Medical Center, Boone, NC350.2806not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Johnson City Medical CenterJohnson City, TN80.78141% cut$764KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Franklin Woods Community HospitalJohnson City, TN9−0.2186No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical CenterBristol, TN17−0.1675No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Indian Path Community HospitalKingsport, TN21−1.0670No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
5Wellmont Holston Valley Medical CenterKingsport, TN220.74621% cut$504KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
6Johnston Memorial HospitalAbingdon, VA27−0.0320No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
7Greeneville Community HospitalGreeneville, TN330.1925No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Watauga Medical CenterBoone, NC350.2806No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Sycamore Shoals Hospital, Elizabethton, TN: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/440018/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.