P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalUPMC St Margaret Estimated FY2026 net: −$405K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 390102

1Hospital

UPMC St Margaret

2Location

Pittsburgh, PA (Pennsylvania’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 15215

Allegheny County

3Type

Major teaching · 236 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2493

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $261K, likely $199⁠–⁠328K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2493 for UPMC St Margaret and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $261K estimate 1% of about $26.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.1306 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $199–328K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2493 This hospital 0.2493 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2493 This hospital 0.2493

Higher than 67% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.2820, to −0.0327. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 52% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9564

    Z-score−0.2242

    Part of score−0.0374

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 56% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.635

    Z-score0.0666

    Part of score+0.0111

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.916

    Z-score0.8894

    Part of score+0.1482

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 79% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.335

    Z-score−0.8826

    Part of score−0.1471

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 90% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.783

    Z-score1.5697

    Part of score+0.2616

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 58% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.734

    Z-score0.0767

    Part of score+0.0128

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.95640.9623−0.2242−0.0374Better than 52% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6350.5590.0666+0.0111Worse than 56% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.9160.4890.8894+0.1482Worse than 83% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.3350.795−0.8826−0.1471Better than 79% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.7830.3461.5697+0.2616Worse than 90% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.7340.6410.0767+0.0128Worse than 58% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.2242PSI 90+0.0666CLABSI+0.8894CAUTI−0.8826SSI+1.5697CDI+0.0767MRSA)÷6measures=0.2493Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1306 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2493, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2242 divided by 6 = −0.0374PSI 90−0.0374 CLABSI: z‑score 0.0666 divided by 6 = +0.0111CLABSI+0.0111 CAUTI: z‑score 0.8894 divided by 6 = +0.1482CAUTI+0.1482 SSI: z‑score −0.8826 divided by 6 = −0.1471SSI−0.1471 CDI: z‑score 1.5697 divided by 6 = +0.2616CDI+0.2616 MRSA: z‑score 0.0767 divided by 6 = +0.0128MRSA+0.0128 Total HAC Score: 0.2493Score0.2493 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2242 divided by 6 = −0.0374PSI 90−0.0374 CLABSI: z‑score 0.0666 divided by 6 = +0.0111CLABSI+0.0111 CAUTI: z‑score 0.8894 divided by 6 = +0.1482CAUTI+0.1482 SSI: z‑score −0.8826 divided by 6 = −0.1471SSI−0.1471 CDI: z‑score 1.5697 divided by 6 = +0.2616CDI+0.2616 MRSA: z‑score 0.0767 divided by 6 = +0.0128MRSA+0.0128 Total HAC Score: 0.2493Score0.2493 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.2242−0.0374−0.0374
CLABSI0.0666+0.0111−0.0263
CAUTI0.8894+0.14820.1219
SSI−0.8826−0.1471−0.0252
CDI1.5697+0.26160.2364
MRSA0.0767+0.01280.2492
Total HAC Score0.2493
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1306 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1306 higher, the cut would have been about $261K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $261K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $261K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2493 This hospital 0.2493 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $261K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $261Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2493 This hospital 0.2493

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$261,188
This hospital0.2493$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$261,188

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($19,399,906payment+$7,123,477teaching, MA stays−$322,096readmissions−$82,521value-based)×1%the cut=$261,188at stake

$261,188at stake÷1,468traditional Medicare stays=$178per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $261K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$322K and −$83K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $14,574,500
Teaching (indirect medical education) $2,646,438
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $7,123,477
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $98,378
Outliers: unusually costly stays $229,840
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,372,536
Uncompensated care $478,214
Total, before the three programs $26,523,383
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9779 − 1) −$322,096
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9943 − 1) −$82,521
After these two $26,118,766
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $261,188 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$476K to −$326K −$404,617

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$14,574,500
Teaching (indirect medical education)$2,646,438
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$7,123,477
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$98,378
Outliers: unusually costly stays$229,840
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,372,536
Uncompensated care$478,214
Total, before the three programs$26,523,383
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9779 − 1))−$322,096
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9943 − 1))−$82,521
After these two$26,118,766
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $261,188)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$476K to −$326K)−$404,617

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2493same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2493 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $261K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0679
CLABSIup to 0.970
CAUTIup to 1.239
SSIup to 0.789
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAup to 1.106

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9564 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.635 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.916 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.335 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.783 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.734 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2493 among its measured results: +0.2616.
  • PSI 90 −0.0374
  • CLABSI +0.0111
  • CAUTI +0.1482
  • SSI −0.1471
  • CDI +0.2616
  • MRSA +0.0128

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.2242−0.0374same
CLABSI0.0666+0.0111same
CAUTI0.8894+0.1482same
SSI−0.8826−0.1471same
CDI1.5697+0.2616same
MRSA0.0767+0.0128same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/390102/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 4 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.7500, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.2100, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.4000, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6446, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3632, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2021: score −0.0990, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2530, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.0555, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0560, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2493, higher than 67% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.7500, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.2100, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.4000, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.6446, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3632, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2021: score −0.0990, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2530, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.0555, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0560, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2493, higher than 67% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.750053.4%not cut
FY20165.500048.7%not cut
FY20177.210086.2%cut
FY20180.400077.3%cut
FY20190.644686.8%cut
FY20200.363276.6%cut
FY2021−0.099043.7%not cut
FY2022−0.253034.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.055557.3%not cut
FY20250.056056.5%not cut
FY20260.249367.7%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.45 → 1.09 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.447CLABSI, 2018: 1.317CLABSI, 2019: 0.693CLABSI, 2021: 2.396CLABSI, 2022: 1.356CLABSI, 2023: 0.205CLABSI, 2024: 1.094 CAUTI 1.03 → 1.14 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.027CAUTI, 2018: 0.515CAUTI, 2019: 0.517CAUTI, 2021: 1.010CAUTI, 2022: 0.502CAUTI, 2023: 0.695CAUTI, 2024: 1.144 SSI, colon 1.41 → 0.21 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.414SSI, colon, 2018: 1.378SSI, colon, 2019: 1.403SSI, colon, 2021: 0.572SSI, colon, 2022: 0.261SSI, colon, 2023: 0.481SSI, colon, 2024: 0.210 MRSA 0.94 → 0.36 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.935MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.363MRSA, 2021: 2.008MRSA, 2022: 1.464MRSA, 2023: 1.114MRSA, 2024: 0.363 C. diff 0.86 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.863C. diff, 2018: 0.966C. diff, 2019: 0.567C. diff, 2021: 0.930C. diff, 2022: 0.943C. diff, 2023: 0.889C. diff, 2024: 0.673 CLABSI 1.45 → 1.09 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.447CLABSI, 2018: 1.317CLABSI, 2019: 0.693CLABSI, 2021: 2.396CLABSI, 2022: 1.356CLABSI, 2023: 0.205CLABSI, 2024: 1.094 CAUTI 1.03 → 1.14 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.027CAUTI, 2018: 0.515CAUTI, 2019: 0.517CAUTI, 2021: 1.010CAUTI, 2022: 0.502CAUTI, 2023: 0.695CAUTI, 2024: 1.144 SSI, colon 1.41 → 0.21 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.414SSI, colon, 2018: 1.378SSI, colon, 2019: 1.403SSI, colon, 2021: 0.572SSI, colon, 2022: 0.261SSI, colon, 2023: 0.481SSI, colon, 2024: 0.210 MRSA 0.94 → 0.36 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.935MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.363MRSA, 2021: 2.008MRSA, 2022: 1.464MRSA, 2023: 1.114MRSA, 2024: 0.363 C. diff 0.86 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.863C. diff, 2018: 0.966C. diff, 2019: 0.567C. diff, 2021: 0.930C. diff, 2022: 0.943C. diff, 2023: 0.889C. diff, 2024: 0.673

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20171.4471.0271.4140.9350.863
20181.3170.5151.3780.0000.966
20190.6930.5171.4030.3630.567
20212.3961.0100.5722.0080.930
20221.3560.5020.2611.4640.943
20230.2050.6950.4811.1140.889
20241.0941.1440.2100.3630.673

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Pennsylvania, its score is higher than 62% of the other 129 scored there.

In Pittsburgh, PA area, its score is higher than 48% of the other 27 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 7 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 39% (Pittsburgh, PA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut Pennsylvania: CMS cut 36 of 130 (28%); middle score 0.1104Pennsylvania 130 hospitals28% cut Pittsburgh, PA area: CMS cut 11 of 28 (39%); middle score 0.2590Pittsburgh, PA area 28 hospitals39% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2493 This hospital 0.2493 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut Pennsylvania: CMS cut 36 of 130 (28%); middle score 0.1104Pennsylvania130 hospitals28% cut Pittsburgh, PA area: CMS cut 11 of 28 (39%); middle score 0.2590Pittsburgh, PA area28 hospitals39% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2493 This hospital 0.2493

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045367%
Northeast region43612428%0.047863%
Pennsylvania1303628%0.110462%
Pittsburgh, PA area281139%0.259048%
Major teaching42413632%0.178055%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073269%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013466%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057469%
This hospital0.2493
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 3 miles away.
5 mi8. Forbes Hospital, Monroeville: score 0.2686, not cut, 9 miles87. UPMC Passavant, Pittsburgh: score 0.0877, not cut, 9 miles76. UPMC East, Monroeville: score 0.0761, not cut, 8 miles65. Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh: score 0.1332, not cut, 6 miles54. UPMC Mercy, Pittsburgh: score −0.0130, not cut, 6 miles43. Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh: score 0.8548, cut, 5 miles32. UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, Pittsburgh: score 0.8919, cut, 5 miles21. West Penn Hospital, Pittsburgh: score 0.7487, cut, 3 miles1This hospital: UPMC St Margaret

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
West Penn Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA30.7487cut
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, Pittsburgh, PA50.8919cut
Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh, PA50.8548cut
UPMC Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA6−0.0130not cut
Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA60.1332not cut
UPMC East, Monroeville, PA80.0761not cut
UPMC Passavant, Pittsburgh, PA90.0877not cut
Forbes Hospital, Monroeville, PA90.2686not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1West Penn HospitalPittsburgh, PA30.74871% cut$253KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
2UPMC Presbyterian ShadysidePittsburgh, PA50.89191% cut$2.8MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC Health SystemPittsburgh, PA50.85481% cut$127KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
4UPMC MercyPittsburgh, PA6−0.0130No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Allegheny General HospitalPittsburgh, PA60.1332No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6UPMC EastMonroeville, PA80.0761No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7UPMC PassavantPittsburgh, PA90.0877No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Forbes HospitalMonroeville, PA90.2686No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. UPMC St Margaret, Pittsburgh, PA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/390102/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.