P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalWest Penn Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$301K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 390090

1Hospital

West Penn Hospital

2Location

Pittsburgh, PA (Pennsylvania’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 15224

Allegheny County

3Type

Major teaching · 311 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.7487

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$253K estimate
Likely $192⁠–⁠317K; about $234 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$253K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7487 for West Penn Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $25.3M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $234 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $192–317K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7487 This hospital 0.7487 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7487 This hospital 0.7487

Higher than 88% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 6 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3124, to 0.4363. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 6; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 76% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0651

    Z-score0.5353

    Part of score+0.0892

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.367

    Z-score1.7647

    Part of score+0.2941

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 65% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.642

    Z-score0.2289

    Part of score+0.0381

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 86% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.562

    Z-score1.2192

    Part of score+0.2032

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 65% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.449

    Z-score0.2764

    Part of score+0.0461

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 71% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.921

    Z-score0.4675

    Part of score+0.0779

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.06510.96230.5353+0.0892Worse than 76% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.3670.5591.7647+0.2941Worse than 92% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6420.4890.2289+0.0381Worse than 65% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.5620.7951.2192+0.2032Worse than 86% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.4490.3460.2764+0.0461Worse than 65% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.9210.6410.4675+0.0779Worse than 71% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.5353PSI 90+1.7647CLABSI+0.2289CAUTI+1.2192SSI+0.2764CDI+0.4675MRSA)÷6measures=0.7487Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3695 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.7487, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.5353 divided by 6 = +0.0892PSI 90+0.0892 CLABSI: z‑score 1.7647 divided by 6 = +0.2941CLABSI+0.2941 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2289 divided by 6 = +0.0381CAUTI+0.0381 SSI: z‑score 1.2192 divided by 6 = +0.2032SSI+0.2032 CDI: z‑score 0.2764 divided by 6 = +0.0461CDI+0.0461 MRSA: z‑score 0.4675 divided by 6 = +0.0779MRSA+0.0779 Total HAC Score: 0.7487Score0.7487 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.5353 divided by 6 = +0.0892PSI 90+0.0892 CLABSI: z‑score 1.7647 divided by 6 = +0.2941CLABSI+0.2941 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2289 divided by 6 = +0.0381CAUTI+0.0381 SSI: z‑score 1.2192 divided by 6 = +0.2032SSI+0.2032 CDI: z‑score 0.2764 divided by 6 = +0.0461CDI+0.0461 MRSA: z‑score 0.4675 divided by 6 = +0.0779MRSA+0.0779 Total HAC Score: 0.7487Score0.7487 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.5353+0.08920.0892
CLABSI1.7647+0.29410.3833
CAUTI0.2289+0.03810.4214
SSI1.2192+0.20320.6246
CDI0.2764+0.04610.6707
MRSA0.4675+0.07790.7486
Total HAC Score0.7487
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3695 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $253K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $253K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $253K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7487 This hospital 0.7487 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $253K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $253Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7487 This hospital 0.7487

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$252,516
This hospital0.7487−$252,516
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$252,516

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($21,316,177payment+$3,984,343teaching, MA stays−$4,311readmissions−$44,618value-based)×1%the cut=$252,516HAC cut

$252,516HAC cut÷1,081traditional Medicare stays=$234per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $253K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$4K and −$45K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $14,370,650
Teaching (indirect medical education) $1,982,144
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $3,984,343
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $511,451
Outliers: unusually costly stays $2,329,914
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,404,697
Uncompensated care $717,321
Total, before the three programs $25,300,520
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9997 − 1) −$4,311
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9969 − 1) −$44,618
After these two $25,251,591
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $192⁠–⁠317K −$252,516
Net of the three programs likely −$354K to −$243K −$301,445

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$14,370,650
Teaching (indirect medical education)$1,982,144
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$3,984,343
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$511,451
Outliers: unusually costly stays$2,329,914
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,404,697
Uncompensated care$717,321
Total, before the three programs$25,300,520
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9997 − 1))−$4,311
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9969 − 1))−$44,618
After these two$25,251,591
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $192–317K)−$252,516
Net of the three programs (likely −$354K to −$243K)−$301,445

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.7487same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$253Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7487 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $253K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSI0.411 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSI0.267 or lower
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0651 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.367 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.642 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.562 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.449 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.921 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.7487 among its measured results: +0.2941.
  • PSI 90 +0.0892
  • CLABSI +0.2941
  • CAUTI +0.0381
  • SSI +0.2032
  • CDI +0.0461
  • MRSA +0.0779

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.5353+0.0892same
CLABSI1.7647+0.2941same
CAUTI0.2289+0.0381same
SSI1.2192+0.2032same
CDI0.2764+0.0461same
MRSA0.4675+0.0779same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/390090/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 6 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0250, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.0000, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.6600, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.4375, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.0871, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.1959, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2956, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.3011, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.3516, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.7571, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7487, higher than 88% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0250, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.0000, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.6600, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.4375, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.0871, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.1959, higher than 67% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2956, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.3011, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.3516, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.7571, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7487, higher than 88% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.025060.2%not cut
FY20167.000076.6%cut
FY20177.660091.3%cut
FY20180.437579.1%cut
FY20190.087160.0%not cut
FY20200.195967.5%not cut
FY20210.295672.8%not cut
FY20220.301175.0%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.351673.9%not cut
FY20250.757189.4%cut
FY20260.748788.5%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.20 → 0.83 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.203CLABSI, 2018: 0.925CLABSI, 2019: 1.221CLABSI, 2021: 2.232CLABSI, 2022: 0.737CLABSI, 2023: 1.799CLABSI, 2024: 0.827 CAUTI 0.55 → 0.59 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.550CAUTI, 2018: 0.468CAUTI, 2019: 0.999CAUTI, 2021: 0.946CAUTI, 2022: 0.673CAUTI, 2023: 0.686CAUTI, 2024: 0.586 SSI, colon 0.35 → 1.75 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.354SSI, colon, 2018: 1.047SSI, colon, 2019: 0.947SSI, colon, 2021: 1.571SSI, colon, 2022: 1.825SSI, colon, 2023: 2.254SSI, colon, 2024: 1.753 SSI, hysterectomy 3.21 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 3.214SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 2.243SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.145SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.668SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 2.010SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.337SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.377 MRSA 0.32 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.316MRSA, 2018: 1.048MRSA, 2019: 0.323MRSA, 2021: 0.979MRSA, 2022: 0.536MRSA, 2023: 1.358MRSA, 2024: 0.468 C. diff 0.72 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.719C. diff, 2018: 1.001C. diff, 2019: 1.141C. diff, 2021: 1.050C. diff, 2022: 0.653C. diff, 2023: 0.241C. diff, 2024: 0.644 CLABSI 1.20 → 0.83 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.203CLABSI, 2018: 0.925CLABSI, 2019: 1.221CLABSI, 2021: 2.232CLABSI, 2022: 0.737CLABSI, 2023: 1.799CLABSI, 2024: 0.827 CAUTI 0.55 → 0.59 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.550CAUTI, 2018: 0.468CAUTI, 2019: 0.999CAUTI, 2021: 0.946CAUTI, 2022: 0.673CAUTI, 2023: 0.686CAUTI, 2024: 0.586 SSI, colon 0.35 → 1.75 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.354SSI, colon, 2018: 1.047SSI, colon, 2019: 0.947SSI, colon, 2021: 1.571SSI, colon, 2022: 1.825SSI, colon, 2023: 2.254SSI, colon, 2024: 1.753 SSI, hysterectomy 3.21 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 3.214SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 2.243SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.145SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.668SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 2.010SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.337SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.377 MRSA 0.32 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.316MRSA, 2018: 1.048MRSA, 2019: 0.323MRSA, 2021: 0.979MRSA, 2022: 0.536MRSA, 2023: 1.358MRSA, 2024: 0.468 C. diff 0.72 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.719C. diff, 2018: 1.001C. diff, 2019: 1.141C. diff, 2021: 1.050C. diff, 2022: 0.653C. diff, 2023: 0.241C. diff, 2024: 0.644

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.2030.5500.3543.2140.3160.719
20180.9250.4681.0472.2431.0481.001
20191.2210.9990.9471.1450.3231.141
20212.2320.9461.5711.6680.9791.050
20220.7370.6731.8252.0100.5360.653
20231.7990.6862.2541.3371.3580.241
20240.8270.5861.7530.3770.4680.644

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Pennsylvania, its score is higher than 89% of the other 129 scored there.

In Pittsburgh, PA area, its score is higher than 81% of the other 27 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (300 to 499 beds) to 39% (Pittsburgh, PA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut Pennsylvania: CMS cut 36 of 130 (28%); middle score 0.1104Pennsylvania 130 hospitals28% cut Pittsburgh, PA area: CMS cut 11 of 28 (39%); middle score 0.2590Pittsburgh, PA area 28 hospitals39% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.7487 This hospital 0.7487 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut Pennsylvania: CMS cut 36 of 130 (28%); middle score 0.1104Pennsylvania130 hospitals28% cut Pittsburgh, PA area: CMS cut 11 of 28 (39%); middle score 0.2590Pittsburgh, PA area28 hospitals39% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.7487 This hospital 0.7487

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045388%
Northeast region43612428%0.047887%
Pennsylvania1303628%0.110489%
Pittsburgh, PA area281139%0.259081%
Major teaching42413632%0.178086%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038492%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013488%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057490%
This hospital0.7487
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi8. UPMC McKeesport Hospital, McKeesport: score 0.3062, not cut, 9 miles87. UPMC Passavant, Pittsburgh: score 0.0877, not cut, 9 miles76. St Clair Hospital, Pittsburgh: score −0.4668, not cut, 9 miles65. UPMC St Margaret, Pittsburgh: score 0.2493, not cut, 3 miles54. Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh: score 0.1332, not cut, 3 miles43. UPMC Mercy, Pittsburgh: score −0.0130, not cut, 2 miles32. Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh: score 0.8548, cut, 2 miles21. UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, Pittsburgh: score 0.8919, cut, 2 miles1This hospital: West Penn Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, Pittsburgh, PA20.8919cut
Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh, PA20.8548cut
UPMC Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA2−0.0130not cut
Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA30.1332not cut
UPMC St Margaret, Pittsburgh, PA30.2493not cut
St Clair Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA9−0.4668not cut
UPMC Passavant, Pittsburgh, PA90.0877not cut
UPMC McKeesport Hospital, McKeesport, PA90.3062not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1UPMC Presbyterian ShadysidePittsburgh, PA20.89191% cut$2.8MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
2Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC Health SystemPittsburgh, PA20.85481% cut$127KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
3UPMC MercyPittsburgh, PA2−0.0130No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Allegheny General HospitalPittsburgh, PA30.1332No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
5UPMC St MargaretPittsburgh, PA30.2493No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6St Clair HospitalPittsburgh, PA9−0.4668No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
7UPMC PassavantPittsburgh, PA90.0877No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8UPMC McKeesport HospitalMcKeesport, PA90.3062No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. West Penn Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/390090/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.