P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalGarnet Health Medical Center Catskills Estimated FY2026 net: −$201K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 330386

1Hospital

Garnet Health Medical Center Catskills

2Location

Harris, NY (New York’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 12742

Sullivan County

3Type

Minor teaching · 164 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

1.4879

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$139K estimate
Likely $99⁠–⁠156K; about $152 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$139K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.4879 for Garnet Health Medical Center Catskills and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $13.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $152 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $99–156K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.4879 This hospital 1.4879 lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.4879 This hospital 1.4879

Higher than 98% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 7 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 4 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.5719, to 0.9160. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 4 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9165

    Z-score−0.5026

    Part of score−0.1257

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.438

    Z-score2.1477

    Part of score+0.5369

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.933

    Z-score2.1505

    Part of score+0.5376

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.729

    Z-score2.1561

    Part of score+0.5390

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.91650.9623−0.5026−0.1257Better than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI1.4380.4892.1477+0.5369Worse than 94% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.9330.3462.1505+0.5376Worse than 94% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.7290.6412.1561+0.5390Worse than 94% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 4; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.5026PSI 90+2.1477CAUTI+2.1505CDI+2.1561MRSA)÷4measures=1.4879Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 1.1087 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 1.4879, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5026 divided by 4 = −0.1257PSI 90−0.1257 CAUTI: z‑score 2.1477 divided by 4 = +0.5369CAUTI+0.5369 CDI: z‑score 2.1505 divided by 4 = +0.5376CDI+0.5376 MRSA: z‑score 2.1561 divided by 4 = +0.5390MRSA+0.5390 Total HAC Score: 1.4879Score1.4879 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5026 divided by 4 = −0.1257PSI 90−0.1257 CAUTI: z‑score 2.1477 divided by 4 = +0.5369CAUTI+0.5369 CDI: z‑score 2.1505 divided by 4 = +0.5376CDI+0.5376 MRSA: z‑score 2.1561 divided by 4 = +0.5390MRSA+0.5390 Total HAC Score: 1.4879Score1.4879 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.5026−0.1257−0.1257
CAUTI2.1477+0.53690.4112
CDI2.1505+0.53760.9488
MRSA2.1561+0.53901.4878
Total HAC Score1.4879
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.1087 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $139K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $139K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $139K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.4879 This hospital 1.4879 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $139K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $139Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.4879 This hospital 1.4879

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$138,663
This hospital1.4879−$138,663
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$138,663

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($13,852,669payment+$75,512teaching, MA stays−$5,240readmissions−$56,631value-based)×1%the cut=$138,663HAC cut

$138,663HAC cut÷912traditional Medicare stays=$152per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $139K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$5K and −$57K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $10,480,583
Teaching (indirect medical education) $152,388
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $75,512
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $527,173
Outliers: unusually costly stays $190,642
Low-volume adjustment $967,164
Capital: buildings and equipment $832,824
Uncompensated care $701,895
Total, before the three programs $13,928,181
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9995 − 1) −$5,240
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9946 − 1) −$56,631
After these two $13,866,310
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $99⁠–⁠156K −$138,663
Net of the three programs likely −$212K to −$139K −$200,534

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$10,480,583
Teaching (indirect medical education)$152,388
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$75,512
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$527,173
Outliers: unusually costly stays$190,642
Low-volume adjustment$967,164
Capital: buildings and equipment$832,824
Uncompensated care$701,895
Total, before the three programs$13,928,181
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9995 − 1))−$5,240
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9946 − 1))−$56,631
After these two$13,866,310
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $99–156K)−$138,663
Net of the three programs (likely −$212K to −$139K)−$200,534

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score1.4879same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$139Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.4879 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $139K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 4 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9165 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1745

CMS 1.438 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0603

CMS 0.933 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0968

CMS 1.729 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0522

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 1.4879 among its measured results: +0.5390.
  • PSI 90 −0.1257
  • CAUTI +0.5369
  • CDI +0.5376
  • MRSA +0.5390

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 4, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.5026−0.1257same
CAUTI2.1477+0.5369same
CDI2.1505+0.5376same
MRSA2.1561+0.5390same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 6 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 7 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.8000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.8100, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.9875, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2019: score 1.2364, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.4283, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.1854, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.0027, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.5189, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.2923, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 1.4879, higher than 98% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.8000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.8100, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.9875, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2019: score 1.2364, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.4283, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.1854, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2022: score 1.0027, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.5189, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.2923, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 1.4879, higher than 98% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.800022.2%not cut
FY20166.000056.2%not cut
FY20177.810092.3%cut
FY20180.987593.7%cut
FY20191.236496.3%cut
FY20201.428398.8%cut
FY20211.185497.9%cut
FY20221.002795.4%cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.518918.6%not cut
FY20250.292371.1%not cut
FY20261.487998.0%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 1.50 → 1.63 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 1.502CAUTI, 2018: 1.765CAUTI, 2019: 1.246CAUTI, 2021: 0.861CAUTI, 2022: 0.523CAUTI, 2023: 1.625 C. diff 1.83 → 0.76 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.827C. diff, 2018: 1.322C. diff, 2019: 1.641C. diff, 2021: 0.666C. diff, 2022: 0.444C. diff, 2023: 1.103C. diff, 2024: 0.758 CAUTI 1.50 → 1.63 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 1.502CAUTI, 2018: 1.765CAUTI, 2019: 1.246CAUTI, 2021: 0.861CAUTI, 2022: 0.523CAUTI, 2023: 1.625 C. diff 1.83 → 0.76 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.827C. diff, 2018: 1.322C. diff, 2019: 1.641C. diff, 2021: 0.666C. diff, 2022: 0.444C. diff, 2023: 1.103C. diff, 2024: 0.758

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTIC. diff
20171.5021.827
20181.7651.322
20191.2461.641
20210.8610.666
20220.5230.444
20231.6251.103
20240.758

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In New York, its score is higher than 98% of the other 125 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 36% (New York).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut New York: CMS cut 45 of 126 (36%); middle score 0.1614New York 126 hospitals36% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 1.4879 This hospital 1.4879 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut New York: CMS cut 45 of 126 (36%); middle score 0.1614New York126 hospitals36% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 1.4879 This hospital 1.4879

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045398%
Northeast region43612428%0.047899%
New York1264536%0.161498%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056799%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073299%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013498%
Rural61919632%0.022996%
This hospital1.4879
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 25 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Northern Dutchess Hospital, Rhinebeck: score −0.6757, not cut, 44 miles87. Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Poughkeepsie: score −0.1763, not cut, 40 miles76. Healthalliance Hospital Marys Avenue Campus, Kingston: score 0.1246, not cut, 39 miles65. Montefiore St Luke's Cornwall, Newburgh: score 0.7227, cut, 39 miles54. St Anthony Community Hospital, Warwick: score −0.3712, not cut, 37 miles43. Wayne Memorial Hospital, Honesdale: score 0.4605, cut, 30 miles32. Garnet Health Medical Center, Middletown: score 0.1208, not cut, 27 miles21. Bon Secours Community Hospital, Port Jervis: score 0.4236, cut, 25 miles1This hospital: Garnet Health Medical Center Catskills

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Bon Secours Community Hospital, Port Jervis, NY250.4236cut
Garnet Health Medical Center, Middletown, NY270.1208not cut
Wayne Memorial Hospital, Honesdale, PA300.4605cut
St Anthony Community Hospital, Warwick, NY37−0.3712not cut
Montefiore St Luke's Cornwall, Newburgh, NY390.7227cut
Healthalliance Hospital Marys Avenue Campus, Kingston, NY390.1246not cut
Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Poughkeepsie, NY40−0.1763not cut
Northern Dutchess Hospital, Rhinebeck, NY44−0.6757not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Bon Secours Community HospitalPort Jervis, NY250.42361% cut$95KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
2Garnet Health Medical CenterMiddletown, NY270.1208No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Wayne Memorial HospitalHonesdale, PA300.46051% cut$128KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4St Anthony Community HospitalWarwick, NY37−0.3712No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
5Montefiore St Luke's CornwallNewburgh, NY390.72271% cut$394KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
6Healthalliance Hospital Marys Avenue CampusKingston, NY390.1246No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Vassar Brothers Medical CenterPoughkeepsie, NY40−0.1763No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Northern Dutchess HospitalRhinebeck, NY44−0.6757No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Garnet Health Medical Center Catskills, Harris, NY: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/330386/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.