P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalGarnet Health Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$539K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 330126

1Hospital

Garnet Health Medical Center

2Location

Middletown, NY (New York’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 10940

Orange County

3Type

Major teaching · 450 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.1208

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $1.3M, likely $1.1⁠–⁠1.4M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1208 for Garnet Health Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $1.3M estimate 1% of about $130M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.2591 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $1.1–1.4M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1208 This hospital 0.1208 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1208 This hospital 0.1208

Higher than 60% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 8 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.2962, to −0.1754. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 92% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8102

    Z-score−1.2442

    Part of score−0.2074

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 82% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.172

    Z-score−1.0075

    Part of score−0.1679

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 67% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.656

    Z-score0.2627

    Part of score+0.0438

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 82% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.398

    Z-score0.9383

    Part of score+0.1564

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.805

    Z-score1.6548

    Part of score+0.2758

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 60% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.755

    Z-score0.1206

    Part of score+0.0201

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.81020.9623−1.2442−0.2074Better than 92% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.1720.559−1.0075−0.1679Better than 82% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6560.4890.2627+0.0438Worse than 67% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.3980.7950.9383+0.1564Worse than 82% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.8050.3461.6548+0.2758Worse than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.7550.6410.1206+0.0201Worse than 60% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−1.2442PSI 90−1.0075CLABSI+0.2627CAUTI+0.9383SSI+1.6548CDI+0.1206MRSA)÷6measures=0.1208Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2591 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.1208, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.2442 divided by 6 = −0.2074PSI 90−0.2074 CLABSI: z‑score −1.0075 divided by 6 = −0.1679CLABSI−0.1679 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2627 divided by 6 = +0.0438CAUTI+0.0438 SSI: z‑score 0.9383 divided by 6 = +0.1564SSI+0.1564 CDI: z‑score 1.6548 divided by 6 = +0.2758CDI+0.2758 MRSA: z‑score 0.1206 divided by 6 = +0.0201MRSA+0.0201 Total HAC Score: 0.1208Score0.1208 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.2442 divided by 6 = −0.2074PSI 90−0.2074 CLABSI: z‑score −1.0075 divided by 6 = −0.1679CLABSI−0.1679 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2627 divided by 6 = +0.0438CAUTI+0.0438 SSI: z‑score 0.9383 divided by 6 = +0.1564SSI+0.1564 CDI: z‑score 1.6548 divided by 6 = +0.2758CDI+0.2758 MRSA: z‑score 0.1206 divided by 6 = +0.0201MRSA+0.0201 Total HAC Score: 0.1208Score0.1208 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−1.2442−0.2074−0.2074
CLABSI−1.0075−0.1679−0.3753
CAUTI0.2627+0.0438−0.3315
SSI0.9383+0.1564−0.1751
CDI1.6548+0.27580.1007
MRSA0.1206+0.02010.1208
Total HAC Score0.1208
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2591 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.2591 higher, the cut would have been about $1.3M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.3M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.3M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1208 This hospital 0.1208 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.3M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.3Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1208 This hospital 0.1208

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,300,608
This hospital0.1208$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,300,608

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($122,296,649payment+$8,303,318teaching, MA stays−$684,565readmissions+$145,356value-based)×1%the cut=$1,300,608at stake

$1,300,608at stake÷6,845traditional Medicare stays=$190per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $1.3M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$685K and +$145K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $93,776,095
Teaching (indirect medical education) $14,455,585
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $8,303,318
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,962,734
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,023,097
Capital: buildings and equipment $8,387,257
Uncompensated care $2,691,881
Total, before the three programs $130,599,967
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9927 − 1) −$684,565
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0016 − 1) +$145,356
After these two $130,060,758
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $1,300,608 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$590K to −$466K −$539,209

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$93,776,095
Teaching (indirect medical education)$14,455,585
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$8,303,318
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,962,734
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,023,097
Capital: buildings and equipment$8,387,257
Uncompensated care$2,691,881
Total, before the three programs$130,599,967
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9927 − 1))−$684,565
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0016 − 1))+$145,356
After these two$130,060,758
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $1,300,608)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$590K to −$466K)−$539,209

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.1208same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1208 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $1.3M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0321
CLABSIup to 0.840
CAUTIup to 1.299
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAup to 1.496

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8102 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.172 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.656 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.398 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.805 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.755 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.1208 among its measured results: +0.2758.
  • PSI 90 −0.2074
  • CLABSI −0.1679
  • CAUTI +0.0438
  • SSI +0.1564
  • CDI +0.2758
  • MRSA +0.0201

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−1.2442−0.2074same
CLABSI−1.0075−0.1679same
CAUTI0.2627+0.0438same
SSI0.9383+0.1564same
CDI1.6548+0.2758same
MRSA0.1206+0.0201same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 6 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 8 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.9500, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.8000, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.3849, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.4689, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4993, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.8328, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.8020, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.5821, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.5483, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.1208, higher than 60% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.9500, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.8000, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.3849, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.4689, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.4993, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.8328, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.8020, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.5821, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.5483, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.1208, higher than 60% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.950039.4%not cut
FY20166.500068.6%not cut
FY20177.800092.3%cut
FY20180.384976.8%cut
FY20190.468980.4%cut
FY20200.499383.0%cut
FY20210.832893.2%cut
FY20220.802091.8%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.582182.9%cut
FY20250.548383.3%cut
FY20260.120860.2%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.18 → 0.10 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.183CLABSI, 2018: 1.471CLABSI, 2019: 1.720CLABSI, 2021: 1.048CLABSI, 2022: 0.609CLABSI, 2023: 0.274CLABSI, 2024: 0.099 CAUTI 1.37 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.371CAUTI, 2018: 1.518CAUTI, 2019: 0.456CAUTI, 2021: 1.912CAUTI, 2022: 1.063CAUTI, 2023: 0.848CAUTI, 2024: 0.482 SSI, colon 0.75 → 1.06 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.750SSI, colon, 2018: 1.052SSI, colon, 2019: 1.570SSI, colon, 2021: 0.395SSI, colon, 2022: 0.925SSI, colon, 2023: 1.750SSI, colon, 2024: 1.062 SSI, hysterectomy 1.38 → 0.72 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.378SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.811SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.510SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.722 MRSA 1.33 → 0.40 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.330MRSA, 2018: 1.141MRSA, 2019: 1.406MRSA, 2021: 1.435MRSA, 2022: 2.143MRSA, 2023: 1.232MRSA, 2024: 0.396 C. diff 1.02 → 0.71 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.025C. diff, 2018: 0.761C. diff, 2019: 0.827C. diff, 2021: 0.907C. diff, 2022: 1.163C. diff, 2023: 0.922C. diff, 2024: 0.706 CLABSI 1.18 → 0.10 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.183CLABSI, 2018: 1.471CLABSI, 2019: 1.720CLABSI, 2021: 1.048CLABSI, 2022: 0.609CLABSI, 2023: 0.274CLABSI, 2024: 0.099 CAUTI 1.37 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.371CAUTI, 2018: 1.518CAUTI, 2019: 0.456CAUTI, 2021: 1.912CAUTI, 2022: 1.063CAUTI, 2023: 0.848CAUTI, 2024: 0.482 SSI, colon 0.75 → 1.06 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.750SSI, colon, 2018: 1.052SSI, colon, 2019: 1.570SSI, colon, 2021: 0.395SSI, colon, 2022: 0.925SSI, colon, 2023: 1.750SSI, colon, 2024: 1.062 SSI, hysterectomy 1.38 → 0.72 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.378SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.811SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.510SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.722 MRSA 1.33 → 0.40 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.330MRSA, 2018: 1.141MRSA, 2019: 1.406MRSA, 2021: 1.435MRSA, 2022: 2.143MRSA, 2023: 1.232MRSA, 2024: 0.396 C. diff 1.02 → 0.71 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.025C. diff, 2018: 0.761C. diff, 2019: 0.827C. diff, 2021: 0.907C. diff, 2022: 1.163C. diff, 2023: 0.922C. diff, 2024: 0.706

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.1831.3710.7501.3781.3301.025
20181.4711.5181.0521.1410.761
20191.7200.4561.5701.4060.827
20211.0481.9120.3950.8111.4350.907
20220.6091.0630.9250.0002.1431.163
20230.2740.8481.7502.5101.2320.922
20240.0990.4821.0620.7220.3960.706

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In New York, its score is higher than 48% of the other 125 scored there.

In Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY area, its score is higher than 60% of the other 5 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (300 to 499 beds) to 36% (New York).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut New York: CMS cut 45 of 126 (36%); middle score 0.1614New York 126 hospitals36% cut Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY area: CMS cut 2 of 6 (33%); middle score −0.0278Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY area6 hospitals33% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.1208 This hospital 0.1208 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut New York: CMS cut 45 of 126 (36%); middle score 0.1614New York126 hospitals36% cut Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY area: CMS cut 2 of 6 (33%); middle score −0.0278Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY area6 hospitals33% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.1208 This hospital 0.1208

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045360%
Northeast region43612428%0.047854%
New York1264536%0.161448%
Kiryas Joel-Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, NY area6233%−0.027860%
Major teaching42413632%0.178045%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038462%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013458%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057461%
This hospital0.1208
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 12 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Poughkeepsie: score −0.1763, not cut, 28 miles87. Hudson Valley Hospital Center, Cortlandt Manor: score −0.8542, not cut, 27 miles76. Garnet Health Medical Center Catskills, Harris: score 1.4879, cut, 27 miles65. Good Samaritan Hospital of Suffern, Suffern: score −0.5762, not cut, 26 miles54. Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw: score −1.3186, not cut, 25 miles43. Montefiore St Luke's Cornwall, Newburgh: score 0.7227, cut, 19 miles32. Bon Secours Community Hospital, Port Jervis: score 0.4236, cut, 17 miles21. St Anthony Community Hospital, Warwick: score −0.3712, not cut, 12 miles1This hospital: Garnet Health Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
St Anthony Community Hospital, Warwick, NY12−0.3712not cut
Bon Secours Community Hospital, Port Jervis, NY170.4236cut
Montefiore St Luke's Cornwall, Newburgh, NY190.7227cut
Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY25−1.3186not cut
Good Samaritan Hospital of Suffern, Suffern, NY26−0.5762not cut
Garnet Health Medical Center Catskills, Harris, NY271.4879cut
Hudson Valley Hospital Center, Cortlandt Manor, NY27−0.8542not cut
Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Poughkeepsie, NY28−0.1763not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1St Anthony Community HospitalWarwick, NY12−0.3712No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
2Bon Secours Community HospitalPort Jervis, NY170.42361% cut$95KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
3Montefiore St Luke's CornwallNewburgh, NY190.72271% cut$394KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
4Helen Hayes HospitalWest Haverstraw, NY25−1.3186No cutno estimateAbove the national median on 0 of 1 measures
5Good Samaritan Hospital of SuffernSuffern, NY26−0.5762No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
6Garnet Health Medical Center CatskillsHarris, NY271.48791% cut$139KAbove the national median on 3 of 4 measures
7Hudson Valley Hospital CenterCortlandt Manor, NY27−0.8542No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Vassar Brothers Medical CenterPoughkeepsie, NY28−0.1763No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Garnet Health Medical Center, Middletown, NY: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/330126/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.