P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalNorth Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore Amory Estimated FY2026 net: −$8K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 250025

1Hospital

North Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore Amory

2Location

Amory, MS (Mississippi’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 38821

Monroe County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 95 beds · For-profit · Rural

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.0360

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $68K, likely $50⁠–⁠84K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0360 for North Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore Amory and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $68K estimate 1% of about $6.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.3439 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $50–84K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0360 This hospital 0.0360 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0360 This hospital 0.0360

Higher than 55% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 4 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.2103, to −0.1743. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 4 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 71% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9038

    Z-score−0.5908

    Part of score−0.1477

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 78% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.838

    Z-score0.7014

    Part of score+0.1754

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.826

    Z-score−0.0415

    Part of score−0.0104

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.397

    Z-score0.0750

    Part of score+0.0188

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.90380.9623−0.5908−0.1477Better than 71% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI0.8380.4890.7014+0.1754Worse than 78% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.8260.795−0.0415−0.0104Worse than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3970.3460.0750+0.0188Worse than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 4; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.5908PSI 90+0.7014CAUTI−0.0415SSI+0.0750CDI)÷4measures=0.0360Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3439 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.0360, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5908 divided by 4 = −0.1477PSI 90−0.1477 CAUTI: z‑score 0.7014 divided by 4 = +0.1754CAUTI+0.1754 SSI: z‑score −0.0415 divided by 4 = −0.0104SSI−0.0104 CDI: z‑score 0.0750 divided by 4 = +0.0188CDI+0.0188 Total HAC Score: 0.0360Score0.0360 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5908 divided by 4 = −0.1477PSI 90−0.1477 CAUTI: z‑score 0.7014 divided by 4 = +0.1754CAUTI+0.1754 SSI: z‑score −0.0415 divided by 4 = −0.0104SSI−0.0104 CDI: z‑score 0.0750 divided by 4 = +0.0188CDI+0.0188 Total HAC Score: 0.0360Score0.0360 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.5908−0.1477−0.1477
CAUTI0.7014+0.17540.0277
SSI−0.0415−0.01040.0173
CDI0.0750+0.01880.0361
Total HAC Score0.0360
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3439 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.3439 higher, the cut would have been about $68K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $68K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $68K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0360 This hospital 0.0360 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $68K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $68Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0360 This hospital 0.0360

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$67,648
This hospital0.0360$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$67,648

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($6,772,434payment−$22,212readmissions+$14,619value-based)×1%the cut=$67,648at stake

$67,648at stake÷640traditional Medicare stays=$106per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $68K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$22K and +$15K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $4,627,548
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $138,826
Outliers: unusually costly stays $12,957
Low-volume adjustment $795,157
Capital: buildings and equipment $349,502
Uncompensated care $848,444
Total, before the three programs $6,772,434
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9952 − 1) −$22,212
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0032 − 1) +$14,619
After these two $6,764,841
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $67,648 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$10K to −$5K −$7,593

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$4,627,548
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$138,826
Outliers: unusually costly stays$12,957
Low-volume adjustment$795,157
Capital: buildings and equipment$349,502
Uncompensated care$848,444
Total, before the three programs$6,772,434
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9952 − 1))−$22,212
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0032 − 1))+$14,619
After these two$6,764,841
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $67,648)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$10K to −$5K)−$7,593

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.0360same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0360 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $68K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.1003
CAUTIup to 1.407
SSIup to 1.627
CDIup to 0.751

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 4 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9038 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1745

CMS 0.838 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0603

CMS 0.826 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0428

CMS 0.397 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0968

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.0360 among its measured results: +0.1754.
  • PSI 90 −0.1477
  • CAUTI +0.1754
  • SSI −0.0104
  • CDI +0.0188

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 4, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.5908−0.1477same
CAUTI0.7014+0.1754same
SSI−0.0415−0.0104same
CDI0.0750+0.0188same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250025/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.2833, higher than 17% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.4739, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −1.3552, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.8913, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.7462, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.6627, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4669, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.6294, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0360, higher than 55% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.2833, higher than 17% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.4739, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −1.3552, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.8913, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.7462, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.6627, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4669, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.6294, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0360, higher than 55% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.05006.1%not cut
FY20164.500030.4%not cut
FY20173.283317.1%not cut
FY2018−1.47393.6%not cut
FY2019−1.35524.6%not cut
FY2020−0.89138.8%not cut
FY2021−0.746211.0%not cut
FY2022−0.662713.2%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.466921.4%not cut
FY2025−0.629414.5%not cut
FY20260.036055.0%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 0.00 → 0.82 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.917CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.859CAUTI, 2024: 0.817 SSI, colon 0.73 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.728SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.922SSI, colon, 2022: 1.876SSI, colon, 2023: 0.693SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.00 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.000C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 0.240C. diff, 2021: 0.319C. diff, 2022: 0.135C. diff, 2023: 0.184C. diff, 2024: 0.644 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.82 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.917CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.859CAUTI, 2024: 0.817 SSI, colon 0.73 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.728SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.922SSI, colon, 2022: 1.876SSI, colon, 2023: 0.693SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.00 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.000C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 0.240C. diff, 2021: 0.319C. diff, 2022: 0.135C. diff, 2023: 0.184C. diff, 2024: 0.644

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.0000.7280.000
20180.0000.000
20190.9220.240
20210.9170.319
20220.0001.8760.135
20230.8590.6930.184
20240.8170.0000.644

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Mississippi, its score is higher than 40% of the other 49 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 36% (Mississippi).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi 50 hospitals36% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.0360 This hospital 0.0360 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi50 hospitals36% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.0360 This hospital 0.0360

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045355%
South region1,17426322%−0.105658%
Mississippi501836%0.192340%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105358%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115458%
For-profit6519815%−0.259068%
Rural61919632%0.022951%
This hospital0.0360
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 23 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Baptist Memorial Hospital Booneville, Booneville: score 0.9923, cut, 47 miles87. Baptist Memorial Hospital Union County, New Albany: score 0.3129, not cut, 46 miles76. Fayette Medical Center, Fayette: score 2.1931, cut, 42 miles65. Baptist Memorial Hospital-Oktibbeha County, Starkville: score −0.7016, not cut, 40 miles54. North Mississippi Health Services - South Marion, Winfield: score 0.5965, cut, 37 miles43. BMH-Golden Triangle, Columbus: score 0.3324, not cut, 31 miles32. Clay County Medical Corporation, West Point: score 0.2053, not cut, 26 miles21. North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo: score 0.5942, cut, 23 miles1This hospital: North Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore Amory

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, MS230.5942cut
Clay County Medical Corporation, West Point, MS260.2053not cut
BMH-Golden Triangle, Columbus, MS310.3324not cut
North Mississippi Health Services - South Marion, Winfield, AL370.5965cut
Baptist Memorial Hospital-Oktibbeha County, Starkville, MS40−0.7016not cut
Fayette Medical Center, Fayette, AL422.1931cut
Baptist Memorial Hospital Union County, New Albany, MS460.3129not cut
Baptist Memorial Hospital Booneville, Booneville, MS470.9923cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1North Mississippi Medical CenterTupelo, MS230.59421% cut$1.2MAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Clay County Medical CorporationWest Point, MS260.2053No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
3BMH-Golden TriangleColumbus, MS310.3324No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4North Mississippi Health Services - South MarionWinfield, AL370.59651% cut$26KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
5Baptist Memorial Hospital-Oktibbeha CountyStarkville, MS40−0.7016No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 4 measures
6Fayette Medical CenterFayette, AL422.19311% cut$32KAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures
7Baptist Memorial Hospital Union CountyNew Albany, MS460.3129No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Baptist Memorial Hospital BoonevilleBooneville, MS470.99231% cut$37KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. North Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore Amory, Amory, MS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250025/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.