P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalNorth Mississippi Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$2.0M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 250004

1Hospital

North Mississippi Medical Center

3Type

Minor teaching · 650 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.5942

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$1.2M estimate
Likely $949K⁠–⁠$1.3M; about $159 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$1.2M

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5942 for North Mississippi Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $117M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $159 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $949K–$1.3M

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5942 This hospital 0.5942 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5942 This hospital 0.5942

Higher than 83% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.3777, to 0.2165. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 86% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1547

    Z-score1.1604

    Part of score+0.1934

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 59% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.666

    Z-score0.1385

    Part of score+0.0231

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 86% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.011

    Z-score1.1184

    Part of score+0.1864

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value2.176

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.3620

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 66% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.238

    Z-score−0.5406

    Part of score−0.0901

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 66% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.466

    Z-score−0.4834

    Part of score−0.0806

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.15470.96231.1604+0.1934Worse than 86% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6660.5590.1385+0.0231Worse than 59% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.0110.4891.1184+0.1864Worse than 86% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI2.1760.7952.1717+0.3620Worse than 95% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2380.346−0.5406−0.0901Better than 66% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.4660.641−0.4834−0.0806Better than 66% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.1604PSI 90+0.1385CLABSI+1.1184CAUTI+2.1717SSI−0.5406CDI−0.4834MRSA)÷6measures=0.5942Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2150 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.5942, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.1604 divided by 6 = +0.1934PSI 90+0.1934 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1385 divided by 6 = +0.0231CLABSI+0.0231 CAUTI: z‑score 1.1184 divided by 6 = +0.1864CAUTI+0.1864 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score −0.5406 divided by 6 = −0.0901CDI−0.0901 MRSA: z‑score −0.4834 divided by 6 = −0.0806MRSA−0.0806 Total HAC Score: 0.5942Score0.5942 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.1604 divided by 6 = +0.1934PSI 90+0.1934 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1385 divided by 6 = +0.0231CLABSI+0.0231 CAUTI: z‑score 1.1184 divided by 6 = +0.1864CAUTI+0.1864 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score −0.5406 divided by 6 = −0.0901CDI−0.0901 MRSA: z‑score −0.4834 divided by 6 = −0.0806MRSA−0.0806 Total HAC Score: 0.5942Score0.5942 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.1604+0.19340.1934
CLABSI0.1385+0.02310.2165
CAUTI1.1184+0.18640.4029
SSI2.1717+0.36200.7649
CDI−0.5406−0.09010.6748
MRSA−0.4834−0.08060.5942
Total HAC Score0.5942
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2150 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $1.2M by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.2M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.2M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5942 This hospital 0.5942 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.2M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.2Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5942 This hospital 0.5942

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,166,129
This hospital0.5942−$1,166,129
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,166,129

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($113,930,878payment+$3,545,225teaching, MA stays−$112,456readmissions−$750,778value-based)×1%the cut=$1,166,129HAC cut

$1,166,129HAC cut÷7,337traditional Medicare stays=$159per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $1.2M: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$112K and −$751K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $86,504,610
Teaching (indirect medical education) $5,978,334
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $3,545,225
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $2,839,946
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,508,640
Capital: buildings and equipment $7,072,282
Uncompensated care $10,027,066
Total, before the three programs $117,476,103
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9987 − 1) −$112,456
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9913 − 1) −$750,778
After these two $116,612,869
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $949K⁠–⁠$1.3M −$1,166,129
Net of the three programs likely −$2.2M to −$1.7M −$2,029,363

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$86,504,610
Teaching (indirect medical education)$5,978,334
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$3,545,225
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$2,839,946
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,508,640
Capital: buildings and equipment$7,072,282
Uncompensated care$10,027,066
Total, before the three programs$117,476,103
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9987 − 1))−$112,456
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9913 − 1))−$750,778
After these two$116,612,869
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $949K–$1.3M)−$1,166,129
Net of the three programs (likely −$2.2M to −$1.7M)−$2,029,363

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.5942same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$1.2Msame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5942 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $1.2M, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9698 or lower
CLABSI0.109 or lower
CAUTI0.475 or lower
SSI1.364 or lower
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1547 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.666 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.011 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 2.176 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.238 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.466 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.5942 among its measured results: +0.3620.
  • PSI 90 +0.1934
  • CLABSI +0.0231
  • CAUTI +0.1864
  • SSI +0.3620
  • CDI −0.0901
  • MRSA −0.0806

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.1604+0.1934same
CLABSI0.1385+0.0231same
CAUTI1.1184+0.1864same
SSI2.1717+0.3620same
CDI−0.5406−0.0901same
MRSA−0.4834−0.0806same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.2250, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.2500, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.9100, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1509, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2684, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3401, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2814, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1858, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4179, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1144, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5942, higher than 83% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.2250, higher than 46% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.2500, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.9100, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1509, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2684, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3401, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2814, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1858, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4179, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1144, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5942, higher than 83% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.225046.1%not cut
FY20165.250045.0%not cut
FY20175.910060.7%not cut
FY2018−0.150940.2%not cut
FY2019−0.268432.5%not cut
FY2020−0.340127.8%not cut
FY2021−0.281432.2%not cut
FY2022−0.185838.4%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.417924.4%not cut
FY20250.114460.8%not cut
FY20260.594283.6%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.35 → 0.57 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.352CLABSI, 2018: 0.212CLABSI, 2019: 0.642CLABSI, 2021: 0.658CLABSI, 2022: 0.452CLABSI, 2023: 0.762CLABSI, 2024: 0.570 CAUTI 0.75 → 1.22 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.753CAUTI, 2018: 0.858CAUTI, 2019: 1.070CAUTI, 2021: 0.827CAUTI, 2022: 0.999CAUTI, 2023: 0.813CAUTI, 2024: 1.222 SSI, colon 1.41 → 2.09 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.409SSI, colon, 2018: 1.229SSI, colon, 2019: 0.612SSI, colon, 2021: 1.191SSI, colon, 2022: 1.173SSI, colon, 2023: 2.217SSI, colon, 2024: 2.088 MRSA 0.51 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.514MRSA, 2018: 0.599MRSA, 2019: 0.710MRSA, 2021: 0.303MRSA, 2022: 0.325MRSA, 2023: 0.468MRSA, 2024: 0.464 C. diff 0.75 → 0.22 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.753C. diff, 2018: 0.620C. diff, 2019: 0.546C. diff, 2021: 0.414C. diff, 2022: 0.224C. diff, 2023: 0.253C. diff, 2024: 0.224 CLABSI 0.35 → 0.57 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.352CLABSI, 2018: 0.212CLABSI, 2019: 0.642CLABSI, 2021: 0.658CLABSI, 2022: 0.452CLABSI, 2023: 0.762CLABSI, 2024: 0.570 CAUTI 0.75 → 1.22 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.753CAUTI, 2018: 0.858CAUTI, 2019: 1.070CAUTI, 2021: 0.827CAUTI, 2022: 0.999CAUTI, 2023: 0.813CAUTI, 2024: 1.222 SSI, colon 1.41 → 2.09 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.409SSI, colon, 2018: 1.229SSI, colon, 2019: 0.612SSI, colon, 2021: 1.191SSI, colon, 2022: 1.173SSI, colon, 2023: 2.217SSI, colon, 2024: 2.088 MRSA 0.51 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.514MRSA, 2018: 0.599MRSA, 2019: 0.710MRSA, 2021: 0.303MRSA, 2022: 0.325MRSA, 2023: 0.468MRSA, 2024: 0.464 C. diff 0.75 → 0.22 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.753C. diff, 2018: 0.620C. diff, 2019: 0.546C. diff, 2021: 0.414C. diff, 2022: 0.224C. diff, 2023: 0.253C. diff, 2024: 0.224

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.3520.7531.4090.5140.753
20180.2120.8581.2290.5990.620
20190.6421.0700.6120.7100.546
20210.6580.8271.1910.3030.414
20220.4520.9991.1730.3250.224
20230.7620.8132.2170.4680.253
20240.5701.2222.0880.4640.224

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Mississippi, its score is higher than 73% of the other 49 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 36% (Mississippi).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi 50 hospitals36% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.5942 This hospital 0.5942 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Mississippi: CMS cut 18 of 50 (36%); middle score 0.1923Mississippi50 hospitals36% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.5942 This hospital 0.5942

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045383%
South region1,17426322%−0.105684%
Mississippi501836%0.192373%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056788%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132382%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013483%
Rural61919632%0.022976%
This hospital0.5942
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 23 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. BMH-Golden Triangle, Columbus: score 0.3324, not cut, 52 miles87. Tishomingo Health Services Inc, Iuka: score 0.4390, cut, 48 miles76. Magnolia Regional Health Center, Corinth: score 0.2833, not cut, 47 miles65. Baptist Memorial Hospital North MS, Oxford: score −0.1555, not cut, 47 miles54. Clay County Medical Corporation, West Point: score 0.2053, not cut, 42 miles43. Baptist Memorial Hospital Booneville, Booneville: score 0.9923, cut, 30 miles32. North Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore Amory, Amory: score 0.0360, not cut, 23 miles21. Baptist Memorial Hospital Union County, New Albany: score 0.3129, not cut, 23 miles1This hospital: North Mississippi Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Baptist Memorial Hospital Union County, New Albany, MS230.3129not cut
North Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore Amory, Amory, MS230.0360not cut
Baptist Memorial Hospital Booneville, Booneville, MS300.9923cut
Clay County Medical Corporation, West Point, MS420.2053not cut
Baptist Memorial Hospital North MS, Oxford, MS47−0.1555not cut
Magnolia Regional Health Center, Corinth, MS470.2833not cut
Tishomingo Health Services Inc, Iuka, MS480.4390cut
BMH-Golden Triangle, Columbus, MS520.3324not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Baptist Memorial Hospital Union CountyNew Albany, MS230.3129No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2North Mississippi Medical Center-Gilmore AmoryAmory, MS230.0360No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 4 measures
3Baptist Memorial Hospital BoonevilleBooneville, MS300.99231% cut$37KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
4Clay County Medical CorporationWest Point, MS420.2053No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
5Baptist Memorial Hospital North MSOxford, MS47−0.1555No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Magnolia Regional Health CenterCorinth, MS470.2833No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Tishomingo Health Services IncIuka, MS480.43901% cut$27KAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures
8BMH-Golden TriangleColumbus, MS520.3324No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, MS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/250004/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.