P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAscension River District Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$10K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 230241

1Hospital

Ascension River District Hospital

2Location

East China, MI (Michigan’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 48054

St. Clair County

3Type

Minor teaching · 68 beds · Government · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

2.3133

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$10K estimate
Likely $7⁠–⁠12K; about $92 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$10K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 2.3133 for Ascension River District Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $978K, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $92 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $7–12K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 2.3133 This hospital 2.3133 lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 2.3133 This hospital 2.3133

Higher than 100% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

CMS’s note on the score: This result is not based on performance data; the hospital did not submit data and did not submit an HAI exemption form.

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 2 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Figure 1. CMS published no measure values for this hospital.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 18: This result is not based on performance data; the hospital did not submit data and did not submit an HAI exemption form.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+1.1201

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 18: This result is not based on performance data; the hospital did not submit data and did not submit an HAI exemption form.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+1.1932

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 90no value published0.9623no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CLABSIno value published0.5592.2402+1.1201
CAUTIno value published0.4892.3863+1.1932
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDIno value published0.346no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 2; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.2402CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI)÷2measures=2.3133Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 1.9341 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 2.3133, above CMS’s line.
1% cut CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 2 = +1.1201CLABSI+1.1201 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 2 = +1.1932CAUTI+1.1932 Total HAC Score: 2.3133Score2.3133 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.52.02.5 1% cut CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 2 = +1.1201CLABSI+1.1201 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 2 = +1.1932CAUTI+1.1932 Total HAC Score: 2.3133Score2.3133 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.52.02.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
CLABSI2.2402+1.12011.1201
CAUTI2.3863+1.19322.3133
Total HAC Score2.3133
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.9341 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $10K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $10K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $10K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 This hospital: 2.3133 This hospital 2.3133 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $10K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $10Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 2.3133 This hospital 2.3133

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$9,783
This hospital2.3133−$9,783
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$9,783

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($962,429payment+$15,909teaching, MA stays+$0readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$9,783HAC cut

$9,783HAC cut÷106traditional Medicare stays=$92per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $10K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $871,695
Teaching (indirect medical education) $18,471
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $15,909
Capital: buildings and equipment $72,263
Total, before the three programs $978,338
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $978,338
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $7⁠–⁠12K −$9,783
Net of the three programs likely −$12K to −$7K −$9,783

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, low-income-patient payments, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$871,695
Teaching (indirect medical education)$18,471
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$15,909
Capital: buildings and equipment$72,263
Total, before the three programs$978,338
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$978,338
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $7–12K)−$9,783
Net of the three programs (likely −$12K to −$7K)−$9,783

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score2.3133same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$10Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 2.3133 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $10K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read NoNote
CLABSICMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.
CAUTICMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 2 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.1160

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.1205

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 2.3133: its z‑score divided by 2, the number of measures scored.
  • CLABSI (assigned by CMS) +1.1201
  • CAUTI (assigned by CMS) +1.1932

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 2, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
CLABSI, assigned2.2402+1.1201same
CAUTI, assigned2.3863+1.1932same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230241/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.4000, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 1.2500, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 1.5833, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1840, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.8576, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7808, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5049, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.0496, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.2694, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2231, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 2.3133, higher than 100% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.4000, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 1.2500, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 1.5833, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1840, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.8576, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7808, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5049, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.0496, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.2694, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2231, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 2.3133, higher than 100% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.40008.5%not cut
FY20161.25000.5%not cut
FY20171.58332.9%not cut
FY2018−0.184038.1%not cut
FY20190.857692.1%cut
FY20200.780891.3%cut
FY20210.504983.1%cut
FY2022−0.049648.7%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.269433.6%not cut
FY2025−0.223136.4%not cut
FY20262.3133100.0%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 1 infection measures ended lower than they started.
C. diff 1.32 → 0.67 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle C. diff, 2017: 1.320C. diff, 2018: 1.723C. diff, 2019: 0.536C. diff, 2021: 0.671 C. diff 1.32 → 0.67 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle C. diff, 2017: 1.320C. diff, 2018: 1.723C. diff, 2019: 0.536C. diff, 2021: 0.671

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearC. diff
20171.320
20181.723
20190.536
20210.671
2022
2023
2024

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Michigan, its score is higher than 100% of the other 87 scored there.

In Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 20 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 35% (Government).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan 88 hospitals34% cut Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area: CMS cut 7 of 21 (33%); middle score −0.0478Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area21 hospitals33% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government 401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 2.3133 This hospital 2.3133 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan88 hospitals34% cut Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area: CMS cut 7 of 21 (33%); middle score −0.0478Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area21 hospitals33% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 2.3133 This hospital 2.3133

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.0453100%
Midwest region68317425%−0.0268100%
Michigan883034%0.0204100%
Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area21733%−0.0478100%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.0567100%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.1154100%
Government40114035%0.1602100%
Urban2,24151023%−0.0574100%
This hospital2.3133
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 14 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Ascension Providence Rochester Hospital, Rochester: score 0.4946, cut, 35 miles87. Henry Ford Health St John Hospital, Detroit: score 0.3086, not cut, 34 miles76. Beaumont Hospital, Troy, Troy: score 0.3760, not cut, 33 miles65. Henry Ford Health Warren Hospital, Warren: score −0.1115, not cut, 33 miles54. Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township: score −0.1030, not cut, 27 miles43. McLaren Macomb, Mount Clemens: score 0.7710, cut, 24 miles32. McLaren Port Huron, Port Huron: score −0.1864, not cut, 14 miles21. Lake Huron Medical Center, Port Huron: score −0.9147, not cut, 14 miles1This hospital: Ascension River District Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Lake Huron Medical Center, Port Huron, MI14−0.9147not cut
McLaren Port Huron, Port Huron, MI14−0.1864not cut
McLaren Macomb, Mount Clemens, MI240.7710cut
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township, MI27−0.1030not cut
Henry Ford Health Warren Hospital, Warren, MI33−0.1115not cut
Beaumont Hospital, Troy, Troy, MI330.3760not cut
Henry Ford Health St John Hospital, Detroit, MI340.3086not cut
Ascension Providence Rochester Hospital, Rochester, MI350.4946cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Lake Huron Medical CenterPort Huron, MI14−0.9147No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
2McLaren Port HuronPort Huron, MI14−0.1864No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3McLaren MacombMount Clemens, MI240.77101% cut$548KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Henry Ford Macomb HospitalClinton Township, MI27−0.1030No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Henry Ford Health Warren HospitalWarren, MI33−0.1115No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Beaumont Hospital, TroyTroy, MI330.3760No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Henry Ford Health St John HospitalDetroit, MI340.3086No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Ascension Providence Rochester HospitalRochester, MI350.49461% cut$450KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

18
This result is not based on performance data; the hospital did not submit data and did not submit an HAI exemption form.
13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Ascension River District Hospital, East China, MI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230241/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.