P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalMcLaren Macomb Estimated FY2026 net: −$686K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 230227

1Hospital

McLaren Macomb

2Location

Mount Clemens, MI (Michigan’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 48043

Macomb County

3Type

Major teaching · 288 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

1 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.7710

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$548K estimate
Likely $417⁠–⁠689K; about $211 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$548K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7710 for McLaren Macomb and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $54.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $211 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $417–689K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7710 This hospital 0.7710 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.7710 This hospital 0.7710

Higher than 89% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.3777, to 0.3933. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 90% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.2045

    Z-score1.5081

    Part of score+0.2514

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 63% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.707

    Z-score0.2336

    Part of score+0.0389

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 87% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value1.043

    Z-score1.1955

    Part of score+0.1993

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value3.711

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.3620

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 80% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.144

    Z-score−0.9046

    Part of score−0.1508

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 70% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS footnote 29: This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

    CMS value0.899

    Z-score0.4215

    Part of score+0.0702

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.20450.96231.5081+0.2514Worse than 90% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7070.5590.2336+0.0389Worse than 63% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.0430.4891.1955+0.1993Worse than 87% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI3.7110.7952.1717+0.3620Worse than 99% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1440.346−0.9046−0.1508Better than 80% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.8990.6410.4215+0.0702Worse than 70% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.5081PSI 90+0.2336CLABSI+1.1955CAUTI+2.1717SSI−0.9046CDI+0.4215MRSA)÷6measures=0.7710Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3918 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.7710, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.5081 divided by 6 = +0.2514PSI 90+0.2514 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2336 divided by 6 = +0.0389CLABSI+0.0389 CAUTI: z‑score 1.1955 divided by 6 = +0.1993CAUTI+0.1993 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score −0.9046 divided by 6 = −0.1508CDI−0.1508 MRSA: z‑score 0.4215 divided by 6 = +0.0702MRSA+0.0702 Total HAC Score: 0.7710Score0.7710 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.5081 divided by 6 = +0.2514PSI 90+0.2514 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2336 divided by 6 = +0.0389CLABSI+0.0389 CAUTI: z‑score 1.1955 divided by 6 = +0.1993CAUTI+0.1993 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score −0.9046 divided by 6 = −0.1508CDI−0.1508 MRSA: z‑score 0.4215 divided by 6 = +0.0702MRSA+0.0702 Total HAC Score: 0.7710Score0.7710 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.5081+0.25140.2514
CLABSI0.2336+0.03890.2903
CAUTI1.1955+0.19930.4896
SSI2.1717+0.36200.8516
CDI−0.9046−0.15080.7008
MRSA0.4215+0.07020.7710
Total HAC Score0.7710
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3918 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $548K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $548K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $548K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7710 This hospital 0.7710 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $548K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $548Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.7710 This hospital 0.7710

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$547,887
This hospital0.7710−$547,887
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$547,887

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($44,588,216payment+$10,338,543teaching, MA stays−$138,043readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$547,887HAC cut

$547,887HAC cut÷2,602traditional Medicare stays=$211per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $548K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$138K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $32,103,035
Teaching (indirect medical education) $6,747,095
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $10,338,543
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $928,099
Outliers: unusually costly stays $107,545
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,152,103
Uncompensated care $1,550,339
Total, before the three programs $54,926,759
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9957 − 1) −$138,043
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $54,788,716
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $417⁠–⁠689K −$547,887
Net of the three programs likely −$806K to −$552K −$685,930

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$32,103,035
Teaching (indirect medical education)$6,747,095
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$10,338,543
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$928,099
Outliers: unusually costly stays$107,545
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,152,103
Uncompensated care$1,550,339
Total, before the three programs$54,926,759
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9957 − 1))−$138,043
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$54,788,716
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $417–689K)−$547,887
Net of the three programs (likely −$806K to −$552K)−$685,930

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.7710same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$548Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.7710 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $548K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.8676 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTI0.067 or lower
SSI0.745 or lower
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.2045 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.707 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.043 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 3.711 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.144 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.899 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.7710 among its measured results: +0.3620.
  • PSI 90 +0.2514
  • CLABSI +0.0389
  • CAUTI +0.1993
  • SSI +0.3620
  • CDI −0.1508
  • MRSA +0.0702

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.5081+0.2514same
CLABSI0.2336+0.0389same
CAUTI1.1955+0.1993same
SSI2.1717+0.3620same
CDI−0.9046−0.1508same
MRSA0.4215+0.0702same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3750, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.0000, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.1300, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0859, higher than 44% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3783, higher than 26% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4840, higher than 20% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4717, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.4675, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.4279, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.4959, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7710, higher than 89% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3750, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.0000, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.1300, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0859, higher than 44% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.3783, higher than 26% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4840, higher than 20% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4717, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.4675, higher than 21% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.4279, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.4959, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.7710, higher than 89% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.375082.7%cut
FY20167.000076.6%cut
FY20176.130066.7%not cut
FY2018−0.085944.4%not cut
FY2019−0.378326.4%not cut
FY2020−0.484020.8%not cut
FY2021−0.471721.0%not cut
FY2022−0.467521.4%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.427977.3%cut
FY20250.495981.1%cut
FY20260.771089.1%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.90 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.181CLABSI, 2019: 0.386CLABSI, 2021: 1.468CLABSI, 2022: 1.151CLABSI, 2023: 0.325CLABSI, 2024: 0.897 CAUTI 0.17 → 0.85 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.168CAUTI, 2018: 0.154CAUTI, 2019: 0.481CAUTI, 2021: 0.523CAUTI, 2022: 0.919CAUTI, 2023: 0.978CAUTI, 2024: 0.847 SSI, colon 0.81 → 3.62 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.807SSI, colon, 2018: 1.208SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 3.303SSI, colon, 2022: 2.001SSI, colon, 2023: 3.135SSI, colon, 2024: 3.619 SSI, hysterectomy 1.01 → 5.07 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.008SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.071SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.887SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 5.068 MRSA 0.30 → 0.88 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.298MRSA, 2018: 0.618MRSA, 2019: 0.340MRSA, 2021: 1.250MRSA, 2022: 1.241MRSA, 2023: 1.010MRSA, 2024: 0.882 C. diff 0.64 → 0.13 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.641C. diff, 2018: 0.607C. diff, 2019: 0.196C. diff, 2021: 0.250C. diff, 2022: 0.259C. diff, 2023: 0.168C. diff, 2024: 0.126 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.90 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.181CLABSI, 2019: 0.386CLABSI, 2021: 1.468CLABSI, 2022: 1.151CLABSI, 2023: 0.325CLABSI, 2024: 0.897 CAUTI 0.17 → 0.85 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.168CAUTI, 2018: 0.154CAUTI, 2019: 0.481CAUTI, 2021: 0.523CAUTI, 2022: 0.919CAUTI, 2023: 0.978CAUTI, 2024: 0.847 SSI, colon 0.81 → 3.62 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.807SSI, colon, 2018: 1.208SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 3.303SSI, colon, 2022: 2.001SSI, colon, 2023: 3.135SSI, colon, 2024: 3.619 SSI, hysterectomy 1.01 → 5.07 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.008SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.071SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 1.887SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 5.068 MRSA 0.30 → 0.88 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.298MRSA, 2018: 0.618MRSA, 2019: 0.340MRSA, 2021: 1.250MRSA, 2022: 1.241MRSA, 2023: 1.010MRSA, 2024: 0.882 C. diff 0.64 → 0.13 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.641C. diff, 2018: 0.607C. diff, 2019: 0.196C. diff, 2021: 0.250C. diff, 2022: 0.259C. diff, 2023: 0.168C. diff, 2024: 0.126

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.0000.1680.8071.0080.2980.641
20180.1810.1541.2081.0710.6180.607
20190.3860.4810.0001.8870.3400.196
20211.4680.5233.3035.0681.2500.250
20221.1510.9192.0011.2410.259
20230.3250.9783.1351.0100.168
20240.8970.8473.6190.8820.126

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Michigan, its score is higher than 85% of the other 87 scored there.

In Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area, its score is higher than 90% of the other 20 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 34% (Michigan).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan 88 hospitals34% cut Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area: CMS cut 7 of 21 (33%); middle score −0.0478Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area21 hospitals33% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.7710 This hospital 0.7710 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan88 hospitals34% cut Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area: CMS cut 7 of 21 (33%); middle score −0.0478Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area21 hospitals33% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.7710 This hospital 0.7710

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045389%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026889%
Michigan883034%0.020485%
Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI area21733%−0.047890%
Major teaching42413632%0.178088%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073291%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013489%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057491%
This hospital0.7710
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 3 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Royal Oak: score 0.5415, cut, 17 miles87. Beaumont Hospital - Grosse Pointe, Grosse Pointe: score −0.3483, not cut, 15 miles76. Ascension Providence Rochester Hospital, Rochester: score 0.4946, cut, 15 miles65. Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital LLC, Warren: score −0.0478, not cut, 14 miles54. Henry Ford Health St John Hospital, Detroit: score 0.3086, not cut, 12 miles43. Beaumont Hospital, Troy, Troy: score 0.3760, not cut, 11 miles32. Henry Ford Health Warren Hospital, Warren: score −0.1115, not cut, 9 miles21. Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township: score −0.1030, not cut, 3 miles1This hospital: McLaren Macomb

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township, MI3−0.1030not cut
Henry Ford Health Warren Hospital, Warren, MI9−0.1115not cut
Beaumont Hospital, Troy, Troy, MI110.3760not cut
Henry Ford Health St John Hospital, Detroit, MI120.3086not cut
Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital LLC, Warren, MI14−0.0478not cut
Ascension Providence Rochester Hospital, Rochester, MI150.4946cut
Beaumont Hospital - Grosse Pointe, Grosse Pointe, MI15−0.3483not cut
Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Royal Oak, MI170.5415cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Henry Ford Macomb HospitalClinton Township, MI3−0.1030No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Henry Ford Health Warren HospitalWarren, MI9−0.1115No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Beaumont Hospital, TroyTroy, MI110.3760No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Henry Ford Health St John HospitalDetroit, MI120.3086No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital LLCWarren, MI14−0.0478No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
6Ascension Providence Rochester HospitalRochester, MI150.49461% cut$450KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Beaumont Hospital - Grosse PointeGrosse Pointe, MI15−0.3483No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Beaumont Hospital Royal OakRoyal Oak, MI170.54151% cut$2.2MAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

29
This measure was calculated using partial performance period data due to a CMS-approved exception.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. McLaren Macomb, Mount Clemens, MI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230227/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.