P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalWyandotte Hospital and Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$956K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 230146

1Hospital

Wyandotte Hospital and Medical Center

2Location

Wyandotte, MI (Michigan’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 48192

Wayne County

3Type

Minor teaching · 345 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3894

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$415K estimate
Likely $316⁠–⁠522K; about $155 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$415K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3894 for Wyandotte Hospital and Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $41.5M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $155 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $316–522K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3894 This hospital 0.3894 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3894 This hospital 0.3894

Higher than 75% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.3337, to 0.0557. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1674

    Z-score1.2490

    Part of score+0.2082

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 67% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.759

    Z-score0.3542

    Part of score+0.0590

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2198

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 62% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.617

    Z-score−0.3996

    Part of score−0.0666

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 74% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.524

    Z-score0.5668

    Part of score+0.0945

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.599

    Z-score1.8845

    Part of score+0.3141

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.16740.96231.2490+0.2082Worse than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7590.5590.3542+0.0590Worse than 67% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2198Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.6170.795−0.3996−0.0666Better than 62% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.5240.3460.5668+0.0945Worse than 74% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.5990.6411.8845+0.3141Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.2490PSI 90+0.3542CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI−0.3996SSI+0.5668CDI+1.8845MRSA)÷6measures=0.3894Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0102 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3894, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.2490 divided by 6 = +0.2082PSI 90+0.2082 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3542 divided by 6 = +0.0590CLABSI+0.0590 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −0.3996 divided by 6 = −0.0666SSI−0.0666 CDI: z‑score 0.5668 divided by 6 = +0.0945CDI+0.0945 MRSA: z‑score 1.8845 divided by 6 = +0.3141MRSA+0.3141 Total HAC Score: 0.3894Score0.3894 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.2490 divided by 6 = +0.2082PSI 90+0.2082 CLABSI: z‑score 0.3542 divided by 6 = +0.0590CLABSI+0.0590 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score −0.3996 divided by 6 = −0.0666SSI−0.0666 CDI: z‑score 0.5668 divided by 6 = +0.0945CDI+0.0945 MRSA: z‑score 1.8845 divided by 6 = +0.3141MRSA+0.3141 Total HAC Score: 0.3894Score0.3894 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.2490+0.20820.2082
CLABSI0.3542+0.05900.2672
CAUTI−1.3186−0.21980.0474
SSI−0.3996−0.0666−0.0192
CDI0.5668+0.09450.0753
MRSA1.8845+0.31410.3894
Total HAC Score0.3894
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0102 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $415K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $415K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $415K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3894 This hospital 0.3894 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $415K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $415Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3894 This hospital 0.3894

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$415,379
This hospital0.3894−$415,379
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$415,379

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($36,895,535payment+$5,182,904teaching, MA stays−$292,508readmissions−$248,067value-based)×1%the cut=$415,379HAC cut

$415,379HAC cut÷2,687traditional Medicare stays=$155per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $415K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$293K and −$248K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $28,677,206
Teaching (indirect medical education) $2,797,461
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $5,182,904
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $816,727
Outliers: unusually costly stays $257,521
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,564,888
Uncompensated care $1,781,732
Total, before the three programs $42,078,439
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9898 − 1) −$292,508
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9913 − 1) −$248,067
After these two $41,537,864
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $316⁠–⁠522K −$415,379
Net of the three programs likely −$1.1M to −$770K −$955,954

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$28,677,206
Teaching (indirect medical education)$2,797,461
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$5,182,904
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$816,727
Outliers: unusually costly stays$257,521
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,564,888
Uncompensated care$1,781,732
Total, before the three programs$42,078,439
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9898 − 1))−$292,508
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9913 − 1))−$248,067
After these two$41,537,864
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $316–522K)−$415,379
Net of the three programs (likely −$1.1M to −$770K)−$955,954

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3894same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$415Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3894 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $415K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.1585 or lower
CLABSI0.732 or lower
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSI0.581 or lower
CDI0.508 or lower
MRSA1.569 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1674 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.759 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.617 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.524 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.599 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3894 among its measured results: +0.3141.
  • PSI 90 +0.2082
  • CLABSI +0.0590
  • CAUTI −0.2198
  • SSI −0.0666
  • CDI +0.0945
  • MRSA +0.3141

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.2490+0.2082same
CLABSI0.3542+0.0590same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198same
SSI−0.3996−0.0666same
CDI0.5668+0.0945same
MRSA1.8845+0.3141same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230146/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.6250, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.1100, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.7886, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.41, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2491, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.1112, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.1256, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.3946, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2626, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3894, higher than 75% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.6250, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.1100, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.7886, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.41, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2491, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.1112, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.1256, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.3946, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.2626, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3894, higher than 75% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.625035.4%not cut
FY20165.000038.0%not cut
FY20177.110084.2%cut
FY20180.788690.3%cut
FY20190.4178.0%cut
FY20200.249170.5%not cut
FY20210.111262.1%not cut
FY20220.125665.2%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.394675.9%cut
FY20250.262669.5%not cut
FY20260.389475.5%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.49 → 0.40 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.489CLABSI, 2018: 1.441CLABSI, 2019: 1.101CLABSI, 2021: 0.976CLABSI, 2022: 2.019CLABSI, 2023: 1.078CLABSI, 2024: 0.402 CAUTI 0.41 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.405CAUTI, 2018: 0.792CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.66 → 0.72 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.657SSI, colon, 2018: 1.840SSI, colon, 2019: 1.041SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.623SSI, colon, 2023: 0.502SSI, colon, 2024: 0.723 SSI, hysterectomy 1.08 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.077SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.552SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 2.281SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.697SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 2.420SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.300SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 2.49 → 1.90 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.492MRSA, 2018: 0.415MRSA, 2019: 0.981MRSA, 2021: 1.883MRSA, 2022: 2.157MRSA, 2023: 1.324MRSA, 2024: 1.896 C. diff 0.52 → 0.52 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.517C. diff, 2018: 0.507C. diff, 2019: 0.324C. diff, 2021: 0.305C. diff, 2022: 0.281C. diff, 2023: 0.528C. diff, 2024: 0.520 CLABSI 0.49 → 0.40 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.489CLABSI, 2018: 1.441CLABSI, 2019: 1.101CLABSI, 2021: 0.976CLABSI, 2022: 2.019CLABSI, 2023: 1.078CLABSI, 2024: 0.402 CAUTI 0.41 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.405CAUTI, 2018: 0.792CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.66 → 0.72 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.657SSI, colon, 2018: 1.840SSI, colon, 2019: 1.041SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.623SSI, colon, 2023: 0.502SSI, colon, 2024: 0.723 SSI, hysterectomy 1.08 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.077SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.552SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 2.281SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.697SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 2.420SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.300SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 2.49 → 1.90 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 2.492MRSA, 2018: 0.415MRSA, 2019: 0.981MRSA, 2021: 1.883MRSA, 2022: 2.157MRSA, 2023: 1.324MRSA, 2024: 1.896 C. diff 0.52 → 0.52 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.517C. diff, 2018: 0.507C. diff, 2019: 0.324C. diff, 2021: 0.305C. diff, 2022: 0.281C. diff, 2023: 0.528C. diff, 2024: 0.520

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.4890.4050.6571.0772.4920.517
20181.4410.7921.8400.5520.4150.507
20191.1010.0001.0412.2810.9810.324
20210.9760.0000.0000.6971.8830.305
20222.0190.0000.6232.4202.1570.281
20231.0780.0000.5021.3001.3240.528
20240.4020.0000.7230.0001.8960.520

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Michigan, its score is higher than 66% of the other 87 scored there.

In Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area, its score is higher than 46% of the other 13 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 7 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 57% (Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan 88 hospitals34% cut Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area: CMS cut 8 of 14 (57%); middle score 0.5176Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area14 hospitals57% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3894 This hospital 0.3894 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan88 hospitals34% cut Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area: CMS cut 8 of 14 (57%); middle score 0.5176Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area14 hospitals57% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3894 This hospital 0.3894

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045375%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026875%
Michigan883034%0.020466%
Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area14857%0.517646%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056779%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038478%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013474%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057477%
This hospital0.3894
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 5 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 6 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Corewell Health Wayne Hospital, Wayne: score 0.6506, cut, 12 miles87. Henry Ford Health Hospital, Detroit: score 0.1266, not cut, 11 miles76. Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit: score 0.6721, cut, 11 miles65. Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit: score 0.2902, not cut, 11 miles54. Harper University Hospital, Detroit: score 0.6458, cut, 11 miles43. Corewell Health Trenton Hospital, Trenton: score 0.3102, not cut, 7 miles32. Beaumont Hospital - Dearborn, Dearborn: score 0.9447, cut, 6 miles21. Beaumont Hospital - Taylor, Taylor: score 1.0796, cut, 6 miles1This hospital: Wyandotte Hospital and Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Beaumont Hospital - Taylor, Taylor, MI61.0796cut
Beaumont Hospital - Dearborn, Dearborn, MI60.9447cut
Corewell Health Trenton Hospital, Trenton, MI70.3102not cut
Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI110.6458cut
Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI110.2902not cut
Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI110.6721cut
Henry Ford Health Hospital, Detroit, MI110.1266not cut
Corewell Health Wayne Hospital, Wayne, MI120.6506cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Beaumont Hospital - TaylorTaylor, MI61.07961% cut$190KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
2Beaumont Hospital - DearbornDearborn, MI60.94471% cut$804KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
3Corewell Health Trenton HospitalTrenton, MI70.3102No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Harper University HospitalDetroit, MI110.64581% cut$500KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
5Karmanos Cancer CenterDetroit, MI110.2902No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 5 measures
6Detroit Receiving HospitalDetroit, MI110.67211% cut$551KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Henry Ford Health HospitalDetroit, MI110.1266No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Corewell Health Wayne HospitalWayne, MI120.65061% cut$208KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Wyandotte Hospital and Medical Center, Wyandotte, MI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230146/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.