P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalHenry Ford Health Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$127K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 230053

1Hospital

Henry Ford Health Hospital

2Location

Detroit, MI (Michigan’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 48202

Wayne County

3Type

Major teaching · 903 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.1266

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $2.1M, likely $1.7⁠–⁠2.3M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1266 for Henry Ford Health Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $2.1M estimate 1% of about $213M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.2533 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $1.7–2.3M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1266 This hospital 0.1266 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.1266 This hospital 0.1266

Higher than 60% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3232, to −0.1966. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0194

    Z-score0.2160

    Part of score+0.0360

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 93% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.395

    Z-score1.8296

    Part of score+0.3049

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.042

    Z-score−1.2174

    Part of score−0.2029

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.219

    Z-score0.6317

    Part of score+0.1053

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.300

    Z-score−0.3005

    Part of score−0.0501

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 62% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.506

    Z-score−0.3998

    Part of score−0.0666

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.01940.96230.2160+0.0360Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.3950.5591.8296+0.3049Worse than 93% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0420.489−1.2174−0.2029Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.2190.7950.6317+0.1053Worse than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3000.346−0.3005−0.0501Better than 57% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.5060.641−0.3998−0.0666Better than 62% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.2160PSI 90+1.8296CLABSI−1.2174CAUTI+0.6317SSI−0.3005CDI−0.3998MRSA)÷6measures=0.1266Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2533 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.1266, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2160 divided by 6 = +0.0360PSI 90+0.0360 CLABSI: z‑score 1.8296 divided by 6 = +0.3049CLABSI+0.3049 CAUTI: z‑score −1.2174 divided by 6 = −0.2029CAUTI−0.2029 SSI: z‑score 0.6317 divided by 6 = +0.1053SSI+0.1053 CDI: z‑score −0.3005 divided by 6 = −0.0501CDI−0.0501 MRSA: z‑score −0.3998 divided by 6 = −0.0666MRSA−0.0666 Total HAC Score: 0.1266Score0.1266 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.2160 divided by 6 = +0.0360PSI 90+0.0360 CLABSI: z‑score 1.8296 divided by 6 = +0.3049CLABSI+0.3049 CAUTI: z‑score −1.2174 divided by 6 = −0.2029CAUTI−0.2029 SSI: z‑score 0.6317 divided by 6 = +0.1053SSI+0.1053 CDI: z‑score −0.3005 divided by 6 = −0.0501CDI−0.0501 MRSA: z‑score −0.3998 divided by 6 = −0.0666MRSA−0.0666 Total HAC Score: 0.1266Score0.1266 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.2160+0.03600.0360
CLABSI1.8296+0.30490.3409
CAUTI−1.2174−0.20290.1380
SSI0.6317+0.10530.2433
CDI−0.3005−0.05010.1932
MRSA−0.3998−0.06660.1266
Total HAC Score0.1266
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2533 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.2533 higher, the cut would have been about $2.1M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2.1M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2.1M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1266 This hospital 0.1266 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2.1M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2.1Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.1266 This hospital 0.1266

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$2,134,656
This hospital0.1266$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$2,134,656

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($143,183,323payment+$70,409,325teaching, MA stays−$210,698readmissions+$83,698value-based)×1%the cut=$2,134,656at stake

$2,134,656at stake÷5,015traditional Medicare stays=$426per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $2.1M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$211K and +$84K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $81,037,676
Teaching (indirect medical education) $33,822,695
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $70,409,325
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $5,371,177
Outliers: unusually costly stays $6,630,503
Capital: buildings and equipment $9,526,007
Uncompensated care $6,795,265
Total, before the three programs $213,592,648
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9974 − 1) −$210,698
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0010 − 1) +$83,698
After these two $213,465,648
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $2,134,656 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$139K to −$110K −$127,000

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$81,037,676
Teaching (indirect medical education)$33,822,695
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$70,409,325
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$5,371,177
Outliers: unusually costly stays$6,630,503
Capital: buildings and equipment$9,526,007
Uncompensated care$6,795,265
Total, before the three programs$213,592,648
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9974 − 1))−$210,698
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0010 − 1))+$83,698
After these two$213,465,648
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $2,134,656)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$139K to −$110K)−$127,000

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.1266same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.1266 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $2.1M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.2364
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIup to 0.670
SSIup to 2.103
CDIup to 0.691
MRSAup to 1.231

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0194 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.395 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.042 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.219 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.300 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.506 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.1266 among its measured results: +0.3049.
  • PSI 90 +0.0360
  • CLABSI +0.3049
  • CAUTI −0.2029
  • SSI +0.1053
  • CDI −0.0501
  • MRSA −0.0666

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.2160+0.0360same
CLABSI1.8296+0.3049same
CAUTI−1.2174−0.2029same
SSI0.6317+0.1053same
CDI−0.3005−0.0501same
MRSA−0.3998−0.0666same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230053/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.0900, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.3086, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.1595, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3390, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5078, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4824, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.1410, higher than 42% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0288, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.1266, higher than 60% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.4000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.0900, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.3086, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.1595, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.3390, higher than 75% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5078, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4824, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.1410, higher than 42% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0288, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.1266, higher than 60% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.400083.3%cut
FY20166.500068.6%not cut
FY20176.090065.7%not cut
FY20180.308672.7%not cut
FY20190.159564.3%not cut
FY20200.339075.3%cut
FY20210.507883.2%cut
FY20220.482482.9%cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.141042.4%not cut
FY20250.028853.9%not cut
FY20260.126660.5%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.69 → 1.51 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.691CLABSI, 2018: 0.822CLABSI, 2019: 1.055CLABSI, 2021: 1.354CLABSI, 2022: 1.506CLABSI, 2023: 1.285CLABSI, 2024: 1.510 CAUTI 0.60 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.604CAUTI, 2018: 0.582CAUTI, 2019: 0.483CAUTI, 2021: 0.204CAUTI, 2022: 0.025CAUTI, 2023: 0.085CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.68 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.682SSI, colon, 2018: 1.461SSI, colon, 2019: 0.848SSI, colon, 2021: 1.588SSI, colon, 2022: 1.620SSI, colon, 2023: 1.528SSI, colon, 2024: 0.935 SSI, hysterectomy 0.59 → 0.58 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.592SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.539SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 2.637SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.213SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 4.545SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.049SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.581 MRSA 0.90 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.902MRSA, 2018: 0.765MRSA, 2019: 0.787MRSA, 2021: 1.127MRSA, 2022: 0.645MRSA, 2023: 0.534MRSA, 2024: 0.478 C. diff 0.84 → 0.23 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.844C. diff, 2018: 0.583C. diff, 2019: 0.383C. diff, 2021: 0.289C. diff, 2022: 0.315C. diff, 2023: 0.376C. diff, 2024: 0.234 CLABSI 0.69 → 1.51 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.691CLABSI, 2018: 0.822CLABSI, 2019: 1.055CLABSI, 2021: 1.354CLABSI, 2022: 1.506CLABSI, 2023: 1.285CLABSI, 2024: 1.510 CAUTI 0.60 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.604CAUTI, 2018: 0.582CAUTI, 2019: 0.483CAUTI, 2021: 0.204CAUTI, 2022: 0.025CAUTI, 2023: 0.085CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.68 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.682SSI, colon, 2018: 1.461SSI, colon, 2019: 0.848SSI, colon, 2021: 1.588SSI, colon, 2022: 1.620SSI, colon, 2023: 1.528SSI, colon, 2024: 0.935 SSI, hysterectomy 0.59 → 0.58 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.592SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.539SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 2.637SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.213SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 4.545SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 2.049SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.581 MRSA 0.90 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.902MRSA, 2018: 0.765MRSA, 2019: 0.787MRSA, 2021: 1.127MRSA, 2022: 0.645MRSA, 2023: 0.534MRSA, 2024: 0.478 C. diff 0.84 → 0.23 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.844C. diff, 2018: 0.583C. diff, 2019: 0.383C. diff, 2021: 0.289C. diff, 2022: 0.315C. diff, 2023: 0.376C. diff, 2024: 0.234

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.6910.6040.6820.5920.9020.844
20180.8220.5821.4611.5390.7650.583
20191.0550.4830.8482.6370.7870.383
20211.3540.2041.5881.2131.1270.289
20221.5060.0251.6204.5450.6450.315
20231.2850.0851.5282.0490.5340.376
20241.5100.0000.9350.5810.4780.234

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Michigan, its score is higher than 52% of the other 87 scored there.

In Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area, its score is higher than 15% of the other 13 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 5 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 57% (Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan 88 hospitals34% cut Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area: CMS cut 8 of 14 (57%); middle score 0.5176Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area14 hospitals57% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.1266 This hospital 0.1266 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Michigan: CMS cut 30 of 88 (34%); middle score 0.0204Michigan88 hospitals34% cut Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area: CMS cut 8 of 14 (57%); middle score 0.5176Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area14 hospitals57% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.1266 This hospital 0.1266

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045360%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026858%
Michigan883034%0.020452%
Detroit-Dearborn-Livonia, MI area14857%0.517615%
Major teaching42413632%0.178045%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132349%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013459%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057462%
This hospital0.1266
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi8. Surgeons Choice Medical Center, Southfield: score −0.1976, not cut, 9 miles87. Beaumont Hospital - Grosse Pointe, Grosse Pointe: score −0.3483, not cut, 9 miles76. Beaumont Hospital - Dearborn, Dearborn: score 0.9447, cut, 8 miles65. Sinai-Grace Hospital, Detroit: score 0.7718, cut, 6 miles54. Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital LLC, Warren: score −0.0478, not cut, 6 miles43. Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit: score 0.6721, cut, 2 miles32. Harper University Hospital, Detroit: score 0.6458, cut, 2 miles21. Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit: score 0.2902, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Henry Ford Health Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI20.2902not cut
Harper University Hospital, Detroit, MI20.6458cut
Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI20.6721cut
Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital LLC, Warren, MI6−0.0478not cut
Sinai-Grace Hospital, Detroit, MI60.7718cut
Beaumont Hospital - Dearborn, Dearborn, MI80.9447cut
Beaumont Hospital - Grosse Pointe, Grosse Pointe, MI9−0.3483not cut
Surgeons Choice Medical Center, Southfield, MI9−0.1976not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Karmanos Cancer CenterDetroit, MI20.2902No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 5 measures
2Harper University HospitalDetroit, MI20.64581% cut$500KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Detroit Receiving HospitalDetroit, MI20.67211% cut$551KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital LLCWarren, MI6−0.0478No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
5Sinai-Grace HospitalDetroit, MI60.77181% cut$560KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6Beaumont Hospital - DearbornDearborn, MI80.94471% cut$804KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
7Beaumont Hospital - Grosse PointeGrosse Pointe, MI9−0.3483No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Surgeons Choice Medical CenterSouthfield, MI9−0.1976No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Henry Ford Health Hospital, Detroit, MI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/230053/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.