P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAdventHealth South Overland Park, Inc Estimated FY2026 net: −$10K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 170208

1Hospital

AdventHealth South Overland Park, Inc

2Location

Overland Park, KS (Kansas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 66223

Johnson County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 85 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.1152

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $57K, likely $42⁠–⁠71K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.1152 for AdventHealth South Overland Park, Inc and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $57K estimate 1% of about $5.7M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.4951 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $42–71K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.1152 This hospital −0.1152 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.1152 This hospital −0.1152

Higher than 44% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 1 years

  1. 15—
  2. 16—
  3. 17—
  4. 18—
  5. 19—
  6. 20—
  7. 21—
  8. 22—
  9. 23—
  10. 24—
  11. 25—
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 2 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.1258, to −0.2410. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 2 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 1; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 61% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9369

    Z-score−0.3597

    Part of score−0.1799

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 59% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.411

    Z-score0.1293

    Part of score+0.0647

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.93690.9623−0.3597−0.1799Better than 61% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTIno value published0.489no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.4110.3460.1293+0.0647Worse than 59% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 2; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.3597PSI 90+0.1293CDI)÷2measures=−0.1152Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.1152; CMS reports −0.1152. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.4951 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.1152, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.3597 divided by 2 = −0.1799PSI 90−0.1799 CDI: z‑score 0.1293 divided by 2 = +0.0647CDI+0.0647 Total HAC Score: −0.1152Score−0.1152 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.3597 divided by 2 = −0.1799PSI 90−0.1799 CDI: z‑score 0.1293 divided by 2 = +0.0647CDI+0.0647 Total HAC Score: −0.1152Score−0.1152 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.3597−0.1799−0.1799
CDI0.1293+0.0647−0.1152
Total HAC Score−0.1152
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4951 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.4951 higher, the cut would have been about $57K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $57K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $57K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.1152 This hospital −0.1152 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $57K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $57Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.1152 This hospital −0.1152

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$57,003
This hospital−0.1152$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$57,003

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($5,710,041payment−$18,693readmissions+$8,944value-based)×1%the cut=$57,003at stake

$57,003at stake÷544traditional Medicare stays=$105per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $57K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$19K and +$9K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $5,192,561
Outliers: unusually costly stays $70,307
Capital: buildings and equipment $447,173
Total, before the three programs $5,710,041
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9964 − 1) −$18,693
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0017 − 1) +$8,944
After these two $5,700,292
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $57,003 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$12K to −$7K −$9,749

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, low-income-patient payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$5,192,561
Outliers: unusually costly stays$70,307
Capital: buildings and equipment$447,173
Total, before the three programs$5,710,041
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9964 − 1))−$18,693
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0017 − 1))+$8,944
After these two$5,700,292
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $57,003)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$12K to −$7K)−$9,749

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.1152same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.1152 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $57K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0784
CDIup to 0.666

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 2 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9369 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.3491

CMS 0.411 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.1936

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.1152 among its measured results: +0.0647.
  • PSI 90 −0.1799
  • CDI +0.0647

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 2, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.3597−0.1799same
CDI0.1293+0.0647same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170208/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Kansas, its score is higher than 62% of the other 43 scored there.

In Kansas City, MO-KS area, its score is higher than 51% of the other 27 scored there.

Figure 6. Its score is above the middle in 3 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Kansas City, MO-KS area) to 28% (Fewer than 100 beds).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas 44 hospitals23% cut Kansas City, MO-KS area: CMS cut 6 of 28 (21%); middle score −0.1180Kansas City, MO-KS area 28 hospitals21% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.1152 This hospital −0.1152 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas44 hospitals23% cut Kansas City, MO-KS area: CMS cut 6 of 28 (21%); middle score −0.1180Kansas City, MO-KS area28 hospitals21% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.1152 This hospital −0.1152

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045344%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026842%
Kansas441023%−0.185662%
Kansas City, MO-KS area28621%−0.118051%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105349%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115450%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013442%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057445%
This hospital−0.1152
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 7. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 5 miles away.
5 mi8. St Joseph Medical Center, Kansas City: score −0.3710, not cut, 8 miles87. Minimally Invasive Surgery Hospital, Lenexa: score −0.1207, not cut, 8 miles76. University of Kansas Health System Olathe Hospital, Olathe: score −0.5275, not cut, 8 miles65. Overland Park Reg Med Ctr, Overland Park: score 0.4059, cut, 8 miles54. Kansas City Orthopaedic Institute, Leawood: score −1.0172, not cut, 7 miles43. Ascentist Hospital LLC, Leawood: score −0.1657, not cut, 7 miles32. Menorah Medical Center, Overland Park: score −0.1812, not cut, 6 miles21. Saint Luke's South Hospital, Overland Park: score −0.2862, not cut, 5 miles1This hospital: AdventHealth South Overland Park, Inc

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Saint Luke's South Hospital, Overland Park, KS5−0.2862not cut
Menorah Medical Center, Overland Park, KS6−0.1812not cut
Ascentist Hospital LLC, Leawood, KS7−0.1657not cut
Kansas City Orthopaedic Institute, Leawood, KS7−1.0172not cut
Overland Park Reg Med Ctr, Overland Park, KS80.4059cut
University of Kansas Health System Olathe Hospital, Olathe, KS8−0.5275not cut
Minimally Invasive Surgery Hospital, Lenexa, KS8−0.1207not cut
St Joseph Medical Center, Kansas City, MO8−0.3710not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Saint Luke's South HospitalOverland Park, KS5−0.2862No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Menorah Medical CenterOverland Park, KS6−0.1812No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3Ascentist Hospital LLCLeawood, KS7−0.1657No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
4Kansas City Orthopaedic InstituteLeawood, KS7−1.0172No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
5Overland Park Reg Med CtrOverland Park, KS80.40591% cut$484KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6University of Kansas Health System Olathe HospitalOlathe, KS8−0.5275No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
7Minimally Invasive Surgery HospitalLenexa, KS8−0.1207No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
8St Joseph Medical CenterKansas City, MO8−0.3710No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. AdventHealth South Overland Park, Inc, Overland Park, KS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170208/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.