P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalOverland Park Reg Med Ctr Estimated FY2026 net: −$999K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 170176

1Hospital

Overland Park Reg Med Ctr

2Location

Overland Park, KS (Kansas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 66215

Johnson County

3Type

Minor teaching · 351 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.4059

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$484K estimate
Likely $369⁠–⁠609K; about $173 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$484K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4059 for Overland Park Reg Med Ctr and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $48.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $173 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $369–609K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4059 This hospital 0.4059 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4059 This hospital 0.4059

Higher than 76% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.2807, to 0.1252. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1629

    Z-score1.2178

    Part of score+0.2030

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 90% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.285

    Z-score1.5744

    Part of score+0.2624

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 51% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.474

    Z-score−0.1760

    Part of score−0.0293

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.227

    Z-score0.6454

    Part of score+0.1076

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 68% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.226

    Z-score−0.5871

    Part of score−0.0978

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 55% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.583

    Z-score−0.2389

    Part of score−0.0398

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.16290.96231.2178+0.2030Worse than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.2850.5591.5744+0.2624Worse than 90% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.4740.489−0.1760−0.0293Better than 51% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.2270.7950.6454+0.1076Worse than 75% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2260.346−0.5871−0.0978Better than 68% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.5830.641−0.2389−0.0398Better than 55% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.2178PSI 90+1.5744CLABSI−0.1760CAUTI+0.6454SSI−0.5871CDI−0.2389MRSA)÷6measures=0.4059Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0267 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.4059, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.2178 divided by 6 = +0.2030PSI 90+0.2030 CLABSI: z‑score 1.5744 divided by 6 = +0.2624CLABSI+0.2624 CAUTI: z‑score −0.1760 divided by 6 = −0.0293CAUTI−0.0293 SSI: z‑score 0.6454 divided by 6 = +0.1076SSI+0.1076 CDI: z‑score −0.5871 divided by 6 = −0.0978CDI−0.0978 MRSA: z‑score −0.2389 divided by 6 = −0.0398MRSA−0.0398 Total HAC Score: 0.4059Score0.4059 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.50.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.2178 divided by 6 = +0.2030PSI 90+0.2030 CLABSI: z‑score 1.5744 divided by 6 = +0.2624CLABSI+0.2624 CAUTI: z‑score −0.1760 divided by 6 = −0.0293CAUTI−0.0293 SSI: z‑score 0.6454 divided by 6 = +0.1076SSI+0.1076 CDI: z‑score −0.5871 divided by 6 = −0.0978CDI−0.0978 MRSA: z‑score −0.2389 divided by 6 = −0.0398MRSA−0.0398 Total HAC Score: 0.4059Score0.4059 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.50.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.2178+0.20300.2030
CLABSI1.5744+0.26240.4654
CAUTI−0.1760−0.02930.4361
SSI0.6454+0.10760.5437
CDI−0.5871−0.09780.4459
MRSA−0.2389−0.03980.4061
Total HAC Score0.4059
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0267 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $484K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $484K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $484K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4059 This hospital 0.4059 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $484K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $484Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4059 This hospital 0.4059

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$484,324
This hospital0.4059−$484,324
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$484,324

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($46,527,671payment+$2,419,623teaching, MA stays−$298,448readmissions−$216,483value-based)×1%the cut=$484,324HAC cut

$484,324HAC cut÷2,799traditional Medicare stays=$173per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $484K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$298K and −$216K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $35,529,567
Teaching (indirect medical education) $2,583,355
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,419,623
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,028,581
Outliers: unusually costly stays $677,549
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,160,580
Uncompensated care $3,548,039
Total, before the three programs $48,947,294
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9916 − 1) −$298,448
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9939 − 1) −$216,483
After these two $48,432,363
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $369⁠–⁠609K −$484,324
Net of the three programs likely −$1.2M to −$805K −$999,255

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$35,529,567
Teaching (indirect medical education)$2,583,355
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,419,623
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,028,581
Outliers: unusually costly stays$677,549
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,160,580
Uncompensated care$3,548,039
Total, before the three programs$48,947,294
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9916 − 1))−$298,448
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9939 − 1))−$216,483
After these two$48,432,363
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $369–609K)−$484,324
Net of the three programs (likely −$1.2M to −$805K)−$999,255

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.4059same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$484Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4059 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $484K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.1398 or lower
CLABSI1.215 or lower
CAUTI0.407 or lower
SSI1.133 or lower
CDI0.184 or lower
MRSA0.506 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1629 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.285 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.474 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.227 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.226 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.583 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.4059 among its measured results: +0.2624.
  • PSI 90 +0.2030
  • CLABSI +0.2624
  • CAUTI −0.0293
  • SSI +0.1076
  • CDI −0.0978
  • MRSA −0.0398

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.2178+0.2030same
CLABSI1.5744+0.2624same
CAUTI−0.1760−0.0293same
SSI0.6454+0.1076same
CDI−0.5871−0.0978same
MRSA−0.2389−0.0398same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170176/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.0250, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.3800, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2296, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2894, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.0651, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3146, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.7514, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6661, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0008, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.4059, higher than 76% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 9.0250, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.3800, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.2296, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2894, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.0651, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3146, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.7514, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.6661, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.0008, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.4059, higher than 76% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20159.025097.2%cut
FY20166.750072.4%not cut
FY20175.380049.4%not cut
FY20180.229668.3%not cut
FY20190.289471.7%not cut
FY20200.065157.6%not cut
FY2021−0.314630.1%not cut
FY2022−0.751410.4%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.666112.6%not cut
FY2025−0.000852.0%not cut
FY20260.405976.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.31 → 0.86 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.312CLABSI, 2018: 0.989CLABSI, 2019: 0.400CLABSI, 2021: 0.917CLABSI, 2022: 0.142CLABSI, 2023: 1.715CLABSI, 2024: 0.857 CAUTI 1.16 → 0.36 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.158CAUTI, 2018: 0.903CAUTI, 2019: 0.516CAUTI, 2021: 1.790CAUTI, 2022: 0.271CAUTI, 2023: 0.596CAUTI, 2024: 0.362 SSI, colon 0.68 → 1.08 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.683SSI, colon, 2018: 0.433SSI, colon, 2019: 0.478SSI, colon, 2021: 0.903SSI, colon, 2022: 0.984SSI, colon, 2023: 1.604SSI, colon, 2024: 1.081 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.614SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.331SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.330SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.711SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.468SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.558 MRSA 0.67 → 0.30 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.669MRSA, 2018: 0.310MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.246MRSA, 2022: 0.390MRSA, 2023: 0.839MRSA, 2024: 0.304 C. diff 0.85 → 0.21 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.855C. diff, 2018: 0.879C. diff, 2019: 0.457C. diff, 2021: 0.307C. diff, 2022: 0.251C. diff, 2023: 0.243C. diff, 2024: 0.209 CLABSI 1.31 → 0.86 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.312CLABSI, 2018: 0.989CLABSI, 2019: 0.400CLABSI, 2021: 0.917CLABSI, 2022: 0.142CLABSI, 2023: 1.715CLABSI, 2024: 0.857 CAUTI 1.16 → 0.36 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.158CAUTI, 2018: 0.903CAUTI, 2019: 0.516CAUTI, 2021: 1.790CAUTI, 2022: 0.271CAUTI, 2023: 0.596CAUTI, 2024: 0.362 SSI, colon 0.68 → 1.08 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.683SSI, colon, 2018: 0.433SSI, colon, 2019: 0.478SSI, colon, 2021: 0.903SSI, colon, 2022: 0.984SSI, colon, 2023: 1.604SSI, colon, 2024: 1.081 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.614SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.331SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.330SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.711SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 1.468SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.558 MRSA 0.67 → 0.30 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.669MRSA, 2018: 0.310MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.246MRSA, 2022: 0.390MRSA, 2023: 0.839MRSA, 2024: 0.304 C. diff 0.85 → 0.21 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.855C. diff, 2018: 0.879C. diff, 2019: 0.457C. diff, 2021: 0.307C. diff, 2022: 0.251C. diff, 2023: 0.243C. diff, 2024: 0.209

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.3121.1580.6830.0000.6690.855
20180.9890.9030.4330.6140.3100.879
20190.4000.5160.4780.3310.0000.457
20210.9171.7900.9030.3300.2460.307
20220.1420.2710.9840.7110.3900.251
20231.7150.5961.6041.4680.8390.243
20240.8570.3621.0810.5580.3040.209

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Kansas, its score is higher than 81% of the other 43 scored there.

In Kansas City, MO-KS area, its score is higher than 81% of the other 27 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 25% (Midwest region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas 44 hospitals23% cut Kansas City, MO-KS area: CMS cut 6 of 28 (21%); middle score −0.1180Kansas City, MO-KS area 28 hospitals21% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.4059 This hospital 0.4059 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas44 hospitals23% cut Kansas City, MO-KS area: CMS cut 6 of 28 (21%); middle score −0.1180Kansas City, MO-KS area28 hospitals21% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.4059 This hospital 0.4059

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045376%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026875%
Kansas441023%−0.185681%
Kansas City, MO-KS area28621%−0.118081%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056779%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038479%
For-profit6519815%−0.259085%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057478%
This hospital0.4059
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 3 miles away.
5 mi8. AdventHealth South Overland Park, Inc, Overland Park: score −0.1152, not cut, 8 miles87. St Joseph Medical Center, Kansas City: score −0.3710, not cut, 6 miles76. Kansas City Orthopaedic Institute, Leawood: score −1.0172, not cut, 5 miles65. Ascentist Hospital LLC, Leawood: score −0.1657, not cut, 4 miles54. AdventHealth Shawnee Mission, Shawnee Mission: score 0.4564, cut, 4 miles43. Menorah Medical Center, Overland Park: score −0.1812, not cut, 4 miles32. Saint Luke's South Hospital, Overland Park: score −0.2862, not cut, 4 miles21. Minimally Invasive Surgery Hospital, Lenexa: score −0.1207, not cut, 3 miles1This hospital: Overland Park Reg Med Ctr

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Minimally Invasive Surgery Hospital, Lenexa, KS3−0.1207not cut
Saint Luke's South Hospital, Overland Park, KS4−0.2862not cut
Menorah Medical Center, Overland Park, KS4−0.1812not cut
AdventHealth Shawnee Mission, Shawnee Mission, KS40.4564cut
Ascentist Hospital LLC, Leawood, KS4−0.1657not cut
Kansas City Orthopaedic Institute, Leawood, KS5−1.0172not cut
St Joseph Medical Center, Kansas City, MO6−0.3710not cut
AdventHealth South Overland Park, Inc, Overland Park, KS8−0.1152not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Minimally Invasive Surgery HospitalLenexa, KS3−0.1207No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
2Saint Luke's South HospitalOverland Park, KS4−0.2862No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3Menorah Medical CenterOverland Park, KS4−0.1812No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4AdventHealth Shawnee MissionShawnee Mission, KS40.45641% cut$501KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Ascentist Hospital LLCLeawood, KS4−0.1657No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
6Kansas City Orthopaedic InstituteLeawood, KS5−1.0172No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
7St Joseph Medical CenterKansas City, MO6−0.3710No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8AdventHealth South Overland Park, IncOverland Park, KS8−0.1152No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Overland Park Reg Med Ctr, Overland Park, KS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170176/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.