P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSalina Surgical Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$64K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 170187

1Hospital

Salina Surgical Hospital

2Location

Salina, KS (Kansas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 67401

Saline County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 8 beds · For-profit · Rural · Medicare-dependent hospital

4Care Compare stars

Not Available

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 16: There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3882

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$64K estimate
Likely $46⁠–⁠72K; about $163 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$64K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3882 for Salina Surgical Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $6.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $163 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $46–72K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3882 This hospital 0.3882 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3882 This hospital 0.3882

Higher than 75% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 2 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.7751, to −0.3869. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 2 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 1; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 75% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8912

    Z-score−0.6793

    Part of score−0.3397

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 89% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.700

    Z-score1.4556

    Part of score+0.7278

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.89120.9623−0.6793−0.3397Better than 75% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTIno value published0.489no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
SSI1.7000.7951.4556+0.7278Worse than 89% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDIno value published0.346no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 2; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.6793PSI 90+1.4556SSI)÷2measures=0.3882Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0090 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3882, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.6793 divided by 2 = −0.3397PSI 90−0.3397 SSI: z‑score 1.4556 divided by 2 = +0.7278SSI+0.7278 Total HAC Score: 0.3882Score0.3882 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.6793 divided by 2 = −0.3397PSI 90−0.3397 SSI: z‑score 1.4556 divided by 2 = +0.7278SSI+0.7278 Total HAC Score: 0.3882Score0.3882 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.6793−0.3397−0.3397
SSI1.4556+0.72780.3881
Total HAC Score0.3882
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0090 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $64K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $64K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $64K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3882 This hospital 0.3882 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $64K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $64Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3882 This hospital 0.3882

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$63,901
This hospital0.3882−$63,901
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$63,901

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($6,390,127payment+$0readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$63,901HAC cut

$63,901HAC cut÷392traditional Medicare stays=$163per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $64K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates $4,800,126
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on $1,223,228
Base payment the base $6,023,354
Capital: buildings and equipment $366,773
Total, before the three programs $6,390,127
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $6,390,127
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $46⁠–⁠72K −$63,901
Net of the three programs likely −$68K to −$44K −$63,901

Not paid to this hospital: teaching payments, low-income-patient payments, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates$4,800,126
Medicare-dependent hospital add-on$1,223,228
Base payment (the base)$6,023,354
Capital: buildings and equipment$366,773
Total, before the three programs$6,390,127
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$6,390,127
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $46–72K)−$63,901
Net of the three programs (likely −$68K to −$44K)−$63,901

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3882same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$64Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3882 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $64K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.8885 or lower
SSI1.689 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 2 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8912 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.3491

CMS 1.700 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0857

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3882 among its measured results: +0.7278.
  • PSI 90 −0.3397
  • SSI +0.7278

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 2, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.6793−0.3397same
SSI1.4556+0.7278same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170187/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.0000, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 8.7500, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.3000, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2958, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 1.1784, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.2604, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.0866, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.6383, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.3626, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.5641, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.3882, higher than 75% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.0000, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 8.7500, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.3000, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2958, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 1.1784, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.2604, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.0866, higher than 59% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.6383, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.3626, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.5641, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.3882, higher than 75% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20151.00000.0%not cut
FY20168.750095.1%cut
FY20176.300070.3%not cut
FY2018−0.295831.2%not cut
FY20191.178496.0%cut
FY2020−0.260432.7%not cut
FY20210.086659.7%not cut
FY20220.638387.3%cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.362627.7%not cut
FY20250.564184.0%cut
FY20260.388275.4%cut

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Kansas, its score is higher than 79% of the other 43 scored there.

Figure 7. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas 44 hospitals23% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3882 This hospital 0.3882 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas44 hospitals23% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3882 This hospital 0.3882

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045375%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026875%
Kansas441023%−0.185679%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105375%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115472%
For-profit6519815%−0.259084%
Rural61919632%0.022968%
This hospital0.3882
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 8. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Manhattan Surgical Hospital LLC, Manhattan: score −0.1497, not cut, 60 miles87. Ascension Via Christi Hospital Manhattan, Inc, Manhattan: score −0.9330, not cut, 60 miles76. NMC Health, Newton: score −0.7685, not cut, 58 miles65. Hutchinson Regional Medical Center Inc, Hutchinson: score −0.3188, not cut, 54 miles54. Summit Surgical, LLC, Hutchinson: score −0.4862, not cut, 54 miles43. Stormont Vail Health Flint Hills, LLC, Junction City: score 0.4403, cut, 43 miles32. McPherson Hospital, McPherson: score 0.6569, cut, 32 miles21. Salina Regional Health Center, Salina: score 0.5272, cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Salina Surgical Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Salina Regional Health Center, Salina, KSunder 10.5272cut
McPherson Hospital, McPherson, KS320.6569cut
Stormont Vail Health Flint Hills, LLC, Junction City, KS430.4403cut
Summit Surgical, LLC, Hutchinson, KS54−0.4862not cut
Hutchinson Regional Medical Center Inc, Hutchinson, KS54−0.3188not cut
NMC Health, Newton, KS58−0.7685not cut
Ascension Via Christi Hospital Manhattan, Inc, Manhattan, KS60−0.9330not cut
Manhattan Surgical Hospital LLC, Manhattan, KS60−0.1497not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Salina Regional Health CenterSalina, KSunder 10.52721% cut$380KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2McPherson HospitalMcPherson, KS320.65691% cut$44KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
3Stormont Vail Health Flint Hills, LLCJunction City, KS430.44031% cut$22KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
4Summit Surgical, LLCHutchinson, KS54−0.4862No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
5Hutchinson Regional Medical Center IncHutchinson, KS54−0.3188No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6NMC HealthNewton, KS58−0.7685No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
7Ascension Via Christi Hospital Manhattan, IncManhattan, KS60−0.9330No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
8Manhattan Surgical Hospital LLCManhattan, KS60−0.1497No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Salina Surgical Hospital, Salina, KS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170187/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.