P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSalina Regional Health Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$682K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 170012

1Hospital

Salina Regional Health Center

2Location

Salina, KS (Kansas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 67401

Saline County

3Type

Minor teaching · 396 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.5272

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$380K estimate
Likely $295⁠–⁠463K; about $157 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$380K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5272 for Salina Regional Health Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $38.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $157 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $295–463K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5272 This hospital 0.5272 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.5272 This hospital 0.5272

Higher than 81% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.3775, to 0.1497. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 86% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1592

    Z-score1.1919

    Part of score+0.1987

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 68% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.380

    Z-score−0.5250

    Part of score−0.0875

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 64% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.354

    Z-score−0.4653

    Part of score−0.0776

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 65% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.565

    Z-score−0.4886

    Part of score−0.0814

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.931

    Z-score2.1427

    Part of score+0.3571

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 88% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.323

    Z-score1.3077

    Part of score+0.2180

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.15920.96231.1919+0.1987Worse than 86% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.3800.559−0.5250−0.0875Better than 68% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.3540.489−0.4653−0.0776Better than 64% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.5650.795−0.4886−0.0814Better than 65% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.9310.3462.1427+0.3571Worse than 94% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.3230.6411.3077+0.2180Worse than 88% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.1919PSI 90−0.5250CLABSI−0.4653CAUTI−0.4886SSI+2.1427CDI+1.3077MRSA)÷6measures=0.5272Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1480 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.5272, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.1919 divided by 6 = +0.1987PSI 90+0.1987 CLABSI: z‑score −0.5250 divided by 6 = −0.0875CLABSI−0.0875 CAUTI: z‑score −0.4653 divided by 6 = −0.0776CAUTI−0.0776 SSI: z‑score −0.4886 divided by 6 = −0.0814SSI−0.0814 CDI: z‑score 2.1427 divided by 6 = +0.3571CDI+0.3571 MRSA: z‑score 1.3077 divided by 6 = +0.2180MRSA+0.2180 Total HAC Score: 0.5272Score0.5272 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.1919 divided by 6 = +0.1987PSI 90+0.1987 CLABSI: z‑score −0.5250 divided by 6 = −0.0875CLABSI−0.0875 CAUTI: z‑score −0.4653 divided by 6 = −0.0776CAUTI−0.0776 SSI: z‑score −0.4886 divided by 6 = −0.0814SSI−0.0814 CDI: z‑score 2.1427 divided by 6 = +0.3571CDI+0.3571 MRSA: z‑score 1.3077 divided by 6 = +0.2180MRSA+0.2180 Total HAC Score: 0.5272Score0.5272 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.1919+0.19870.1987
CLABSI−0.5250−0.08750.1112
CAUTI−0.4653−0.07760.0336
SSI−0.4886−0.0814−0.0478
CDI2.1427+0.35710.3093
MRSA1.3077+0.21800.5273
Total HAC Score0.5272
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1480 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $380K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $380K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $380K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5272 This hospital 0.5272 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $380K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $380Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.5272 This hospital 0.5272

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$380,125
This hospital0.5272−$380,125
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$380,125

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($38,105,100payment+$209,024teaching, MA stays+$0readmissions−$301,604value-based)×1%the cut=$380,125HAC cut

$380,125HAC cut÷2,425traditional Medicare stays=$157per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $380K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and −$302K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $28,832,553
Teaching (indirect medical education) $923,507
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $209,024
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $256,033
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,223,365
Sole community hospital rate difference $4,495,903
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,373,739
Total, before the three programs $38,314,124
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9895 − 1) −$301,604
After these two $38,012,520
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $295⁠–⁠463K −$380,125
Net of the three programs likely −$790K to −$545K −$681,729

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$28,832,553
Teaching (indirect medical education)$923,507
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$209,024
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$256,033
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,223,365
Sole community hospital rate difference$4,495,903
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,373,739
Total, before the three programs$38,314,124
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9895 − 1))−$301,604
After these two$38,012,520
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $295–463K)−$380,125
Net of the three programs (likely −$790K to −$545K)−$681,729

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.5272same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$380Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.5272 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $380K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.0319 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSI0.046 or lower
CDI0.701 or lower
MRSA0.898 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1592 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.380 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.354 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.565 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.931 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.323 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.5272 among its measured results: +0.3571.
  • PSI 90 +0.1987
  • CLABSI −0.0875
  • CAUTI −0.0776
  • SSI −0.0814
  • CDI +0.3571
  • MRSA +0.2180

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.1919+0.1987same
CLABSI−0.5250−0.0875same
CAUTI−0.4653−0.0776same
SSI−0.4886−0.0814same
CDI2.1427+0.3571same
MRSA1.3077+0.2180same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170012/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.3750, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.4500, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3313, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.09, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.6970, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.0600, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.6445, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.5920, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.3863, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5272, higher than 81% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.3750, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.4500, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3313, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.09, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.6970, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.0600, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.6445, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.5920, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.3863, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.5272, higher than 81% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.375032.8%not cut
FY20166.750072.4%not cut
FY20175.450051.4%not cut
FY2018−0.331329.3%not cut
FY2019−0.0945.0%not cut
FY20200.697088.9%cut
FY20211.060096.8%cut
FY20220.644587.6%cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.592015.1%not cut
FY2025−0.386325.7%not cut
FY20260.527281.3%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.25 → 0.40 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.248CLABSI, 2018: 1.822CLABSI, 2019: 1.367CLABSI, 2021: 0.562CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.365CLABSI, 2024: 0.396 CAUTI 0.61 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.609CAUTI, 2018: 0.605CAUTI, 2019: 0.216CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.324CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.752 SSI, colon 1.42 → 0.85 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.420SSI, colon, 2018: 0.879SSI, colon, 2019: 0.384SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.367SSI, colon, 2024: 0.852 MRSA 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 3.302MRSA, 2019: 1.100MRSA, 2021: 0.670MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 0.90 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.901C. diff, 2018: 1.125C. diff, 2019: 1.867C. diff, 2021: 0.891C. diff, 2022: 1.092C. diff, 2023: 0.922C. diff, 2024: 0.942 CLABSI 0.25 → 0.40 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.248CLABSI, 2018: 1.822CLABSI, 2019: 1.367CLABSI, 2021: 0.562CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.365CLABSI, 2024: 0.396 CAUTI 0.61 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.609CAUTI, 2018: 0.605CAUTI, 2019: 0.216CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.324CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.752 SSI, colon 1.42 → 0.85 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.420SSI, colon, 2018: 0.879SSI, colon, 2019: 0.384SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.367SSI, colon, 2024: 0.852 MRSA 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 3.302MRSA, 2019: 1.100MRSA, 2021: 0.670MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 0.90 → 0.94 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.901C. diff, 2018: 1.125C. diff, 2019: 1.867C. diff, 2021: 0.891C. diff, 2022: 1.092C. diff, 2023: 0.922C. diff, 2024: 0.942

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.2480.6091.4200.0000.901
20181.8220.6050.8793.3021.125
20191.3670.2160.3841.1001.867
20210.5620.0000.0000.6700.891
20220.0000.3240.0000.0001.092
20230.3650.0000.3670.0000.922
20240.3960.7520.8520.942

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Kansas, its score is higher than 88% of the other 43 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas 44 hospitals23% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.5272 This hospital 0.5272 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Kansas: CMS cut 10 of 44 (23%); middle score −0.1856Kansas44 hospitals23% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.5272 This hospital 0.5272

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045381%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026880%
Kansas441023%−0.185688%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056785%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038486%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013480%
Rural61919632%0.022973%
This hospital0.5272
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Manhattan Surgical Hospital LLC, Manhattan: score −0.1497, not cut, 60 miles87. Ascension Via Christi Hospital Manhattan, Inc, Manhattan: score −0.9330, not cut, 60 miles76. NMC Health, Newton: score −0.7685, not cut, 58 miles65. Hutchinson Regional Medical Center Inc, Hutchinson: score −0.3188, not cut, 54 miles54. Summit Surgical, LLC, Hutchinson: score −0.4862, not cut, 54 miles43. Stormont Vail Health Flint Hills, LLC, Junction City: score 0.4403, cut, 43 miles32. McPherson Hospital, McPherson: score 0.6569, cut, 32 miles21. Salina Surgical Hospital, Salina: score 0.3882, cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Salina Regional Health Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Salina Surgical Hospital, Salina, KSunder 10.3882cut
McPherson Hospital, McPherson, KS320.6569cut
Stormont Vail Health Flint Hills, LLC, Junction City, KS430.4403cut
Summit Surgical, LLC, Hutchinson, KS54−0.4862not cut
Hutchinson Regional Medical Center Inc, Hutchinson, KS54−0.3188not cut
NMC Health, Newton, KS58−0.7685not cut
Ascension Via Christi Hospital Manhattan, Inc, Manhattan, KS60−0.9330not cut
Manhattan Surgical Hospital LLC, Manhattan, KS60−0.1497not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Salina Surgical HospitalSalina, KSunder 10.38821% cut$64KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
2McPherson HospitalMcPherson, KS320.65691% cut$44KAbove the national median on 2 of 3 measures
3Stormont Vail Health Flint Hills, LLCJunction City, KS430.44031% cut$22KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
4Summit Surgical, LLCHutchinson, KS54−0.4862No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
5Hutchinson Regional Medical Center IncHutchinson, KS54−0.3188No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6NMC HealthNewton, KS58−0.7685No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
7Ascension Via Christi Hospital Manhattan, IncManhattan, KS60−0.9330No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
8Manhattan Surgical Hospital LLCManhattan, KS60−0.1497No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Salina Regional Health Center, Salina, KS: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/170012/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.