P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSouth Shore Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$57K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 140181

1Hospital

South Shore Hospital

2Location

Chicago, IL (Illinois’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 60617

Cook County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 137 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

Not Available

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 16: There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

1.7595

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $39⁠–⁠64K; about $130 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$51K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.7595 for South Shore Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $5.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $130 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $39–64K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.7595 This hospital 1.7595 lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.7595 This hospital 1.7595

Higher than 98% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 8 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.5052, to 1.2543. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 53% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9530

    Z-score−0.2473

    Part of score−0.0495

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 100% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value7.581

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.4480

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.540

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.4773

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.127

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.4386

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value3.396

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.4450

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.95300.9623−0.2473−0.0495Better than 53% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI7.5810.5592.2402+0.4480Worse than 100% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.5400.4892.3863+0.4773Worse than 95% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI1.1270.3462.1931+0.4386Worse than 97% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA3.3960.6412.2251+0.4450Worse than 99% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.2473PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI+2.1931CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷5measures=1.7595Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 1.3803 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 1.7595, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2473 divided by 5 = −0.0495PSI 90−0.0495 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 5 = +0.4480CLABSI+0.4480 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 5 = +0.4386CDI+0.4386 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 1.7595Score1.7595 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.52.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2473 divided by 5 = −0.0495PSI 90−0.0495 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 5 = +0.4480CLABSI+0.4480 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 5 = +0.4386CDI+0.4386 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 1.7595Score1.7595 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.52.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.2473−0.0495−0.0495
CLABSI2.2402+0.44800.3985
CAUTI2.3863+0.47730.8758
CDI2.1931+0.43861.3144
MRSA2.2251+0.44501.7594
Total HAC Score1.7595
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.3803 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $51K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $51K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $51K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.7595 This hospital 1.7595 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $51K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $51Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.7595 This hospital 1.7595

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$51,163
This hospital1.7595−$51,163
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$51,163

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($5,122,334payment−$6,015readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$51,163HAC cut

$51,163HAC cut÷394traditional Medicare stays=$130per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $51K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$6K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $3,759,279
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $254,766
Outliers: unusually costly stays $261,345
Capital: buildings and equipment $330,164
Uncompensated care $516,780
Total, before the three programs $5,122,334
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9984 − 1) −$6,015
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $5,116,319
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $39⁠–⁠64K −$51,163
Net of the three programs likely −$67K to −$46K −$57,178

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$3,759,279
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$254,766
Outliers: unusually costly stays$261,345
Capital: buildings and equipment$330,164
Uncompensated care$516,780
Total, before the three programs$5,122,334
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9984 − 1))−$6,015
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$5,116,319
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $39–64K)−$51,163
Net of the three programs (likely −$67K to −$46K)−$57,178

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score1.7595same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$51Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.7595 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $51K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9530 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 7.581 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 1.540 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 1.127 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

CMS 3.396 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0418

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 1.7595 among its measured results: +0.4773.
  • PSI 90 −0.0495
  • CLABSI +0.4480
  • CAUTI +0.4773
  • CDI +0.4386
  • MRSA +0.4450

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.2473−0.0495same
CLABSI2.2402+0.4480same
CAUTI2.3863+0.4773same
CDI2.1931+0.4386same
MRSA2.2251+0.4450same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 5 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 8 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9250, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.7500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.7400, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 1.5627, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2019: score 1.9229, higher than 99% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.6957, higher than 99% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.3329, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.7912, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2024: score 1.5361, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.5474, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.7595, higher than 98% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9250, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.7500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.7400, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 1.5627, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2019: score 1.9229, higher than 99% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.6957, higher than 99% of scores; cutFY2021: score 1.3329, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.7912, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2024: score 1.5361, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.5474, higher than 98% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.7595, higher than 98% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.925023.0%not cut
FY20163.750019.6%not cut
FY20175.740056.9%not cut
FY20181.562797.5%cut
FY20191.922999.5%cut
FY20201.695799.1%cut
FY20211.332998.6%cut
FY20220.791291.5%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20241.536197.0%cut
FY20251.547498.1%cut
FY20261.759598.5%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 2.42 → 5.27 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.419CLABSI, 2018: 3.373CLABSI, 2019: 5.581CLABSI, 2021: 3.518CLABSI, 2022: 5.272 CAUTI 2.51 → 2.21 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.509CAUTI, 2018: 1.538CAUTI, 2019: 0.650CAUTI, 2021: 0.537CAUTI, 2022: 1.729CAUTI, 2023: 0.961CAUTI, 2024: 2.205 C. diff 1.79 → 0.68 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.786C. diff, 2018: 1.782C. diff, 2019: 1.001C. diff, 2021: 0.977C. diff, 2022: 1.422C. diff, 2023: 1.556C. diff, 2024: 0.679 CLABSI 2.42 → 5.27 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 2.419CLABSI, 2018: 3.373CLABSI, 2019: 5.581CLABSI, 2021: 3.518CLABSI, 2022: 5.272 CAUTI 2.51 → 2.21 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.509CAUTI, 2018: 1.538CAUTI, 2019: 0.650CAUTI, 2021: 0.537CAUTI, 2022: 1.729CAUTI, 2023: 0.961CAUTI, 2024: 2.205 C. diff 1.79 → 0.68 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.786C. diff, 2018: 1.782C. diff, 2019: 1.001C. diff, 2021: 0.977C. diff, 2022: 1.422C. diff, 2023: 1.556C. diff, 2024: 0.679

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIC. diff
20172.4192.5091.786
20183.3731.5381.782
20195.5810.6501.001
20213.5180.5370.977
20225.2721.7291.422
20230.9611.556
20242.2050.679

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Illinois, its score is higher than 99% of the other 111 scored there.

In Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 53 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 30% (Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois 112 hospitals28% cut Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area: CMS cut 16 of 54 (30%); middle score −0.0514Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area54 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 1.7595 This hospital 1.7595 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois112 hospitals28% cut Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area: CMS cut 16 of 54 (30%); middle score −0.0514Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area54 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 1.7595 This hospital 1.7595

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045398%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026899%
Illinois1123128%0.052899%
Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area541630%−0.0514100%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105397%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073299%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013499%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057499%
This hospital1.7595
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is about a mile away.
5 mi8. OSF Little Company of Mary Medical Center, Evergreen Park: score 0.3837, cut, 7 miles87. Holy Cross Hospital, Chicago: score −0.0473, not cut, 6 miles76. Roseland Community Hospital, Chicago: score 0.9385, cut, 5 miles65. Provident Hospital of Chicago, Chicago: score 1.4729, cut, 4 miles54. St Bernard Hospital, Chicago: score −0.1496, not cut, 4 miles43. The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago: score −0.0700, not cut, 3 miles32. Advocate Trinity Hospital, Chicago: score 0.2800, not cut, 2 miles21. Jackson Park Hospital, Chicago: score 1.0161, cut, about a mile1This hospital: South Shore Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Jackson Park Hospital, Chicago, IL11.0161cut
Advocate Trinity Hospital, Chicago, IL20.2800not cut
The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL3−0.0700not cut
St Bernard Hospital, Chicago, IL4−0.1496not cut
Provident Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL41.4729cut
Roseland Community Hospital, Chicago, IL50.9385cut
Holy Cross Hospital, Chicago, IL6−0.0473not cut
OSF Little Company of Mary Medical Center, Evergreen Park, IL70.3837cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Jackson Park HospitalChicago, IL11.01611% cut$62KAbove the national median on 3 of 5 measures
2Advocate Trinity HospitalChicago, IL20.2800No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3The University of Chicago Medical CenterChicago, IL3−0.0700No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4St Bernard HospitalChicago, IL4−0.1496No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 5 measures
5Provident Hospital of ChicagoChicago, IL41.47291% cut$41KAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures
6Roseland Community HospitalChicago, IL50.93851% cut$54KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Holy Cross HospitalChicago, IL6−0.0473No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
8OSF Little Company of Mary Medical CenterEvergreen Park, IL70.38371% cut$385KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. South Shore Hospital, Chicago, IL: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/140181/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.