P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalOSF Little Company of Mary Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$699K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 140179

1Hospital

OSF Little Company of Mary Medical Center

2Location

Evergreen Park, IL (Illinois’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 60805

Cook County

3Type

Minor teaching · 298 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3837

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$385K estimate
Likely $293⁠–⁠484K; about $148 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$385K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3837 for OSF Little Company of Mary Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $38.5M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $148 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $293–484K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3837 This hospital 0.3837 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3837 This hospital 0.3837

Higher than 75% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 7 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.3777, to 0.0060. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 62% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9328

    Z-score−0.3886

    Part of score−0.0648

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.856

    Z-score0.5793

    Part of score+0.0966

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.937

    Z-score0.9400

    Part of score+0.1567

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value2.181

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.3620

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 70% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.215

    Z-score−0.6297

    Part of score−0.1050

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 61% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.520

    Z-score−0.3705

    Part of score−0.0618

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.93280.9623−0.3886−0.0648Better than 62% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.8560.5590.5793+0.0966Worse than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.9370.4890.9400+0.1567Worse than 83% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI2.1810.7952.1717+0.3620Worse than 95% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2150.346−0.6297−0.1050Better than 70% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.5200.641−0.3705−0.0618Better than 61% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.3886PSI 90+0.5793CLABSI+0.9400CAUTI+2.1717SSI−0.6297CDI−0.3705MRSA)÷6measures=0.3837Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0045 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3837, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.3886 divided by 6 = −0.0648PSI 90−0.0648 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5793 divided by 6 = +0.0966CLABSI+0.0966 CAUTI: z‑score 0.9400 divided by 6 = +0.1567CAUTI+0.1567 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score −0.6297 divided by 6 = −0.1050CDI−0.1050 MRSA: z‑score −0.3705 divided by 6 = −0.0618MRSA−0.0618 Total HAC Score: 0.3837Score0.3837 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.3886 divided by 6 = −0.0648PSI 90−0.0648 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5793 divided by 6 = +0.0966CLABSI+0.0966 CAUTI: z‑score 0.9400 divided by 6 = +0.1567CAUTI+0.1567 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score −0.6297 divided by 6 = −0.1050CDI−0.1050 MRSA: z‑score −0.3705 divided by 6 = −0.0618MRSA−0.0618 Total HAC Score: 0.3837Score0.3837 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.3886−0.0648−0.0648
CLABSI0.5793+0.09660.0318
CAUTI0.9400+0.15670.1885
SSI2.1717+0.36200.5505
CDI−0.6297−0.10500.4455
MRSA−0.3705−0.06180.3837
Total HAC Score0.3837
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0045 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $385K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $385K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $385K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3837 This hospital 0.3837 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $385K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $385Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3837 This hospital 0.3837

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$385,154
This hospital0.3837−$385,154
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$385,154

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($37,482,670payment+$1,346,373teaching, MA stays−$328,427readmissions+$14,806value-based)×1%the cut=$385,154HAC cut

$385,154HAC cut÷2,608traditional Medicare stays=$148per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $385K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$328K and +$15K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $30,409,870
Teaching (indirect medical education) $1,100,533
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $1,346,373
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,256,840
Outliers: unusually costly stays $595,425
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,608,229
Uncompensated care $1,511,773
Total, before the three programs $38,829,043
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9892 − 1) −$328,427
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0005 − 1) +$14,806
After these two $38,515,422
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $293⁠–⁠484K −$385,154
Net of the three programs likely −$821K to −$563K −$698,775

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$30,409,870
Teaching (indirect medical education)$1,100,533
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$1,346,373
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,256,840
Outliers: unusually costly stays$595,425
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,608,229
Uncompensated care$1,511,773
Total, before the three programs$38,829,043
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9892 − 1))−$328,427
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0005 − 1))+$14,806
After these two$38,515,422
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $293–484K)−$385,154
Net of the three programs (likely −$821K to −$563K)−$698,775

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3837same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$385Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3837 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $385K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9288 or lower
CLABSI0.844 or lower
CAUTI0.925 or lower
SSI2.102 or lower
CDI0.208 or lower
MRSA0.507 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9328 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.856 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.937 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 2.181 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.215 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.520 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3837 among its measured results: +0.3620.
  • PSI 90 −0.0648
  • CLABSI +0.0966
  • CAUTI +0.1567
  • SSI +0.3620
  • CDI −0.1050
  • MRSA −0.0618

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.3886−0.0648same
CLABSI0.5793+0.0966same
CAUTI0.9400+0.1567same
SSI2.1717+0.3620same
CDI−0.6297−0.1050same
MRSA−0.3705−0.0618same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/140179/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 6 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 7 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 8.2500, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2016: score 9.2500, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2017: score 8.8500, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6869, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.7495, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3980, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.0176, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1486, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.2985, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0002, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3837, higher than 75% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 8.2500, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2016: score 9.2500, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2017: score 8.8500, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6869, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.7495, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.3980, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.0176, higher than 53% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1486, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.2985, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0002, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.3837, higher than 75% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20158.250091.4%cut
FY20169.250097.8%cut
FY20178.850097.5%cut
FY20180.686988.0%cut
FY20190.749590.1%cut
FY20200.398078.6%cut
FY20210.017653.6%not cut
FY2022−0.148640.6%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.298531.9%not cut
FY20250.000252.0%not cut
FY20260.383775.3%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.06 → 0.63 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.063CLABSI, 2018: 0.499CLABSI, 2019: 0.483CLABSI, 2021: 0.739CLABSI, 2022: 0.562CLABSI, 2023: 1.070CLABSI, 2024: 0.634 CAUTI 1.28 → 1.13 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.283CAUTI, 2018: 0.527CAUTI, 2019: 0.693CAUTI, 2021: 1.100CAUTI, 2022: 0.435CAUTI, 2023: 0.743CAUTI, 2024: 1.133 SSI, colon 1.81 → 1.63 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.808SSI, colon, 2018: 0.661SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.926SSI, colon, 2022: 0.472SSI, colon, 2023: 2.277SSI, colon, 2024: 1.629 MRSA 0.00 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 0.308MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.608MRSA, 2022: 0.626MRSA, 2023: 0.636MRSA, 2024: 0.381 C. diff 0.91 → 0.18 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.914C. diff, 2018: 0.768C. diff, 2019: 0.343C. diff, 2021: 0.080C. diff, 2022: 0.130C. diff, 2023: 0.245C. diff, 2024: 0.178 CLABSI 1.06 → 0.63 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.063CLABSI, 2018: 0.499CLABSI, 2019: 0.483CLABSI, 2021: 0.739CLABSI, 2022: 0.562CLABSI, 2023: 1.070CLABSI, 2024: 0.634 CAUTI 1.28 → 1.13 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.283CAUTI, 2018: 0.527CAUTI, 2019: 0.693CAUTI, 2021: 1.100CAUTI, 2022: 0.435CAUTI, 2023: 0.743CAUTI, 2024: 1.133 SSI, colon 1.81 → 1.63 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.808SSI, colon, 2018: 0.661SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.926SSI, colon, 2022: 0.472SSI, colon, 2023: 2.277SSI, colon, 2024: 1.629 MRSA 0.00 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 0.308MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.608MRSA, 2022: 0.626MRSA, 2023: 0.636MRSA, 2024: 0.381 C. diff 0.91 → 0.18 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.914C. diff, 2018: 0.768C. diff, 2019: 0.343C. diff, 2021: 0.080C. diff, 2022: 0.130C. diff, 2023: 0.245C. diff, 2024: 0.178

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20171.0631.2831.8080.0000.914
20180.4990.5270.6610.3080.768
20190.4830.6930.0000.0000.343
20210.7391.1000.9260.6080.080
20220.5620.4350.4720.6260.130
20231.0700.7432.2770.6360.245
20240.6341.1331.6290.3810.178

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Illinois, its score is higher than 72% of the other 111 scored there.

In Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area, its score is higher than 71% of the other 53 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 30% (Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois 112 hospitals28% cut Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area: CMS cut 16 of 54 (30%); middle score −0.0514Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area54 hospitals30% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3837 This hospital 0.3837 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Illinois: CMS cut 31 of 112 (28%); middle score 0.0528Illinois112 hospitals28% cut Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area: CMS cut 16 of 54 (30%); middle score −0.0514Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area54 hospitals30% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3837 This hospital 0.3837

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045375%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026874%
Illinois1123128%0.052872%
Chicago-Naperville-Schaumburg, IL area541630%−0.051471%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056779%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073277%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013474%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057477%
This hospital0.3837
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi8. The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago: score −0.0700, not cut, 6 miles87. Palos Community Hospital, Palos Heights: score 0.6265, cut, 6 miles76. Advocate Trinity Hospital, Chicago: score 0.2800, not cut, 6 miles65. Jackson Park Hospital, Chicago: score 1.0161, cut, 6 miles54. St Bernard Hospital, Chicago: score −0.1496, not cut, 5 miles43. Roseland Community Hospital, Chicago: score 0.9385, cut, 4 miles32. Holy Cross Hospital, Chicago: score −0.0473, not cut, 3 miles21. Advocate Christ Hospital & Medical Center, Oak Lawn: score 0.2914, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: OSF Little Company of Mary Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Advocate Christ Hospital & Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL20.2914not cut
Holy Cross Hospital, Chicago, IL3−0.0473not cut
Roseland Community Hospital, Chicago, IL40.9385cut
St Bernard Hospital, Chicago, IL5−0.1496not cut
Jackson Park Hospital, Chicago, IL61.0161cut
Advocate Trinity Hospital, Chicago, IL60.2800not cut
Palos Community Hospital, Palos Heights, IL60.6265cut
The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL6−0.0700not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Advocate Christ Hospital & Medical CenterOak Lawn, IL20.2914No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Holy Cross HospitalChicago, IL3−0.0473No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
3Roseland Community HospitalChicago, IL40.93851% cut$54KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4St Bernard HospitalChicago, IL5−0.1496No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 5 measures
5Jackson Park HospitalChicago, IL61.01611% cut$62KAbove the national median on 3 of 5 measures
6Advocate Trinity HospitalChicago, IL60.2800No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Palos Community HospitalPalos Heights, IL60.62651% cut$1.0MAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
8The University of Chicago Medical CenterChicago, IL6−0.0700No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. OSF Little Company of Mary Medical Center, Evergreen Park, IL: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/140179/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.