P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalWest Valley Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: +$109K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 130014

1Hospital

West Valley Medical Center

2Location

Caldwell, ID (Idaho’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 83605

Canyon County

3Type

Minor teaching · 150 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

5 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.9870

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $77K, likely $59⁠–⁠97K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.9870 for West Valley Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $77K estimate 1% of about $7.7M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 1.3669 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $59–97K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.9870 This hospital −0.9870 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.9870 This hospital −0.9870

Higher than 4% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 4 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

None of the measures CMS scored it on is above the national median, so no single measure at the median would lower its score.

Figure 1. Of its 4 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 0.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 80% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8761

    Z-score−0.7846

    Part of score−0.1962

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.3297

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 62% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.627

    Z-score−0.3824

    Part of score−0.0956

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4622

    Part of score−0.3656

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.87610.9623−0.7846−0.1962Better than 80% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.3297Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.6270.795−0.3824−0.0956Better than 62% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.0000.346−1.4622−0.3656Better than 91% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 4; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.7846PSI 90−1.3186CAUTI−0.3824SSI−1.4622CDI)÷4measures=−0.9870Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.9870; CMS reports −0.9870. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 1.3669 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.9870, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7846 divided by 4 = −0.1962PSI 90−0.1962 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 4 = −0.3297CAUTI−0.3297 SSI: z‑score −0.3824 divided by 4 = −0.0956SSI−0.0956 CDI: z‑score −1.4622 divided by 4 = −0.3656CDI−0.3656 Total HAC Score: −0.9870Score−0.9870 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7846 divided by 4 = −0.1962PSI 90−0.1962 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 4 = −0.3297CAUTI−0.3297 SSI: z‑score −0.3824 divided by 4 = −0.0956SSI−0.0956 CDI: z‑score −1.4622 divided by 4 = −0.3656CDI−0.3656 Total HAC Score: −0.9870Score−0.9870 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.7846−0.1962−0.1962
CAUTI−1.3186−0.3297−0.5259
SSI−0.3824−0.0956−0.6215
CDI−1.4622−0.3656−0.9871
Total HAC Score−0.9870
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.3669 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 1.3669 higher, the cut would have been about $77K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $77K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $77K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.9870 This hospital −0.9870 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $77K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $77Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.9870 This hospital −0.9870

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$76,982
This hospital−0.9870$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$76,982

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($7,403,604payment+$185,349teaching, MA stays+$0readmissions+$109,202value-based)×1%the cut=$76,982at stake

$76,982at stake÷497traditional Medicare stays=$155per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $77K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and +$109K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $5,460,971
Teaching (indirect medical education) $97,315
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $185,349
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $356,328
Capital: buildings and equipment $478,570
Uncompensated care $1,010,420
Total, before the three programs $7,588,953
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0200 − 1) +$109,202
After these two $7,698,155
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $76,982 $0
Net of the three programs likely $88⁠–⁠128K +$109,202

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, outlier payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$5,460,971
Teaching (indirect medical education)$97,315
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$185,349
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$356,328
Capital: buildings and equipment$478,570
Uncompensated care$1,010,420
Total, before the three programs$7,588,953
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0200 − 1))+$109,202
After these two$7,698,155
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $76,982)$0
Net of the three programs (likely $88–128K)+$109,202

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.9870same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.9870 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $77K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 4 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8761 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1745

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0603

CMS 0.627 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0428

CMS 0.000 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0968

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.9870: its z‑score divided by 4, the number of measures scored.
  • PSI 90 −0.1962
  • CAUTI −0.3297
  • SSI −0.0956
  • CDI −0.3656

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 4, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.7846−0.1962same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.3297same
SSI−0.3824−0.0956same
CDI−1.4622−0.3656same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/130014/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.4500, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.5000, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.8900, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0638, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −1.1831, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −1.0618, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9563, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.7995, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −1.1837, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −1.0410, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.9870, higher than 4% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.4500, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.5000, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.8900, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0638, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −1.1831, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −1.0618, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.9563, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.7995, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −1.1837, higher than 1% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −1.0410, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.9870, higher than 4% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.450018.8%not cut
FY20163.500016.7%not cut
FY20174.890039.6%not cut
FY2018−0.063845.9%not cut
FY2019−1.18316.4%not cut
FY2020−1.06184.6%not cut
FY2021−0.95636.0%not cut
FY2022−0.79959.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−1.18371.8%not cut
FY2025−1.04103.7%not cut
FY2026−0.98704.1%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.917CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000 C. diff 0.13 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.129C. diff, 2018: 0.194C. diff, 2019: 0.206C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.917CAUTI, 2021: 0.000CAUTI, 2022: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000 C. diff 0.13 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.129C. diff, 2018: 0.194C. diff, 2019: 0.206C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.0000.129
20180.9170.194
20190.0000.206
20210.0000.0000.000
20220.0000.000
20230.000
20240.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Idaho, its score is higher than 0% of the other 14 scored there.

In Boise City, ID area, its score is higher than 0% of the other 5 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Idaho) to 26% (West region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Idaho: CMS cut 2 of 15 (13%); middle score −0.0963Idaho 15 hospitals13% cut Boise City, ID area: CMS cut 1 of 6 (17%); middle score 0.0715Boise City, ID area 6 hospitals17% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.9870 This hospital −0.9870 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Idaho: CMS cut 2 of 15 (13%); middle score −0.0963Idaho15 hospitals13% cut Boise City, ID area: CMS cut 1 of 6 (17%); middle score 0.0715Boise City, ID area6 hospitals17% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.9870 This hospital −0.9870

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.04534%
West region59315726%−0.03023%
Idaho15213%−0.09630%
Boise City, ID area6117%0.07150%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.05671%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.07323%
For-profit6519815%−0.25909%
Urban2,24151023%−0.05743%
This hospital−0.9870
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 6 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Providence St Mary Medical Center, Walla Walla: score −0.1921, not cut, 187 miles87. St Lukes Magic Valley Medical Center, Twin Falls: score −0.5523, not cut, 134 miles76. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Ontario, Ontario: score 0.9725, cut, 29 miles65. St Luke's Regional Medical Center, Boise: score −0.0111, not cut, 25 miles54. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise: score 0.1541, not cut, 22 miles43. Treasure Valley Hospital, Boise: score −0.2650, not cut, 20 miles32. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa, Nampa: score 1.0612, cut, 10 miles21. St Luke's Nampa Medical Center, Nampa: score 0.1612, not cut, 6 miles1This hospital: West Valley Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
St Luke's Nampa Medical Center, Nampa, ID60.1612not cut
Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa, Nampa, ID101.0612cut
Treasure Valley Hospital, Boise, ID20−0.2650not cut
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, ID220.1541not cut
St Luke's Regional Medical Center, Boise, ID25−0.0111not cut
Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Ontario, Ontario, OR290.9725cut
St Lukes Magic Valley Medical Center, Twin Falls, ID134−0.5523not cut
Providence St Mary Medical Center, Walla Walla, WA187−0.1921not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1St Luke's Nampa Medical CenterNampa, ID60.1612No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - NampaNampa, ID101.06121% cut$169KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
3Treasure Valley HospitalBoise, ID20−0.2650No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
4Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterBoise, ID220.1541No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5St Luke's Regional Medical CenterBoise, ID25−0.0111No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6Saint Alphonsus Medical Center OntarioOntario, OR290.97251% cut$46KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
7St Lukes Magic Valley Medical CenterTwin Falls, ID134−0.5523No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Providence St Mary Medical CenterWalla Walla, WA187−0.1921No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. West Valley Medical Center, Caldwell, ID: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/130014/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.