P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSaint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa Estimated FY2026 net: −$262K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 130013

1Hospital

Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa

2Location

Nampa, ID (Idaho’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 83687

Canyon County

3Type

Minor teaching · 152 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

1.0612

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$169K estimate
Likely $124⁠–⁠210K; about $141 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$169K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.0612 for Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $16.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $141 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $124–210K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.0612 This hospital 1.0612 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.0612 This hospital 1.0612

Higher than 94% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.4090, to 0.6522. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 6; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0101

    Z-score0.1513

    Part of score+0.0252

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 84% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.033

    Z-score0.9899

    Part of score+0.1650

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 94% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.507

    Z-score2.3140

    Part of score+0.3857

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 60% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.940

    Z-score0.1537

    Part of score+0.0256

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.668

    Z-score1.1244

    Part of score+0.1874

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 91% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.479

    Z-score1.6337

    Part of score+0.2723

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.01010.96230.1513+0.0252Worse than 67% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.0330.5590.9899+0.1650Worse than 84% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.5070.4892.3140+0.3857Worse than 94% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.9400.7950.1537+0.0256Worse than 60% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.6680.3461.1244+0.1874Worse than 85% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.4790.6411.6337+0.2723Worse than 91% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.1513PSI 90+0.9899CLABSI+2.3140CAUTI+0.1537SSI+1.1244CDI+1.6337MRSA)÷6measures=1.0612Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.6820 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 1.0612, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.1513 divided by 6 = +0.0252PSI 90+0.0252 CLABSI: z‑score 0.9899 divided by 6 = +0.1650CLABSI+0.1650 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3140 divided by 6 = +0.3857CAUTI+0.3857 SSI: z‑score 0.1537 divided by 6 = +0.0256SSI+0.0256 CDI: z‑score 1.1244 divided by 6 = +0.1874CDI+0.1874 MRSA: z‑score 1.6337 divided by 6 = +0.2723MRSA+0.2723 Total HAC Score: 1.0612Score1.0612 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.1513 divided by 6 = +0.0252PSI 90+0.0252 CLABSI: z‑score 0.9899 divided by 6 = +0.1650CLABSI+0.1650 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3140 divided by 6 = +0.3857CAUTI+0.3857 SSI: z‑score 0.1537 divided by 6 = +0.0256SSI+0.0256 CDI: z‑score 1.1244 divided by 6 = +0.1874CDI+0.1874 MRSA: z‑score 1.6337 divided by 6 = +0.2723MRSA+0.2723 Total HAC Score: 1.0612Score1.0612 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.1513+0.02520.0252
CLABSI0.9899+0.16500.1902
CAUTI2.3140+0.38570.5759
SSI0.1537+0.02560.6015
CDI1.1244+0.18740.7889
MRSA1.6337+0.27231.0612
Total HAC Score1.0612
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.6820 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $169K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $169K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $169K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.0612 This hospital 1.0612 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $169K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $169Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 1.0612 This hospital 1.0612

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$168,991
This hospital1.0612−$168,991
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$168,991

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($16,991,871payment−$28,106readmissions−$64,627value-based)×1%the cut=$168,991HAC cut

$168,991HAC cut÷1,198traditional Medicare stays=$141per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $169K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$28K and −$65K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $13,383,624
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $365,641
Outliers: unusually costly stays $226,183
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,072,715
Uncompensated care $1,943,708
Total, before the three programs $16,991,871
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9979 − 1) −$28,106
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9952 − 1) −$64,627
After these two $16,899,138
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $124⁠–⁠210K −$168,991
Net of the three programs likely −$334K to −$189K −$261,724

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$13,383,624
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$365,641
Outliers: unusually costly stays$226,183
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,072,715
Uncompensated care$1,943,708
Total, before the three programs$16,991,871
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9979 − 1))−$28,106
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9952 − 1))−$64,627
After these two$16,899,138
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $124–210K)−$168,991
Net of the three programs (likely −$334K to −$189K)−$261,724

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score1.0612same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$169Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.0612 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $169K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0101 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.033 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.507 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.940 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.668 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.479 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 1.0612 among its measured results: +0.3857.
  • PSI 90 +0.0252
  • CLABSI +0.1650
  • CAUTI +0.3857
  • SSI +0.0256
  • CDI +0.1874
  • MRSA +0.2723

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.1513+0.0252same
CLABSI0.9899+0.1650same
CAUTI2.3140+0.3857same
SSI0.1537+0.0256same
CDI1.1244+0.1874same
MRSA1.6337+0.2723same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.1000, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.7500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.3800, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4131, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.9598, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5845, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1698, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2536, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.0440, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.2739, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 1.0612, higher than 94% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.1000, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 3.7500, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.3800, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4131, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.9598, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5845, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1698, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2536, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.0440, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.2739, higher than 70% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 1.0612, higher than 94% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.100029.0%not cut
FY20163.750019.6%not cut
FY20173.380018.2%not cut
FY2018−0.413124.7%not cut
FY2019−0.95989.3%not cut
FY2020−0.584516.3%not cut
FY2021−0.169839.4%not cut
FY2022−0.253633.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.044049.7%not cut
FY20250.273970.3%not cut
FY20261.061294.9%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.78 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.332CLABSI, 2019: 0.372CLABSI, 2021: 2.062CLABSI, 2022: 0.871CLABSI, 2023: 1.323CLABSI, 2024: 0.778 CAUTI 0.54 → 1.75 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.542CAUTI, 2018: 0.601CAUTI, 2019: 0.302CAUTI, 2021: 0.805CAUTI, 2022: 0.299CAUTI, 2023: 1.250CAUTI, 2024: 1.747 SSI, colon 0.53 → 1.50 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.532SSI, colon, 2018: 0.797SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.374SSI, colon, 2024: 1.501 MRSA 0.95 → 1.45 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.954MRSA, 2021: 0.000MRSA, 2022: 0.722MRSA, 2023: 1.514MRSA, 2024: 1.446 C. diff 0.52 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.521C. diff, 2018: 0.611C. diff, 2019: 0.542C. diff, 2021: 0.549C. diff, 2022: 0.872C. diff, 2023: 0.871C. diff, 2024: 0.482 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.78 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.332CLABSI, 2019: 0.372CLABSI, 2021: 2.062CLABSI, 2022: 0.871CLABSI, 2023: 1.323CLABSI, 2024: 0.778 CAUTI 0.54 → 1.75 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.542CAUTI, 2018: 0.601CAUTI, 2019: 0.302CAUTI, 2021: 0.805CAUTI, 2022: 0.299CAUTI, 2023: 1.250CAUTI, 2024: 1.747 SSI, colon 0.53 → 1.50 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.532SSI, colon, 2018: 0.797SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.374SSI, colon, 2024: 1.501 MRSA 0.95 → 1.45 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2019: 0.954MRSA, 2021: 0.000MRSA, 2022: 0.722MRSA, 2023: 1.514MRSA, 2024: 1.446 C. diff 0.52 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.521C. diff, 2018: 0.611C. diff, 2019: 0.542C. diff, 2021: 0.549C. diff, 2022: 0.872C. diff, 2023: 0.871C. diff, 2024: 0.482

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.0000.5420.5320.521
20180.3320.6010.7970.611
20190.3720.3020.9540.542
20212.0620.8050.0000.0000.549
20220.8710.2990.0000.7220.872
20231.3231.2500.3741.5140.871
20240.7781.7471.5011.4460.482

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Idaho, its score is higher than 100% of the other 14 scored there.

In Boise City, ID area, its score is higher than 100% of the other 5 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Idaho) to 26% (West region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Idaho: CMS cut 2 of 15 (13%); middle score −0.0963Idaho 15 hospitals13% cut Boise City, ID area: CMS cut 1 of 6 (17%); middle score 0.0715Boise City, ID area 6 hospitals17% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 1.0612 This hospital 1.0612 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Idaho: CMS cut 2 of 15 (13%); middle score −0.0963Idaho15 hospitals13% cut Boise City, ID area: CMS cut 1 of 6 (17%); middle score 0.0715Boise City, ID area6 hospitals17% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 1.0612 This hospital 1.0612

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045394%
West region59315726%−0.030293%
Idaho15213%−0.0963100%
Boise City, ID area6117%0.0715100%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056797%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073296%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013496%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057496%
This hospital1.0612
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 4 miles away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Providence St Mary Medical Center, Walla Walla: score −0.1921, not cut, 194 miles87. St Lukes Magic Valley Medical Center, Twin Falls: score −0.5523, not cut, 125 miles76. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Ontario, Ontario: score 0.9725, cut, 37 miles65. St Luke's Regional Medical Center, Boise: score −0.0111, not cut, 16 miles54. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise: score 0.1541, not cut, 13 miles43. Treasure Valley Hospital, Boise: score −0.2650, not cut, 11 miles32. West Valley Medical Center, Caldwell: score −0.9870, not cut, 10 miles21. St Luke's Nampa Medical Center, Nampa: score 0.1612, not cut, 4 miles1This hospital: Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
St Luke's Nampa Medical Center, Nampa, ID40.1612not cut
West Valley Medical Center, Caldwell, ID10−0.9870not cut
Treasure Valley Hospital, Boise, ID11−0.2650not cut
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center, Boise, ID130.1541not cut
St Luke's Regional Medical Center, Boise, ID16−0.0111not cut
Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Ontario, Ontario, OR370.9725cut
St Lukes Magic Valley Medical Center, Twin Falls, ID125−0.5523not cut
Providence St Mary Medical Center, Walla Walla, WA194−0.1921not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1St Luke's Nampa Medical CenterNampa, ID40.1612No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2West Valley Medical CenterCaldwell, ID10−0.9870No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 4 measures
3Treasure Valley HospitalBoise, ID11−0.2650No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
4Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterBoise, ID130.1541No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5St Luke's Regional Medical CenterBoise, ID16−0.0111No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6Saint Alphonsus Medical Center OntarioOntario, OR370.97251% cut$46KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
7St Lukes Magic Valley Medical CenterTwin Falls, ID125−0.5523No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Providence St Mary Medical CenterWalla Walla, WA194−0.1921No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa, Nampa, ID: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/130013/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.