P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalPacifica Hospital of the Valley Estimated FY2026 net: −$41K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050378

1Hospital

Pacifica Hospital of the Valley

2Location

Sun Valley, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 91352

Los Angeles County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 161 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

Not Available

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 16: There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

1.5073

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

Likely $31⁠–⁠51K; about $166 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$41K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.5073 for Pacifica Hospital of the Valley and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $4.1M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $166 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $31–51K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.5073 This hospital 1.5073 lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.5073 This hospital 1.5073

Higher than 98% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 9 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19No
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.5052, to 1.0021. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 51% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9593

    Z-score−0.2035

    Part of score−0.0407

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value2.597

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.4480

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value2.513

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.4773

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 82% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.607

    Z-score0.8882

    Part of score+0.1776

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value2.970

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.4450

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.95930.9623−0.2035−0.0407Better than 51% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI2.5970.5592.2402+0.4480Worse than 99% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI2.5130.4892.3863+0.4773Worse than 99% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDI0.6070.3460.8882+0.1776Worse than 82% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA2.9700.6412.2251+0.4450Worse than 99% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.2035PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI+0.8882CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷5measures=1.5073Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 1.1281 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 1.5073, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2035 divided by 5 = −0.0407PSI 90−0.0407 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 5 = +0.4480CLABSI+0.4480 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 CDI: z‑score 0.8882 divided by 5 = +0.1776CDI+0.1776 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 1.5073Score1.5073 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.2035 divided by 5 = −0.0407PSI 90−0.0407 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 5 = +0.4480CLABSI+0.4480 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 CDI: z‑score 0.8882 divided by 5 = +0.1776CDI+0.1776 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 1.5073Score1.5073 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.51.01.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.2035−0.0407−0.0407
CLABSI2.2402+0.44800.4073
CAUTI2.3863+0.47730.8846
CDI0.8882+0.17761.0622
MRSA2.2251+0.44501.5072
Total HAC Score1.5073
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.1281 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $41K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $41K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $41K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.5073 This hospital 1.5073 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $41K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $41Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.5073 This hospital 1.5073

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$40,595
This hospital1.5073−$40,595
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$40,595

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($4,059,515payment+$0readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$40,595HAC cut

$40,595HAC cut÷244traditional Medicare stays=$166per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $41K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $2,846,182
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $526,202
Outliers: unusually costly stays $69,048
Capital: buildings and equipment $278,705
Uncompensated care $339,378
Total, before the three programs $4,059,515
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $4,059,515
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $31⁠–⁠51K −$40,595
Net of the three programs likely −$48K to −$33K −$40,595

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$2,846,182
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$526,202
Outliers: unusually costly stays$69,048
Capital: buildings and equipment$278,705
Uncompensated care$339,378
Total, before the three programs$4,059,515
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$4,059,515
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $31–51K)−$40,595
Net of the three programs (likely −$48K to −$33K)−$40,595

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score1.5073same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$41Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.5073 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $41K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9593 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 2.597 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 2.513 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 0.607 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

CMS 2.970 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0418

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 1.5073 among its measured results: +0.4773.
  • PSI 90 −0.0407
  • CLABSI +0.4480
  • CAUTI +0.4773
  • CDI +0.1776
  • MRSA +0.4450

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.2035−0.0407same
CLABSI2.2402+0.4480same
CAUTI2.3863+0.4773same
CDI0.8882+0.1776same
MRSA2.2251+0.4450same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 4 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 9 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.5500, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2016: score 8.5000, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.7625, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6795, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.1309, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.4543, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3935, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.5847, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 1.2261, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.2099, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.5073, higher than 98% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.5500, higher than 84% of scores; cutFY2016: score 8.5000, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2017: score 6.7625, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.6795, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.1309, higher than 62% of scores; not cutFY2020: score 0.4543, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3935, higher than 77% of scores; cutFY2022: score −0.5847, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 1.2261, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.2099, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.5073, higher than 98% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.550084.4%cut
FY20168.500093.7%cut
FY20176.762579.1%cut
FY20180.679587.9%cut
FY20190.130962.5%not cut
FY20200.454381.1%cut
FY20210.393577.7%cut
FY2022−0.584716.4%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20241.226195.7%cut
FY20251.209996.4%cut
FY20261.507398.0%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 4.19 → 1.76 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 4.188CLABSI, 2022: 2.577CLABSI, 2023: 3.410CLABSI, 2024: 1.759 CAUTI 1.26 → 2.48 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2021: 1.256CAUTI, 2022: 1.949CAUTI, 2023: 2.545CAUTI, 2024: 2.483 C. diff 0.62 → 0.62 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.617C. diff, 2018: 0.549C. diff, 2019: 0.188C. diff, 2021: 1.685C. diff, 2022: 0.621C. diff, 2023: 0.590C. diff, 2024: 0.618 CLABSI 4.19 → 1.76 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 4.188CLABSI, 2022: 2.577CLABSI, 2023: 3.410CLABSI, 2024: 1.759 CAUTI 1.26 → 2.48 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2021: 1.256CAUTI, 2022: 1.949CAUTI, 2023: 2.545CAUTI, 2024: 2.483 C. diff 0.62 → 0.62 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.617C. diff, 2018: 0.549C. diff, 2019: 0.188C. diff, 2021: 1.685C. diff, 2022: 0.621C. diff, 2023: 0.590C. diff, 2024: 0.618

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIC. diff
20170.617
20180.549
20190.188
20214.1881.2561.685
20222.5771.9490.621
20233.4102.5450.590
20241.7592.4830.618

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 98% of the other 276 scored there.

In Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area, its score is higher than 98% of the other 69 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 30% (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 1.5073 This hospital 1.5073 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 1.5073 This hospital 1.5073

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045398%
West region59315726%−0.030297%
California2777627%−0.021798%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area702130%0.020098%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105397%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073299%
For-profit6519815%−0.259097%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057498%
This hospital1.5073
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi8. Encino Hospital Medical Center, Encino: score −0.6552, not cut, 8 miles87. Providence Saint Joseph Medical Ctr, Burbank: score −0.2155, not cut, 7 miles76. LAC/Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar: score 0.6690, cut, 6 miles65. Sherman Oaks Hospital, Sherman Oaks: score −1.2170, not cut, 6 miles54. Valley Presbyterian Hospital, Van Nuys: score 0.0114, not cut, 5 miles43. Providence Holy Cross Medical Center, Mission Hills: score −0.3794, not cut, 5 miles32. Mission Community Hospital, Panorama City: score 1.0928, cut, 4 miles21. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City, Panorama City: score −0.0567, not cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Pacifica Hospital of the Valley

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City, Panorama City, CA2−0.0567not cut
Mission Community Hospital, Panorama City, CA41.0928cut
Providence Holy Cross Medical Center, Mission Hills, CA5−0.3794not cut
Valley Presbyterian Hospital, Van Nuys, CA50.0114not cut
Sherman Oaks Hospital, Sherman Oaks, CA6−1.2170not cut
LAC/Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA60.6690cut
Providence Saint Joseph Medical Ctr, Burbank, CA7−0.2155not cut
Encino Hospital Medical Center, Encino, CA8−0.6552not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama CityPanorama City, CA2−0.0567No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Mission Community HospitalPanorama City, CA41.09281% cut$337KAbove the national median on 4 of 5 measures
3Providence Holy Cross Medical CenterMission Hills, CA5−0.3794No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
4Valley Presbyterian HospitalVan Nuys, CA50.0114No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Sherman Oaks HospitalSherman Oaks, CA6−1.2170No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
6LAC/Olive View-UCLA Medical CenterSylmar, CA60.66901% cut$422KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Providence Saint Joseph Medical CtrBurbank, CA7−0.2155No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
8Encino Hospital Medical CenterEncino, CA8−0.6552No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Pacifica Hospital of the Valley, Sun Valley, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050378/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.