P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalProvidence Saint Joseph Medical Ctr Estimated FY2026 net: −$1.3M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050235

1Hospital

Providence Saint Joseph Medical Ctr

2Location

Burbank, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 91505

Los Angeles County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 360 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.2155

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $1.0M, likely $824K⁠–⁠$1.1M estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.2155 for Providence Saint Joseph Medical Ctr and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $1.0M estimate 1% of about $101M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.5954 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $824K–$1.1M

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.2155 This hospital −0.2155 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.2155 This hospital −0.2155

Higher than 37% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 4 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.0707, to −0.2862. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 50% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9633

    Z-score−0.1756

    Part of score−0.0293

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 61% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.685

    Z-score0.1826

    Part of score+0.0304

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.665

    Z-score0.2844

    Part of score+0.0474

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 85% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.211

    Z-score−1.0950

    Part of score−0.1825

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 58% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.403

    Z-score0.0983

    Part of score+0.0164

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 70% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.416

    Z-score−0.5879

    Part of score−0.0980

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.96330.9623−0.1756−0.0293Worse than 50% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6850.5590.1826+0.0304Worse than 61% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.6650.4890.2844+0.0474Worse than 68% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.2110.795−1.0950−0.1825Better than 85% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.4030.3460.0983+0.0164Worse than 58% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.4160.641−0.5879−0.0980Better than 70% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.1756PSI 90+0.1826CLABSI+0.2844CAUTI−1.0950SSI+0.0983CDI−0.5879MRSA)÷6measures=−0.2155Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.2155; CMS reports −0.2155. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.5954 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.2155, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1756 divided by 6 = −0.0293PSI 90−0.0293 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1826 divided by 6 = +0.0304CLABSI+0.0304 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2844 divided by 6 = +0.0474CAUTI+0.0474 SSI: z‑score −1.0950 divided by 6 = −0.1825SSI−0.1825 CDI: z‑score 0.0983 divided by 6 = +0.0164CDI+0.0164 MRSA: z‑score −0.5879 divided by 6 = −0.0980MRSA−0.0980 Total HAC Score: −0.2155Score−0.2155 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1756 divided by 6 = −0.0293PSI 90−0.0293 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1826 divided by 6 = +0.0304CLABSI+0.0304 CAUTI: z‑score 0.2844 divided by 6 = +0.0474CAUTI+0.0474 SSI: z‑score −1.0950 divided by 6 = −0.1825SSI−0.1825 CDI: z‑score 0.0983 divided by 6 = +0.0164CDI+0.0164 MRSA: z‑score −0.5879 divided by 6 = −0.0980MRSA−0.0980 Total HAC Score: −0.2155Score−0.2155 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.1756−0.0293−0.0293
CLABSI0.1826+0.03040.0011
CAUTI0.2844+0.04740.0485
SSI−1.0950−0.1825−0.1340
CDI0.0983+0.0164−0.1176
MRSA−0.5879−0.0980−0.2156
Total HAC Score−0.2155
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.5954 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.5954 higher, the cut would have been about $1.0M by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.2155 This hospital −0.2155 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $1.0Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.2155 This hospital −0.2155

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$1,012,371
This hospital−0.2155$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$1,012,371

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($102,545,583payment−$883,677readmissions−$424,849value-based)×1%the cut=$1,012,371at stake

$1,012,371at stake÷5,030traditional Medicare stays=$201per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $1.0M by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$884K and −$425K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $80,334,288
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $6,417,103
Outliers: unusually costly stays $6,854,121
Capital: buildings and equipment $7,212,330
Uncompensated care $1,727,741
Total, before the three programs $102,545,583
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9890 − 1) −$883,677
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9947 − 1) −$424,849
After these two $101,237,057
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $1,012,371 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$1.4M to −$1.1M −$1,308,526

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$80,334,288
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$6,417,103
Outliers: unusually costly stays$6,854,121
Capital: buildings and equipment$7,212,330
Uncompensated care$1,727,741
Total, before the three programs$102,545,583
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9890 − 1))−$883,677
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9947 − 1))−$424,849
After these two$101,237,057
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $1,012,371)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$1.4M to −$1.1M)−$1,308,526

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.2155same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.2155 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $1.0M out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9633 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.685 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.665 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.211 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.403 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.416 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.2155 among its measured results: +0.0474.
  • PSI 90 −0.0293
  • CLABSI +0.0304
  • CAUTI +0.0474
  • SSI −0.1825
  • CDI +0.0164
  • MRSA −0.0980

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.1756−0.0293same
CLABSI0.1826+0.0304same
CAUTI0.2844+0.0474same
SSI−1.0950−0.1825same
CDI0.0983+0.0164same
MRSA−0.5879−0.0980same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050235/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 4 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 4 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.8500, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.2500, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2017: score 8.2700, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.3898, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.4777, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.0577, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1947, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1555, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5271, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.5419, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.2155, higher than 37% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.8500, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 7.2500, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2017: score 8.2700, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.3898, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.4777, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.0577, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1947, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1555, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5271, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.5419, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.2155, higher than 37% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.850071.5%not cut
FY20167.250081.2%cut
FY20178.270095.6%cut
FY20181.389896.9%cut
FY20190.477780.8%cut
FY2020−0.057747.7%not cut
FY2021−0.194738.0%not cut
FY2022−0.155540.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.527118.2%not cut
FY2025−0.541918.3%not cut
FY2026−0.215537.6%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.27 → 1.13 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.273CLABSI, 2018: 0.513CLABSI, 2019: 0.426CLABSI, 2021: 1.948CLABSI, 2022: 0.400CLABSI, 2023: 0.266CLABSI, 2024: 1.134 CAUTI 1.83 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.831CAUTI, 2018: 1.681CAUTI, 2019: 1.309CAUTI, 2021: 0.260CAUTI, 2022: 0.570CAUTI, 2023: 0.862CAUTI, 2024: 0.456 SSI, colon 0.20 → 0.36 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.196SSI, colon, 2018: 0.220SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.360 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.91 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.907 MRSA 1.29 → 0.63 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.295MRSA, 2018: 0.861MRSA, 2019: 0.580MRSA, 2021: 1.454MRSA, 2022: 0.547MRSA, 2023: 0.250MRSA, 2024: 0.625 C. diff 0.94 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.938C. diff, 2018: 0.196C. diff, 2019: 0.341C. diff, 2021: 0.236C. diff, 2022: 0.410C. diff, 2023: 0.317C. diff, 2024: 0.481 CLABSI 1.27 → 1.13 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.273CLABSI, 2018: 0.513CLABSI, 2019: 0.426CLABSI, 2021: 1.948CLABSI, 2022: 0.400CLABSI, 2023: 0.266CLABSI, 2024: 1.134 CAUTI 1.83 → 0.46 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.831CAUTI, 2018: 1.681CAUTI, 2019: 1.309CAUTI, 2021: 0.260CAUTI, 2022: 0.570CAUTI, 2023: 0.862CAUTI, 2024: 0.456 SSI, colon 0.20 → 0.36 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.196SSI, colon, 2018: 0.220SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.360 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.91 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.907 MRSA 1.29 → 0.63 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.295MRSA, 2018: 0.861MRSA, 2019: 0.580MRSA, 2021: 1.454MRSA, 2022: 0.547MRSA, 2023: 0.250MRSA, 2024: 0.625 C. diff 0.94 → 0.48 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.938C. diff, 2018: 0.196C. diff, 2019: 0.341C. diff, 2021: 0.236C. diff, 2022: 0.410C. diff, 2023: 0.317C. diff, 2024: 0.481

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.2731.8310.1960.0001.2950.938
20180.5131.6810.2200.0000.8610.196
20190.4261.3090.0000.0000.5800.341
20211.9480.2600.0000.0001.4540.236
20220.4000.5700.0000.0000.5470.410
20230.2660.8620.0000.0000.2500.317
20241.1340.4560.3600.9070.6250.481

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 36% of the other 276 scored there.

In Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area, its score is higher than 34% of the other 69 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (300 to 499 beds) to 30% (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.2155 This hospital −0.2155 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.2155 This hospital −0.2155

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045337%
West region59315726%−0.030236%
California2777627%−0.021736%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area702130%0.020034%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105342%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038435%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013434%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057437%
This hospital−0.2155
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 4 miles away.
5 mi8. Sherman Oaks Hospital, Sherman Oaks: score −1.2170, not cut, 7 miles87. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles: score 0.2860, not cut, 6 miles76. USC Verdugo Hills Hospital, Glendale: score 0.3430, not cut, 6 miles65. Glendale Adventist Medical Center, Glendale: score −0.8423, not cut, 6 miles54. Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles: score −1.0158, not cut, 5 miles43. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Los Angeles, Los Angeles: score 0.0463, not cut, 4 miles32. Glendale Mem Hospital & Hlth Center, Glendale: score −0.5249, not cut, 4 miles21. Southern California Hospital at Hollywood, Hollywood: score −1.2793, not cut, 4 miles1This hospital: Providence Saint Joseph Medical Ctr

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Southern California Hospital at Hollywood, Hollywood, CA4−1.2793not cut
Glendale Mem Hospital & Hlth Center, Glendale, CA4−0.5249not cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA40.0463not cut
Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA5−1.0158not cut
Glendale Adventist Medical Center, Glendale, CA6−0.8423not cut
USC Verdugo Hills Hospital, Glendale, CA60.3430not cut
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA60.2860not cut
Sherman Oaks Hospital, Sherman Oaks, CA7−1.2170not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Southern California Hospital at HollywoodHollywood, CA4−1.2793No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
2Glendale Mem Hospital & Hlth CenterGlendale, CA4−0.5249No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Los AngelesLos Angeles, CA40.0463No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterLos Angeles, CA5−1.0158No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
5Glendale Adventist Medical CenterGlendale, CA6−0.8423No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
6USC Verdugo Hills HospitalGlendale, CA60.3430No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos Angeles, CA60.2860No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
8Sherman Oaks HospitalSherman Oaks, CA7−1.2170No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Providence Saint Joseph Medical Ctr, Burbank, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050235/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.