P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalAdventist Health Simi Valley Estimated FY2026 net: −$890K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050236

1Hospital

Adventist Health Simi Valley

2Location

Simi Valley, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 93065

Ventura County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 149 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3861

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$413K estimate
Likely $315⁠–⁠520K; about $165 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$413K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3861 for Adventist Health Simi Valley and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $41.3M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $165 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $315–520K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3861 This hospital 0.3861 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3861 This hospital 0.3861

Higher than 75% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 6 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.3905, to −0.0044. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 79% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0900

    Z-score0.7087

    Part of score+0.1181

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.103

    Z-score1.1522

    Part of score+0.1920

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 74% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.253

    Z-score−0.7088

    Part of score−0.1181

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 83% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.271

    Z-score−0.9923

    Part of score−0.1654

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.360

    Z-score−0.0682

    Part of score−0.0114

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.795

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.3708

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.09000.96230.7087+0.1181Worse than 79% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.1030.5591.1522+0.1920Worse than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.2530.489−0.7088−0.1181Better than 74% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.2710.795−0.9923−0.1654Better than 83% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3600.346−0.0682−0.0114Worse than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.7950.6412.2251+0.3708Worse than 95% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.7087PSI 90+1.1522CLABSI−0.7088CAUTI−0.9923SSI−0.0682CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷6measures=0.3861Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0069 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3861, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.7087 divided by 6 = +0.1181PSI 90+0.1181 CLABSI: z‑score 1.1522 divided by 6 = +0.1920CLABSI+0.1920 CAUTI: z‑score −0.7088 divided by 6 = −0.1181CAUTI−0.1181 SSI: z‑score −0.9923 divided by 6 = −0.1654SSI−0.1654 CDI: z‑score −0.0682 divided by 6 = −0.0114CDI−0.0114 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 6 = +0.3708MRSA+0.3708 Total HAC Score: 0.3861Score0.3861 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.7087 divided by 6 = +0.1181PSI 90+0.1181 CLABSI: z‑score 1.1522 divided by 6 = +0.1920CLABSI+0.1920 CAUTI: z‑score −0.7088 divided by 6 = −0.1181CAUTI−0.1181 SSI: z‑score −0.9923 divided by 6 = −0.1654SSI−0.1654 CDI: z‑score −0.0682 divided by 6 = −0.0114CDI−0.0114 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 6 = +0.3708MRSA+0.3708 Total HAC Score: 0.3861Score0.3861 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.7087+0.11810.1181
CLABSI1.1522+0.19200.3101
CAUTI−0.7088−0.11810.1920
SSI−0.9923−0.16540.0266
CDI−0.0682−0.01140.0152
MRSA2.2251+0.37080.3860
Total HAC Score0.3861
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0069 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $413K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $413K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $413K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3861 This hospital 0.3861 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $413K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $413Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3861 This hospital 0.3861

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$413,485
This hospital0.3861−$413,485
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$413,485

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($41,824,644payment−$469,891readmissions−$6,240value-based)×1%the cut=$413,485HAC cut

$413,485HAC cut÷2,501traditional Medicare stays=$165per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $413K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$470K and −$6K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $35,869,564
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,270,141
Outliers: unusually costly stays $768,326
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,014,177
Uncompensated care $902,436
Total, before the three programs $41,824,644
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9869 − 1) −$469,891
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9998 − 1) −$6,240
After these two $41,348,513
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $315⁠–⁠520K −$413,485
Net of the three programs likely −$1.0M to −$716K −$889,616

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$35,869,564
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,270,141
Outliers: unusually costly stays$768,326
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,014,177
Uncompensated care$902,436
Total, before the three programs$41,824,644
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9869 − 1))−$469,891
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9998 − 1))−$6,240
After these two$41,348,513
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $315–520K)−$413,485
Net of the three programs (likely −$1.0M to −$716K)−$889,616

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3861same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$413Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3861 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $413K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.0839 or lower
CLABSI1.085 or lower
CAUTI0.235 or lower
SSI0.246 or lower
CDI0.349 or lower
MRSA1.742 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0900 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.103 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.253 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.271 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.360 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.795 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3861 among its measured results: +0.3708.
  • PSI 90 +0.1181
  • CLABSI +0.1920
  • CAUTI −0.1181
  • SSI −0.1654
  • CDI −0.0114
  • MRSA +0.3708

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.7087+0.1181same
CLABSI1.1522+0.1920same
CAUTI−0.7088−0.1181same
SSI−0.9923−0.1654same
CDI−0.0682−0.0114same
MRSA2.2251+0.3708same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050236/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 6 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.2000, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.7500, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.0400, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.0561, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.0105, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3458, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.5681, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5381, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.5188, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.6260, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.3861, higher than 75% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.2000, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.7500, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.0400, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.0561, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.0105, higher than 51% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3458, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.5681, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5381, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.5188, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.6260, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.3861, higher than 75% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.200080.4%cut
FY20167.750086.8%cut
FY20177.040083.7%cut
FY20180.056157.3%not cut
FY2019−0.010551.2%not cut
FY2020−0.345827.5%not cut
FY2021−0.568116.9%not cut
FY2022−0.538118.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.518881.2%cut
FY20250.626086.0%cut
FY20260.386175.3%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.43 → 1.19 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.431CLABSI, 2018: 1.240CLABSI, 2019: 0.621CLABSI, 2021: 0.339CLABSI, 2022: 1.794CLABSI, 2023: 1.027CLABSI, 2024: 1.192 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.546CAUTI, 2021: 0.928CAUTI, 2022: 0.403CAUTI, 2023: 0.517CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.82 → 0.66 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.818SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.657 MRSA 0.96 → 2.01 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.964MRSA, 2018: 0.875MRSA, 2019: 0.729MRSA, 2021: 1.768MRSA, 2022: 3.046MRSA, 2023: 1.550MRSA, 2024: 2.007 C. diff 0.95 → 0.34 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.946C. diff, 2018: 0.304C. diff, 2019: 0.169C. diff, 2021: 0.166C. diff, 2022: 0.629C. diff, 2023: 0.380C. diff, 2024: 0.343 CLABSI 1.43 → 1.19 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.431CLABSI, 2018: 1.240CLABSI, 2019: 0.621CLABSI, 2021: 0.339CLABSI, 2022: 1.794CLABSI, 2023: 1.027CLABSI, 2024: 1.192 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.546CAUTI, 2021: 0.928CAUTI, 2022: 0.403CAUTI, 2023: 0.517CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 0.82 → 0.66 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.818SSI, colon, 2018: 0.000SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.657 MRSA 0.96 → 2.01 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.964MRSA, 2018: 0.875MRSA, 2019: 0.729MRSA, 2021: 1.768MRSA, 2022: 3.046MRSA, 2023: 1.550MRSA, 2024: 2.007 C. diff 0.95 → 0.34 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.946C. diff, 2018: 0.304C. diff, 2019: 0.169C. diff, 2021: 0.166C. diff, 2022: 0.629C. diff, 2023: 0.380C. diff, 2024: 0.343

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20171.4310.0000.8180.9640.946
20181.2400.0000.0000.8750.304
20190.6210.5460.0000.7290.169
20210.3390.9280.0001.7680.166
20221.7940.4030.0003.0460.629
20231.0270.5170.0001.5500.380
20241.1920.0000.6572.0070.343

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 72% of the other 276 scored there.

In Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA area, its score is higher than 50% of the other 4 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 7 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 60% (Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA area: CMS cut 3 of 5 (60%); middle score 0.3861Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA area5 hospitals60% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3861 This hospital 0.3861 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA area: CMS cut 3 of 5 (60%); middle score 0.3861Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA area5 hospitals60% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3861 This hospital 0.3861

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045375%
West region59315726%−0.030273%
California2777627%−0.021772%
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA area5360%0.386150%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105375%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073277%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013474%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057477%
This hospital0.3861
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 9 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Mission Community Hospital, Panorama City: score 1.0928, cut, 17 miles87. Providence Holy Cross Medical Center, Mission Hills: score −0.3794, not cut, 16 miles76. Providence Cedars Sinai Tarzana Medical Center, Tarzana: score −0.0258, not cut, 15 miles65. Northridge Hospital Medical Center, Northridge: score −0.8508, not cut, 13 miles54. Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital, Valencia: score 0.7971, cut, 13 miles43. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland Hills, Woodland Hills: score 0.6581, cut, 12 miles32. Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center, Thousand Oaks: score −0.2715, not cut, 10 miles21. UCLA West Valley Medical Center, West Hills: score 0.6598, cut, 9 miles1This hospital: Adventist Health Simi Valley

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
UCLA West Valley Medical Center, West Hills, CA90.6598cut
Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center, Thousand Oaks, CA10−0.2715not cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland Hills, Woodland Hills, CA120.6581cut
Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital, Valencia, CA130.7971cut
Northridge Hospital Medical Center, Northridge, CA13−0.8508not cut
Providence Cedars Sinai Tarzana Medical Center, Tarzana, CA15−0.0258not cut
Providence Holy Cross Medical Center, Mission Hills, CA16−0.3794not cut
Mission Community Hospital, Panorama City, CA171.0928cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1UCLA West Valley Medical CenterWest Hills, CA90.65981% cut$571KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Los Robles Hospital & Medical CenterThousand Oaks, CA10−0.2715No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
3Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland HillsWoodland Hills, CA120.65811% cut$74KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Henry Mayo Newhall HospitalValencia, CA130.79711% cut$451KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
5Northridge Hospital Medical CenterNorthridge, CA13−0.8508No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
6Providence Cedars Sinai Tarzana Medical CenterTarzana, CA15−0.0258No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Providence Holy Cross Medical CenterMission Hills, CA16−0.3794No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Mission Community HospitalPanorama City, CA171.09281% cut$337KAbove the national median on 4 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Adventist Health Simi Valley, Simi Valley, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050236/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.