P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalKaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland Hills Estimated FY2026 net: −$74K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 050677

1Hospital

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland Hills

2Location

Woodland Hills, CA (California’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 91367

Los Angeles County

3Type

Minor teaching · 218 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

4 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6581

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$74K estimate
Likely $56⁠–⁠93K; about $284 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$74K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6581 for Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland Hills and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $7.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $284 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $56–93K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6581 This hospital 0.6581 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6581 This hospital 0.6581

Higher than 85% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 6 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CLABSI down to the national median (0.559) would lower the score the most: by 0.3917, to 0.2664. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; CLABSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 65% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9975

    Z-score0.0632

    Part of score+0.0105

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value1.966

    Z-score2.2402

    Part of score+0.3734

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 84% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.958

    Z-score0.9907

    Part of score+0.1651

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 51% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.821

    Z-score−0.0501

    Part of score−0.0084

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 62% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.265

    Z-score−0.4361

    Part of score−0.0727

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 86% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.243

    Z-score1.1405

    Part of score+0.1901

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.99750.96230.0632+0.0105Worse than 65% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI1.9660.5592.2402+0.3734Worse than 97% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.9580.4890.9907+0.1651Worse than 84% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.8210.795−0.0501−0.0084Worse than 51% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2650.346−0.4361−0.0727Better than 62% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.2430.6411.1405+0.1901Worse than 86% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.0632PSI 90+2.2402CLABSI+0.9907CAUTI−0.0501SSI−0.4361CDI+1.1405MRSA)÷6measures=0.6581Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2789 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6581, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.0632 divided by 6 = +0.0105PSI 90+0.0105 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.9907 divided by 6 = +0.1651CAUTI+0.1651 SSI: z‑score −0.0501 divided by 6 = −0.0084SSI−0.0084 CDI: z‑score −0.4361 divided by 6 = −0.0727CDI−0.0727 MRSA: z‑score 1.1405 divided by 6 = +0.1901MRSA+0.1901 Total HAC Score: 0.6581Score0.6581 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.0632 divided by 6 = +0.0105PSI 90+0.0105 CLABSI: z‑score 2.2402 divided by 6 = +0.3734CLABSI+0.3734 CAUTI: z‑score 0.9907 divided by 6 = +0.1651CAUTI+0.1651 SSI: z‑score −0.0501 divided by 6 = −0.0084SSI−0.0084 CDI: z‑score −0.4361 divided by 6 = −0.0727CDI−0.0727 MRSA: z‑score 1.1405 divided by 6 = +0.1901MRSA+0.1901 Total HAC Score: 0.6581Score0.6581 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.0632+0.01050.0105
CLABSI2.2402+0.37340.3839
CAUTI0.9907+0.16510.5490
SSI−0.0501−0.00840.5406
CDI−0.4361−0.07270.4679
MRSA1.1405+0.19010.6580
Total HAC Score0.6581
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2789 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $74K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $74K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $74K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6581 This hospital 0.6581 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $74K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $74Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6581 This hospital 0.6581

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$73,891
This hospital0.6581−$73,891
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$73,891

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($4,649,844payment+$2,739,580teaching, MA stays+$0readmissions−$284value-based)×1%the cut=$73,891HAC cut

$73,891HAC cut÷260traditional Medicare stays=$284per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $74K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and −$284.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $3,631,232
Teaching (indirect medical education) $135,627
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,739,580
Outliers: unusually costly stays $540,073
Capital: buildings and equipment $342,912
Total, before the three programs $7,389,424
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9999 − 1) −$284
After these two $7,389,140
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $56⁠–⁠93K −$73,891
Net of the three programs likely −$87K to −$60K −$74,175

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, low-income-patient payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$3,631,232
Teaching (indirect medical education)$135,627
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,739,580
Outliers: unusually costly stays$540,073
Capital: buildings and equipment$342,912
Total, before the three programs$7,389,424
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9999 − 1))−$284
After these two$7,389,140
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $56–93K)−$73,891
Net of the three programs (likely −$87K to −$60K)−$74,175

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6581same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$74Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6581 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $74K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSI0.850 or lower
CAUTI0.263 or lower
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSA0.442 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9975 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 1.966 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.958 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.821 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.265 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.243 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CLABSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6581 among its measured results: +0.3734.
  • PSI 90 +0.0105
  • CLABSI +0.3734
  • CAUTI +0.1651
  • SSI −0.0084
  • CDI −0.0727
  • MRSA +0.1901

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.0632+0.0105same
CLABSI2.2402+0.3734same
CAUTI0.9907+0.1651same
SSI−0.0501−0.0084same
CDI−0.4361−0.0727same
MRSA1.1405+0.1901same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050677/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 6 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0250, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.2500, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.5500, higher than 75% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.3292, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.7581, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.9522, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6873, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.2473, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.5586, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7002, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6581, higher than 85% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.0250, higher than 60% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.2500, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.5500, higher than 75% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.3292, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.7581, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.9522, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6873, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.2473, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.5586, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.7002, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.6581, higher than 85% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.025060.2%not cut
FY20165.250045.0%not cut
FY20176.550075.2%not cut
FY20180.329274.0%not cut
FY20190.758190.2%cut
FY20200.952295.1%cut
FY20210.687390.2%cut
FY20220.247371.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.558682.3%cut
FY20250.700288.3%cut
FY20260.658185.9%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.99 → 1.27 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.986CLABSI, 2018: 2.080CLABSI, 2019: 0.390CLABSI, 2021: 2.936CLABSI, 2022: 2.326CLABSI, 2023: 2.716CLABSI, 2024: 1.267 CAUTI 3.05 → 1.22 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 3.049CAUTI, 2018: 1.214CAUTI, 2019: 1.830CAUTI, 2021: 3.717CAUTI, 2022: 0.800CAUTI, 2023: 0.672CAUTI, 2024: 1.217 SSI, colon 0.25 → 1.07 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.253SSI, colon, 2018: 0.250SSI, colon, 2019: 0.745SSI, colon, 2021: 1.413SSI, colon, 2022: 0.565SSI, colon, 2023: 0.311SSI, colon, 2024: 1.075 MRSA 0.71 → 0.65 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.707MRSA, 2018: 1.667MRSA, 2019: 0.647MRSA, 2021: 2.761MRSA, 2022: 0.422MRSA, 2023: 1.945MRSA, 2024: 0.653 C. diff 0.96 → 0.22 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.961C. diff, 2018: 0.665C. diff, 2019: 0.317C. diff, 2021: 0.760C. diff, 2022: 0.969C. diff, 2023: 0.312C. diff, 2024: 0.222 CLABSI 1.99 → 1.27 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.986CLABSI, 2018: 2.080CLABSI, 2019: 0.390CLABSI, 2021: 2.936CLABSI, 2022: 2.326CLABSI, 2023: 2.716CLABSI, 2024: 1.267 CAUTI 3.05 → 1.22 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 3.049CAUTI, 2018: 1.214CAUTI, 2019: 1.830CAUTI, 2021: 3.717CAUTI, 2022: 0.800CAUTI, 2023: 0.672CAUTI, 2024: 1.217 SSI, colon 0.25 → 1.07 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.253SSI, colon, 2018: 0.250SSI, colon, 2019: 0.745SSI, colon, 2021: 1.413SSI, colon, 2022: 0.565SSI, colon, 2023: 0.311SSI, colon, 2024: 1.075 MRSA 0.71 → 0.65 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.707MRSA, 2018: 1.667MRSA, 2019: 0.647MRSA, 2021: 2.761MRSA, 2022: 0.422MRSA, 2023: 1.945MRSA, 2024: 0.653 C. diff 0.96 → 0.22 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.961C. diff, 2018: 0.665C. diff, 2019: 0.317C. diff, 2021: 0.760C. diff, 2022: 0.969C. diff, 2023: 0.312C. diff, 2024: 0.222

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20171.9863.0490.2530.7070.961
20182.0801.2140.2501.6670.665
20190.3901.8300.7450.6470.317
20212.9363.7171.4132.7610.760
20222.3260.8000.5650.4220.969
20232.7160.6720.3111.9450.312
20241.2671.2171.0750.6530.222

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In California, its score is higher than 86% of the other 276 scored there.

In Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area, its score is higher than 78% of the other 69 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 21% (Minor teaching) to 30% (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California 277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6581 This hospital 0.6581 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut California: CMS cut 76 of 277 (27%); middle score −0.0217California277 hospitals27% cut Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area: CMS cut 21 of 70 (30%); middle score 0.0200Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area70 hospitals30% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6581 This hospital 0.6581

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045385%
West region59315726%−0.030285%
California2777627%−0.021786%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA area702130%0.020078%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056790%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073288%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013485%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057488%
This hospital0.6581
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 3 miles away.
5 mi8. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City, Panorama City: score −0.0567, not cut, 10 miles87. Mission Community Hospital, Panorama City: score 1.0928, cut, 8 miles76. Sherman Oaks Hospital, Sherman Oaks: score −1.2170, not cut, 8 miles65. Valley Presbyterian Hospital, Van Nuys: score 0.0114, not cut, 7 miles54. Encino Hospital Medical Center, Encino: score −0.6552, not cut, 6 miles43. Northridge Hospital Medical Center, Northridge: score −0.8508, not cut, 5 miles32. Providence Cedars Sinai Tarzana Medical Center, Tarzana: score −0.0258, not cut, 3 miles21. UCLA West Valley Medical Center, West Hills: score 0.6598, cut, 3 miles1This hospital: Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland Hills

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
UCLA West Valley Medical Center, West Hills, CA30.6598cut
Providence Cedars Sinai Tarzana Medical Center, Tarzana, CA3−0.0258not cut
Northridge Hospital Medical Center, Northridge, CA5−0.8508not cut
Encino Hospital Medical Center, Encino, CA6−0.6552not cut
Valley Presbyterian Hospital, Van Nuys, CA70.0114not cut
Sherman Oaks Hospital, Sherman Oaks, CA8−1.2170not cut
Mission Community Hospital, Panorama City, CA81.0928cut
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City, Panorama City, CA10−0.0567not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1UCLA West Valley Medical CenterWest Hills, CA30.65981% cut$571KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2Providence Cedars Sinai Tarzana Medical CenterTarzana, CA3−0.0258No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Northridge Hospital Medical CenterNorthridge, CA5−0.8508No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
4Encino Hospital Medical CenterEncino, CA6−0.6552No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
5Valley Presbyterian HospitalVan Nuys, CA70.0114No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Sherman Oaks HospitalSherman Oaks, CA8−1.2170No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures
7Mission Community HospitalPanorama City, CA81.09281% cut$337KAbove the national median on 4 of 5 measures
8Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama CityPanorama City, CA10−0.0567No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Woodland Hills, Woodland Hills, CA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/050677/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.