P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalOro Valley Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$110K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 030114

1Hospital

Oro Valley Hospital

2Location

Oro Valley, AZ (Arizona’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 85755

Pima County

3Type

Minor teaching · 146 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.0245

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $220K, likely $161⁠–⁠274K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0245 for Oro Valley Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $220K estimate 1% of about $22.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.3554 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $161–274K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0245 This hospital 0.0245 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0245 This hospital 0.0245

Higher than 54% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.5052, to −0.4807. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 91% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8165

    Z-score−1.2007

    Part of score−0.2401

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4065

    Part of score−0.2813

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 96% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.694

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.4773

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 70% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.487

    Z-score−0.6222

    Part of score−0.1244

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.627

    Z-score0.9656

    Part of score+0.1931

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.81650.9623−1.2007−0.2401Better than 91% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.0000.559−1.4065−0.2813Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.6940.4892.3863+0.4773Worse than 96% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.4870.795−0.6222−0.1244Better than 70% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.6270.3460.9656+0.1931Worse than 83% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−1.2007PSI 90−1.4065CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI−0.6222SSI+0.9656CDI)÷5measures=0.0245Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3554 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.0245, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.2007 divided by 5 = −0.2401PSI 90−0.2401 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 5 = −0.2813CLABSI−0.2813 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 SSI: z‑score −0.6222 divided by 5 = −0.1244SSI−0.1244 CDI: z‑score 0.9656 divided by 5 = +0.1931CDI+0.1931 Total HAC Score: 0.0245Score0.0245 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.2007 divided by 5 = −0.2401PSI 90−0.2401 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 5 = −0.2813CLABSI−0.2813 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 SSI: z‑score −0.6222 divided by 5 = −0.1244SSI−0.1244 CDI: z‑score 0.9656 divided by 5 = +0.1931CDI+0.1931 Total HAC Score: 0.0245Score0.0245 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−1.2007−0.2401−0.2401
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2813−0.5214
CAUTI2.3863+0.4773−0.0441
SSI−0.6222−0.1244−0.1685
CDI0.9656+0.19310.0246
Total HAC Score0.0245
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3554 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.3554 higher, the cut would have been about $220K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $220K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $220K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0245 This hospital 0.0245 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $220K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $220Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0245 This hospital 0.0245

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$220,004
This hospital0.0245$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$220,004

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($22,004,111payment+$106,282teaching, MA stays−$6,029readmissions−$103,964value-based)×1%the cut=$220,004at stake

$220,004at stake÷1,858traditional Medicare stays=$118per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $220K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$6K and −$104K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $20,095,084
Teaching (indirect medical education) $323,531
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $106,282
Outliers: unusually costly stays $4,622
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,580,874
Total, before the three programs $22,110,393
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9997 − 1) −$6,029
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9948 − 1) −$103,964
After these two $22,000,400
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $220,004 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$140K to −$80K −$109,993

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, low-income-patient payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$20,095,084
Teaching (indirect medical education)$323,531
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$106,282
Outliers: unusually costly stays$4,622
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,580,874
Total, before the three programs$22,110,393
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9997 − 1))−$6,029
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9948 − 1))−$103,964
After these two$22,000,400
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $220,004)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$140K to −$80K)−$109,993

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.0245same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0245 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $220K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0704
CLABSIup to 0.764
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIup to 1.522
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8165 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.000 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 1.694 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 0.487 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0343

CMS 0.627 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.0245 among its measured results: +0.4773.
  • PSI 90 −0.2401
  • CLABSI −0.2813
  • CAUTI +0.4773
  • SSI −0.1244
  • CDI +0.1931

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−1.2007−0.2401same
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2813same
CAUTI2.3863+0.4773same
SSI−0.6222−0.1244same
CDI0.9656+0.1931same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030114/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.0000, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.9000, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2828, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.6507, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.8515, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −1.5359, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −1.5538, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4994, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2920, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0245, higher than 54% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.0000, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.9000, higher than 40% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.2828, higher than 32% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.6507, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.8515, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −1.5359, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −1.5538, higher than 0% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.4994, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2920, higher than 31% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0245, higher than 54% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.000040.4%not cut
FY20165.500048.7%not cut
FY20174.900040.0%not cut
FY2018−0.282832.0%not cut
FY2019−0.650716.5%not cut
FY2020−0.85159.6%not cut
FY2021−1.53590.5%not cut
FY2022−1.55380.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.499419.8%not cut
FY2025−0.292031.2%not cut
FY20260.024554.3%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.569CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.00 → 1.88 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 1.602CAUTI, 2022: 0.493CAUTI, 2023: 1.545CAUTI, 2024: 1.876 SSI, colon 0.99 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2022: 0.994SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 1.12 → 0.24 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.123C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 0.000C. diff, 2021: 0.428C. diff, 2022: 0.398C. diff, 2023: 1.035C. diff, 2024: 0.244 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 0.569CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.00 → 1.88 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 1.602CAUTI, 2022: 0.493CAUTI, 2023: 1.545CAUTI, 2024: 1.876 SSI, colon 0.99 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2022: 0.994SSI, colon, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 1.12 → 0.24 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.123C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 0.000C. diff, 2021: 0.428C. diff, 2022: 0.398C. diff, 2023: 1.035C. diff, 2024: 0.244

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.0000.0001.123
20180.000
20190.000
20210.5691.6020.428
20220.0000.4930.9940.398
20230.0001.5450.0001.035
20240.0001.8760.244

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Arizona, its score is higher than 48% of the other 60 scored there.

In Tucson, AZ area, its score is higher than 50% of the other 8 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 26% (West region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona 61 hospitals20% cut Tucson, AZ area: CMS cut 2 of 9 (22%); middle score 0.0245Tucson, AZ area 9 hospitals22% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.0245 This hospital 0.0245 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona61 hospitals20% cut Tucson, AZ area: CMS cut 2 of 9 (22%); middle score 0.0245Tucson, AZ area9 hospitals22% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.0245 This hospital 0.0245

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045354%
West region59315726%−0.030253%
Arizona611220%0.056048%
Tucson, AZ area9222%0.024550%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056754%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073255%
For-profit6519815%−0.259067%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057455%
This hospital0.0245
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 8 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Banner Casa Grande Medical Center, Casa Grande: score 0.4417, cut, 54 miles87. Northwest Medical Center Sahuarita, Sahuarita: score −0.3421, not cut, 32 miles76. Banner-University Medical Center South Campus, Tucson: score 0.3505, not cut, 17 miles65. St Joseph's Hospital, Tucson: score −0.9114, not cut, 15 miles54. St. Mary's Hospital, Tucson: score −0.2762, not cut, 14 miles43. Tucson Medical Center, Tucson: score 0.5559, cut, 13 miles32. Banner - University Medical Center Tucson Campus, Tucson: score 0.3012, not cut, 13 miles21. Northwest Medical Center, Tucson: score −0.8103, not cut, 8 miles1This hospital: Oro Valley Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Northwest Medical Center, Tucson, AZ8−0.8103not cut
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson Campus, Tucson, AZ130.3012not cut
Tucson Medical Center, Tucson, AZ130.5559cut
St. Mary's Hospital, Tucson, AZ14−0.2762not cut
St Joseph's Hospital, Tucson, AZ15−0.9114not cut
Banner-University Medical Center South Campus, Tucson, AZ170.3505not cut
Northwest Medical Center Sahuarita, Sahuarita, AZ32−0.3421not cut
Banner Casa Grande Medical Center, Casa Grande, AZ540.4417cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Northwest Medical CenterTucson, AZ8−0.8103No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
2Banner - University Medical Center Tucson CampusTucson, AZ130.3012No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Tucson Medical CenterTucson, AZ130.55591% cut$1.2MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4St. Mary's HospitalTucson, AZ14−0.2762No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5St Joseph's HospitalTucson, AZ15−0.9114No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
6Banner-University Medical Center South CampusTucson, AZ170.3505No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Northwest Medical Center SahuaritaSahuarita, AZ32−0.3421No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 5 measures
8Banner Casa Grande Medical CenterCasa Grande, AZ540.44171% cut$146KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Oro Valley Hospital, Oro Valley, AZ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030114/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.