P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalBanner Casa Grande Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$331K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 030016

1Hospital

Banner Casa Grande Medical Center

2Location

Casa Grande, AZ (Arizona’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 85122

Pinal County

3Type

Minor teaching · 141 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.4417

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$146K estimate
Likely $112⁠–⁠184K; about $135 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$146K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4417 for Banner Casa Grande Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $14.6M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $135 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $112–184K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4417 This hospital 0.4417 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4417 This hospital 0.4417

Higher than 77% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.3145, to 0.1272. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1428

    Z-score1.0776

    Part of score+0.1796

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 63% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.714

    Z-score0.2498

    Part of score+0.0416

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 80% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.176

    Z-score−0.8944

    Part of score−0.1491

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.828

    Z-score−0.0381

    Part of score−0.0064

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 72% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.503

    Z-score0.4855

    Part of score+0.0809

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.544

    Z-score1.7695

    Part of score+0.2949

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.14280.96231.0776+0.1796Worse than 85% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7140.5590.2498+0.0416Worse than 63% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.1760.489−0.8944−0.1491Better than 80% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.8280.795−0.0381−0.0064Worse than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.5030.3460.4855+0.0809Worse than 72% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.5440.6411.7695+0.2949Worse than 92% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.0776PSI 90+0.2498CLABSI−0.8944CAUTI−0.0381SSI+0.4855CDI+1.7695MRSA)÷6measures=0.4417Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0625 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.4417, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0776 divided by 6 = +0.1796PSI 90+0.1796 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2498 divided by 6 = +0.0416CLABSI+0.0416 CAUTI: z‑score −0.8944 divided by 6 = −0.1491CAUTI−0.1491 SSI: z‑score −0.0381 divided by 6 = −0.0064SSI−0.0064 CDI: z‑score 0.4855 divided by 6 = +0.0809CDI+0.0809 MRSA: z‑score 1.7695 divided by 6 = +0.2949MRSA+0.2949 Total HAC Score: 0.4417Score0.4417 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.0776 divided by 6 = +0.1796PSI 90+0.1796 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2498 divided by 6 = +0.0416CLABSI+0.0416 CAUTI: z‑score −0.8944 divided by 6 = −0.1491CAUTI−0.1491 SSI: z‑score −0.0381 divided by 6 = −0.0064SSI−0.0064 CDI: z‑score 0.4855 divided by 6 = +0.0809CDI+0.0809 MRSA: z‑score 1.7695 divided by 6 = +0.2949MRSA+0.2949 Total HAC Score: 0.4417Score0.4417 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.40.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.0776+0.17960.1796
CLABSI0.2498+0.04160.2212
CAUTI−0.8944−0.14910.0721
SSI−0.0381−0.00640.0657
CDI0.4855+0.08090.1466
MRSA1.7695+0.29490.4415
Total HAC Score0.4417
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0625 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $146K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $146K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $146K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4417 This hospital 0.4417 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $146K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $146Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4417 This hospital 0.4417

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$146,365
This hospital0.4417−$146,365
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$146,365

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($14,820,738payment−$134,500readmissions−$49,707value-based)×1%the cut=$146,365HAC cut

$146,365HAC cut÷1,083traditional Medicare stays=$135per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $146K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$135K and −$50K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $12,008,912
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $547,847
Outliers: unusually costly stays $261,554
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,030,571
Uncompensated care $971,854
Total, before the three programs $14,820,738
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9888 − 1) −$134,500
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9959 − 1) −$49,707
After these two $14,636,531
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $112⁠–⁠184K −$146,365
Net of the three programs likely −$389K to −$266K −$330,572

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$12,008,912
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$547,847
Outliers: unusually costly stays$261,554
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,030,571
Uncompensated care$971,854
Total, before the three programs$14,820,738
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9888 − 1))−$134,500
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9959 − 1))−$49,707
After these two$14,636,531
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $112–184K)−$146,365
Net of the three programs (likely −$389K to −$266K)−$330,572

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.4417same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$146Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4417 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $146K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.0889 or lower
CLABSI0.552 or lower
CAUTI0.020 or lower
SSI0.609 or lower
CDI0.406 or lower
MRSA1.364 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1428 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.714 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.176 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.828 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.503 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.544 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.4417 among its measured results: +0.2949.
  • PSI 90 +0.1796
  • CLABSI +0.0416
  • CAUTI −0.1491
  • SSI −0.0064
  • CDI +0.0809
  • MRSA +0.2949

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.0776+0.1796same
CLABSI0.2498+0.0416same
CAUTI−0.8944−0.1491same
SSI−0.0381−0.0064same
CDI0.4855+0.0809same
MRSA1.7695+0.2949same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030016/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.1000, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.2600, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4611, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4052, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4442, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.6537, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.7298, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8341, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2394, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.4417, higher than 77% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.1000, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.7500, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.2600, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.4611, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.4052, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.4442, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.6537, higher than 13% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.7298, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8341, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2394, higher than 35% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.4417, higher than 77% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.100045.3%not cut
FY20166.750072.4%not cut
FY20175.260047.5%not cut
FY2018−0.461122.4%not cut
FY2019−0.405225.3%not cut
FY2020−0.444222.5%not cut
FY2021−0.653713.5%not cut
FY2022−0.729811.2%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.83417.0%not cut
FY2025−0.239435.3%not cut
FY20260.441777.7%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.55 → 0.85 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.547CLABSI, 2018: 0.469CLABSI, 2019: 0.494CLABSI, 2021: 2.145CLABSI, 2022: 0.473CLABSI, 2023: 0.615CLABSI, 2024: 0.852 CAUTI 0.59 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.594CAUTI, 2018: 0.274CAUTI, 2019: 0.573CAUTI, 2021: 0.507CAUTI, 2022: 0.266CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.378 SSI, colon 0.50 → 1.16 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.500SSI, colon, 2018: 0.506SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 1.097SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.739SSI, colon, 2024: 1.157 MRSA 0.89 → 0.84 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.893MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.552MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 2.131MRSA, 2024: 0.845 C. diff 0.39 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.393C. diff, 2018: 0.411C. diff, 2019: 0.353C. diff, 2021: 0.336C. diff, 2022: 0.546C. diff, 2023: 0.723C. diff, 2024: 0.274 CLABSI 0.55 → 0.85 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.547CLABSI, 2018: 0.469CLABSI, 2019: 0.494CLABSI, 2021: 2.145CLABSI, 2022: 0.473CLABSI, 2023: 0.615CLABSI, 2024: 0.852 CAUTI 0.59 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.594CAUTI, 2018: 0.274CAUTI, 2019: 0.573CAUTI, 2021: 0.507CAUTI, 2022: 0.266CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.378 SSI, colon 0.50 → 1.16 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.500SSI, colon, 2018: 0.506SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 1.097SSI, colon, 2022: 0.000SSI, colon, 2023: 0.739SSI, colon, 2024: 1.157 MRSA 0.89 → 0.84 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.893MRSA, 2018: 0.000MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 0.552MRSA, 2022: 0.000MRSA, 2023: 2.131MRSA, 2024: 0.845 C. diff 0.39 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.393C. diff, 2018: 0.411C. diff, 2019: 0.353C. diff, 2021: 0.336C. diff, 2022: 0.546C. diff, 2023: 0.723C. diff, 2024: 0.274

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.5470.5940.5000.8930.393
20180.4690.2740.5060.0000.411
20190.4940.5730.0000.0000.353
20212.1450.5071.0970.5520.336
20220.4730.2660.0000.0000.546
20230.6150.0000.7392.1310.723
20240.8520.3781.1570.8450.274

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Arizona, its score is higher than 86% of the other 60 scored there.

In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area, its score is higher than 88% of the other 36 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 19% (Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area) to 26% (West region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona 61 hospitals20% cut Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area: CMS cut 7 of 37 (19%); middle score 0.0991Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37 hospitals19% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.4417 This hospital 0.4417 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona61 hospitals20% cut Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area: CMS cut 7 of 37 (19%); middle score 0.0991Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37 hospitals19% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.4417 This hospital 0.4417

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045377%
West region59315726%−0.030276%
Arizona611220%0.056086%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37719%0.099188%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056781%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073279%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013476%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057479%
This hospital0.4417
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 25 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Banner Gateway Medical Center, Gilbert: score 0.2048, not cut, 35 miles87. HonorHealth Four Peaks Medical Center, Mesa: score −0.4955, not cut, 35 miles76. Dignity Health Arizona General Hospital, Mesa: score 0.4311, cut, 31 miles65. Chandler Regional Medical Center, Chandler: score −0.1918, not cut, 30 miles54. East Valley Er & Hospital, Gilbert: score 2.1966, cut, 29 miles43. Banner Ocotillo Medical Center, Chandler: score −0.4846, not cut, 29 miles32. Mercy Gilbert Medical Center, Gilbert: score 0.1207, not cut, 28 miles21. Banner Ironwood Medical Center, Queen Creek: score 0.1049, not cut, 25 miles1This hospital: Banner Casa Grande Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Banner Ironwood Medical Center, Queen Creek, AZ250.1049not cut
Mercy Gilbert Medical Center, Gilbert, AZ280.1207not cut
Banner Ocotillo Medical Center, Chandler, AZ29−0.4846not cut
East Valley Er & Hospital, Gilbert, AZ292.1966cut
Chandler Regional Medical Center, Chandler, AZ30−0.1918not cut
Dignity Health Arizona General Hospital, Mesa, AZ310.4311cut
HonorHealth Four Peaks Medical Center, Mesa, AZ35−0.4955not cut
Banner Gateway Medical Center, Gilbert, AZ350.2048not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Banner Ironwood Medical CenterQueen Creek, AZ250.1049No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
2Mercy Gilbert Medical CenterGilbert, AZ280.1207No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Banner Ocotillo Medical CenterChandler, AZ29−0.4846No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4East Valley Er & HospitalGilbert, AZ292.19661% cut$2KAbove the national median on 3 of 3 measures
5Chandler Regional Medical CenterChandler, AZ30−0.1918No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Dignity Health Arizona General HospitalMesa, AZ310.43111% cut$71KAbove the national median on 3 of 4 measures
7HonorHealth Four Peaks Medical CenterMesa, AZ35−0.4955No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
8Banner Gateway Medical CenterGilbert, AZ350.2048No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Banner Casa Grande Medical Center, Casa Grande, AZ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030016/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.