P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalBanner Gateway Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$196K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 030122

1Hospital

Banner Gateway Medical Center

2Location

Gilbert, AZ (Arizona’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 85234

Maricopa County

3Type

Minor teaching · 177 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2048

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $378K, likely $288⁠–⁠476K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2048 for Banner Gateway Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $378K estimate 1% of about $37.8M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.1751 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $288–476K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2048 This hospital 0.2048 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2048 This hospital 0.2048

Higher than 65% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 7 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.3302, to −0.1254. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 57% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9783

    Z-score−0.0710

    Part of score−0.0118

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.854

    Z-score0.5746

    Part of score+0.0958

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.311

    Z-score1.8416

    Part of score+0.3069

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.758

    Z-score−0.1580

    Part of score−0.0263

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 50% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.350

    Z-score−0.1069

    Part of score−0.0178

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 80% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.290

    Z-score−0.8512

    Part of score−0.1419

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.97830.9623−0.0710−0.0118Worse than 57% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.8540.5590.5746+0.0958Worse than 74% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.3110.4891.8416+0.3069Worse than 92% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.7580.795−0.1580−0.0263Better than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3500.346−0.1069−0.0178Worse than 50% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.2900.641−0.8512−0.1419Better than 80% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.0710PSI 90+0.5746CLABSI+1.8416CAUTI−0.1580SSI−0.1069CDI−0.8512MRSA)÷6measures=0.2048Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make 0.2049; CMS reports 0.2048. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.1751 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2048, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.0710 divided by 6 = −0.0118PSI 90−0.0118 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5746 divided by 6 = +0.0958CLABSI+0.0958 CAUTI: z‑score 1.8416 divided by 6 = +0.3069CAUTI+0.3069 SSI: z‑score −0.1580 divided by 6 = −0.0263SSI−0.0263 CDI: z‑score −0.1069 divided by 6 = −0.0178CDI−0.0178 MRSA: z‑score −0.8512 divided by 6 = −0.1419MRSA−0.1419 Total HAC Score: 0.2048Score0.2048 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.0710 divided by 6 = −0.0118PSI 90−0.0118 CLABSI: z‑score 0.5746 divided by 6 = +0.0958CLABSI+0.0958 CAUTI: z‑score 1.8416 divided by 6 = +0.3069CAUTI+0.3069 SSI: z‑score −0.1580 divided by 6 = −0.0263SSI−0.0263 CDI: z‑score −0.1069 divided by 6 = −0.0178CDI−0.0178 MRSA: z‑score −0.8512 divided by 6 = −0.1419MRSA−0.1419 Total HAC Score: 0.2048Score0.2048 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.0710−0.0118−0.0118
CLABSI0.5746+0.09580.0840
CAUTI1.8416+0.30690.3909
SSI−0.1580−0.02630.3646
CDI−0.1069−0.01780.3468
MRSA−0.8512−0.14190.2049
Total HAC Score0.2048
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1751 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1751 higher, the cut would have been about $378K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $378K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $378K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2048 This hospital 0.2048 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $378K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $378Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2048 This hospital 0.2048

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$378,285
This hospital0.2048$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$378,285

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($38,023,476payment+$1,179teaching, MA stays−$5,713readmissions−$190,451value-based)×1%the cut=$378,285at stake

$378,285at stake÷1,958traditional Medicare stays=$193per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $378K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$6K and −$190K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $28,563,145
Teaching (indirect medical education) $1,428
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $1,179
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $884,029
Outliers: unusually costly stays $3,848,312
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,268,781
Uncompensated care $1,457,781
Total, before the three programs $38,024,655
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9998 − 1) −$5,713
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9933 − 1) −$190,451
After these two $37,828,491
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $378,285 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$231K to −$158K −$196,164

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$28,563,145
Teaching (indirect medical education)$1,428
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$1,179
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$884,029
Outliers: unusually costly stays$3,848,312
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,268,781
Uncompensated care$1,457,781
Total, before the three programs$38,024,655
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9998 − 1))−$5,713
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9933 − 1))−$190,451
After these two$37,828,491
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $378,285)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$231K to −$158K)−$196,164

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2048same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2048 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $378K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.1281
CLABSIup to 1.305
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIup to 1.368
CDIup to 0.620
MRSAup to 0.790

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9783 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.854 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 1.311 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.758 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.350 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.290 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2048 among its measured results: +0.3069.
  • PSI 90 −0.0118
  • CLABSI +0.0958
  • CAUTI +0.3069
  • SSI −0.0263
  • CDI −0.0178
  • MRSA −0.1419

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.0710−0.0118same
CLABSI0.5746+0.0958same
CAUTI1.8416+0.3069same
SSI−0.1580−0.0263same
CDI−0.1069−0.0178same
MRSA−0.8512−0.1419same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030122/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 4 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 7 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.7250, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.0000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.2958, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.8275, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.2039, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6823, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4056, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1777, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.4231, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.2048, higher than 65% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.7250, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.2500, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.0000, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.2958, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.8275, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2020: score 1.2039, higher than 97% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.6823, higher than 90% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.4056, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.1777, higher than 64% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.4231, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.2048, higher than 65% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.725086.8%cut
FY20166.250064.4%not cut
FY20177.000083.1%cut
FY20180.295872.2%not cut
FY20190.827591.6%cut
FY20201.203997.8%cut
FY20210.682390.0%cut
FY20220.405679.8%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.177764.8%not cut
FY20250.423178.0%cut
FY20260.204865.2%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.54 → 0.55 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.541CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.781CLABSI, 2021: 1.761CLABSI, 2022: 1.191CLABSI, 2023: 1.175CLABSI, 2024: 0.552 CAUTI 1.94 → 1.16 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.943CAUTI, 2018: 0.531CAUTI, 2019: 1.091CAUTI, 2021: 1.835CAUTI, 2023: 1.514CAUTI, 2024: 1.155 SSI, colon 1.66 → 1.21 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.660SSI, colon, 2018: 1.440SSI, colon, 2019: 1.529SSI, colon, 2021: 0.612SSI, colon, 2022: 1.191SSI, colon, 2023: 0.647SSI, colon, 2024: 1.213 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.66 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.688SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.427SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.940SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.401SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.310SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.661 MRSA 3.09 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 3.086MRSA, 2018: 3.086MRSA, 2019: 0.287MRSA, 2021: 0.765MRSA, 2022: 0.644MRSA, 2023: 0.236MRSA, 2024: 0.377 C. diff 3.05 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 3.047C. diff, 2018: 2.729C. diff, 2019: 1.438C. diff, 2021: 0.803C. diff, 2022: 0.417C. diff, 2023: 0.268C. diff, 2024: 0.469 CLABSI 1.54 → 0.55 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.541CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.781CLABSI, 2021: 1.761CLABSI, 2022: 1.191CLABSI, 2023: 1.175CLABSI, 2024: 0.552 CAUTI 1.94 → 1.16 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.943CAUTI, 2018: 0.531CAUTI, 2019: 1.091CAUTI, 2021: 1.835CAUTI, 2023: 1.514CAUTI, 2024: 1.155 SSI, colon 1.66 → 1.21 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.660SSI, colon, 2018: 1.440SSI, colon, 2019: 1.529SSI, colon, 2021: 0.612SSI, colon, 2022: 1.191SSI, colon, 2023: 0.647SSI, colon, 2024: 1.213 SSI, hysterectomy 0.00 → 0.66 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.688SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.427SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 0.940SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.401SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.310SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.661 MRSA 3.09 → 0.38 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 3.086MRSA, 2018: 3.086MRSA, 2019: 0.287MRSA, 2021: 0.765MRSA, 2022: 0.644MRSA, 2023: 0.236MRSA, 2024: 0.377 C. diff 3.05 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 3.047C. diff, 2018: 2.729C. diff, 2019: 1.438C. diff, 2021: 0.803C. diff, 2022: 0.417C. diff, 2023: 0.268C. diff, 2024: 0.469

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.5411.9431.6600.0003.0863.047
20180.0000.5311.4400.6883.0862.729
20190.7811.0911.5290.4270.2871.438
20211.7611.8350.6120.9400.7650.803
20221.1911.1911.4010.6440.417
20231.1751.5140.6470.3100.2360.268
20240.5521.1551.2130.6610.3770.469

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Arizona, its score is higher than 65% of the other 60 scored there.

In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area, its score is higher than 63% of the other 36 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 19% (Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area) to 26% (West region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona 61 hospitals20% cut Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area: CMS cut 7 of 37 (19%); middle score 0.0991Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37 hospitals19% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2048 This hospital 0.2048 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Arizona: CMS cut 12 of 61 (20%); middle score 0.0560Arizona61 hospitals20% cut Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area: CMS cut 7 of 37 (19%); middle score 0.0991Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37 hospitals19% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2048 This hospital 0.2048

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045365%
West region59315726%−0.030263%
Arizona611220%0.056065%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ area37719%0.099163%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056768%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073266%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013463%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057467%
This hospital0.2048
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
5 mi8. Banner Goldfield Medical Center, Apache Junction: score −1.4622, not cut, 9 miles87. Mercy Gilbert Medical Center, Gilbert: score 0.1207, not cut, 7 miles76. Dignity Health Arizona General Hospital, Mesa: score 0.4311, cut, 7 miles65. East Valley Er & Hospital, Gilbert: score 2.1966, cut, 6 miles54. HonorHealth Four Peaks Medical Center, Mesa: score −0.4955, not cut, 5 miles43. Banner Heart Hospital, Mesa: score 0.7449, cut, 3 miles32. Banner Baywood Medical Center, Mesa: score 0.1540, not cut, 3 miles21. Arizona Spine and Joint Hospital, Mesa: score −0.8110, not cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Banner Gateway Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Arizona Spine and Joint Hospital, Mesa, AZunder 1−0.8110not cut
Banner Baywood Medical Center, Mesa, AZ30.1540not cut
Banner Heart Hospital, Mesa, AZ30.7449cut
HonorHealth Four Peaks Medical Center, Mesa, AZ5−0.4955not cut
East Valley Er & Hospital, Gilbert, AZ62.1966cut
Dignity Health Arizona General Hospital, Mesa, AZ70.4311cut
Mercy Gilbert Medical Center, Gilbert, AZ70.1207not cut
Banner Goldfield Medical Center, Apache Junction, AZ9−1.4622not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Arizona Spine and Joint HospitalMesa, AZunder 1−0.8110No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
2Banner Baywood Medical CenterMesa, AZ30.1540No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Banner Heart HospitalMesa, AZ30.74491% cut$343KAbove the national median on 5 of 5 measures
4HonorHealth Four Peaks Medical CenterMesa, AZ5−0.4955No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
5East Valley Er & HospitalGilbert, AZ62.19661% cut$2KAbove the national median on 3 of 3 measures
6Dignity Health Arizona General HospitalMesa, AZ70.43111% cut$71KAbove the national median on 3 of 4 measures
7Mercy Gilbert Medical CenterGilbert, AZ70.1207No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
8Banner Goldfield Medical CenterApache Junction, AZ9−1.4622No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Banner Gateway Medical Center, Gilbert, AZ: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/030122/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.