P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalThe Hospital at Westlake Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$14K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 670006

1Hospital

The Hospital at Westlake Medical Center

2Location

Austin, TX (Texas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 78746

Travis County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 23 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

Not Available

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
CMS footnote 16: There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.5845

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $42K, likely $31⁠–⁠52K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.5845 for The Hospital at Westlake Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $42K estimate 1% of about $4.2M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.9644 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $31–52K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.5845 This hospital −0.5845 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.5845 This hospital −0.5845

Higher than 16% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

CMS scored this hospital on a single measure, so that measure alone set its Total HAC Score.

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 1 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

None of the measures CMS scored it on is above the national median, so no single measure at the median would lower its score.

Figure 1. This hospital has a published value for one measure, PSI 90, and it is at or below the national median.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 71% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9047

    Z-score−0.5845

    Part of score−0.5845

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.90470.9623−0.5845−0.5845Better than 71% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTIno value published0.489no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
SSIno value published0.795no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CDIno value published0.346no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 1; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.5845PSI 90)÷1measures=−0.5845Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.5845; CMS reports −0.5845. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.9644 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.5845, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5845 divided by 1 = −0.5845PSI 90−0.5845 Total HAC Score: −0.5845Score−0.5845 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5845 divided by 1 = −0.5845PSI 90−0.5845 Total HAC Score: −0.5845Score−0.5845 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.5845−0.5845−0.5845
Total HAC Score−0.5845
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.9644 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.9644 higher, the cut would have been about $42K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $42K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $42K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.5845 This hospital −0.5845 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $42K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $42Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.5845 This hospital −0.5845

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$41,981
This hospital−0.5845$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$41,981

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($4,211,780payment−$13,642readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$41,981at stake

$41,981at stake÷183traditional Medicare stays=$229per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $42K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$14K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $3,789,313
Outliers: unusually costly stays $103,448
Capital: buildings and equipment $319,019
Total, before the three programs $4,211,780
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9964 − 1) −$13,642
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $4,198,138
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $41,981 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$17K to −$10K −$13,642

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, low-income-patient payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$3,789,313
Outliers: unusually costly stays$103,448
Capital: buildings and equipment$319,019
Total, before the three programs$4,211,780
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9964 − 1))−$13,642
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$4,198,138
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $41,981)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$17K to −$10K)−$13,642

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.5845same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.5845 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $42K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.0426

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 1 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9047 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.6981

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.5845: its z‑score divided by 1, the number of measures scored.
  • PSI 90 −0.5845

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 1, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.5845−0.5845same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/670006/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.0000, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.2000, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0387, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.1866, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1845, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3322, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0880, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5657, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.7234, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.5845, higher than 16% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.0000, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.0000, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.2000, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.0387, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.1866, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1845, higher than 38% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.3322, higher than 29% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0880, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.5657, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.7234, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.5845, higher than 16% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.000012.3%not cut
FY20165.000038.0%not cut
FY20172.20009.4%not cut
FY2018−0.038747.9%not cut
FY2019−0.186638.5%not cut
FY2020−0.184538.1%not cut
FY2021−0.332229.0%not cut
FY2022−0.088045.6%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.565716.0%not cut
FY2025−0.723411.0%not cut
FY2026−0.584516.0%not cut

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Texas, its score is higher than 26% of the other 254 scored there.

In Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX area, its score is higher than 23% of the other 17 scored there.

Figure 7. Its score is below the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 6% (Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX area) to 28% (Fewer than 100 beds).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas 255 hospitals13% cut Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX area: CMS cut 1 of 18 (6%); middle score −0.3001Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX area18 hospitals6% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.5845 This hospital −0.5845 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas255 hospitals13% cut Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX area: CMS cut 1 of 18 (6%); middle score −0.3001Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX area18 hospitals6% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.5845 This hospital −0.5845

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045316%
South region1,17426322%−0.105619%
Texas2553213%−0.236826%
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX area1816%−0.300123%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105321%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115426%
For-profit6519815%−0.259028%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057414%
This hospital−0.5845
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 8. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 4 miles away.
5 mi8. Ascension Seton Northwest, Austin: score −0.9387, not cut, 9 miles87. Ascension Seton Southwest, Austin: score 0.0142, not cut, 6 miles76. Northwest Hills Surgical Hospital, Austin: score 0.8824, cut, 6 miles65. St David's Medical Center, Austin: score 0.1673, not cut, 6 miles54. St David's South Austin Medical Center, Austin: score −0.1688, not cut, 6 miles43. Dell Seton Med Center at the University of TX, Austin: score 0.3109, not cut, 6 miles32. Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin, Austin: score −0.5209, not cut, 5 miles21. Baylor Scott & White Medical Center- Austin, Austin: score 0.1196, not cut, 4 miles1This hospital: The Hospital at Westlake Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center- Austin, Austin, TX40.1196not cut
Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin, Austin, TX5−0.5209not cut
Dell Seton Med Center at the University of TX, Austin, TX60.3109not cut
St David's South Austin Medical Center, Austin, TX6−0.1688not cut
St David's Medical Center, Austin, TX60.1673not cut
Northwest Hills Surgical Hospital, Austin, TX60.8824cut
Ascension Seton Southwest, Austin, TX60.0142not cut
Ascension Seton Northwest, Austin, TX9−0.9387not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Baylor Scott & White Medical Center- AustinAustin, TX40.1196No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
2Ascension Seton Medical Center AustinAustin, TX5−0.5209No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
3Dell Seton Med Center at the University of TXAustin, TX60.3109No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
4St David's South Austin Medical CenterAustin, TX6−0.1688No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5St David's Medical CenterAustin, TX60.1673No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6Northwest Hills Surgical HospitalAustin, TX60.88241% cut$17KAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
7Ascension Seton SouthwestAustin, TX60.0142No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
8Ascension Seton NorthwestAustin, TX9−0.9387No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. The Hospital at Westlake Medical Center, Austin, TX: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/670006/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.