P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSt Marys Hospital Medical Ctr Estimated FY2026 net: −$34K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 520097

1Hospital

St Marys Hospital Medical Ctr

2Location

Green Bay, WI (Wisconsin’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 54303

Brown County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 158 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.3208

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $84K, likely $61⁠–⁠104K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3208 for St Marys Hospital Medical Ctr and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $84K estimate 1% of about $8.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.0591 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $61–104K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3208 This hospital 0.3208 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.3208 This hospital 0.3208

Higher than 71% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4490, to −0.1282. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.3610

    Z-score2.5111

    Part of score+0.4185

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 67% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.385

    Z-score−0.5134

    Part of score−0.0856

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 71% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.717

    Z-score0.4097

    Part of score+0.0683

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 56% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.885

    Z-score0.0595

    Part of score+0.0099

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.337

    Z-score−0.1573

    Part of score−0.0262

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 62% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.513

    Z-score−0.3851

    Part of score−0.0642

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.36100.96232.5111+0.4185Worse than 95% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.3850.559−0.5134−0.0856Better than 67% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7170.4890.4097+0.0683Worse than 71% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.8850.7950.0595+0.0099Worse than 56% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3370.346−0.1573−0.0262Better than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.5130.641−0.3851−0.0642Better than 62% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.5111PSI 90−0.5134CLABSI+0.4097CAUTI+0.0595SSI−0.1573CDI−0.3851MRSA)÷6measures=0.3208Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0591 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.3208, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score −0.5134 divided by 6 = −0.0856CLABSI−0.0856 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4097 divided by 6 = +0.0683CAUTI+0.0683 SSI: z‑score 0.0595 divided by 6 = +0.0099SSI+0.0099 CDI: z‑score −0.1573 divided by 6 = −0.0262CDI−0.0262 MRSA: z‑score −0.3851 divided by 6 = −0.0642MRSA−0.0642 Total HAC Score: 0.3208Score0.3208 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score −0.5134 divided by 6 = −0.0856CLABSI−0.0856 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4097 divided by 6 = +0.0683CAUTI+0.0683 SSI: z‑score 0.0595 divided by 6 = +0.0099SSI+0.0099 CDI: z‑score −0.1573 divided by 6 = −0.0262CDI−0.0262 MRSA: z‑score −0.3851 divided by 6 = −0.0642MRSA−0.0642 Total HAC Score: 0.3208Score0.3208 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.5111+0.41850.4185
CLABSI−0.5134−0.08560.3329
CAUTI0.4097+0.06830.4012
SSI0.0595+0.00990.4111
CDI−0.1573−0.02620.3849
MRSA−0.3851−0.06420.3207
Total HAC Score0.3208
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0591 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.0591 higher, the cut would have been about $84K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $84K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $84K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3208 This hospital 0.3208 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $84K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $84Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.3208 This hospital 0.3208

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$83,808
This hospital0.3208$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$83,808

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($8,414,751payment+$0readmissions−$33,954value-based)×1%the cut=$83,808at stake

$83,808at stake÷715traditional Medicare stays=$117per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $84K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to $0 and −$34K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $7,031,642
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $75,168
Outliers: unusually costly stays $125,234
Capital: buildings and equipment $550,231
Uncompensated care $632,476
Total, before the three programs $8,414,751
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (1.0000 − 1) $0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9952 − 1) −$33,954
After these two $8,380,797
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $83,808 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$43K to −$25K −$33,954

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$7,031,642
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$75,168
Outliers: unusually costly stays$125,234
Capital: buildings and equipment$550,231
Uncompensated care$632,476
Total, before the three programs$8,414,751
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (1.0000 − 1))$0
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9952 − 1))−$33,954
After these two$8,380,797
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $83,808)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$43K to −$25K)−$33,954

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.3208same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.3208 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $84K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIup to 0.536
CAUTIup to 0.862
SSIup to 1.089
CDIup to 0.427
MRSAup to 0.680

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.3610 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.385 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.717 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.885 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.337 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.513 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.3208 among its measured results: +0.4185.
  • PSI 90 +0.4185
  • CLABSI −0.0856
  • CAUTI +0.0683
  • SSI +0.0099
  • CDI −0.0262
  • MRSA −0.0642

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.5111+0.4185same
CLABSI−0.5134−0.0856same
CAUTI0.4097+0.0683same
SSI0.0595+0.0099same
CDI−0.1573−0.0262same
MRSA−0.3851−0.0642same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520097/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.0000, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.3625, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0653, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.0324, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5594, higher than 17% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2495, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2821, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8174, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.6293, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.3208, higher than 71% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.0000, higher than 25% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.3625, higher than 18% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.0653, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.0324, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5594, higher than 17% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2495, higher than 34% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.2821, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8174, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.6293, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.3208, higher than 71% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.000025.0%not cut
FY20164.750033.4%not cut
FY20173.362518.1%not cut
FY20180.065357.9%not cut
FY20190.032454.8%not cut
FY2020−0.559417.3%not cut
FY2021−0.249534.0%not cut
FY20220.282173.6%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.817489.3%cut
FY20250.629386.2%cut
FY20260.320871.7%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.81 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.688CLABSI, 2021: 0.000CLABSI, 2022: 1.261CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.809 CAUTI 1.77 → 0.79 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.775CAUTI, 2018: 0.901CAUTI, 2019: 2.455CAUTI, 2021: 1.539CAUTI, 2022: 2.372CAUTI, 2023: 0.660CAUTI, 2024: 0.786 C. diff 0.83 → 0.17 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.831C. diff, 2018: 0.482C. diff, 2019: 0.405C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.954C. diff, 2023: 0.502C. diff, 2024: 0.170 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.81 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2018: 0.000CLABSI, 2019: 0.688CLABSI, 2021: 0.000CLABSI, 2022: 1.261CLABSI, 2023: 0.000CLABSI, 2024: 0.809 CAUTI 1.77 → 0.79 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.775CAUTI, 2018: 0.901CAUTI, 2019: 2.455CAUTI, 2021: 1.539CAUTI, 2022: 2.372CAUTI, 2023: 0.660CAUTI, 2024: 0.786 C. diff 0.83 → 0.17 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.831C. diff, 2018: 0.482C. diff, 2019: 0.405C. diff, 2021: 0.000C. diff, 2022: 0.954C. diff, 2023: 0.502C. diff, 2024: 0.170

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIC. diff
20171.7750.831
20180.0000.9010.482
20190.6882.4550.405
20210.0001.5390.000
20221.2612.3720.954
20230.0000.6600.502
20240.8090.7860.170

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Wisconsin, its score is higher than 70% of the other 61 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 26% (Nonprofit).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin 62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.3208 This hospital 0.3208 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.3208 This hospital 0.3208

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045371%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026871%
Wisconsin621626%0.099670%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105372%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073273%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013470%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057473%
This hospital0.3208
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 3 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Holy Family Memorial, Manitowoc: score −0.7720, not cut, 36 miles87. Aurora Medical Ctr Manitowoc County, Two Rivers: score −0.5123, not cut, 36 miles76. Thedacare Regional Med Ctr - Neenah, Neenah: score −0.4204, not cut, 33 miles65. Ascension Ne Wisconsin - St Elizabeth Campus, Appleton: score 0.0515, not cut, 26 miles54. Thedacare Regional Medical Center - Appleton Inc, Appleton: score −0.0268, not cut, 24 miles43. Aurora BayCare Medical Ctr, Green Bay: score 0.5010, cut, 7 miles32. Bellin Memorial Hospital, Green Bay: score 0.5037, cut, 3 miles21. St Vincent Hospital, Green Bay: score −0.3049, not cut, 3 miles1This hospital: St Marys Hospital Medical Ctr

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
St Vincent Hospital, Green Bay, WI3−0.3049not cut
Bellin Memorial Hospital, Green Bay, WI30.5037cut
Aurora BayCare Medical Ctr, Green Bay, WI70.5010cut
Thedacare Regional Medical Center - Appleton Inc, Appleton, WI24−0.0268not cut
Ascension Ne Wisconsin - St Elizabeth Campus, Appleton, WI260.0515not cut
Thedacare Regional Med Ctr - Neenah, Neenah, WI33−0.4204not cut
Aurora Medical Ctr Manitowoc County, Two Rivers, WI36−0.5123not cut
Holy Family Memorial, Manitowoc, WI36−0.7720not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1St Vincent HospitalGreen Bay, WI3−0.3049No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Bellin Memorial HospitalGreen Bay, WI30.50371% cut$268KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3Aurora BayCare Medical CtrGreen Bay, WI70.50101% cut$265KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Thedacare Regional Medical Center - Appleton IncAppleton, WI24−0.0268No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5Ascension Ne Wisconsin - St Elizabeth CampusAppleton, WI260.0515No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
6Thedacare Regional Med Ctr - NeenahNeenah, WI33−0.4204No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Aurora Medical Ctr Manitowoc CountyTwo Rivers, WI36−0.5123No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
8Holy Family MemorialManitowoc, WI36−0.7720No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. St Marys Hospital Medical Ctr, Green Bay, WI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520097/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.