P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalFroedtert South Inc. Estimated FY2026 net: −$376K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 520021

1Hospital

Froedtert South Inc.

2Location

Kenosha, WI (Wisconsin’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 53143

Kenosha County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 380 beds · Government · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.8888

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$253K estimate
Likely $193⁠–⁠318K; about $146 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$253K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8888 for Froedtert South Inc. and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $25.3M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $146 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $193–318K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8888 This hospital 0.8888 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.8888 This hospital 0.8888

Higher than 91% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.3859, to 0.5029. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 6; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 88% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1800

    Z-score1.3369

    Part of score+0.2228

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 78% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.927

    Z-score0.7440

    Part of score+0.1240

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 72% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.730

    Z-score0.4411

    Part of score+0.0735

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.071

    Z-score0.3782

    Part of score+0.0630

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 95% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.953

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.3655

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 64% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.812

    Z-score0.2397

    Part of score+0.0400

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.18000.96231.3369+0.2228Worse than 88% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.9270.5590.7440+0.1240Worse than 78% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7300.4890.4411+0.0735Worse than 72% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.0710.7950.3782+0.0630Worse than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.9530.3462.1931+0.3655Worse than 95% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.8120.6410.2397+0.0400Worse than 64% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(1.3369PSI 90+0.7440CLABSI+0.4411CAUTI+0.3782SSI+2.1931CDI+0.2397MRSA)÷6measures=0.8888Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.5096 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.8888, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.3369 divided by 6 = +0.2228PSI 90+0.2228 CLABSI: z‑score 0.7440 divided by 6 = +0.1240CLABSI+0.1240 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4411 divided by 6 = +0.0735CAUTI+0.0735 SSI: z‑score 0.3782 divided by 6 = +0.0630SSI+0.0630 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 0.2397 divided by 6 = +0.0400MRSA+0.0400 Total HAC Score: 0.8888Score0.8888 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 1.3369 divided by 6 = +0.2228PSI 90+0.2228 CLABSI: z‑score 0.7440 divided by 6 = +0.1240CLABSI+0.1240 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4411 divided by 6 = +0.0735CAUTI+0.0735 SSI: z‑score 0.3782 divided by 6 = +0.0630SSI+0.0630 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 6 = +0.3655CDI+0.3655 MRSA: z‑score 0.2397 divided by 6 = +0.0400MRSA+0.0400 Total HAC Score: 0.8888Score0.8888 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 901.3369+0.22280.2228
CLABSI0.7440+0.12400.3468
CAUTI0.4411+0.07350.4203
SSI0.3782+0.06300.4833
CDI2.1931+0.36550.8488
MRSA0.2397+0.04000.8888
Total HAC Score0.8888
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.5096 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $253K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $253K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $253K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8888 This hospital 0.8888 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $253K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $253Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.8888 This hospital 0.8888

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$252,980
This hospital0.8888−$252,980
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$252,980

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($25,420,866payment−$76,598readmissions−$46,307value-based)×1%the cut=$252,980HAC cut

$252,980HAC cut÷1,738traditional Medicare stays=$146per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $253K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$77K and −$46K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $19,640,534
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $280,467
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,578,706
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,830,901
Uncompensated care $2,090,258
Total, before the three programs $25,420,866
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9961 − 1) −$76,598
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9976 − 1) −$46,307
After these two $25,297,961
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $193⁠–⁠318K −$252,980
Net of the three programs likely −$442K to −$303K −$375,885

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$19,640,534
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$280,467
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,578,706
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,830,901
Uncompensated care$2,090,258
Total, before the three programs$25,420,866
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9961 − 1))−$76,598
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9976 − 1))−$46,307
After these two$25,297,961
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $193–318K)−$252,980
Net of the three programs (likely −$442K to −$303K)−$375,885

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.8888same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$253Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.8888 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $253K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDI0.154 or lower
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1800 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.927 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.730 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.071 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.953 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.812 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.8888 among its measured results: +0.3655.
  • PSI 90 +0.2228
  • CLABSI +0.1240
  • CAUTI +0.0735
  • SSI +0.0630
  • CDI +0.3655
  • MRSA +0.0400

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 901.3369+0.2228same
CLABSI0.7440+0.1240same
CAUTI0.4411+0.0735same
SSI0.3782+0.0630same
CDI2.1931+0.3655same
MRSA0.2397+0.0400same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0000, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.9200, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1610, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.8147, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.5915, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.1755, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.1928, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 1.2431, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.2273, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8888, higher than 91% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 2.0000, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.2500, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 3.9200, higher than 24% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1610, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.8147, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.5915, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.1755, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.1928, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 1.2431, higher than 95% of scores; cutFY2025: score 1.2273, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.8888, higher than 91% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20152.00004.7%not cut
FY20162.25006.2%not cut
FY20173.920024.7%not cut
FY2018−0.161039.6%not cut
FY20190.814791.4%cut
FY20200.591586.0%cut
FY20210.175566.5%not cut
FY20220.192868.7%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20241.243195.9%cut
FY20251.227396.5%cut
FY20260.888891.8%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.10 → 1.23 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.104CLABSI, 2018: 1.441CLABSI, 2019: 0.338CLABSI, 2021: 1.384CLABSI, 2022: 1.253CLABSI, 2023: 0.621CLABSI, 2024: 1.229 CAUTI 2.07 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.072CAUTI, 2018: 1.153CAUTI, 2019: 0.401CAUTI, 2021: 1.406CAUTI, 2022: 1.821CAUTI, 2023: 0.821CAUTI, 2024: 0.636 SSI, colon 1.55 → 0.98 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.555SSI, colon, 2018: 0.636SSI, colon, 2019: 0.941SSI, colon, 2021: 3.652SSI, colon, 2022: 2.995SSI, colon, 2023: 1.336SSI, colon, 2024: 0.978 MRSA 0.75 → 1.13 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.754MRSA, 2018: 0.654MRSA, 2019: 1.675MRSA, 2021: 1.352MRSA, 2022: 1.019MRSA, 2023: 0.520MRSA, 2024: 1.129 C. diff 1.25 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.251C. diff, 2018: 0.681C. diff, 2019: 1.012C. diff, 2021: 2.062C. diff, 2022: 2.093C. diff, 2023: 1.337C. diff, 2024: 0.754 CLABSI 1.10 → 1.23 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.104CLABSI, 2018: 1.441CLABSI, 2019: 0.338CLABSI, 2021: 1.384CLABSI, 2022: 1.253CLABSI, 2023: 0.621CLABSI, 2024: 1.229 CAUTI 2.07 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 2.072CAUTI, 2018: 1.153CAUTI, 2019: 0.401CAUTI, 2021: 1.406CAUTI, 2022: 1.821CAUTI, 2023: 0.821CAUTI, 2024: 0.636 SSI, colon 1.55 → 0.98 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.555SSI, colon, 2018: 0.636SSI, colon, 2019: 0.941SSI, colon, 2021: 3.652SSI, colon, 2022: 2.995SSI, colon, 2023: 1.336SSI, colon, 2024: 0.978 MRSA 0.75 → 1.13 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.754MRSA, 2018: 0.654MRSA, 2019: 1.675MRSA, 2021: 1.352MRSA, 2022: 1.019MRSA, 2023: 0.520MRSA, 2024: 1.129 C. diff 1.25 → 0.75 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.251C. diff, 2018: 0.681C. diff, 2019: 1.012C. diff, 2021: 2.062C. diff, 2022: 2.093C. diff, 2023: 1.337C. diff, 2024: 0.754

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20171.1042.0721.5550.7541.251
20181.4411.1530.6360.6540.681
20190.3380.4010.9411.6751.012
20211.3841.4063.6521.3522.062
20221.2531.8212.9951.0192.093
20230.6210.8211.3360.5201.337
20241.2290.6360.9781.1290.754

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Wisconsin, its score is higher than 96% of the other 61 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (300 to 499 beds) to 35% (Government).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region 683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin 62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government 401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.8888 This hospital 0.8888 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Midwest region: CMS cut 174 of 683 (25%); middle score −0.0268Midwest region683 hospitals25% cut Wisconsin: CMS cut 16 of 62 (26%); middle score 0.0996Wisconsin62 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Government: CMS cut 140 of 401 (35%); middle score 0.1602Government401 hospitals35% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.8888 This hospital 0.8888

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045391%
Midwest region68317425%−0.026892%
Wisconsin621626%0.099696%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105389%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038495%
Government40114035%0.160284%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057493%
This hospital0.8888
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 4 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Aurora Memorial Hospital Burlington, Burlington: score 0.6344, cut, 24 miles87. Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital, Lake Forest: score −0.1778, not cut, 22 miles76. Advocate Condell Medical Center, Libertyville: score −0.1754, not cut, 22 miles65. Midwest Orthopedic Specialty Hospital, Franklin: score −0.3350, not cut, 21 miles54. Vista Medical Center East, Waukegan: score −0.6736, not cut, 14 miles43. Ascension All Saints Hospital, Racine: score 0.0943, not cut, 11 miles32. Midwestern Region Med Center, Inc, Zion: score 0.3020, not cut, 9 miles21. Aurora Medical Center Kenosha, Kenosha: score 0.6506, cut, 4 miles1This hospital: Froedtert South Inc.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Aurora Medical Center Kenosha, Kenosha, WI40.6506cut
Midwestern Region Med Center, Inc, Zion, IL90.3020not cut
Ascension All Saints Hospital, Racine, WI110.0943not cut
Vista Medical Center East, Waukegan, IL14−0.6736not cut
Midwest Orthopedic Specialty Hospital, Franklin, WI21−0.3350not cut
Advocate Condell Medical Center, Libertyville, IL22−0.1754not cut
Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital, Lake Forest, IL22−0.1778not cut
Aurora Memorial Hospital Burlington, Burlington, WI240.6344cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Aurora Medical Center KenoshaKenosha, WI40.65061% cut$258KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
2Midwestern Region Med Center, IncZion, IL90.3020No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 3 measures
3Ascension All Saints HospitalRacine, WI110.0943No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4Vista Medical Center EastWaukegan, IL14−0.6736No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
5Midwest Orthopedic Specialty HospitalFranklin, WI21−0.3350No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 1 measures
6Advocate Condell Medical CenterLibertyville, IL22−0.1754No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
7Northwestern Lake Forest HospitalLake Forest, IL22−0.1778No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
8Aurora Memorial Hospital BurlingtonBurlington, WI240.63441% cut$90KAbove the national median on 3 of 5 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Froedtert South Inc., Kenosha, WI: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/520021/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.