P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalRaleigh General Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$601K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 510070

1Hospital

Raleigh General Hospital

2Location

Beckley, WV (West Virginia’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 25801

Raleigh County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 300 beds · For-profit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

2 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.4315

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$340K estimate
Likely $277⁠–⁠370K; about $122 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$340K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4315 for Raleigh General Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $34.0M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $122 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $277–370K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4315 This hospital 0.4315 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4315 This hospital 0.4315

Higher than 77% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 6 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.3777, to 0.0538. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 64% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9964

    Z-score0.0551

    Part of score+0.0092

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 83% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.166

    Z-score−1.0214

    Part of score−0.1702

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 72% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.730

    Z-score0.4411

    Part of score+0.0735

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 99% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value3.127

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.3620

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 83% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.625

    Z-score0.9579

    Part of score+0.1597

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 54% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.690

    Z-score−0.0152

    Part of score−0.0025

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.99640.96230.0551+0.0092Worse than 64% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.1660.559−1.0214−0.1702Better than 83% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7300.4890.4411+0.0735Worse than 72% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI3.1270.7952.1717+0.3620Worse than 99% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.6250.3460.9579+0.1597Worse than 83% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.6900.641−0.0152−0.0025Worse than 54% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.0551PSI 90−1.0214CLABSI+0.4411CAUTI+2.1717SSI+0.9579CDI−0.0152MRSA)÷6measures=0.4315Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0523 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.4315, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.0551 divided by 6 = +0.0092PSI 90+0.0092 CLABSI: z‑score −1.0214 divided by 6 = −0.1702CLABSI−0.1702 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4411 divided by 6 = +0.0735CAUTI+0.0735 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score 0.9579 divided by 6 = +0.1597CDI+0.1597 MRSA: z‑score −0.0152 divided by 6 = −0.0025MRSA−0.0025 Total HAC Score: 0.4315Score0.4315 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.40.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.0551 divided by 6 = +0.0092PSI 90+0.0092 CLABSI: z‑score −1.0214 divided by 6 = −0.1702CLABSI−0.1702 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4411 divided by 6 = +0.0735CAUTI+0.0735 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 6 = +0.3620SSI+0.3620 CDI: z‑score 0.9579 divided by 6 = +0.1597CDI+0.1597 MRSA: z‑score −0.0152 divided by 6 = −0.0025MRSA−0.0025 Total HAC Score: 0.4315Score0.4315 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.40.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.0551+0.00920.0092
CLABSI−1.0214−0.1702−0.1610
CAUTI0.4411+0.0735−0.0875
SSI2.1717+0.36200.2745
CDI0.9579+0.15970.4342
MRSA−0.0152−0.00250.4317
Total HAC Score0.4315
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0523 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $340K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $340K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $340K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4315 This hospital 0.4315 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $340K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $340Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4315 This hospital 0.4315

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$340,302
This hospital0.4315−$340,302
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$340,302

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($34,290,381payment−$229,342readmissions−$30,856value-based)×1%the cut=$340,302HAC cut

$340,302HAC cut÷2,778traditional Medicare stays=$122per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $340K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$229K and −$31K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $29,784,627
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,202,108
Outliers: unusually costly stays $166,794
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,458,097
Uncompensated care $678,755
Total, before the three programs $34,290,381
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9923 − 1) −$229,342
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9990 − 1) −$30,856
After these two $34,030,183
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $277⁠–⁠370K −$340,302
Net of the three programs likely −$657K to −$519K −$600,500

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$29,784,627
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,202,108
Outliers: unusually costly stays$166,794
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,458,097
Uncompensated care$678,755
Total, before the three programs$34,290,381
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9923 − 1))−$229,342
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9990 − 1))−$30,856
After these two$34,030,183
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $277–370K)−$340,302
Net of the three programs (likely −$657K to −$519K)−$600,500

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.4315same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$340Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4315 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $340K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9513 or lower
CLABSI0.030 or lower
CAUTI0.599 or lower
SSI1.934 or lower
CDI0.543 or lower
MRSA0.539 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9964 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.166 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.730 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 3.127 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.625 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.690 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.4315 among its measured results: +0.3620.
  • PSI 90 +0.0092
  • CLABSI −0.1702
  • CAUTI +0.0735
  • SSI +0.3620
  • CDI +0.1597
  • MRSA −0.0025

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.0551+0.0092same
CLABSI−1.0214−0.1702same
CAUTI0.4411+0.0735same
SSI2.1717+0.3620same
CDI0.9579+0.1597same
MRSA−0.0152−0.0025same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 6 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.4500, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.4000, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.6989, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.62, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.6151, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3047, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1919, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8974, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.9285, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.4315, higher than 77% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.4500, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 5.5000, higher than 48% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.4000, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.6989, higher than 88% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.62, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.6151, higher than 86% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.3047, higher than 73% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.1919, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.8974, higher than 91% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.9285, higher than 92% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.4315, higher than 77% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.450050.0%not cut
FY20165.500048.7%not cut
FY20176.400072.2%not cut
FY20180.698988.2%cut
FY20190.6286.1%cut
FY20200.615186.7%cut
FY20210.304773.3%not cut
FY2022−0.191937.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.897491.0%cut
FY20250.928592.8%cut
FY20260.431577.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.26 → 0.18 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.259CLABSI, 2018: 0.330CLABSI, 2019: 0.109CLABSI, 2021: 1.895CLABSI, 2022: 1.118CLABSI, 2023: 0.153CLABSI, 2024: 0.182 CAUTI 0.41 → 0.20 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.407CAUTI, 2018: 0.175CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.646CAUTI, 2022: 1.751CAUTI, 2023: 1.152CAUTI, 2024: 0.205 SSI, colon 3.05 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 3.053SSI, colon, 2018: 2.076SSI, colon, 2019: 0.500 MRSA 1.76 → 1.02 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.761MRSA, 2018: 2.091MRSA, 2019: 1.444MRSA, 2021: 1.248MRSA, 2022: 1.552MRSA, 2023: 0.351MRSA, 2024: 1.018 C. diff 1.11 → 0.35 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.107C. diff, 2018: 0.836C. diff, 2019: 0.743C. diff, 2021: 0.799C. diff, 2022: 0.324C. diff, 2023: 0.875C. diff, 2024: 0.350 CLABSI 0.26 → 0.18 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.259CLABSI, 2018: 0.330CLABSI, 2019: 0.109CLABSI, 2021: 1.895CLABSI, 2022: 1.118CLABSI, 2023: 0.153CLABSI, 2024: 0.182 CAUTI 0.41 → 0.20 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.407CAUTI, 2018: 0.175CAUTI, 2019: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 0.646CAUTI, 2022: 1.751CAUTI, 2023: 1.152CAUTI, 2024: 0.205 SSI, colon 3.05 → 0.50 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 3.053SSI, colon, 2018: 2.076SSI, colon, 2019: 0.500 MRSA 1.76 → 1.02 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.761MRSA, 2018: 2.091MRSA, 2019: 1.444MRSA, 2021: 1.248MRSA, 2022: 1.552MRSA, 2023: 0.351MRSA, 2024: 1.018 C. diff 1.11 → 0.35 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.107C. diff, 2018: 0.836C. diff, 2019: 0.743C. diff, 2021: 0.799C. diff, 2022: 0.324C. diff, 2023: 0.875C. diff, 2024: 0.350

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.2590.4073.0531.7611.107
20180.3300.1752.0762.0910.836
20190.1090.0000.5001.4440.743
20211.8950.6461.2480.799
20221.1181.7511.5520.324
20230.1531.1520.3510.875
20240.1820.2051.0180.350

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In West Virginia, its score is higher than 50% of the other 22 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 52% (West Virginia).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut West Virginia: CMS cut 12 of 23 (52%); middle score 0.4315West Virginia 23 hospitals52% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.4315 This hospital 0.4315 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut West Virginia: CMS cut 12 of 23 (52%); middle score 0.4315West Virginia23 hospitals52% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.4315 This hospital 0.4315

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045377%
South region1,17426322%−0.105679%
West Virginia231252%0.431550%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105377%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038481%
For-profit6519815%−0.259086%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057479%
This hospital0.4315
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 5 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 2 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Carilion Tazewell Community Hospital, Tazewell: score 0.7294, cut, 48 miles87. Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston: score 1.1186, cut, 45 miles76. CAMC Charleston Surgical Hospital, Charleston: score −0.0072, not cut, 45 miles65. Logan Regional Medical Center, Logan: score 1.3213, cut, 43 miles54. CAMC Greenbrier Valley Medical Center, Inc, Ronceverte: score 0.1701, not cut, 40 miles43. Welch Community Hospital, Welch: score 0.1602, not cut, 32 miles32. Princeton Community Hospital Assn Inc, Princeton: score 1.5692, cut, 30 miles21. Beckley ARH Hospital, Beckley: score 0.8635, cut, 2 miles1This hospital: Raleigh General Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Beckley ARH Hospital, Beckley, WV20.8635cut
Princeton Community Hospital Assn Inc, Princeton, WV301.5692cut
Welch Community Hospital, Welch, WV320.1602not cut
CAMC Greenbrier Valley Medical Center, Inc, Ronceverte, WV400.1701not cut
Logan Regional Medical Center, Logan, WV431.3213cut
CAMC Charleston Surgical Hospital, Charleston, WV45−0.0072not cut
Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, WV451.1186cut
Carilion Tazewell Community Hospital, Tazewell, VA480.7294cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Beckley ARH HospitalBeckley, WV20.86351% cut$139KAbove the national median on 3 of 5 measures
2Princeton Community Hospital Assn IncPrinceton, WV301.56921% cut$252KAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
3Welch Community HospitalWelch, WV320.1602No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
4CAMC Greenbrier Valley Medical Center, IncRonceverte, WV400.1701No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 5 measures
5Logan Regional Medical CenterLogan, WV431.32131% cut$125KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6CAMC Charleston Surgical HospitalCharleston, WV45−0.0072No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
7Charleston Area Medical CenterCharleston, WV451.11861% cut$1.5MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
8Carilion Tazewell Community HospitalTazewell, VA480.72941% cut$21KAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Raleigh General Hospital, Beckley, WV: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/510070/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.