P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSwedish Edmonds Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$145K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 500026

1Hospital

Swedish Edmonds Hospital

2Location

Edmonds, WA (Washington’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 98026

Snohomish County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 217 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.0590

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $286K, likely $218⁠–⁠359K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0590 for Swedish Edmonds Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $286K estimate 1% of about $28.6M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.3209 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $218–359K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0590 This hospital 0.0590 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.0590 This hospital 0.0590

Higher than 56% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.1957, to −0.1367. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 79% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8793

    Z-score−0.7620

    Part of score−0.1270

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 65% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.725

    Z-score0.2754

    Part of score+0.0459

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.976

    Z-score1.0340

    Part of score+0.1723

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.835

    Z-score−0.0261

    Part of score−0.0044

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 76% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.537

    Z-score0.6171

    Part of score+0.1029

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 78% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.322

    Z-score−0.7843

    Part of score−0.1307

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.87930.9623−0.7620−0.1270Better than 79% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.7250.5590.2754+0.0459Worse than 65% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.9760.4891.0340+0.1723Worse than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.8350.795−0.0261−0.0044Worse than 52% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.5370.3460.6171+0.1029Worse than 76% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.3220.641−0.7843−0.1307Better than 78% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.7620PSI 90+0.2754CLABSI+1.0340CAUTI−0.0261SSI+0.6171CDI−0.7843MRSA)÷6measures=0.0590Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.3209 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.0590, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7620 divided by 6 = −0.1270PSI 90−0.1270 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2754 divided by 6 = +0.0459CLABSI+0.0459 CAUTI: z‑score 1.0340 divided by 6 = +0.1723CAUTI+0.1723 SSI: z‑score −0.0261 divided by 6 = −0.0044SSI−0.0044 CDI: z‑score 0.6171 divided by 6 = +0.1029CDI+0.1029 MRSA: z‑score −0.7843 divided by 6 = −0.1307MRSA−0.1307 Total HAC Score: 0.0590Score0.0590 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.7620 divided by 6 = −0.1270PSI 90−0.1270 CLABSI: z‑score 0.2754 divided by 6 = +0.0459CLABSI+0.0459 CAUTI: z‑score 1.0340 divided by 6 = +0.1723CAUTI+0.1723 SSI: z‑score −0.0261 divided by 6 = −0.0044SSI−0.0044 CDI: z‑score 0.6171 divided by 6 = +0.1029CDI+0.1029 MRSA: z‑score −0.7843 divided by 6 = −0.1307MRSA−0.1307 Total HAC Score: 0.0590Score0.0590 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.7620−0.1270−0.1270
CLABSI0.2754+0.0459−0.0811
CAUTI1.0340+0.17230.0912
SSI−0.0261−0.00440.0868
CDI0.6171+0.10290.1897
MRSA−0.7843−0.13070.0590
Total HAC Score0.0590
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.3209 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.3209 higher, the cut would have been about $286K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $286K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $286K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0590 This hospital 0.0590 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $286K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $286Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.0590 This hospital 0.0590

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$285,937
This hospital0.0590$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$285,937

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($28,739,013payment−$31,353readmissions−$113,933value-based)×1%the cut=$285,937at stake

$285,937at stake÷1,828traditional Medicare stays=$156per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $286K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$31K and −$114K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $22,395,157
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $711,718
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,719,052
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,977,091
Uncompensated care $1,935,995
Total, before the three programs $28,739,013
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9986 − 1) −$31,353
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9949 − 1) −$113,933
After these two $28,593,727
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $285,937 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$171K to −$117K −$145,286

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$22,395,157
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$711,718
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,719,052
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,977,091
Uncompensated care$1,935,995
Total, before the three programs$28,739,013
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9986 − 1))−$31,353
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9949 − 1))−$113,933
After these two$28,593,727
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $285,937)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$171K to −$117K)−$145,286

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.0590same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.0590 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $286K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.1544
CLABSIup to 1.553
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIup to 1.956
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAup to 1.241

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8793 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.725 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.976 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.835 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.537 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.322 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.0590 among its measured results: +0.1723.
  • PSI 90 −0.1270
  • CLABSI +0.0459
  • CAUTI +0.1723
  • SSI −0.0044
  • CDI +0.1029
  • MRSA −0.1307

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.7620−0.1270same
CLABSI0.2754+0.0459same
CAUTI1.0340+0.1723same
SSI−0.0261−0.0044same
CDI0.6171+0.1029same
MRSA−0.7843−0.1307same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/500026/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.7500, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.7500, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1489, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.1621, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.6563, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.8159, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.8021, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.1507, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0123, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0590, higher than 56% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 4.7500, higher than 37% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.7500, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.1489, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.1621, higher than 39% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.6563, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.8159, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.8021, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.1507, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0123, higher than 52% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.0590, higher than 56% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20154.750037.4%not cut
FY20164.500030.4%not cut
FY20175.750057.3%not cut
FY20180.148963.6%not cut
FY2019−0.162139.9%not cut
FY2020−0.656314.2%not cut
FY2021−0.81599.0%not cut
FY2022−0.80219.0%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.150763.1%not cut
FY20250.012352.7%not cut
FY20260.059056.5%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.42 → 0.50 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.418CLABSI, 2018: 0.776CLABSI, 2019: 0.367CLABSI, 2021: 1.087CLABSI, 2022: 1.623CLABSI, 2023: 1.031CLABSI, 2024: 0.502 CAUTI 0.82 → 1.22 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.820CAUTI, 2018: 0.492CAUTI, 2019: 0.761CAUTI, 2021: 0.804CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.651CAUTI, 2024: 1.220 SSI, colon 0.00 → 1.31 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.301SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 1.182SSI, colon, 2022: 1.418SSI, colon, 2023: 0.543SSI, colon, 2024: 1.306 MRSA 0.00 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 0.421MRSA, 2019: 0.383MRSA, 2021: 0.000MRSA, 2022: 0.536MRSA, 2023: 0.407MRSA, 2024: 0.266 C. diff 1.30 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.299C. diff, 2018: 0.239C. diff, 2019: 0.284C. diff, 2021: 0.314C. diff, 2022: 0.305C. diff, 2023: 0.427C. diff, 2024: 0.672 CLABSI 0.42 → 0.50 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.418CLABSI, 2018: 0.776CLABSI, 2019: 0.367CLABSI, 2021: 1.087CLABSI, 2022: 1.623CLABSI, 2023: 1.031CLABSI, 2024: 0.502 CAUTI 0.82 → 1.22 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.820CAUTI, 2018: 0.492CAUTI, 2019: 0.761CAUTI, 2021: 0.804CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.651CAUTI, 2024: 1.220 SSI, colon 0.00 → 1.31 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.000SSI, colon, 2018: 0.301SSI, colon, 2019: 0.000SSI, colon, 2021: 1.182SSI, colon, 2022: 1.418SSI, colon, 2023: 0.543SSI, colon, 2024: 1.306 MRSA 0.00 → 0.27 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.000MRSA, 2018: 0.421MRSA, 2019: 0.383MRSA, 2021: 0.000MRSA, 2022: 0.536MRSA, 2023: 0.407MRSA, 2024: 0.266 C. diff 1.30 → 0.67 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.299C. diff, 2018: 0.239C. diff, 2019: 0.284C. diff, 2021: 0.314C. diff, 2022: 0.305C. diff, 2023: 0.427C. diff, 2024: 0.672

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.4180.8200.0000.0001.299
20180.7760.4920.3010.4210.239
20190.3670.7610.0000.3830.284
20211.0870.8041.1820.0000.314
20221.6230.0001.4180.5360.305
20231.0310.6510.5430.4070.427
20240.5021.2201.3060.2660.672

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Washington, its score is higher than 48% of the other 45 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 26% (West region).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Washington: CMS cut 12 of 46 (26%); middle score 0.0723Washington 46 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.0590 This hospital 0.0590 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Washington: CMS cut 12 of 46 (26%); middle score 0.0723Washington46 hospitals26% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.0590 This hospital 0.0590

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045356%
West region59315726%−0.030255%
Washington461226%0.072348%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105360%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073258%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013454%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057457%
This hospital0.0590
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 9 miles away.
5 mi10 mi8. Overlake Hospital Medical Center & Clinics, Bellevue: score 0.5857, cut, 14 miles87. Harborview Medical Center, Seattle: score 1.5608, cut, 14 miles76. Swedish Medical Center / Cherry Hill, Seattle: score 0.2676, not cut, 14 miles65. Swedish Medical Center, Seattle: score 0.3055, not cut, 13 miles54. Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle: score −0.7265, not cut, 13 miles43. Kaiser Permanente Central Hospital, Seattle: score 0.0453, not cut, 13 miles32. University of Washington Medical Ctr, Seattle: score 0.7996, cut, 11 miles21. Evergreenhealth Medical Center, Kirkland: score −0.3875, not cut, 9 miles1This hospital: Swedish Edmonds Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Evergreenhealth Medical Center, Kirkland, WA9−0.3875not cut
University of Washington Medical Ctr, Seattle, WA110.7996cut
Kaiser Permanente Central Hospital, Seattle, WA130.0453not cut
Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA13−0.7265not cut
Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA130.3055not cut
Swedish Medical Center / Cherry Hill, Seattle, WA140.2676not cut
Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA141.5608cut
Overlake Hospital Medical Center & Clinics, Bellevue, WA140.5857cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Evergreenhealth Medical CenterKirkland, WA9−0.3875No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2University of Washington Medical CtrSeattle, WA110.79961% cut$2.1MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Kaiser Permanente Central HospitalSeattle, WA130.0453No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
4Virginia Mason Medical CenterSeattle, WA13−0.7265No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
5Swedish Medical CenterSeattle, WA130.3055No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6Swedish Medical Center / Cherry HillSeattle, WA140.2676No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 5 measures
7Harborview Medical CenterSeattle, WA141.56081% cut$1.1MAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
8Overlake Hospital Medical Center & ClinicsBellevue, WA140.58571% cut$544KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Swedish Edmonds Hospital, Edmonds, WA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/500026/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.