P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalRutland Regional Medical Center Estimated FY2026 net: −$259K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 470005

1Hospital

Rutland Regional Medical Center

2Location

Rutland, VT (Vermont’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 05701

Rutland County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 301 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Rural referral center · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

1.0356

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$314K estimate
Likely $244⁠–⁠382K; about $152 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$314K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.0356 for Rutland Regional Medical Center and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $31.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $152 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $244–382K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.0356 This hospital 1.0356 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 1.0356 This hospital 1.0356

Higher than 94% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 2 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4490, to 0.5866. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 96% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.3833

    Z-score2.5111

    Part of score+0.4185

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 61% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.682

    Z-score0.1756

    Part of score+0.0293

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 74% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.753

    Z-score0.4965

    Part of score+0.0828

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 58% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.670

    Z-score−0.3088

    Part of score−0.0515

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 92% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.864

    Z-score1.8833

    Part of score+0.3139

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 89% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.394

    Z-score1.4560

    Part of score+0.2427

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.38330.96232.5111+0.4185Worse than 96% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6820.5590.1756+0.0293Worse than 61% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7530.4890.4965+0.0828Worse than 74% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.6700.795−0.3088−0.0515Better than 58% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.8640.3461.8833+0.3139Worse than 92% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.3940.6411.4560+0.2427Worse than 89% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.5111PSI 90+0.1756CLABSI+0.4965CAUTI−0.3088SSI+1.8833CDI+1.4560MRSA)÷6measures=1.0356Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.6564 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 1.0356, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1756 divided by 6 = +0.0293CLABSI+0.0293 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4965 divided by 6 = +0.0828CAUTI+0.0828 SSI: z‑score −0.3088 divided by 6 = −0.0515SSI−0.0515 CDI: z‑score 1.8833 divided by 6 = +0.3139CDI+0.3139 MRSA: z‑score 1.4560 divided by 6 = +0.2427MRSA+0.2427 Total HAC Score: 1.0356Score1.0356 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.1756 divided by 6 = +0.0293CLABSI+0.0293 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4965 divided by 6 = +0.0828CAUTI+0.0828 SSI: z‑score −0.3088 divided by 6 = −0.0515SSI−0.0515 CDI: z‑score 1.8833 divided by 6 = +0.3139CDI+0.3139 MRSA: z‑score 1.4560 divided by 6 = +0.2427MRSA+0.2427 Total HAC Score: 1.0356Score1.0356 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.60.81.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.5111+0.41850.4185
CLABSI0.1756+0.02930.4478
CAUTI0.4965+0.08280.5306
SSI−0.3088−0.05150.4791
CDI1.8833+0.31390.7930
MRSA1.4560+0.24271.0357
Total HAC Score1.0356
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.6564 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $314K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $314K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $314K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 1.0356 This hospital 1.0356 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $314K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $314Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 1.0356 This hospital 1.0356

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$313,637
This hospital1.0356−$313,637
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$313,637

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($31,309,091payment−$28,575readmissions+$83,170value-based)×1%the cut=$313,637HAC cut

$313,637HAC cut÷2,060traditional Medicare stays=$152per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $314K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$29K and +$83K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $19,049,823
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $665,410
Outliers: unusually costly stays $1,760,204
Sole community hospital rate difference $8,272,600
Capital: buildings and equipment $1,561,054
Total, before the three programs $31,309,091
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9985 − 1) −$28,575
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0044 − 1) +$83,170
After these two $31,363,686
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $244⁠–⁠382K −$313,637
Net of the three programs likely −$300K to −$207K −$259,042

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a low-volume adjustment, and uncompensated care payments.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$19,049,823
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$665,410
Outliers: unusually costly stays$1,760,204
Sole community hospital rate difference$8,272,600
Capital: buildings and equipment$1,561,054
Total, before the three programs$31,309,091
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9985 − 1))−$28,575
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0044 − 1))+$83,170
After these two$31,363,686
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $244–382K)−$313,637
Net of the three programs (likely −$300K to −$207K)−$259,042

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score1.0356same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$314Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 1.0356 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $314K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.7839 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDInot possible with this measure alone
MRSAnot possible with this measure alone

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.3833 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.682 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.753 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.670 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.864 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.394 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 1.0356 among its measured results: +0.4185.
  • PSI 90 +0.4185
  • CLABSI +0.0293
  • CAUTI +0.0828
  • SSI −0.0515
  • CDI +0.3139
  • MRSA +0.2427

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.5111+0.4185same
CLABSI0.1756+0.0293same
CAUTI0.4965+0.0828same
SSI−0.3088−0.0515same
CDI1.8833+0.3139same
MRSA1.4560+0.2427same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 2 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.0000, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.2800, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3665, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.134, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3411, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4451, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2536, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3201, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.5353, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.0356, higher than 94% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.0000, higher than 12% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 4.2800, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.3665, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.134, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3411, higher than 27% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.4451, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.2536, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.3201, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.5353, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2026: score 1.0356, higher than 94% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.000012.3%not cut
FY20164.500030.4%not cut
FY20174.280030.5%not cut
FY2018−0.366527.1%not cut
FY2019−0.13441.8%not cut
FY2020−0.341127.8%not cut
FY2021−0.445122.1%not cut
FY2022−0.253633.9%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.320130.3%not cut
FY20250.535383.0%cut
FY20261.035694.2%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 2 of its 5 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.00 → 0.73 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.674CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.079CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.639CLABSI, 2024: 0.730 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.838CAUTI, 2021: 1.829CAUTI, 2022: 0.324CAUTI, 2023: 1.364CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 1.86 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.859SSI, colon, 2018: 1.507SSI, colon, 2019: 0.516SSI, colon, 2021: 1.305SSI, colon, 2022: 1.564SSI, colon, 2023: 1.257SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.40 → 1.30 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.404MRSA, 2018: 0.666MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 1.428MRSA, 2022: 0.492MRSA, 2023: 1.496MRSA, 2024: 1.305 C. diff 0.48 → 0.93 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.484C. diff, 2018: 0.412C. diff, 2019: 0.897C. diff, 2021: 0.557C. diff, 2022: 0.538C. diff, 2023: 0.797C. diff, 2024: 0.932 CLABSI 0.00 → 0.73 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.000CLABSI, 2018: 0.674CLABSI, 2019: 0.000CLABSI, 2021: 1.079CLABSI, 2022: 0.000CLABSI, 2023: 0.639CLABSI, 2024: 0.730 CAUTI 0.00 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.000CAUTI, 2019: 0.838CAUTI, 2021: 1.829CAUTI, 2022: 0.324CAUTI, 2023: 1.364CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 SSI, colon 1.86 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.859SSI, colon, 2018: 1.507SSI, colon, 2019: 0.516SSI, colon, 2021: 1.305SSI, colon, 2022: 1.564SSI, colon, 2023: 1.257SSI, colon, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.40 → 1.30 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.404MRSA, 2018: 0.666MRSA, 2019: 0.000MRSA, 2021: 1.428MRSA, 2022: 0.492MRSA, 2023: 1.496MRSA, 2024: 1.305 C. diff 0.48 → 0.93 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.484C. diff, 2018: 0.412C. diff, 2019: 0.897C. diff, 2021: 0.557C. diff, 2022: 0.538C. diff, 2023: 0.797C. diff, 2024: 0.932

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonMRSAC. diff
20170.0000.0001.8591.4040.484
20180.6740.0001.5070.6660.412
20190.0000.8380.5160.0000.897
20211.0791.8291.3051.4280.557
20220.0000.3241.5640.4920.538
20230.6391.3641.2571.4960.797
20240.7300.0000.0001.3050.932

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Vermont, its score is higher than 40% of the other 5 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 6 of the 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 22% (300 to 499 beds) to 67% (Vermont).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut Vermont: CMS cut 4 of 6 (67%); middle score 1.0510Vermont 6 hospitals67% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 1.0356 This hospital 1.0356 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut Vermont: CMS cut 4 of 6 (67%); middle score 1.0510Vermont6 hospitals67% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 1.0356 This hospital 1.0356

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045394%
Northeast region43612428%0.047894%
Vermont6467%1.051040%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105392%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038498%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013495%
Rural61919632%0.022989%
This hospital1.0356
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 40 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Univ. of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington: score 1.0951, cut, 62 miles87. Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital, Lebanon: score 0.4187, cut, 61 miles76. Cheshire Medical Center, Keene: score −0.2955, not cut, 56 miles65. Brattleboro Memorial Hospital, Brattleboro: score −0.3152, not cut, 56 miles54. Saratoga Hospital, Saratoga Springs: score −0.1274, not cut, 55 miles43. Southwestern Vermont Medical Center, Bennington: score −0.4317, not cut, 52 miles32. Central Vermont Medical Center, Barre: score 1.3224, cut, 47 miles21. Glens Falls Hospital, Glens Falls: score 0.2472, not cut, 40 miles1This hospital: Rutland Regional Medical Center

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Glens Falls Hospital, Glens Falls, NY400.2472not cut
Central Vermont Medical Center, Barre, VT471.3224cut
Southwestern Vermont Medical Center, Bennington, VT52−0.4317not cut
Saratoga Hospital, Saratoga Springs, NY55−0.1274not cut
Brattleboro Memorial Hospital, Brattleboro, VT56−0.3152not cut
Cheshire Medical Center, Keene, NH56−0.2955not cut
Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital, Lebanon, NH610.4187cut
Univ. of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT621.0951cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Glens Falls HospitalGlens Falls, NY400.2472No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Central Vermont Medical CenterBarre, VT471.32241% cut$323KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Southwestern Vermont Medical CenterBennington, VT52−0.4317No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4Saratoga HospitalSaratoga Springs, NY55−0.1274No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Brattleboro Memorial HospitalBrattleboro, VT56−0.3152No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
6Cheshire Medical CenterKeene, NH56−0.2955No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Mary Hitchcock Memorial HospitalLebanon, NH610.41871% cut$2.1MAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
8Univ. of Vermont - Fletcher Allen Health CareBurlington, VT621.09511% cut$1.6MAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Rutland Regional Medical Center, Rutland, VT: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/470005/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.