P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalHendrick Medical Center Brownwood Estimated FY2026 net: −$354K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 450587

1Hospital

Hendrick Medical Center Brownwood

2Location

Brownwood, TX (Texas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 76801

Brown County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 216 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Sole community hospital

4Care Compare stars

1 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.8999

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $157K, likely $112⁠–⁠176K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.8999 for Hendrick Medical Center Brownwood and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $157K estimate 1% of about $15.7M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 1.2798 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $112–176K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.8999 This hospital −0.8999 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.8999 This hospital −0.8999

Higher than 5% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Never cut in 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

None of the measures CMS scored it on is above the national median, so no single measure at the median would lower its score.

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 0.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 72% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9033

    Z-score−0.5945

    Part of score−0.1189

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2637

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 81% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.292

    Z-score−0.9563

    Part of score−0.1913

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.333

    Z-score−0.1728

    Part of score−0.0346

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4573

    Part of score−0.2915

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.90330.9623−0.5945−0.1189Better than 72% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2637Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.2920.795−0.9563−0.1913Better than 81% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.3330.346−0.1728−0.0346Better than 51% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.0000.641−1.4573−0.2915Better than 87% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.5945PSI 90−1.3186CAUTI−0.9563SSI−0.1728CDI−1.4573MRSA)÷5measures=−0.8999Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.8999; CMS reports −0.8999. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 1.2798 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.8999, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5945 divided by 5 = −0.1189PSI 90−0.1189 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 5 = −0.2637CAUTI−0.2637 SSI: z‑score −0.9563 divided by 5 = −0.1913SSI−0.1913 CDI: z‑score −0.1728 divided by 5 = −0.0346CDI−0.0346 MRSA: z‑score −1.4573 divided by 5 = −0.2915MRSA−0.2915 Total HAC Score: −0.8999Score−0.8999 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.5945 divided by 5 = −0.1189PSI 90−0.1189 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 5 = −0.2637CAUTI−0.2637 SSI: z‑score −0.9563 divided by 5 = −0.1913SSI−0.1913 CDI: z‑score −0.1728 divided by 5 = −0.0346CDI−0.0346 MRSA: z‑score −1.4573 divided by 5 = −0.2915MRSA−0.2915 Total HAC Score: −0.8999Score−0.8999 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.0−0.50.00.5

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.5945−0.1189−0.1189
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2637−0.3826
SSI−0.9563−0.1913−0.5739
CDI−0.1728−0.0346−0.6085
MRSA−1.4573−0.2915−0.9000
Total HAC Score−0.8999
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 1.2798 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 1.2798 higher, the cut would have been about $157K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $157K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $157K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.8999 This hospital −0.8999 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $157K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $157Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.8999 This hospital −0.8999

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$156,862
This hospital−0.8999$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$156,862

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($16,040,046payment−$176,683readmissions−$177,192value-based)×1%the cut=$156,862at stake

$156,862at stake÷1,199traditional Medicare stays=$131per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $157K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$177K and −$177K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $11,857,946
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $355,738
Outliers: unusually costly stays $101,267
Low-volume adjustment $1,168,336
Capital: buildings and equipment $960,142
Uncompensated care $1,596,617
Total, before the three programs $16,040,046
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9851 − 1) −$176,683
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9851 − 1) −$177,192
After these two $15,686,171
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $156,862 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$375K to −$246K −$353,875

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$11,857,946
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$355,738
Outliers: unusually costly stays$101,267
Low-volume adjustment$1,168,336
Capital: buildings and equipment$960,142
Uncompensated care$1,596,617
Total, before the three programs$16,040,046
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9851 − 1))−$176,683
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9851 − 1))−$177,192
After these two$15,686,171
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $156,862)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$375K to −$246K)−$353,875

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.8999same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.8999 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $157K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9033 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 0.292 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0343

CMS 0.333 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

CMS 0.000 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0418

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.8999: its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored.
  • PSI 90 −0.1189
  • CAUTI −0.2637
  • SSI −0.1913
  • CDI −0.0346
  • MRSA −0.2915

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.5945−0.1189same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2637same
SSI−0.9563−0.1913same
CDI−0.1728−0.0346same
MRSA−1.4573−0.2915same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/450587/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS made a decision on this hospital in 11 years and never cut it.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9250, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.0000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.0200, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.2085, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.6821, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3368, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −1.0020, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.9068, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.7019, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.9117, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.8999, higher than 5% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.9250, higher than 23% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.0000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.0200, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −1.2085, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.6821, higher than 15% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.3368, higher than 28% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −1.0020, higher than 4% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.9068, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.7019, higher than 11% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.9117, higher than 5% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.8999, higher than 5% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.925023.0%not cut
FY20164.000022.1%not cut
FY20172.02007.9%not cut
FY2018−1.20855.6%not cut
FY2019−0.682115.4%not cut
FY2020−0.336828.0%not cut
FY2021−1.00204.7%not cut
FY2022−0.90685.7%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.701911.8%not cut
FY2025−0.91175.8%not cut
FY2026−0.89995.6%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 0 of its 3 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 0.00 → 2.75 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 2.750 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.83 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.835 C. diff 0.18 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.184C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 0.178C. diff, 2021: 0.368C. diff, 2022: 0.210C. diff, 2023: 0.180C. diff, 2024: 0.466 CAUTI 0.00 → 2.75 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2021: 2.750 SSI, colon 0.00 → 0.83 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2021: 0.000SSI, colon, 2024: 0.835 C. diff 0.18 → 0.47 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.184C. diff, 2018: 0.000C. diff, 2019: 0.178C. diff, 2021: 0.368C. diff, 2022: 0.210C. diff, 2023: 0.180C. diff, 2024: 0.466

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTISSI, colonC. diff
20170.0000.184
20180.000
20190.178
20212.7500.0000.368
20220.210
20230.180
20240.8350.466

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Texas, its score is higher than 8% of the other 254 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Texas) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas 255 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.8999 This hospital −0.8999 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas255 hospitals13% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.8999 This hospital −0.8999

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.04535%
South region1,17426322%−0.10568%
Texas2553213%−0.23688%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.10538%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.07325%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.01343%
Rural61919632%0.02295%
This hospital−0.8999
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 59 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Seton Medical Center Harker Heights, Harker Heights: score −1.1078, not cut, 90 miles87. Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Marble Falls, Marble Falls: score 0.0655, not cut, 90 miles76. Shannon Medical Center, San Angelo: score −0.1758, not cut, 86 miles65. Lake Granbury Medical Center, Granbury: score −0.7555, not cut, 86 miles54. Glen Rose Medical Center, Glen Rose: score 1.8213, cut, 82 miles43. AdventHealth Central Texas, Killeen: score −0.2114, not cut, 80 miles32. Hendrick Medical Center, Abilene: score 0.2106, not cut, 70 miles21. Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Stephenvill, Stephenville: score −0.1447, not cut, 59 miles1This hospital: Hendrick Medical Center Brownwood

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Stephenvill, Stephenville, TX59−0.1447not cut
Hendrick Medical Center, Abilene, TX700.2106not cut
AdventHealth Central Texas, Killeen, TX80−0.2114not cut
Glen Rose Medical Center, Glen Rose, TX821.8213cut
Lake Granbury Medical Center, Granbury, TX86−0.7555not cut
Shannon Medical Center, San Angelo, TX86−0.1758not cut
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Marble Falls, Marble Falls, TX900.0655not cut
Seton Medical Center Harker Heights, Harker Heights, TX90−1.1078not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital StephenvillStephenville, TX59−0.1447No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
2Hendrick Medical CenterAbilene, TX700.2106No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3AdventHealth Central TexasKilleen, TX80−0.2114No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
4Glen Rose Medical CenterGlen Rose, TX821.82131% cut$12KAbove the national median on 1 of 1 measures
5Lake Granbury Medical CenterGranbury, TX86−0.7555No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 5 measures
6Shannon Medical CenterSan Angelo, TX86−0.1758No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Marble FallsMarble Falls, TX900.0655No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 3 measures
8Seton Medical Center Harker HeightsHarker Heights, TX90−1.1078No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 5 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Hendrick Medical Center Brownwood, Brownwood, TX: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/450587/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.