P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalNorthwest Texas Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$32K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 450209

1Hospital

Northwest Texas Hospital

2Location

Amarillo, TX (Texas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 79106

Potter County

3Type

Minor teaching · 495 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.0930

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $476K, likely $388⁠–⁠517K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.0930 for Northwest Texas Hospital and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $476K estimate 1% of about $47.6M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.4729 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $388–517K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.0930 This hospital −0.0930 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.0930 This hospital −0.0930

Higher than 46% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing SSI down to the national median (0.795) would lower the score the most: by 0.1522, to −0.2452. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 4; SSI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.8428

    Z-score−1.0167

    Part of score−0.1695

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 55% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.614

    Z-score0.0179

    Part of score+0.0030

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 58% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.573

    Z-score0.0626

    Part of score+0.0104

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 79% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.328

    Z-score0.8184

    Part of score+0.1364

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 68% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.228

    Z-score−0.5793

    Part of score−0.0966

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 61% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.764

    Z-score0.1394

    Part of score+0.0232

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.84280.9623−1.0167−0.1695Better than 87% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6140.5590.0179+0.0030Worse than 55% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.5730.4890.0626+0.0104Worse than 58% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.3280.7950.8184+0.1364Worse than 79% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.2280.346−0.5793−0.0966Better than 68% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.7640.6410.1394+0.0232Worse than 61% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−1.0167PSI 90+0.0179CLABSI+0.0626CAUTI+0.8184SSI−0.5793CDI+0.1394MRSA)÷6measures=−0.0930Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.0930; CMS reports −0.0930. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.4729 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.0930, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.0167 divided by 6 = −0.1695PSI 90−0.1695 CLABSI: z‑score 0.0179 divided by 6 = +0.0030CLABSI+0.0030 CAUTI: z‑score 0.0626 divided by 6 = +0.0104CAUTI+0.0104 SSI: z‑score 0.8184 divided by 6 = +0.1364SSI+0.1364 CDI: z‑score −0.5793 divided by 6 = −0.0966CDI−0.0966 MRSA: z‑score 0.1394 divided by 6 = +0.0232MRSA+0.0232 Total HAC Score: −0.0930Score−0.0930 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −1.0167 divided by 6 = −0.1695PSI 90−0.1695 CLABSI: z‑score 0.0179 divided by 6 = +0.0030CLABSI+0.0030 CAUTI: z‑score 0.0626 divided by 6 = +0.0104CAUTI+0.0104 SSI: z‑score 0.8184 divided by 6 = +0.1364SSI+0.1364 CDI: z‑score −0.5793 divided by 6 = −0.0966CDI−0.0966 MRSA: z‑score 0.1394 divided by 6 = +0.0232MRSA+0.0232 Total HAC Score: −0.0930Score−0.0930 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−1.0167−0.1695−0.1695
CLABSI0.0179+0.0030−0.1665
CAUTI0.0626+0.0104−0.1561
SSI0.8184+0.1364−0.0197
CDI−0.5793−0.0966−0.1163
MRSA0.1394+0.0232−0.0931
Total HAC Score−0.0930
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.4729 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.4729 higher, the cut would have been about $476K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $476K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $476K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.0930 This hospital −0.0930 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $476K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $476Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.0930 This hospital −0.0930

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$475,968
This hospital−0.0930$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$475,968

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($44,798,434payment+$2,830,186teaching, MA stays−$31,785readmissions+$0value-based)×1%the cut=$475,968at stake

$475,968at stake÷2,311traditional Medicare stays=$206per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $476K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$32K and $0.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $28,895,640
Teaching (indirect medical education) $2,924,239
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,830,186
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $2,012,581
Outliers: unusually costly stays $576,757
Capital: buildings and equipment $2,699,229
Uncompensated care $7,689,988
Total, before the three programs $47,628,620
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9989 − 1) −$31,785
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment $0
After these two $47,596,835
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $475,968 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$35K to −$27K −$31,785

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$28,895,640
Teaching (indirect medical education)$2,924,239
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,830,186
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$2,012,581
Outliers: unusually costly stays$576,757
Capital: buildings and equipment$2,699,229
Uncompensated care$7,689,988
Total, before the three programs$47,628,620
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9989 − 1))−$31,785
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (not in CMS’s value-based factors: no adjustment)$0
After these two$47,596,835
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $475,968)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$35K to −$27K)−$31,785

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.0930same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.0930 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $476K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.2485
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.8428 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.614 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.573 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.328 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.228 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.764 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. SSI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.0930 among its measured results: +0.1364.
  • PSI 90 −0.1695
  • CLABSI +0.0030
  • CAUTI +0.0104
  • SSI +0.1364
  • CDI −0.0966
  • MRSA +0.0232

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−1.0167−0.1695same
CLABSI0.0179+0.0030same
CAUTI0.0626+0.0104same
SSI0.8184+0.1364same
CDI−0.5793−0.0966same
MRSA0.1394+0.0232same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/450209/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 2 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.1000, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.4100, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.5481, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.495, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2662, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2208, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.3289, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.0116, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2615, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.0930, higher than 46% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 5.1000, higher than 45% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.5000, higher than 30% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 5.4100, higher than 50% of scores; not cutFY2018: score 0.5481, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.495, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.2662, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.2208, higher than 69% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.3289, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2024: score 0.0116, higher than 54% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −0.2615, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.0930, higher than 46% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20155.100045.3%not cut
FY20164.500030.4%not cut
FY20175.410050.2%not cut
FY20180.548183.7%cut
FY20190.49581.5%cut
FY20200.266271.2%not cut
FY20210.220869.2%not cut
FY20220.328976.6%cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.011654.2%not cut
FY2025−0.261533.2%not cut
FY2026−0.093046.6%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 3 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.45 → 0.94 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.450CLABSI, 2018: 0.803CLABSI, 2019: 1.071CLABSI, 2021: 0.196CLABSI, 2022: 1.129CLABSI, 2023: 0.269CLABSI, 2024: 0.944 CAUTI 0.99 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.986CAUTI, 2018: 0.833CAUTI, 2019: 1.149CAUTI, 2021: 0.486CAUTI, 2022: 0.661CAUTI, 2023: 0.593CAUTI, 2024: 0.555 SSI, colon 0.41 → 1.55 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.407SSI, colon, 2018: 0.821SSI, colon, 2019: 0.503SSI, colon, 2021: 1.110SSI, colon, 2022: 0.703SSI, colon, 2023: 1.480SSI, colon, 2024: 1.555 SSI, hysterectomy 0.65 → 1.19 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.647SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.486SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.534SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.951SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.498SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 1.193 MRSA 0.98 → 1.12 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.978MRSA, 2018: 0.889MRSA, 2019: 0.613MRSA, 2021: 1.481MRSA, 2022: 0.640MRSA, 2023: 0.392MRSA, 2024: 1.118 C. diff 0.70 → 0.20 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.696C. diff, 2018: 0.547C. diff, 2019: 0.351C. diff, 2021: 0.336C. diff, 2022: 0.384C. diff, 2023: 0.254C. diff, 2024: 0.196 CLABSI 1.45 → 0.94 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 1.450CLABSI, 2018: 0.803CLABSI, 2019: 1.071CLABSI, 2021: 0.196CLABSI, 2022: 1.129CLABSI, 2023: 0.269CLABSI, 2024: 0.944 CAUTI 0.99 → 0.56 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 0.986CAUTI, 2018: 0.833CAUTI, 2019: 1.149CAUTI, 2021: 0.486CAUTI, 2022: 0.661CAUTI, 2023: 0.593CAUTI, 2024: 0.555 SSI, colon 0.41 → 1.55 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.407SSI, colon, 2018: 0.821SSI, colon, 2019: 0.503SSI, colon, 2021: 1.110SSI, colon, 2022: 0.703SSI, colon, 2023: 1.480SSI, colon, 2024: 1.555 SSI, hysterectomy 0.65 → 1.19 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.647SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.486SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.534SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 0.951SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.498SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 1.193 MRSA 0.98 → 1.12 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.978MRSA, 2018: 0.889MRSA, 2019: 0.613MRSA, 2021: 1.481MRSA, 2022: 0.640MRSA, 2023: 0.392MRSA, 2024: 1.118 C. diff 0.70 → 0.20 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.696C. diff, 2018: 0.547C. diff, 2019: 0.351C. diff, 2021: 0.336C. diff, 2022: 0.384C. diff, 2023: 0.254C. diff, 2024: 0.196

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20171.4500.9860.4070.9780.696
20180.8030.8330.8210.6470.8890.547
20191.0711.1490.5030.4860.6130.351
20210.1960.4861.1101.5341.4810.336
20221.1290.6610.7030.9510.6400.384
20230.2690.5931.4800.4980.3920.254
20240.9440.5551.5551.1931.1180.196

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Texas, its score is higher than 62% of the other 254 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 2 of the 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Texas) to 26% (Nonprofit).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas 255 hospitals13% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds 523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.0930 This hospital −0.0930 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas255 hospitals13% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 300 to 499 beds: CMS cut 113 of 523 (22%); middle score −0.0384300 to 499 beds523 hospitals22% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.0930 This hospital −0.0930

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045346%
South region1,17426322%−0.105650%
Texas2553213%−0.236862%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056746%
300 to 499 beds52311322%−0.038445%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013444%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057447%
This hospital−0.0930
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Lubbock Heart Hospital LP, Lubbock: score −0.0579, not cut, 110 miles87. Roosevelt General Hospital, Portales: score 0.0301, not cut, 108 miles76. Childress Regional Medical Center, Childress: score −0.0342, not cut, 105 miles65. Lamb Healthcare Center, Littlefield: score 2.2091, cut, 92 miles54. Plains Regional Medical Center, Clovis: score 0.4927, cut, 92 miles43. Covenant Hospital Plainview, Plainview: score −0.4609, not cut, 69 miles32. Quail Creek Surgical Hospital, Amarillo: score −1.1258, not cut, less than a mile21. BSA Hospital, Amarillo: score −0.2368, not cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Northwest Texas Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
BSA Hospital, Amarillo, TXunder 1−0.2368not cut
Quail Creek Surgical Hospital, Amarillo, TXunder 1−1.1258not cut
Covenant Hospital Plainview, Plainview, TX69−0.4609not cut
Plains Regional Medical Center, Clovis, NM920.4927cut
Lamb Healthcare Center, Littlefield, TX922.2091cut
Childress Regional Medical Center, Childress, TX105−0.0342not cut
Roosevelt General Hospital, Portales, NM1080.0301not cut
Lubbock Heart Hospital LP, Lubbock, TX110−0.0579not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1BSA HospitalAmarillo, TXunder 1−0.2368No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2Quail Creek Surgical HospitalAmarillo, TXunder 1−1.1258No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 2 measures
3Covenant Hospital PlainviewPlainview, TX69−0.4609No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 3 measures
4Plains Regional Medical CenterClovis, NM920.49271% cut$96KAbove the national median on 2 of 4 measures
5Lamb Healthcare CenterLittlefield, TX922.20911% cut$8KAbove the national median on 2 of 2 measures
6Childress Regional Medical CenterChildress, TX105−0.0342No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
7Roosevelt General HospitalPortales, NM1080.0301No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 1 measures
8Lubbock Heart Hospital LPLubbock, TX110−0.0579No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Northwest Texas Hospital, Amarillo, TX: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/450209/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.