P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalCHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi Estimated FY2026 net: −$135K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 450046

1Hospital

CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi

2Location

Corpus Christi, TX (Texas’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 78404

Nueces County

3Type

Minor teaching · 1,040 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

−0.3973

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $779K, likely $634⁠–⁠847K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.3973 for CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $779K estimate 1% of about $77.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays. Its score was 0.7772 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $634–847K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.3973 This hospital −0.3973 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: −0.3973 This hospital −0.3973

Higher than 26% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing MRSA down to the national median (0.641) would lower the score the most: by 0.1059, to −0.5032. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 2; MRSA added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 53% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9698

    Z-score−0.1304

    Part of score−0.0217

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 60% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.460

    Z-score−0.3394

    Part of score−0.0566

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 71% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.284

    Z-score−0.6340

    Part of score−0.1057

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 69% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.496

    Z-score−0.6068

    Part of score−0.1011

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 88% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.070

    Z-score−1.1911

    Part of score−0.1985

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 73% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.945

    Z-score0.5177

    Part of score+0.0863

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.96980.9623−0.1304−0.0217Worse than 53% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.4600.559−0.3394−0.0566Better than 60% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.2840.489−0.6340−0.1057Better than 71% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.4960.795−0.6068−0.1011Better than 69% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.0700.346−1.1911−0.1985Better than 88% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.9450.6410.5177+0.0863Worse than 73% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.1304PSI 90−0.3394CLABSI−0.6340CAUTI−0.6068SSI−1.1911CDI+0.5177MRSA)÷6measures=−0.3973Total HAC Score

Added from the rounded z‑scores CMS published, the parts make −0.3973; CMS reports −0.3973. The small difference is rounding.

This hospital’s score is 0.7772 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to −0.3973, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1304 divided by 6 = −0.0217PSI 90−0.0217 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3394 divided by 6 = −0.0566CLABSI−0.0566 CAUTI: z‑score −0.6340 divided by 6 = −0.1057CAUTI−0.1057 SSI: z‑score −0.6068 divided by 6 = −0.1011SSI−0.1011 CDI: z‑score −1.1911 divided by 6 = −0.1985CDI−0.1985 MRSA: z‑score 0.5177 divided by 6 = +0.0863MRSA+0.0863 Total HAC Score: −0.3973Score−0.3973 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.1304 divided by 6 = −0.0217PSI 90−0.0217 CLABSI: z‑score −0.3394 divided by 6 = −0.0566CLABSI−0.0566 CAUTI: z‑score −0.6340 divided by 6 = −0.1057CAUTI−0.1057 SSI: z‑score −0.6068 divided by 6 = −0.1011SSI−0.1011 CDI: z‑score −1.1911 divided by 6 = −0.1985CDI−0.1985 MRSA: z‑score 0.5177 divided by 6 = +0.0863MRSA+0.0863 Total HAC Score: −0.3973Score−0.3973 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.6−0.4−0.20.00.20.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.1304−0.0217−0.0217
CLABSI−0.3394−0.0566−0.0783
CAUTI−0.6340−0.1057−0.1840
SSI−0.6068−0.1011−0.2851
CDI−1.1911−0.1985−0.4836
MRSA0.5177+0.0863−0.3973
Total HAC Score−0.3973
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.7772 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.7772 higher, the cut would have been about $779K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $779K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $779K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.3973 This hospital −0.3973 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $779K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $779Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: −0.3973 This hospital −0.3973

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$779,216
This hospital−0.3973$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$779,216

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($75,236,120payment+$2,820,933teaching, MA stays−$117,226readmissions−$18,208value-based)×1%the cut=$779,216at stake

$779,216at stake÷3,396traditional Medicare stays=$229per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $779K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$117K and −$18K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $45,086,947
Teaching (indirect medical education) $1,455,858
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,820,933
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $1,964,889
Outliers: unusually costly stays $590,188
Capital: buildings and equipment $3,909,005
Uncompensated care $22,229,233
Total, before the three programs $78,057,053
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9974 − 1) −$117,226
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9996 − 1) −$18,208
After these two $77,921,619
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $779,216 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$148K to −$117K −$135,434

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$45,086,947
Teaching (indirect medical education)$1,455,858
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,820,933
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$1,964,889
Outliers: unusually costly stays$590,188
Capital: buildings and equipment$3,909,005
Uncompensated care$22,229,233
Total, before the three programs$78,057,053
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9974 − 1))−$117,226
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9996 − 1))−$18,208
After these two$77,921,619
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $779,216)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$148K to −$117K)−$135,434

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score−0.3973same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of −0.3973 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $779K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90any value: every PSI 90 value past the cap (1.3482) scores the same
CLABSIany value: every CLABSI value past the cap (1.572) scores the same
CAUTIany value: every CAUTI value past the cap (1.537) scores the same
SSIany value: every SSI value past the cap (2.118) scores the same
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAany value: every MRSA value past the cap (1.762) scores the same

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9698 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.460 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.284 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.496 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.070 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.945 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. MRSA added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of −0.3973 among its measured results: +0.0863.
  • PSI 90 −0.0217
  • CLABSI −0.0566
  • CAUTI −0.1057
  • SSI −0.1011
  • CDI −0.1985
  • MRSA +0.0863

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.1304−0.0217same
CLABSI−0.3394−0.0566same
CAUTI−0.6340−0.1057same
SSI−0.6068−0.1011same
CDI−1.1911−0.1985same
MRSA0.5177+0.0863same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/450046/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.8750, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.6100, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.2335, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2829, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1080, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1432, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0385, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.3232, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1952, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.3973, higher than 26% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 6.8750, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 6.0000, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 6.6100, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2018: score 0.2335, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.2829, higher than 71% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.1080, higher than 43% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.1432, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.0385, higher than 56% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.3232, higher than 72% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.1952, higher than 65% of scores; not cutFY2026: score −0.3973, higher than 26% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20156.875071.7%not cut
FY20166.000056.2%not cut
FY20176.610076.6%cut
FY20180.233568.6%not cut
FY20190.282971.4%not cut
FY2020−0.108043.6%not cut
FY2021−0.143241.0%not cut
FY20220.038556.1%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.323272.2%not cut
FY20250.195265.5%not cut
FY2026−0.397326.4%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.98 → 0.33 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.984CLABSI, 2018: 0.703CLABSI, 2019: 1.612CLABSI, 2021: 1.917CLABSI, 2022: 1.664CLABSI, 2023: 0.582CLABSI, 2024: 0.333 CAUTI 1.39 → 0.18 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.389CAUTI, 2018: 0.776CAUTI, 2019: 0.947CAUTI, 2021: 0.784CAUTI, 2022: 0.535CAUTI, 2023: 0.367CAUTI, 2024: 0.181 SSI, colon 1.11 → 0.29 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.109SSI, colon, 2018: 0.994SSI, colon, 2019: 0.989SSI, colon, 2021: 1.154SSI, colon, 2022: 0.749SSI, colon, 2023: 0.794SSI, colon, 2024: 0.287 SSI, hysterectomy 1.52 → 3.23 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.519SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.577SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 3.231 MRSA 0.65 → 0.88 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.654MRSA, 2018: 0.749MRSA, 2019: 0.916MRSA, 2021: 1.470MRSA, 2022: 1.358MRSA, 2023: 1.007MRSA, 2024: 0.880 C. diff 0.55 → 0.06 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.548C. diff, 2018: 0.192C. diff, 2019: 0.208C. diff, 2021: 0.280C. diff, 2022: 0.217C. diff, 2023: 0.079C. diff, 2024: 0.059 CLABSI 0.98 → 0.33 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.984CLABSI, 2018: 0.703CLABSI, 2019: 1.612CLABSI, 2021: 1.917CLABSI, 2022: 1.664CLABSI, 2023: 0.582CLABSI, 2024: 0.333 CAUTI 1.39 → 0.18 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.389CAUTI, 2018: 0.776CAUTI, 2019: 0.947CAUTI, 2021: 0.784CAUTI, 2022: 0.535CAUTI, 2023: 0.367CAUTI, 2024: 0.181 SSI, colon 1.11 → 0.29 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 1.109SSI, colon, 2018: 0.994SSI, colon, 2019: 0.989SSI, colon, 2021: 1.154SSI, colon, 2022: 0.749SSI, colon, 2023: 0.794SSI, colon, 2024: 0.287 SSI, hysterectomy 1.52 → 3.23 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 1.519SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 0.000SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.577SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 3.231 MRSA 0.65 → 0.88 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 0.654MRSA, 2018: 0.749MRSA, 2019: 0.916MRSA, 2021: 1.470MRSA, 2022: 1.358MRSA, 2023: 1.007MRSA, 2024: 0.880 C. diff 0.55 → 0.06 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.548C. diff, 2018: 0.192C. diff, 2019: 0.208C. diff, 2021: 0.280C. diff, 2022: 0.217C. diff, 2023: 0.079C. diff, 2024: 0.059

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.9841.3891.1091.5190.6540.548
20180.7030.7760.9940.0000.7490.192
20191.6120.9470.9890.5770.9160.208
20211.9170.7841.1543.2311.4700.280
20221.6640.5350.7491.3580.217
20230.5820.3670.7941.0070.079
20240.3330.1810.2870.8800.059

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Texas, its score is higher than 38% of the other 254 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is below the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 13% (Texas) to 29% (500 beds and up).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas 255 hospitals13% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching 873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: −0.3973 This hospital −0.3973 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Texas: CMS cut 32 of 255 (13%); middle score −0.2368Texas255 hospitals13% cut Minor teaching: CMS cut 181 of 873 (21%); middle score −0.0567Minor teaching873 hospitals21% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: −0.3973 This hospital −0.3973

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045326%
South region1,17426322%−0.105630%
Texas2553213%−0.236838%
Minor teaching87318121%−0.056722%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132311%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013423%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057425%
This hospital−0.3973
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 1 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is about a mile away.
25 mi50 mi100 mi8. Harlingen Medical Center, Harlingen: score 0.2163, not cut, 106 miles87. Cuero Regional Hospital, Cuero: score −0.7971, not cut, 93 miles76. Citizens Medical Center, Victoria: score −0.7743, not cut, 77 miles65. De Tar Hospital Navarro, Victoria: score 0.8667, cut, 76 miles54. CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Beeville, Beeville: score −0.7709, not cut, 49 miles43. CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Alice, Alice: score −0.8507, not cut, 45 miles32. CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Kleberg, Kingsville: score −0.1486, not cut, 34 miles21. Corpus Christi Medical Center,the, Corpus Christi: score −0.5433, not cut, about a mile1This hospital: CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Corpus Christi Medical Center,the, Corpus Christi, TX1−0.5433not cut
CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Kleberg, Kingsville, TX34−0.1486not cut
CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Alice, Alice, TX45−0.8507not cut
CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Beeville, Beeville, TX49−0.7709not cut
De Tar Hospital Navarro, Victoria, TX760.8667cut
Citizens Medical Center, Victoria, TX77−0.7743not cut
Cuero Regional Hospital, Cuero, TX93−0.7971not cut
Harlingen Medical Center, Harlingen, TX1060.2163not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Corpus Christi Medical Center,theCorpus Christi, TX1−0.5433No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
2CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital KlebergKingsville, TX34−0.1486No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 4 measures
3CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital AliceAlice, TX45−0.8507No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 4 measures
4CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital BeevilleBeeville, TX49−0.7709No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
5De Tar Hospital NavarroVictoria, TX760.86671% cut$252KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
6Citizens Medical CenterVictoria, TX77−0.7743No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Cuero Regional HospitalCuero, TX93−0.7971No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
8Harlingen Medical CenterHarlingen, TX1060.2163No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/450046/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.