P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalSouthern Tennessee Regional Health System Lawrence Estimated FY2026 net: −$36K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 440175

1Hospital

Southern Tennessee Regional Health System Lawrence

2Location

Lawrenceburg, TN (Tennessee’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 38464

Lawrence County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 96 beds · Nonprofit · Rural · Medicare-dependent hospital

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.9941

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$52K estimate
Likely $37⁠–⁠58K; about $113 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$52K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.9941 for Southern Tennessee Regional Health System Lawrence and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $5.2M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year: about $113 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $37–58K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.9941 This hospital 0.9941 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.9941 This hospital 0.9941

Higher than 93% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 1 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

None of the measures CMS scored it on is above the national median, so no single measure at the median would lower its score.

Figure 1. Of its 2 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 0.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Better than 57% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.9454

    Z-score−0.3008

    Part of score−0.0602

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2637

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 11: There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.4343

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 11: There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.1931

    Part of score+0.4386

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    CMS assigned this measure its worst possible score under the program’s rules; it is not a measured result. CMS’s footnote gives the reason.

    CMS footnote 11: There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-score2.2251

    Part of score+0.4450

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 900.94540.9623−0.3008−0.0602Better than 57% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSIno value published0.559no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2637Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSIno value published0.7952.1717+0.4343
CDIno value published0.3462.1931+0.4386
MRSAno value published0.6412.2251+0.4450

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(−0.3008PSI 90−1.3186CAUTI+2.1717SSI+2.1931CDI+2.2251MRSA)÷5measures=0.9941Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.6149 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.9941, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.3008 divided by 5 = −0.0602PSI 90−0.0602 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 5 = −0.2637CAUTI−0.2637 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 5 = +0.4343SSI+0.4343 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 5 = +0.4386CDI+0.4386 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 0.9941Score0.9941 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.50.00.51.0 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score −0.3008 divided by 5 = −0.0602PSI 90−0.0602 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 5 = −0.2637CAUTI−0.2637 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 5 = +0.4343SSI+0.4343 CDI: z‑score 2.1931 divided by 5 = +0.4386CDI+0.4386 MRSA: z‑score 2.2251 divided by 5 = +0.4450MRSA+0.4450 Total HAC Score: 0.9941Score0.9941 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.50.00.51.0

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 90−0.3008−0.0602−0.0602
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2637−0.3239
SSI2.1717+0.43430.1104
CDI2.1931+0.43860.5490
MRSA2.2251+0.44500.9940
Total HAC Score0.9941
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.6149 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $52K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $52K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $52K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.9941 This hospital 0.9941 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $52K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $52Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.9941 This hospital 0.9941

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$52,137
This hospital0.9941−$52,137
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$52,137

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($5,197,956payment−$1,824readmissions+$17,608value-based)×1%the cut=$52,137HAC cut

$52,137HAC cut÷460traditional Medicare stays=$113per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $52K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$2K and +$18K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $3,648,870
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $109,466
Low-volume adjustment $757,558
Capital: buildings and equipment $280,979
Uncompensated care $401,083
Total, before the three programs $5,197,956
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9995 − 1) −$1,824
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0048 − 1) +$17,608
After these two $5,213,740
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $37⁠–⁠58K −$52,137
Net of the three programs likely −$39K to −$25K −$36,353

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, outlier payments, and a sole community hospital rate difference.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$3,648,870
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$109,466
Low-volume adjustment$757,558
Capital: buildings and equipment$280,979
Uncompensated care$401,083
Total, before the three programs$5,197,956
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9995 − 1))−$1,824
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0048 − 1))+$17,608
After these two$5,213,740
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $37–58K)−$52,137
Net of the three programs (likely −$39K to −$25K)−$36,353

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.9941same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$52Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.9941 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $52K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read NoNote
PSI 90not possible with this measure alone
CAUTInot possible with this measure alone
SSICMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.
CDICMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.
MRSACMS assigned this measure’s score, so there is no submitted value to solve for.

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 0.9454 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0343

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0418

CMS assigned this measure’s score; CMS’s footnote in the table above gives the reason. Enter a value to see the score had it been submitted.

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. Each bar is one measure’s part of this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.9941: its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored.
  • PSI 90 −0.0602
  • CAUTI −0.2637
  • SSI (assigned by CMS) +0.4343
  • CDI (assigned by CMS) +0.4386
  • MRSA (assigned by CMS) +0.4450

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 90−0.3008−0.0602same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2637same
SSI, assigned2.1717+0.4343same
CDI, assigned2.1931+0.4386same
MRSA, assigned2.2251+0.4450same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/440175/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 1 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.8000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.7500, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.0250, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.6142, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2139, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5071, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.8820, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5920, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8607, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −1.1457, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.9941, higher than 93% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 3.8000, higher than 22% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 2.7500, higher than 9% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.0250, higher than 8% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.6142, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.2139, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.5071, higher than 19% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.8820, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.5920, higher than 16% of scores; not cutFY2024: score −0.8607, higher than 6% of scores; not cutFY2025: score −1.1457, higher than 2% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.9941, higher than 93% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20153.800022.2%not cut
FY20162.75009.4%not cut
FY20172.02508.0%not cut
FY2018−0.614216.5%not cut
FY2019−0.213936.4%not cut
FY2020−0.507119.5%not cut
FY2021−0.88207.9%not cut
FY2022−0.592016.0%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.86076.1%not cut
FY2025−1.14572.6%not cut
FY20260.994193.7%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 1 infection measures ended lower than they started.
C. diff 0.66 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle C. diff, 2017: 0.662C. diff, 2018: 0.485C. diff, 2019: 0.247C. diff, 2021: 0.539C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.000 C. diff 0.66 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle C. diff, 2017: 0.662C. diff, 2018: 0.485C. diff, 2019: 0.247C. diff, 2021: 0.539C. diff, 2022: 0.000C. diff, 2023: 0.000C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearC. diff
20170.662
20180.485
20190.247
20210.539
20220.000
20230.000
20240.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Tennessee, its score is higher than 97% of the other 72 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 7 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 19% (Tennessee) to 32% (Rural).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut Tennessee: CMS cut 14 of 73 (19%); middle score −0.2186Tennessee 73 hospitals19% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural 619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.9941 This hospital 0.9941 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut Tennessee: CMS cut 14 of 73 (19%); middle score −0.2186Tennessee73 hospitals19% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Rural: CMS cut 196 of 619 (32%); middle score 0.0229Rural619 hospitals32% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.9941 This hospital 0.9941

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045393%
South region1,17426322%−0.105693%
Tennessee731419%−0.218697%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105391%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115486%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013494%
Rural61919632%0.022987%
This hospital0.9941
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut none of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 19 miles away.
10 mi25 mi50 mi8. Decatur Morgan Hospital - Decatur Campus, Decatur: score −0.6520, not cut, 50 miles87. Lincoln Medical Center, Fayetteville: score −0.2274, not cut, 44 miles76. Helen Keller Hospital, Sheffield: score 0.3280, not cut, 41 miles65. North Alabama Shoals Hospital, Muscle Shoals: score −0.3755, not cut, 41 miles54. Athens Limestone Hospital, Athens: score −0.6097, not cut, 37 miles43. North Alabama Medical Center, Florence: score −0.9099, not cut, 37 miles32. Maury Regional Hospital, Columbia: score 0.1211, not cut, 28 miles21. Southern Tennessee Regional Health System Pulaski, Pulaski: score −0.3800, not cut, 19 miles1This hospital: Southern Tennessee Regional Health System Lawrence

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Southern Tennessee Regional Health System Pulaski, Pulaski, TN19−0.3800not cut
Maury Regional Hospital, Columbia, TN280.1211not cut
North Alabama Medical Center, Florence, AL37−0.9099not cut
Athens Limestone Hospital, Athens, AL37−0.6097not cut
North Alabama Shoals Hospital, Muscle Shoals, AL41−0.3755not cut
Helen Keller Hospital, Sheffield, AL410.3280not cut
Lincoln Medical Center, Fayetteville, TN44−0.2274not cut
Decatur Morgan Hospital - Decatur Campus, Decatur, AL50−0.6520not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Southern Tennessee Regional Health System PulaskiPulaski, TN19−0.3800No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
2Maury Regional HospitalColumbia, TN280.1211No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
3North Alabama Medical CenterFlorence, AL37−0.9099No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
4Athens Limestone HospitalAthens, AL37−0.6097No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
5North Alabama Shoals HospitalMuscle Shoals, AL41−0.3755No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
6Helen Keller HospitalSheffield, AL410.3280No cut$0Above the national median on 3 of 6 measures
7Lincoln Medical CenterFayetteville, TN44−0.2274No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 2 measures
8Decatur Morgan Hospital - Decatur CampusDecatur, AL50−0.6520No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.
11
There were discrepancies in the data collection process.

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Southern Tennessee Regional Health System Lawrence, Lawrenceburg, TN: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/440175/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.