P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalKershawhealth Estimated FY2026 net: −$46K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 420048

1Hospital

Kershawhealth

2Location

Camden, SC (South Carolina’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 29020

Kershaw County

3Type

Not a teaching hospital · 119 beds · For-profit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.2572

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

No cut
CMS’s value: No

7Estimated cut

$0
A cut would have been $94K, likely $69⁠–⁠117K estimate

No cut

$0

from this program

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2572 for Kershawhealth and a payment reduction decision of No.

A cut would have taken about $94K estimate 1% of about $9.4M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year. Its score was 0.1227 under 0.3799, the lowest score CMS cut.

Likely range $69–117K

Its score was at or below CMS’s line, so this program did not cut its Medicare payments for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2572 This hospital 0.2572 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.2572 This hospital 0.2572

Higher than 68% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 5 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16No
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18Cut
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22Cut
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26No

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CDI down to the national median (0.346) would lower the score the most: by 0.2723, to −0.0151. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CDI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 82% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.1173

    Z-score0.8997

    Part of score+0.1500

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 64% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.412

    Z-score−0.4507

    Part of score−0.0751

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.3186

    Part of score−0.2198

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 85% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value1.528

    Z-score1.1610

    Part of score+0.1935

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 89% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.768

    Z-score1.5116

    Part of score+0.2519

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Better than 56% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value0.573

    Z-score−0.2598

    Part of score−0.0433

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.11730.96230.8997+0.1500Worse than 82% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.4120.559−0.4507−0.0751Better than 64% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.0000.489−1.3186−0.2198Better than 85% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI1.5280.7951.1610+0.1935Worse than 85% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.7680.3461.5116+0.2519Worse than 89% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA0.5730.641−0.2598−0.0433Better than 56% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.8997PSI 90−0.4507CLABSI−1.3186CAUTI+1.1610SSI+1.5116CDI−0.2598MRSA)÷6measures=0.2572Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.1227 below 0.3799, the lowest score CMS marked Yes. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.2572, below CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.8997 divided by 6 = +0.1500PSI 90+0.1500 CLABSI: z‑score −0.4507 divided by 6 = −0.0751CLABSI−0.0751 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score 1.1610 divided by 6 = +0.1935SSI+0.1935 CDI: z‑score 1.5116 divided by 6 = +0.2519CDI+0.2519 MRSA: z‑score −0.2598 divided by 6 = −0.0433MRSA−0.0433 Total HAC Score: 0.2572Score0.2572 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.8997 divided by 6 = +0.1500PSI 90+0.1500 CLABSI: z‑score −0.4507 divided by 6 = −0.0751CLABSI−0.0751 CAUTI: z‑score −1.3186 divided by 6 = −0.2198CAUTI−0.2198 SSI: z‑score 1.1610 divided by 6 = +0.1935SSI+0.1935 CDI: z‑score 1.5116 divided by 6 = +0.2519CDI+0.2519 MRSA: z‑score −0.2598 divided by 6 = −0.0433MRSA−0.0433 Total HAC Score: 0.2572Score0.2572 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.2−0.10.00.10.20.30.4

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.8997+0.15000.1500
CLABSI−0.4507−0.07510.0749
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198−0.1449
SSI1.1610+0.19350.0486
CDI1.5116+0.25190.3005
MRSA−0.2598−0.04330.2572
Total HAC Score0.2572
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.1227 under the lowest score CMS cut, costs it nothing; 0.1227 higher, the cut would have been about $94K by this site’s estimate, the same as at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $94K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $94K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2572 This hospital 0.2572 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $94K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $94Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.2572 This hospital 0.2572

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$94,283
This hospital0.2572$0
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$94,283

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($9,473,845payment−$6,480readmissions−$39,112value-based)×1%the cut=$94,283at stake

$94,283at stake÷827traditional Medicare stays=$114per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. No HAC cut this year; 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment would have been about $94K by this site’s estimate. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$6K and −$39K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $7,200,109
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $123,986
Outliers: unusually costly stays $239,332
Capital: buildings and equipment $560,621
Uncompensated care $1,349,797
Total, before the three programs $9,473,845
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9991 − 1) −$6,480
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9946 − 1) −$39,112
After these two $9,428,253
HAC Reduction Program no cut; 1% would have been $94,283 $0
Net of the three programs likely −$58K to −$33K −$45,592

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, teaching payments, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$7,200,109
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$123,986
Outliers: unusually costly stays$239,332
Capital: buildings and equipment$560,621
Uncompensated care$1,349,797
Total, before the three programs$9,473,845
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9991 − 1))−$6,480
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9946 − 1))−$39,112
After these two$9,428,253
HAC Reduction Program (no cut; 1% would have been $94,283)$0
Net of the three programs (likely −$58K to −$33K)−$45,592

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.2572same
Payment reduction decisionNosame
Payment cut0%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$0same

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.2572 and a payment reduction decision of No.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

How much cushion?

Staying at or under CMS’s line keeps about $94K out of this program’s cut, this site estimates: a score a hair over would cost all of it.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureHighest value that keeps No
PSI 90up to 1.2220
CLABSIup to 0.727
CAUTIup to 0.303
SSIup to 1.955
CDIany value: every CDI value past the cap (0.944) scores the same
MRSAup to 0.923

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.1173 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.412 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.000 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 1.528 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.768 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 0.573 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CDI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.2572 among its measured results: +0.2519.
  • PSI 90 +0.1500
  • CLABSI −0.0751
  • CAUTI −0.2198
  • SSI +0.1935
  • CDI +0.2519
  • MRSA −0.0433

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.8997+0.1500same
CLABSI−0.4507−0.0751same
CAUTI−1.3186−0.2198same
SSI1.1610+0.1935same
CDI1.5116+0.2519same
MRSA−0.2598−0.0433same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/420048/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 5 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 8.6250, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.3200, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.2825, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.4313, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.1021, higher than 44% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.1268, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.5118, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.2281, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0736, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2572, higher than 68% of scores; not cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 8.6250, higher than 93% of scores; cutFY2016: score 6.5000, higher than 68% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 7.3200, higher than 87% of scores; cutFY2018: score 1.2825, higher than 96% of scores; cutFY2019: score 0.4313, higher than 78% of scores; cutFY2020: score −0.1021, higher than 44% of scores; not cutFY2021: score 0.1268, higher than 63% of scores; not cutFY2022: score 0.5118, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2024: score −0.2281, higher than 36% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.0736, higher than 57% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.2572, higher than 68% of scores; not cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20158.625093.6%cut
FY20166.500068.6%not cut
FY20177.320087.5%cut
FY20181.282596.6%cut
FY20190.431378.9%cut
FY2020−0.102144.0%not cut
FY20210.126863.1%not cut
FY20220.511883.9%cut
FY2023no decision
FY2024−0.228136.2%not cut
FY20250.073657.9%not cut
FY20260.257268.2%not cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 4 of its 4 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 1.46 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 1.455CLABSI, 2022: 0.596CLABSI, 2023: 0.707CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.93 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.927CAUTI, 2018: 1.118CAUTI, 2019: 2.119CAUTI, 2021: 1.369CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.90 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2022: 0.902MRSA, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 1.35 → 1.04 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.354C. diff, 2018: 0.608C. diff, 2019: 0.560C. diff, 2021: 1.046C. diff, 2022: 0.469C. diff, 2023: 0.550C. diff, 2024: 1.043 CLABSI 1.46 → 0.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2021: 1.455CLABSI, 2022: 0.596CLABSI, 2023: 0.707CLABSI, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 1.93 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.927CAUTI, 2018: 1.118CAUTI, 2019: 2.119CAUTI, 2021: 1.369CAUTI, 2022: 0.000CAUTI, 2023: 0.000CAUTI, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 0.90 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2022: 0.902MRSA, 2023: 0.000 C. diff 1.35 → 1.04 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.354C. diff, 2018: 0.608C. diff, 2019: 0.560C. diff, 2021: 1.046C. diff, 2022: 0.469C. diff, 2023: 0.550C. diff, 2024: 1.043

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTIMRSAC. diff
20171.9271.354
20181.1180.608
20192.1190.560
20211.4551.3691.046
20220.5960.0000.9020.469
20230.7070.0000.0000.550
20240.0000.0001.043

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In South Carolina, its score is higher than 70% of the other 50 scored there.

In Columbia, SC area, its score is higher than 40% of the other 5 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in 7 of the 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 15% (For-profit) to 33% (Columbia, SC area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region 1,174 hospitals22% cut South Carolina: CMS cut 12 of 51 (24%); middle score −0.1589South Carolina 51 hospitals24% cut Columbia, SC area: CMS cut 2 of 6 (33%); middle score 0.2770Columbia, SC area 6 hospitals33% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching 1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds 1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit 651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.2572 This hospital 0.2572 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut South region: CMS cut 263 of 1,174 (22%); middle score −0.1056South region1,174 hospitals22% cut South Carolina: CMS cut 12 of 51 (24%); middle score −0.1589South Carolina51 hospitals24% cut Columbia, SC area: CMS cut 2 of 6 (33%); middle score 0.2770Columbia, SC area6 hospitals33% cut Not teaching: CMS cut 389 of 1,563 (25%); middle score −0.1053Not teaching1,563 hospitals25% cut 100 to 299 beds: CMS cut 275 of 1,193 (23%); middle score −0.0732100 to 299 beds1,193 hospitals23% cut For-profit: CMS cut 98 of 651 (15%); middle score −0.2590For-profit651 hospitals15% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.2572 This hospital 0.2572

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045368%
South region1,17426322%−0.105671%
South Carolina511224%−0.158970%
Columbia, SC area6233%0.277040%
Not teaching1,56338925%−0.105370%
100 to 299 beds1,19327523%−0.073269%
For-profit6519815%−0.259078%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057470%
This hospital0.2572
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 2 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 27 miles away.
5 mi10 mi25 mi8. Prisma Health Baptist Parkridge, Columbia: score 0.6603, cut, 37 miles87. MUSC Health Lancaster Medical Center, Lancaster: score −0.3119, not cut, 34 miles76. Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia: score −0.5967, not cut, 34 miles65. Prisma Health Baptist, Columbia: score −0.5081, not cut, 30 miles54. MUSC Health Columbia Medical Center Downtown, Columbia: score 0.3823, cut, 29 miles43. Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center, Hartsville: score 0.2040, not cut, 28 miles32. Prisma Health Richland Hospital, Columbia: score 0.2967, not cut, 28 miles21. Prisma Health Tuomey Hospital, Sumter: score −0.6471, not cut, 27 miles1This hospital: Kershawhealth

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Prisma Health Tuomey Hospital, Sumter, SC27−0.6471not cut
Prisma Health Richland Hospital, Columbia, SC280.2967not cut
Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center, Hartsville, SC280.2040not cut
MUSC Health Columbia Medical Center Downtown, Columbia, SC290.3823cut
Prisma Health Baptist, Columbia, SC30−0.5081not cut
Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia, SC34−0.5967not cut
MUSC Health Lancaster Medical Center, Lancaster, SC34−0.3119not cut
Prisma Health Baptist Parkridge, Columbia, SC370.6603cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Prisma Health Tuomey HospitalSumter, SC27−0.6471No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 6 measures
2Prisma Health Richland HospitalColumbia, SC280.2967No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Carolina Pines Regional Medical CenterHartsville, SC280.2040No cut$0Above the national median on 1 of 3 measures
4MUSC Health Columbia Medical Center DowntownColumbia, SC290.38231% cut$450KAbove the national median on 3 of 6 measures
5Prisma Health BaptistColumbia, SC30−0.5081No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
6Lexington Medical CenterWest Columbia, SC34−0.5967No cut$0Above the national median on 0 of 6 measures
7MUSC Health Lancaster Medical CenterLancaster, SC34−0.3119No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Prisma Health Baptist ParkridgeColumbia, SC370.66031% cut$166KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Kershawhealth, Camden, SC: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/420048/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.