P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalThomas Jefferson University Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$4.0M×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 390174

1Hospital

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

2Location

Philadelphia, PA (Pennsylvania’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 19107

Philadelphia County

3Type

Major teaching · 743 beds · Nonprofit · Urban · Rural referral center

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.6456

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$2.7M estimate
Likely $2.2⁠–⁠2.9M; about $354 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$2.7M

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6456 for Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $271M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $354 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $2.2–2.9M

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6456 This hospital 0.6456 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.6456 This hospital 0.6456

Higher than 85% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 7 of 11 years

  1. 15Cut
  2. 16Cut
  3. 17Cut
  4. 18No
  5. 19Cut
  6. 20Cut
  7. 21Cut
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24No
  11. 25No
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on all 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing PSI 90 down to the national median (0.9623) would lower the score the most: by 0.4490, to 0.1966. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 6 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 5; PSI 90 added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    added the most

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.4553

    Z-score2.5111

    Part of score+0.4185

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Worse than 56% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.626

    Z-score0.0457

    Part of score+0.0076

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 71% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value0.721

    Z-score0.4194

    Part of score+0.0699

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Better than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value0.514

    Z-score−0.5760

    Part of score−0.0960

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Worse than 78% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.564

    Z-score0.7217

    Part of score+0.1203

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Worse than 79% of the other 2,067 hospitals

    CMS value1.057

    Z-score0.7517

    Part of score+0.1253

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.45530.96232.5111+0.4185Worse than 97% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.6260.5590.0457+0.0076Worse than 56% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI0.7210.4890.4194+0.0699Worse than 71% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI0.5140.795−0.5760−0.0960Better than 68% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.5640.3460.7217+0.1203Worse than 78% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSA1.0570.6410.7517+0.1253Worse than 79% of the other 2,067 hospitals

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 6; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(2.5111PSI 90+0.0457CLABSI+0.4194CAUTI−0.5760SSI+0.7217CDI+0.7517MRSA)÷6measures=0.6456Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.2664 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.6456, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.0457 divided by 6 = +0.0076CLABSI+0.0076 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4194 divided by 6 = +0.0699CAUTI+0.0699 SSI: z‑score −0.5760 divided by 6 = −0.0960SSI−0.0960 CDI: z‑score 0.7217 divided by 6 = +0.1203CDI+0.1203 MRSA: z‑score 0.7517 divided by 6 = +0.1253MRSA+0.1253 Total HAC Score: 0.6456Score0.6456 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 2.5111 divided by 6 = +0.4185PSI 90+0.4185 CLABSI: z‑score 0.0457 divided by 6 = +0.0076CLABSI+0.0076 CAUTI: z‑score 0.4194 divided by 6 = +0.0699CAUTI+0.0699 SSI: z‑score −0.5760 divided by 6 = −0.0960SSI−0.0960 CDI: z‑score 0.7217 divided by 6 = +0.1203CDI+0.1203 MRSA: z‑score 0.7517 divided by 6 = +0.1253MRSA+0.1253 Total HAC Score: 0.6456Score0.6456 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line 0.00.20.40.6

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 902.5111+0.41850.4185
CLABSI0.0457+0.00760.4261
CAUTI0.4194+0.06990.4960
SSI−0.5760−0.09600.4000
CDI0.7217+0.12030.5203
MRSA0.7517+0.12530.6456
Total HAC Score0.6456
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.2664 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $2.7M by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2.7M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2.7M at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6456 This hospital 0.6456 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $2.7M at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $2.7Mat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.6456 This hospital 0.6456

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$2,706,407
This hospital0.6456−$2,706,407
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$2,706,407

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($224,717,249payment+$47,254,569teaching, MA stays−$1,077,345readmissions−$253,818value-based)×1%the cut=$2,706,407HAC cut

$2,706,407HAC cut÷7,644traditional Medicare stays=$354per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $2.7M: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$1.1M and −$254K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $129,800,613
Teaching (indirect medical education) $48,279,338
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $47,254,569
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $7,383,059
Outliers: unusually costly stays $18,937,909
Capital: buildings and equipment $14,801,444
Uncompensated care $5,514,886
Total, before the three programs $271,971,818
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9917 − 1) −$1,077,345
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (0.9980 − 1) −$253,818
After these two $270,640,655
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $2.2⁠–⁠2.9M −$2,706,407
Net of the three programs likely −$4.4M to −$3.5M −$4,037,570

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$129,800,613
Teaching (indirect medical education)$48,279,338
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$47,254,569
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$7,383,059
Outliers: unusually costly stays$18,937,909
Capital: buildings and equipment$14,801,444
Uncompensated care$5,514,886
Total, before the three programs$271,971,818
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9917 − 1))−$1,077,345
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (0.9980 − 1))−$253,818
After these two$270,640,655
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $2.2–2.9M)−$2,706,407
Net of the three programs (likely −$4.4M to −$3.5M)−$4,037,570

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.6456same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$2.7Msame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.6456 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $2.7M, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 901.1191 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTI0.057 or lower
SSInot possible with this measure alone
CDI0.151 or lower
MRSA0.292 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 6 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.4553 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1164

CMS 0.626 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0387

CMS 0.721 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0402

CMS 0.514 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0286

CMS 0.564 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0645

CMS 1.057 · median 0.641 · cap 1.762 · each 0.1 = 0.0348

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. PSI 90 added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.6456 among its measured results: +0.4185.
  • PSI 90 +0.4185
  • CLABSI +0.0076
  • CAUTI +0.0699
  • SSI −0.0960
  • CDI +0.1203
  • MRSA +0.1253

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 6, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 902.5111+0.4185same
CLABSI0.0457+0.0076same
CAUTI0.4194+0.0699same
SSI−0.5760−0.0960same
CDI0.7217+0.1203same
MRSA0.7517+0.1253same

Interactive what-if at https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/390174/

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 7 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3750, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.0000, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.1300, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2018: score −0.0169, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5112, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7185, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5225, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.1434, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.3621, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.2150, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.6456, higher than 85% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 7.3750, higher than 82% of scores; cutFY2016: score 7.0000, higher than 76% of scores; cutFY2017: score 7.1300, higher than 85% of scores; cutFY2018: score −0.0169, higher than 49% of scores; not cutFY2019: score 0.5112, higher than 81% of scores; cutFY2020: score 0.7185, higher than 89% of scores; cutFY2021: score 0.5225, higher than 83% of scores; cutFY2022: score 0.1434, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.3621, higher than 74% of scores; not cutFY2025: score 0.2150, higher than 66% of scores; not cutFY2026: score 0.6456, higher than 85% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20157.375082.7%cut
FY20167.000076.6%cut
FY20177.130085.0%cut
FY2018−0.016949.9%not cut
FY20190.511281.9%cut
FY20200.718589.7%cut
FY20210.522583.7%cut
FY20220.143466.2%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.362174.4%not cut
FY20250.215066.4%not cut
FY20260.645685.4%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 5 of its 6 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CLABSI 0.94 → 0.57 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.940CLABSI, 2018: 1.049CLABSI, 2019: 0.514CLABSI, 2021: 0.747CLABSI, 2022: 0.759CLABSI, 2023: 0.681CLABSI, 2024: 0.571 CAUTI 1.17 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’21’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.166CAUTI, 2018: 0.672CAUTI, 2019: 0.599CAUTI, 2021: 0.442CAUTI, 2022: 0.753CAUTI, 2023: 0.800CAUTI, 2024: 0.641 SSI, colon 0.47 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.472SSI, colon, 2018: 1.080SSI, colon, 2019: 0.748SSI, colon, 2021: 1.101SSI, colon, 2022: 0.897SSI, colon, 2023: 0.484SSI, colon, 2024: 0.573 SSI, hysterectomy 2.10 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 2.102SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.371SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.574SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.802SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.053SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.853SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.08 → 1.01 1 0 ’18’21’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.083MRSA, 2018: 0.743MRSA, 2019: 0.689MRSA, 2021: 0.938MRSA, 2022: 0.958MRSA, 2023: 1.103MRSA, 2024: 1.012 C. diff 1.03 → 0.61 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.030C. diff, 2018: 0.919C. diff, 2019: 0.682C. diff, 2021: 0.613C. diff, 2022: 0.679C. diff, 2023: 0.521C. diff, 2024: 0.608 CLABSI 0.94 → 0.57 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CLABSI, 2017: 0.940CLABSI, 2018: 1.049CLABSI, 2019: 0.514CLABSI, 2021: 0.747CLABSI, 2022: 0.759CLABSI, 2023: 0.681CLABSI, 2024: 0.571 CAUTI 1.17 → 0.64 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 CAUTI, 2017: 1.166CAUTI, 2018: 0.672CAUTI, 2019: 0.599CAUTI, 2021: 0.442CAUTI, 2022: 0.753CAUTI, 2023: 0.800CAUTI, 2024: 0.641 SSI, colon 0.47 → 0.57 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, colon, 2017: 0.472SSI, colon, 2018: 1.080SSI, colon, 2019: 0.748SSI, colon, 2021: 1.101SSI, colon, 2022: 0.897SSI, colon, 2023: 0.484SSI, colon, 2024: 0.573 SSI, hysterectomy 2.10 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 SSI, hysterectomy, 2017: 2.102SSI, hysterectomy, 2018: 1.371SSI, hysterectomy, 2019: 0.574SSI, hysterectomy, 2021: 1.802SSI, hysterectomy, 2022: 1.053SSI, hysterectomy, 2023: 0.853SSI, hysterectomy, 2024: 0.000 MRSA 1.08 → 1.01 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 MRSA, 2017: 1.083MRSA, 2018: 0.743MRSA, 2019: 0.689MRSA, 2021: 0.938MRSA, 2022: 0.958MRSA, 2023: 1.103MRSA, 2024: 1.012 C. diff 1.03 → 0.61 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 1.030C. diff, 2018: 0.919C. diff, 2019: 0.682C. diff, 2021: 0.613C. diff, 2022: 0.679C. diff, 2023: 0.521C. diff, 2024: 0.608

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCLABSICAUTISSI, colonSSI, hysterectomyMRSAC. diff
20170.9401.1660.4722.1021.0831.030
20181.0490.6721.0801.3710.7430.919
20190.5140.5990.7480.5740.6890.682
20210.7470.4421.1011.8020.9380.613
20220.7590.7530.8971.0530.9580.679
20230.6810.8000.4840.8531.1030.521
20240.5710.6410.5730.0001.0120.608

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Pennsylvania, its score is higher than 84% of the other 129 scored there.

In Philadelphia, PA area, its score is higher than 75% of the other 12 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 38% (Philadelphia, PA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region 436 hospitals28% cut Pennsylvania: CMS cut 36 of 130 (28%); middle score 0.1104Pennsylvania 130 hospitals28% cut Philadelphia, PA area: CMS cut 5 of 13 (38%); middle score 0.2073Philadelphia, PA area 13 hospitals38% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up 365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.6456 This hospital 0.6456 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut Northeast region: CMS cut 124 of 436 (28%); middle score 0.0478Northeast region436 hospitals28% cut Pennsylvania: CMS cut 36 of 130 (28%); middle score 0.1104Pennsylvania130 hospitals28% cut Philadelphia, PA area: CMS cut 5 of 13 (38%); middle score 0.2073Philadelphia, PA area13 hospitals38% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut 500 beds and up: CMS cut 105 of 365 (29%); middle score 0.1323500 beds and up365 hospitals29% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.6456 This hospital 0.6456

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045385%
Northeast region43612428%0.047883%
Pennsylvania1303628%0.110484%
Philadelphia, PA area13538%0.207375%
Major teaching42413632%0.178081%
500 beds and up36510529%0.132384%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013485%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057487%
This hospital0.6456
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 3 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is less than a mile away.
5 mi8. Main Line Hospital Lankenau, Wynnewood: score −0.2339, not cut, 6 miles87. Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia: score 0.0063, not cut, 4 miles76. Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Camden: score −0.1613, not cut, 3 miles65. Kensington Hospital, Philadelphia: score 0.3826, cut, 3 miles54. Cooper University Hospital, Camden: score 1.2454, cut, 2 miles43. Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia: score 0.0917, not cut, 2 miles32. Hospital of Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia: score 0.2073, not cut, 2 miles21. Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia: score 0.3799, cut, less than a mile1This hospital: Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PAunder 10.3799cut
Hospital of Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA20.2073not cut
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA20.0917not cut
Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ21.2454cut
Kensington Hospital, Philadelphia, PA30.3826cut
Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Camden, NJ3−0.1613not cut
Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA40.0063not cut
Main Line Hospital Lankenau, Wynnewood, PA6−0.2339not cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Pennsylvania HospitalPhiladelphia, PAunder 10.37991% cut$669KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
2Hospital of Univ of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA20.2073No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
3Penn Presbyterian Medical CenterPhiladelphia, PA20.0917No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
4Cooper University HospitalCamden, NJ21.24541% cut$1.9MAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
5Kensington HospitalPhiladelphia, PA30.38261% cutno estimateAbove the national median on 1 of 2 measures
6Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes HospitalCamden, NJ3−0.1613No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
7Temple University HospitalPhiladelphia, PA40.0063No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
8Main Line Hospital LankenauWynnewood, PA6−0.2339No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures

Download all hospitals’ data (CSV) · Data dictionary · CMS’s dataset page

How the program works, and how to find another hospital

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/390174/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.