P&P, Paid & Penalized

Public Medicare data, made visible.

HospitalProvidence Milwaukie Hospital Estimated FY2026 net: −$112K×

Hospital record · FY2026CCN 380082

1Hospital

Providence Milwaukie Hospital

2Location

Milwaukie, OR (Oregon’s hospitals on the map and in the table) 97222

Clackamas County

3Type

Major teaching · 77 beds · Nonprofit · Urban

4Care Compare stars

3 of 5 stars

Overall rating, CMS Care Compare data of July 22, 2026
Open on Care Compare (opens in a new tab)

5Total HAC Score

0.4619

As CMS reports it

6Payment reduction

1% cut
CMS’s value: Yes

7Estimated cut

$119K estimate
Likely $87⁠–⁠148K; about $195 per traditional Medicare stay

Cut 1%

$119K

cut from its FY2026 Medicare inpatient payments, this site estimates estimate

For fiscal year 2026, CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4619 for Providence Milwaukie Hospital and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

That is 1% of about $11.9M, this site’s estimate of what traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays in a year plus the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays: about $195 per traditional Medicare stay.

Likely range $87–148K

Its score was above CMS’s line, so CMS cut its Medicare inpatient payments by 1% for the year. The score compares hospitals with each other; it is not a grade of the quality of care.

CMS cut scores of 0.3799 and above.

Each year CMS cuts the hospitals with the highest quarter of scores, those above the 75th percentile, so the line moves with other hospitals’ scores.

lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4619 This hospital 0.4619 lowest −1.4728 highest 2.3133 1% cut Middle hospital: −0.0453 Middle hospital−0.0453 CMS’s line: 0.3799 and up CMS’s line0.3799 and up This hospital: 0.4619 This hospital 0.4619

Higher than 78% of the other 2,928 scores CMS published (higher is worse).

Its record, fiscal years 2015 to 2026 Cut in 3 of 11 years

  1. 15No
  2. 16No
  3. 17No
  4. 18No
  5. 19No
  6. 20No
  7. 21No
  8. 22No
  9. 23—
  10. 24Cut
  11. 25Cut
  12. 26Cut

Where the score came from

CMS scored this hospital on 5 of the 6 measures. On every measure a lower value is better. Each row puts the hospital among every hospital with a value: the gray columns are those hospitals, the tall tick is the national median, and the hatched ends score the same as CMS’s floor or cap.

Bringing CAUTI down to the national median (0.489) would lower the score the most: by 0.5052, to −0.0433. That change alone would put the score under CMS’s line. Try it in the what-if

Figure 1. Of its 5 measures with a value, this hospital is above the national median on 3; CAUTI added the most to its score.
  • This hospital
  • National median
  • Scores the same as CMS’s floor or cap
  1. PSI 90 (what it counts)

    Safety problems such as serious bedsores, falls that break a bone and blood clots after surgery, found by CMS in traditional Medicare claims. A value of 1 matches the national composite value.

    Patient safety and adverse events composite

    Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0021. How this site estimates

    CMS value1.0152

    Z-score0.1867

    Part of score+0.0373

  2. CLABSI (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections tied to a central line, a tube often placed in a large vein in the neck, chest or groin. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Central line–associated bloodstream infections

    Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals

    CMS value0.000

    Z-score−1.4065

    Part of score−0.2813

  3. CAUTI (what it counts)

    Urinary tract infections that start from a urinary catheter, a tube that drains the bladder. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    added the most

    Catheter-associated urinary tract infections

    Worse than 97% of the other 2,354 hospitals

    CMS value1.986

    Z-score2.3863

    Part of score+0.4773

  4. SSI (what it counts)

    Deep infections at the site of colon surgery or an abdominal hysterectomy, within a month of the operation, pooled into one measure. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Surgical site infections after colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy

    Worse than 98% of the other 2,269 hospitals

    CMS value2.732

    Z-score2.1717

    Part of score+0.4343

  5. CDI (what it counts)

    C. diff infections, which cause diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infections

    Better than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals

    estimate

    This site recomputes this measure’s z‑score from CMS’s published value. The recompute can differ from CMS’s z‑score by up to 0.0071. How this site estimates

    CMS value0.112

    Z-score−1.0285

    Part of score−0.2057

  6. MRSA (what it counts)

    Bloodstream infections with MRSA, a germ that resists several antibiotics, found by a lab test and starting in the hospital. Hospitals report them to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. A value of 1.0 means as many infections as the CDC’s model predicted.

    MRSA bloodstream infections

    Not scored on this measure

    CMS footnote 13: Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.

    CMS footnote 5: Results are not available for this reporting period.

    CMS valueno value published

    Z-scoreno value published

    Part of scoreno value published

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureCMS valueNational medianZ-scorePart of the scoreAmong hospitals
PSI 901.01520.96230.1867+0.0373Worse than 68% of the other 2,808 hospitals
CLABSI0.0000.559−1.4065−0.2813Better than 86% of the other 2,181 hospitals
CAUTI1.9860.4892.3863+0.4773Worse than 97% of the other 2,354 hospitals
SSI2.7320.7952.1717+0.4343Worse than 98% of the other 2,269 hospitals
CDI0.1120.346−1.0285−0.2057Better than 84% of the other 2,766 hospitals
MRSAno value published0.641no value publishedno value publishedNot scored on this measure

How the parts add up

CMS adds the z‑scores and divides by the number of measures scored, so each measure counts the same. Each bar below is one z‑score divided by 5; a bar right of zero raised the score and one left of zero lowered it.

(0.1867PSI 90−1.4065CLABSI+2.3863CAUTI+2.1717SSI−1.0285CDI)÷5measures=0.4619Total HAC Score

This hospital’s score is 0.0827 above 0.3792, the highest score CMS marked No. (This site recomputes.)

Figure 2. The parts add up to 0.4619, above CMS’s line.
1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.1867 divided by 5 = +0.0373PSI 90+0.0373 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 5 = −0.2813CLABSI−0.2813 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 5 = +0.4343SSI+0.4343 CDI: z‑score −1.0285 divided by 5 = −0.2057CDI−0.2057 Total HAC Score: 0.4619Score0.4619 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.60.8 1% cut PSI 90: z‑score 0.1867 divided by 5 = +0.0373PSI 90+0.0373 CLABSI: z‑score −1.4065 divided by 5 = −0.2813CLABSI−0.2813 CAUTI: z‑score 2.3863 divided by 5 = +0.4773CAUTI+0.4773 SSI: z‑score 2.1717 divided by 5 = +0.4343SSI+0.4343 CDI: z‑score −1.0285 divided by 5 = −0.2057CDI−0.2057 Total HAC Score: 0.4619Score0.4619 CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −0.20.00.20.40.60.8

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreRunning total
PSI 900.1867+0.03730.0373
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2813−0.2440
CAUTI2.3863+0.47730.2333
SSI2.1717+0.43430.6676
CDI−1.0285−0.20570.4619
Total HAC Score0.4619
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The money is a cliff

This program’s cut doesn’t grow with the score. Over CMS’s line, CMS cuts 1% of what traditional Medicare pays a hospital for inpatient stays that year, and of the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage stays; at or under the line, this program cuts nothing.

The chart draws what the cut would be for this hospital at any Total HAC Score, from this site’s estimate of its payments, with its own score marked.

Figure 3. The cut is a cliff, not a slope: this hospital’s score, 0.0827 over the highest score CMS didn’t cut, costs it about $119K by this site’s estimate, and at CMS’s highest score, 2.3133, the cut would be the same.
CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $119K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $119K at any score from 0.3799 −1012 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4619 This hospital 0.4619 CMS’s line $0 at any score up to 0.3792 $119K at any score from 0.3799 $0at any score up to 0.3792 $119Kat any score from 0.3799 −1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 CMS’s highest score: 2.3133 CMS’s highest score 2.3133 This hospital: 0.4619 This hospital 0.4619

Under the axis, every Total HAC Score CMS published: 306 of the 2,929 scored within 0.1 of CMS’s line, on one side or the other.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
ScoreTotal HAC ScoreEstimated HAC cut (whole dollars)
Any score up to 0.37920.3792$0
Any score from 0.37990.3799−$118,969
This hospital0.4619−$118,969
CMS’s highest score2.3133−$118,969

The money, line by line

This site estimates what traditional Medicare pays the hospital for a year of inpatient stays, and the teaching payments Medicare makes on its Medicare Advantage patients’ stays, from CMS’s FY2026 payment files, then applies Medicare’s three hospital quality programs: the readmissions and value-based adjustments to the base payment, and the HAC cut last, as the law sets.

The readmissions and value-based programs adjust only the base payment: the DRG rates times the hospital’s cases, and a Medicare-dependent hospital’s add-on. The HAC cut comes last and takes 1% of everything left, teaching, low-income-patient, outlier, capital and uncompensated care payments included.

($9,244,967payment+$2,644,538teaching, MA stays−$2,557readmissions+$9,908value-based)×1%the cut=$118,969HAC cut

$118,969HAC cut÷609traditional Medicare stays=$195per traditional Medicare stay

Figure 4. This site estimates the HAC cut at $119K: 1% of the hospital’s whole inpatient payment, taken last. The readmissions and value-based adjustments, on the base alone, came to −$3K and +$10K.

Estimated Medicare inpatient payments · FY2026 estimate

What traditional Medicare pays it for inpatient stays, and for teaching on Medicare Advantage stays
DRG payments at the federal rates the base $6,391,870
Teaching (indirect medical education) $1,170,799
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays $2,644,538
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share) $173,092
Outliers: unusually costly stays $104,187
Capital: buildings and equipment $564,288
Uncompensated care $840,731
Total, before the three programs $11,889,505
The three programs: two on the base, the HAC cut last
Readmissions (HRRP) base × (0.9996 − 1) −$2,557
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) base × (1.0016 − 1) +$9,908
After these two $11,896,856
HAC Reduction Program 1% of everything above; likely $87⁠–⁠148K −$118,969
Net of the three programs likely −$142K to −$81K −$111,618

Not paid to this hospital: a Medicare-dependent hospital add-on, a sole community hospital rate difference, and a low-volume adjustment.

Whole dollars, so every line adds up; the estimate is not that precise. Each likely range spans the middle 80% of the misses this site’s estimate made for similar hospitals (or for a wider group, where there were too few) when it was checked against their FY2024 cost reports: one year’s check, not a promise of how often a hospital’s actual figure lands inside.

Estimate · Source: this site’s arithmetic on CMS’s FY2026 IPPS final rule files (the impact file, the rate tables and the value-based factors), its FY2026 HRRP supplemental file and HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
LineAmount (whole dollars)
DRG payments at the federal rates (the base)$6,391,870
Teaching (indirect medical education)$1,170,799
Teaching on Medicare Advantage stays$2,644,538
Many low-income patients (disproportionate share)$173,092
Outliers: unusually costly stays$104,187
Capital: buildings and equipment$564,288
Uncompensated care$840,731
Total, before the three programs$11,889,505
Readmissions (HRRP) (base × (0.9996 − 1))−$2,557
Value-based purchasing (HVBP) (base × (1.0016 − 1))+$9,908
After these two$11,896,856
HAC Reduction Program (1% of everything above; likely $87–148K)−$118,969
Net of the three programs (likely −$142K to −$81K)−$111,618

What if a measure were different?

Change a measure’s value to see how this site recomputes the Total HAC Score, the payment reduction decision and, by its estimate, the money, starting from CMS’s values. The money doesn’t slide with the score: it drops off a cliff at CMS’s line.

The what-if needs JavaScript. Without it, the values below stay as they are.

Show table
CMS reportsHypothetical
Total HAC Score0.4619same
Payment reduction decisionYessame
Payment cut1%same
Estimated HAC cut estimate$119Ksame

CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799

The faint ticks are CMS’s line in earlier years under the same formula, from about 0.300 (FY2022) to about 0.375 (FY2024). The line moves every year, so a hospital can cross it without changing anything.

CMS reports a Total HAC Score of 0.4619 and a payment reduction decision of Yes.

A what-if shows the formula’s arithmetic, not what a hospital could realistically change or how. CMS’s real result also depends on other hospitals.

What would it take?

Getting under CMS’s line would keep about $119K, this site estimates: the whole cut, however far under the score lands.

From CMS’s values, one measure at a time, with every other measure held at CMS’s value.

MeasureValue that would read No
PSI 900.9559 or lower
CLABSInot possible with this measure alone
CAUTI1.365 or lower
SSI1.876 or lower
CDI0.005 or lower

Each measure weighs 1 ÷ 5 of the score.

Measure values

SIR 1.0 = as many infections as predicted · Lower is better

On each track the tick is the national median; shaded values score the same as the floor or cap, as this site fits them to CMS’s values.

CMS 1.0152 · median 0.9623 · floor 0.7760 · cap 1.3482 · each 0.1 = 0.1396

CMS 0.000 · median 0.559 · cap 1.572 · each 0.1 = 0.0464

CMS 1.986 · median 0.489 · cap 1.537 · each 0.1 = 0.0482

CMS 2.732 · median 0.795 · cap 2.118 · each 0.1 = 0.0343

CMS 0.112 · median 0.346 · cap 0.944 · each 0.1 = 0.0774

Have your NHSN predicted counts? (optional, stays in your browser)

Stays in your browser; never sent.

Figure 5. CAUTI added the most to this hospital’s Total HAC Score of 0.4619 among its measured results: +0.4773.
  • PSI 90 +0.0373
  • CLABSI −0.2813
  • CAUTI +0.4773
  • SSI +0.4343
  • CDI −0.2057

A measure adds its z‑score divided by 5, the number of measures scored. Bars right of the center line raise the score. Hatched: assigned by CMS.

This site recomputes · Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
MeasureZ-scorePart of the scoreHypothetical
PSI 900.1867+0.0373same
CLABSI−1.4065−0.2813same
CAUTI2.3863+0.4773same
SSI2.1717+0.4343same
CDI−1.0285−0.2057same

Among hospitals with a Yes or No payment decision, CMS cut those with a published Total HAC Score of 0.3799 or higher and none at 0.3792 or lower. Maryland’s hospitals are scored but not subject to the reduction.

Held fixed: every other hospital’s results, CMS’s line, and each measure’s mean, spread, floor and cap as this site fits them to CMS’s published values.

Year by year

Where this hospital’s score fell among every hospital’s, each year CMS published one. A score near the top is among the highest; the shaded band is where CMS cut. Places compare across years even where CMS changed how it builds the score.

Its longest run: cut 3 years in a row.

Figure 6. CMS cut this hospital in 3 of the 11 years it made a decision.
highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.7000, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.3167, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1288, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.7194, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.9439, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2606, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0665, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.4702, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.4908, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.4619, higher than 78% of scores; cut 161820222426 highest middle lowest z‑scoresequal weights no scores FY2015: score 1.7000, higher than 3% of scores; not cutFY2016: score 4.7500, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2017: score 2.3167, higher than 10% of scores; not cutFY2018: score −0.1288, higher than 41% of scores; not cutFY2019: score −0.7194, higher than 14% of scores; not cutFY2020: score −0.9439, higher than 7% of scores; not cutFY2021: score −0.2606, higher than 33% of scores; not cutFY2022: score −0.0665, higher than 47% of scores; not cutFY2024: score 0.4702, higher than 79% of scores; cutFY2025: score 0.4908, higher than 80% of scores; cutFY2026: score 0.4619, higher than 78% of scores; cut 151617181920212223242526

● Red: a year CMS cut it ○ Hollow: a year it didn’t

This site recomputes · Source: CMS, HACRP hospital files for fiscal years 2015 to 2026 (Provider Data Catalog, its archives and, for the oldest years, the Internet Archive’s copies), and CMS’s cut lists for FY2015 and FY2016.

Show table
Fiscal yearTotal HAC ScoreHigher than this share of scoresPayment reduction
FY20151.70003.2%not cut
FY20164.750033.4%not cut
FY20172.316710.1%not cut
FY2018−0.128841.5%not cut
FY2019−0.719414.3%not cut
FY2020−0.94397.7%not cut
FY2021−0.260633.5%not cut
FY2022−0.066547.3%not cut
FY2023no decision
FY20240.470279.0%cut
FY20250.490880.9%cut
FY20260.461978.7%cut

Its infections, year by year

This hospital’s infection rate against prediction for each calendar year Care Compare published one, on each measure with at least two years of results (black), over the nation’s middle hospital (gray). Below the dashed line at one, fewer infections than predicted. Each year is measured against the same fixed baseline, not against other hospitals, so unlike the score they can all improve at once.

Figure 7. 1 of its 2 infection measures ended lower than they started.
CAUTI 0.00 → 1.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’21’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.937CAUTI, 2019: 0.944CAUTI, 2021: 0.855CAUTI, 2022: 0.883CAUTI, 2023: 2.964CAUTI, 2024: 0.998 C. diff 0.13 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’21’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.131C. diff, 2018: 0.692C. diff, 2019: 0.363C. diff, 2021: 0.245C. diff, 2022: 0.634C. diff, 2023: 0.229C. diff, 2024: 0.000 CAUTI 0.00 → 1.00 1as predicted 0 ’18’20’22’24 Nation’s middle CAUTI, 2017: 0.000CAUTI, 2018: 0.937CAUTI, 2019: 0.944CAUTI, 2021: 0.855CAUTI, 2022: 0.883CAUTI, 2023: 2.964CAUTI, 2024: 0.998 C. diff 0.13 → 0.00 1 0 ’18’20’22’24 C. diff, 2017: 0.131C. diff, 2018: 0.692C. diff, 2019: 0.363C. diff, 2021: 0.245C. diff, 2022: 0.634C. diff, 2023: 0.229C. diff, 2024: 0.000

Source: CMS Care Compare, healthcare-associated infections by hospital, calendar years 2017 to 2024 (Provider Data Catalog archives; the oldest year through the Internet Archive’s copy).

Show table
Calendar yearCAUTIC. diff
20170.0000.131
20180.9370.692
20190.9440.363
20210.8550.245
20220.8830.634
20232.9640.229
20240.9980.000

Among hospitals like it

Each row is a group this hospital belongs to, drawn from every hospital in it with a payment decision. Red columns are hospitals past CMS’s line, the ones CMS cut; the short tick is the group’s middle score.

In Oregon, its score is higher than 64% of the other 31 scored there.

In Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA area, its score is higher than 62% of the other 16 scored there.

Figure 8. Its score is above the middle in all 8 groups it belongs to; the share cut runs from 23% (Urban) to 47% (Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA area).
All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals 2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region 593 hospitals26% cut Oregon: CMS cut 13 of 32 (41%); middle score 0.2424Oregon 32 hospitals41% cut Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA area: CMS cut 8 of 17 (47%); middle score 0.3761Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA area17 hospitals47% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching 424 hospitals32% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds 805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit 1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban 2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1012 This hospital: 0.4619 This hospital 0.4619 All hospitals: CMS cut 718 of 2,886 (25%); middle score −0.0453All hospitals2,886 hospitals25% cut West region: CMS cut 157 of 593 (26%); middle score −0.0302West region593 hospitals26% cut Oregon: CMS cut 13 of 32 (41%); middle score 0.2424Oregon32 hospitals41% cut Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA area: CMS cut 8 of 17 (47%); middle score 0.3761Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA area17 hospitals47% cut Major teaching: CMS cut 136 of 424 (32%); middle score 0.1780Major teaching424 hospitals32% cut Fewer than 100 beds: CMS cut 225 of 805 (28%); middle score −0.1154Fewer than 100 beds805 hospitals28% cut Nonprofit: CMS cut 478 of 1,830 (26%); middle score −0.0134Nonprofit1,830 hospitals26% cut Urban: CMS cut 510 of 2,241 (23%); middle score −0.0574Urban2,241 hospitals23% cut CMS’s line: between 0.3792 and 0.3799 CMS’s line −1.5−1.0−0.50.00.51.01.52.0 This hospital: 0.4619 This hospital 0.4619

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
GroupWith a decisionHospitals cutShare cutMiddle scoreHospital higher than
All hospitals2,88671825%−0.045378%
West region59315726%−0.030278%
Oregon321341%0.242464%
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA area17847%0.376162%
Major teaching42413632%0.178072%
Fewer than 100 beds80522528%−0.115474%
Nonprofit1,83047826%−0.013477%
Urban2,24151023%−0.057480%
This hospital0.4619
CMS’s line0.37920.3799

The nearest hospitals

The 8 closest hospitals with a Total HAC Score, in a straight line. The squares are each hospital’s measures in order: filled, above the national median; open, at or below it; hatched, assigned by CMS; blank, not scored.

Figure 9. CMS cut 4 of the 8 nearest hospitals; the closest is 4 miles away.
5 mi8. Legacy Meridian Park Medical Center, Tualatin: score 0.9794, cut, 9 miles87. Providence St Vincent Medical Center, Portland: score −0.5110, not cut, 8 miles76. Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland: score 0.4646, cut, 7 miles65. Legacy Good Samaritan Medical Center, Portland: score 0.0174, not cut, 6 miles54. Adventist Health Portland, Portland: score −0.4087, not cut, 5 miles43. Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland: score −0.0715, not cut, 5 miles32. OHSU Hospital and Clinics, Portland: score 1.0194, cut, 4 miles21. Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center, Clackamas: score 0.4184, cut, 4 miles1This hospital: Providence Milwaukie Hospital

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.

Show table
HospitalMilesScoreDecision
Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center, Clackamas, OR40.4184cut
OHSU Hospital and Clinics, Portland, OR41.0194cut
Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR5−0.0715not cut
Adventist Health Portland, Portland, OR5−0.4087not cut
Legacy Good Samaritan Medical Center, Portland, OR60.0174not cut
Legacy Emanuel Medical Center, Portland, OR70.4646cut
Providence St Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR8−0.5110not cut
Legacy Meridian Park Medical Center, Tualatin, OR90.9794cut

#HospitalMilesScoreDecisionEst. cut ($, modeled)Measures
1Kaiser Sunnyside Medical CenterClackamas, OR40.41841% cut$203KAbove the national median on 4 of 6 measures
2OHSU Hospital and ClinicsPortland, OR41.01941% cut$2.1MAbove the national median on 6 of 6 measures
3Providence Portland Medical CenterPortland, OR5−0.0715No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
4Adventist Health PortlandPortland, OR5−0.4087No cut$0Above the national median on 4 of 6 measures
5Legacy Good Samaritan Medical CenterPortland, OR60.0174No cut$0Above the national median on 5 of 6 measures
6Legacy Emanuel Medical CenterPortland, OR70.46461% cut$599KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures
7Providence St Vincent Medical CenterPortland, OR8−0.5110No cut$0Above the national median on 2 of 6 measures
8Legacy Meridian Park Medical CenterTualatin, OR90.97941% cut$237KAbove the national median on 5 of 6 measures

CMS’s footnotes on this page

13
Results cannot be calculated for this reporting period.
5
Results are not available for this reporting period.

A penalty reflects how CMS’s formula scored relative performance; it is not a verdict on the quality of care.

Cite this page

Paid & Penalized. Providence Milwaukie Hospital, Milwaukie, OR: Hospital-Acquired Conditions, FY2026. https://paidandpenalized.org/hacrp/hospital/380082/. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog, HACRP FY2026 (yq43-i98g), released August 13, 2026.